ARTICLE
Auteur(s) : Nathalie Vingering1, Marine
Oseredczuk2, Laure du Chaffaut2, Jayne
Ireland2, Martial
Ledoux1
1Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des aliments,
laboratoire d'études et de recherches sur la qualité des aliments
et sur les procédés agroalimentaires, 23 avenue du
Général-De-Gaulle, 94706 Maisons-Alfort cedex, France
2Agence française de sécurité sanitaire
des aliments, centre d'information sur la qualité des
aliments, 27-31 avenue du Général-Leclerc, 94701 Maisons-Alfort
cedex, France
Article reçu le 28 Janvier 2010, accepté le 27 Avril 2010
Introduction
Interest in the specific fatty acid (FA) composition of oils has
been emerging with the growing scientific evidence that all fats
are not equivalent in regard to consumers' health. French
scientists from public health or food research institutes have
recommended daily amounts for each types of FA, i.e., saturated
(SFA), monounsaturated (MUFA), polyunsaturated (PUFA), and
trans-fatty acids (TFA), as well as for specific fatty acids such
as linoleic (LA), linolenic acids (ALA), and long-chain PUFA
(AFSSA, 2005; Legrand et al., 2001). With these recent
concerns about specific biological properties of individual FA,
consumers as well as food industry have paid attention to FA
composition of vegetable oils, seeking wider diversity. A new
market has arisen with providers proposing dozens of edible oils,
including traditionally produced and locally consumed oils,
vegetable oils previously used as ingredients in cosmetic
formulations, and new mixtures of vegetable oils combined to
balance FA proportions, especially essential PUFAs.
In this new context, the Information Centre on Food Quality of
the French Food Safety Agency (Afssa-Ciqual) sought to update the
French reference food composition tables regarding FA composition
of edible oils. Afssa-Ciqual has published the French food
composition tables on the Internet, available for consumers, food
industries, health care professionals, and other scientists as
reference data (Afssa-Ciqual). The aim of this study was to analyse
the FA composition of edible oils using an efficient highly polar
middle length GC column in order to provide accurate FA profiles of
main oils commonly consumed in France at the present time, as well
as FA composition of specific new oils.
Material and methods
Chemicals
Fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) standards, including nonanoic acid
methyl ester C9:0 used as internal standard, and Supeclo
37 component FAME mix #47885-U were purchased from
Sigma-Aldrich France (Saint Quentin Fallavier, F). Anhydrous milk
fat certified reference material (CRM) 164 was purchased from
the UE-CBR (Brussels, B). All other reagents were analytical grade
from various trademarks.
Sampling
Eleven kinds of vegetable oils, either representative of the French
diet pattern or missing in CIQUAL data base, were sampled.
Following the usual sampling procedure applied by the Afssa-Ciqual,
a cost-effective convenience sampling plan was applied. Five
bottles of major trademarks of each kind of oils were purchased in
January 2007 from several supermarkets in N.E. of France and were
mixed together in equivalent proportions. In addition, a virgin
avocado oil, a virgin wheat germ oil, and an organic virgin walnut
oil (unavailable in supermarkets) were bought in specialised
organic groceries and individually analysed. Two distinct brands
among the five walnut oils composing the mixture sample were also
individually analysed to check trans-FA contents. Details on
samples are given in table 1.
Table 1 Oil samples (information obtained
from packaging or from producers).
|
Oils
|
Trademarks
|
Information
|
|
Argan
|
1
|
Virgin cold-pressed oil. Organic agriculture. Moroccan fruits
|
|
2
|
Kernels slightly roasted. Organic agriculture.
|
|
3
|
Kernels slightly roasted. Organic agriculture
|
|
4
|
Virgin oil
|
|
Avocado
|
5
|
Virgin cold-pressed oil, organic agriculture.
|
|
Combined olive and seed oils
|
1
|
Rapeseed and olive oils
|
|
6
|
Olive and sunflower oils
|
|
7
|
Sunflower, rapeseed, olive, grape seed oils
|
|
8
|
Safflower, olive, and nut oils
|
|
9
|
No detail.
