Home > Journals > Agronomy et biotechnology > Science et changements planétaires / Sécheresse > summary
 
      Advanced search    Shopping cart    French version 
 
Latest books
Catalogue/Search
Collections
All journals
Medicine
Biology and research
Public health
Agronomy and biotech.
Science et changements planétaires / Sécheresse
- Current issue
- Archives
- Subscribe
- Order an issue
- More information
My account
Forgotten password?
Online account   activation
Subscribe
Licences IP
- Instructions for use
- Estimate request form
- Licence agreement
Order an issue
Pay-per-view articles
Newsletters
How can I publish?
Journals
Books
Help for advertisers
Foreign rights
Book sales agents



 

Texte intégral de l'article
 
Printable version

Rainfall estimation in the Sahel: Using an error model to evaluate rain gauge and satellite products


Science et changements planétaires / Sécheresse. Volume 15, Number 3, 271-8, JUILLET-AOÛT-SEPTEMBRE 2004, Note de recherche

Résumé   Article gratuit  

Author(s) : Abdou Ali, Abou Amani, Thierry Lebel

Summary : Drought is continuing in the Sahel. Lower rainfall and the decrease of the number of raingauges are two factors that lead to larger errors in the estimation of rainfall from ground observations. This paper consequently investigates the quality of rainfall estimation from the raingauge operational network and the differences existing between ground-based rainfall estimates and various satellite-based rainfall estimates. To provide an objective base for this evaluation, an error model approach is presented. The error model is calibrated on a densely instrumented test area. A first application of the model is to study the concept of standard optimal networks, optimal referring here to a given level of average expected error for a given space-time resolution. Taking 1° x 1° monthly resolutions as the lowest acceptable values for many water resources and agronomical applications, it is shown that the AGRHYMET Regional Center (CRA) operational network is far from being optimal, since it guarantees in rare places only an average estimation error lower than 10%. The proposed error model also makes it possible to carry out an intercomparison of the most commonly used satellite products, that is CMAP, GPI, GPCC, and GPCP. All these products have a distribution of their estimated rainfall values which is significantly less dispersed than the distribution of the CRA ground-based reference values (computed at the same resolution as the satellite rainfall products). The differences between the reference values and the satellite products and the differences between the various satellite products are strongly dependent on the latitude. The performance of the GPI product is the worst, whereas the CMAP product, which in fact includes a large quantity of rain gauge data, is the best on average.

Keywords : Rainfall, Modelling, Sahel

 

About us - Contact us - Conditions of use - Secure payment
Latest news - Conferences
Copyright © 2007 John Libbey Eurotext - All rights reserved
[ Legal information - Powered by Dolomède ]