|
|
Combined vegetable oils
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
Sunflower, oleisol, rapeseed, and grape seed oils
|
|
12
|
Corn, walnut, wheat germ, and grape seed oils
|
|
13
|
“4 oils” Grape seed, rapeseed, oleisol, and sunflower oils
|
|
13
|
“Special” Palm, sunflower, and rapeseed oils
|
|
Grapeseed
|
1
|
Virgin cold-pressed oil. Organic agriculture. French seeds.
|
|
12
|
|
13
|
|
14
|
|
15
|
|
Groundnut (Peanut)
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
Hazelnut
|
1
|
Virgin cold-pressed oil. Organic agriculture.
|
|
12
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
Olive
|
12
|
Virgin cold-pressed oil.
|
|
13
|
Virgin cold-pressed oil.
|
|
18
|
Virgin cold-pressed oil.
|
|
19
|
Virgin cold-pressed oil.
|
|
20
|
Virgin cold-pressed oil.
|
|
Rapeseed
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
Sesame
|
1
|
Virgin cold-pressed oil. Organic Agriculture. African seeds
|
|
2
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
22
|
Virgin cold-pressed oil. Organic Agriculture.
|
|
23
|
|
|
Sunflower
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
Walnut
|
11 (walnut I)
|
|
|
12 (walnut II)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
Walnut I
|
11
|
|
|
Walnut II
|
12
|
|
|
Walnut III
|
25
|
Virgin cold-pressed oil. French fruits from organic
agriculture.
|
|
Wheat germ
|
1
|
Virgin cold-pressed oil.
|
Fatty acid esterification
Fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) were prepared using sodium
methoxide as a catalyst. In brief, a 50 mg portion of
vegetable oil was weighed to the nearest 0.1 mg in a reacting
flask. Then 1 mL internal standard solution (1 mg C9:0
99% purity/mL in hexane) was added and the flask was shaken
vigorously. 2 mL 0.5N sodium methoxide was then added, and the
flask was vigorously shaken again for 1 min. before being
heated to 40 °C for 30 min., with vigorous shaking at
regular intervals. Then 100 μL glacial acetic acid, 4 mL
distilled water, and 4 mL hexane were successively added, and
the flask was vigorously shaken each time. The flask was then
centrifuged, and the supernatant was stored at – 80 °C
under nitrogen until the GC analysis, if necessary.
For the GC analysis, 50 μL of FAME solution was diluted in
1 mL hexane, and then 0.5 μL was injected in GC.
Methylation and analysis were performed in duplicate for each
sample at the same time.
Chromatographic conditions for FA analysis
GC analysis was carried out on an Agilent 6890N gas chromatograph
(Agilent Technologies Inc., Massy, F) equipped with an Agilent 7683
autosampler, an on-column injector set in “track oven” mode (which
means that the injector temperature is always 3 °C higher than the
oven temperature) and a flame-ionisation detector (FID) set at 255
°C. Signal acquisition was computed with a Varian
Galaxie® software data system (Varian Inc.,
Les Ulis, F). A BPX-70 (60 m × 0.25 mm i.d.,
0.25 μm film; SGE Europe Ltd, Courtaboeuf, F) flexible
fused-silica-column was used with column inlet pressure set at
110 kPa (constant pressure), hydrogen as the carrier gas, and
the following temperature programme: 60 °C (5 min) – 15
°C/min. 165 °C (1 min.) – 2 °C/min. 225 °C 4 min.
A reference solution was made in the lab by spiking a CRM164
FAME solution with a fish oil FAME solution plus some commercial
FAME standards (including Supelco #47885-U). This lab-made
reference FAME solution was used to determine as many FAME peaks as
possible using the BPX-70 column under working conditions.
Chromatographic peaks were identified by comparison with several
typical chromatograms such as: individual FAME reference
chromatograms, CRM164 chromatograms (before and after spiking with
reference FAME solutions), as well as chromatograms of both
lab-made reference FAME and CRM164 FAME fractions from silver
nitrate impregnated thin-layer chromatography [determination of
saturated FA, mono-cis FA, trans-FA, and polyunsaturated fatty acid
(PUFA) subclasses], and finally chromatograms reported in the
literature under the same chromatographic conditions (Vingering and
LeDoux, 2009). The lab-made reference FAME solution and Supelco
#47885-U standard were injected twice each (at the beginning and at
the end of a series sequence, after blanks) during each series of
chromatographic runs as qualitative standards to check the FAME
retention times and to identify peaks in samples by comparison of
chromatograms. The FAME overlaps occurring when using the BPX-70
60-m column were described and discussed earlier (Vingering and
LeDoux, 2009).
The correction factors were determined and calculated as
previously reported (Vingering and LeDoux, 2009). A control
oil with a simple FA profile was made in the lab by mixing
non-refined olive and walnut oils. After homogenisation, small
portions of the mixture were poured into amber vials and stored
under nitrogen at – 28 °C, until use. Ten aliquots of
this control oil were first methylated in duplicate following the
working conditions and analysed using BPX-70 column to check
repeatability and accuracy. A sample of this lab-made control
oil mixture is systematically thawed and added as a quantitative
control in each series of GC runs to regularly check the
performance of the method. All FAMEs were quantified against C9:0
FAME 99% purity as internal standard (Vingering and LeDoux,
2009).
Results and discussion
Fatty acid analysis
Ten aliquots of a lab-made control oil mixture were methylated and
analysed in duplicate under working conditions. The results were in
the range of the ISO/IDF Standard (ISO15885/IDF184, 2002) (data not
shown).
All the oil FA composition analyses in the present study were
made within the same series: samples were methylated the same day
in duplicate and then analyzed on the BPX-70 60-m column within the
same run. A typical chromatogram of a vegetable oil is shown
in Figure 1.
The use of a 60-m highly polar GC capillary column allowed
separation and identification of many fatty acids, including minor
FAs, such as trans isomers. Only few authors (Ortiz Moreno
et al., 2003; Noor Lida et al., 2002; Christopoulou
et al., 2004) used such efficient middle length GC columns for
studying FA composition of vegetable oils. Others worked with
shorter columns (25-30 m) bonded with average or highly polar
phases, the reason why poor information on specific minor FAs, such
as TFA, were available in most publications (Juanéda et al.,
2007).
Fatty acid composition of vegetable oils
The fatty acid composition of analysed oils is shown in table 2. All the duplicate results were in
accordance with the ISO/IDF Standard (ISO15885/IDF184, 2002): the
relative difference between two independent single test results,
obtained using the same method on identical test material in the
same laboratory by the same operator using the same equipment
within a short interval of time, will be greater than 5% in not
more than 5% of cases, with an absolute maximum of
1 g/100 g (FA > 5 g/100 g) or 12% with an
absolute maximum of 0.5 g/100 g (1 g < FA <
5 g/100 g) (data not shown).
Dubois et al., 2007, 2008 classified vegetable oils within
different classes and subclasses according to their FA profiles.
Results of this study are presented following this
classification.
Oils from MUFA group
Rapeseed, olive, hazelnut, and avocado are MUFA rich oils,
especially in oleic acid (18:1 n-9) with contents ranging from
50 (avocado) to 70 g/100 g of oil (olive, hazelnut).
Dubois et al., 2007 classified these vegetable oils in the
MUFA group, since MUFA were found to be major FAs in these fruits
and seeds.
Our results regarding rapeseed oil FA composition are similar to
the data from literature (Lee et al., 1998; Przybylski and
Mag, 2002). Beside high contents of MUFAs with oleic acid as major
FA, the rapeseed oil was found to be one of the richest oils
in ALA (7.8 g/100 g oil) with a low LA n-6/ALA n-3 ratio
(2.4), due to a low content in linoleic acid.
Olive oil is mainly a source of oleic acid (> 70% of
total FAs) and shows the lowest content in linoleic acid compared
to the other oils analysed in this study. Overall, our results
regarding this oil are within the range of French and Greek olive
cultivars FA composition (Ollivier et al., 2006, 2003; Boskou,
2002), but slightly lower than Italian, Korean, and Japanese olive
oils regarding 16:0 and 18:2 n-6 contents and slightly higher for
18:3 n-3 content (Lee et al., 1998; Mannina et al., 2003;
Ranalli et al., 2003). Our results are in accordance with
specifications of trade standards for olive oils as defined by the
International Olive Oil Council (IOOC). FA composition of various
olive cultivars showed significant differences (Ollivier
et al., 2003; Mannina et al., 2003), so olive oil FA
profiles have been considered as a parameter to characterise a
registered designation of origin (RDO) (Ollivier et al.,
2006). Moreover, significant differences were observed between
olive pulp and seed FA compositions (Ranalli et al.,
2003).
Hazelnut oil shows the highest oleic acid contents
(72.7 g/100 g oil). Our results are close to the FA
profile reported for Turkish hazelnut oil with slight differences:
OA content is slightly lower, and both LA and ALA contents are
higher in the present study than in the Turkish one (Alasalvar
et al., 2003).
In addition to a high oleic acid level, avocado oil shows high
contents in two other MUFAs, palmitoleic (16:1 n-7) and
cis-vaccenic (18:1 n-7) acid (respectively, 7.7 and
7.1 g/100 g oil), compared to other vegetable oils
(from 0.1 to 0.8 g/100 g oil), confirming previous
reports (Ortiz Moreno et al., 2003; Bora et al., 2001).
Nevertheless, this oil shows the highest palmitic acid (16:0)
content (16.9 g/100 g compared to 0.1 - 15.9
for other oils). In our study, the oleic (OA, 18:1 n-9), linoleic
(LA, 18:2 n-6), and α-linolenic (ALA, 18:3 n-3) acid contents of
avocado oil (respectively, 53.1%, 11.1%, and 0.6% of total FAs) are
slightly lower than the average values reported for Mexican avocado
(respectively, 60.3%, 13.7, and 1.4%) (Ortiz Moreno et al.,
2003). These authors extracted oil from avocado pulp in their lab
using four different methods including solvent and/or microwaves
and observed a significant influence of extraction procedure on the
FA profile. In our study, the analysed avocado oil, labelled as
cold pressed oil, was bought in a specialised store and FAME was
directly made from the oil sample. Considering individual results
by Ortiz-Moreno et al., 2003, our results were close to their
“microwaves/squeezing extracted oil” except for ALA which remained
higher in Mexican avocado (1.8% of total FAs). A different
cultivar from Brazil showed ALA content of avocado pulp oil as low
as in our study (0.5% of total FAs) (Bora et al., 2001). These
authors also reported that avocado pulp and seed oils showed
significant differences in FA composition, the seed oil being much
richer in PUFA than the pulp oil, especially both LA and ALA (Bora
et al., 2001). Last point, the avocado oil studied here also
contained trans-FAs as high as 0.5% of total FAs. Such a relatively
high content is at the upper limit for TFA contents in cold pressed
oils (Brühl, 1995). Such TFA contents were previously reported
while testing various extraction procedures in laboratory, ranging
from 0.3 to 0.9% of total FAs depending on the method of oil
extraction from avocado pulp (Ortiz-Moreno et al., 2003). As
we used a moderate methylation procedure with sodium methoxide as
catalyst in small amounts of hexane in order to reduce the risk of
generating TFAs during analysis, TFAs from avocado oil were
probably present either in avocado pulp or/and generated during
process. On the other hand, we did not find any TFA, even as
traces, in virgin wheat germ, walnut oils, or olive oil mixtures in
the present study (table 2), so the
methodology used here did not seem to generate TFAs.
MUFA/SFA + LA subclass
Groundnut and argan oils were classified as MUFA (group)/SFA + LA
(subclass) oils since average SFA and LA contents were higher than
in the MUFA group/MUFA subclass (Dubois et al., 2007). Major
FAs in groundnut oil are found to be oleic acid and then
linoleic acid. The present results are comparable to some
previously reported data (Sanders, 2002; Dorschel, 2002), but SFA
and LA contents in the tested groundnut oil mixture are slightly
lower and OA content is slightly higher than the average values
calculated by Dubois et al., 2007 from literature data. The
ALA content of groundnut oil measured in the present study (0.1%)
is lower than the published results for US oils (0.7%) (Dubois
et al., 2007; Dorschel, 2002), but similar to findings for
Greek oils (0.1%) (Christopoulou et al., 2004). The
specificity of groundnut oil of containing long chain (C > 20)
FAs, i.e., 20:0, 20:1, 22:0, and 24:0, is thus confirmed.
Argan oil, an exotic oil from Morocco, with putative biological
properties interesting for human health (Charrouf and Guillaume,
2008), is more or less balanced in OA and LA as major FAs, with
respectively, 40 and 33 g/100 g of oil and is also
found to be rich in palmitic acid (16:0). Those findings are in
agreement with data from literature (Rezanka and Rezankovà, 1999;
Hilali et al., 2005). ALA content of argan oil is very low
(0.1 g/100 g oil). Such low ALA contents have been
observed in some argan oils from different origins (Hilali
et al., 2005), but ALA contents as high as 3.8% have also been
reported (Rezanka and Rezankovà, 1999).
Table 2 FA composition of analysed vegetable oils
(in g FA/ 100 g oil).
|
Rapeseed
|
Olive
|
Hazelnut
|
Avocado
|
Groundnut (peanut)
|
Argan
|
Combined Olive and Seeds
|
Grapeseed
|
|
Group1
|
MUFA
|
MUFA
|
PUFA
|
|
Subclass1
|
MUFA
|
SFA + LA
|
LA
|
|
14:0
|
0.1
|
-
|
-
|
0.1
|
0.0
|
0.2
|
-
|
-
|
|
16:0
|
4.5
|
8.3
|
5.6
|
16.9
|
8.9
|
11.9
|
7.9
|
6.9
|
|
16:1 n-7+n-9
|
0.2
|
0.8
|
0.2
|
7.7
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
0.4
|
0.1
|
|
17:0
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
0.0
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
|
17:1 n-9
|
0.1
|
0.2
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
-
|
0.1
|
-
|
|
18:0
|
1.6
|
3.0
|
2.5
|
0.8
|
2.6
|
5.0
|
3.2
|
3.9
|
|
18:1-trans*
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0.1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
18:1 n-9
|
55.2
|
71.0
|
72.7
|
50.3
|
51.3
|
43.8
|
46.3
|
18.4
|
|
18:1 n-7
|
4.0
|
3.3
|
2.4
|
7.1
|
1.3
|
0.9
|
2.7
|
1.0
|
|
18:2-trans*
|
0.1
|
-
|
0.1
|
0.3
|
0.2
|
-
|
0.1
|
0.6
|
|
18:2 n-6
|
19.4
|
6.7
|
12.9
|
10.5
|
23.5
|
33.3
|
32.5
|
63.3
|
|
18:3-trans*
|
0.6
|
-
|
-
|
0.1
|
-
|
-
|
0.1
|
-
|
|
18:3 n-6
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
18:3 n-3
|
7.8
|
0.7
|
0.4
|
0.6
|
0.2
|
0.1
|
2.2
|
0.4
|
|
20:0
|
0.6
|
0.4
|
0.2
|
0.1
|
1.2
|
0.4
|
0.5
|
0.3
|
|
20:1 n-9
|
1.1
|
0.4
|
0.2
|
0.1
|
1.5
|
0.4
|
0.5
|
0.3
|
|
20:2 n-6
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
22:0
|
0.3
|
0.1
|
0.0
|
-
|
2.5
|
0.1
|
0.3
|
0.1
|
|
22:1 n-9
|
0.2
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0.1
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
-
|
|
24:0
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
-
|
-
|
1.4
|
0.0
|
0.1
|
-
|
|
24:1 n-9
|
0.1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
SFA
|
7.3
|
11.9
|
8.3
|
17.9
|
16.7
|
17.6
|
12.1
|
11.2
|
|
MUFA
|
59.7
|
75.2
|
75.4
|
65.2
|
54.24
|
44.8
|
49.4
|
19.5
|
|
PUFA
|
26.9
|
7.4
|
13.3
|
11.0
|
23.7
|
33.5
|
34.7
|
63.6
|
|
PUFA n-3
|
7.8
|
0.7
|
0.4
|
0.6
|
0.2
|
0.1
|
2.2
|
0.4
|
|
PUFA n-6
|
19.1
|
6.7
|
12.9
|
10.5
|
23.5
|
33.3
|
32.5
|
63.3
|
|
n6/n3 ratio
|
2.4
|
10.0
|
35.9
|
19.0
|
130.5
|
256.3
|
14.9
|
175.7
|
|
trans-FA
|
0.7
|
-
|
0.1
|
0.5
|
0.2
|
-
|
0.1
|
0.5
|
|
Total FA
|
95.7
|
94.9
|
97.4
|
94.8
|
94.8
|
96.3
|
96.8
|
95.2
|
|
Sunflower
|
Sesame
|
Combined
|
Wheat germ
|
Walnut
|
Walnut I
|
Walnut II
|
Walnut III (organic)
|
|
Group1
|
PUFA
|
PUFA
|
|
Subclass1
|
LA + MUFA
|
LA + SFA
|
|
14:0
|
0.1
|
0.0
|
-
|
0.1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
16:0
|
6.0
|
8.4
|
6.3
|
15.9
|
7.2
|
6.5
|
6.9
|
6.4
|
|
16:1 n-7+n-9
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
0.2
|
0.2
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
|
17:0
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
-
|
0.1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
17:1 n-9
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.
|
-
|
0.0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
18:0
|
3.6
|
5.5
|
2.9
|
0.6
|
2.7
|
2.5
|
2.6
|
2.7
|
|
18:1-trans*
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
18:1 n-9
|
29.4
|
38.5
|
38.4
|
11.1
|
15.2
|
15.8
|
14.1
|
17.4
|
|
18:1 n-7
|
1.3
|
1.6
|
1.6
|
1.5
|
1.3
|
1.3
|
1.2
|
1.2
|
|
18:2-trans*
|
0.5
|
0.2
|
0.3
|
-
|
0.3
|
0.2
|
0.5
|
-
|
|
18:2 n-6
|
54.5
|
40.0
|
44.4
|
52.7
|
57.1
|
56.1
|
57.3
|
57.3
|
|
18:3-trans*
|
-
|
-
|
0.1
|
-
|
0.5
|
0.6
|
1.3
|
-
|
|
18:3 n-6
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
18:3 n-3
|
0.1
|
0.4
|
1.3
|
7.1
|
11.9
|
12.1
|
11.7
|
10.8
|
|
20:0
|
0.3
|
0.7
|
0.4
|
0.3
|
0.1
|
0.3
|
0.0
|
0.3
|
|
20:1 n-9
|
0.2
|
0.3
|
0.3
|
1.4
|
0.2
|
0.1
|
0.2
|
0.2
|
|
20:2 n-6
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0.1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
22:0
|
0.7
|
0.1
|
0.5
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
22:1 n-9
|
-
|
-
|
0.0
|
0.2
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
24:0
|
0.2
|
0.0
|
0.2
|
0.1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
24:1 n-9
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0.2
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
SFA
|
10.9
|
14.9
|
10.3
|
17.2
|
10.0
|
9.3
|
9.8
|
9.4
|
|
MUFA
|
30.8
|
40.2
|
40.2
|
13.3
|
16.6
|
17.1
|
15.4
|
18.7
|
|
PUFA
|
54.6
|
40.4
|
45.7
|
60.0
|
69.1
|
68.2
|
69.0
|
68.1
|
|
PUFA n-3
|
0.1
|
0.4
|
1.3
|
7.1
|
11.9
|
12.1
|
11.7
|
10.8
|
|
PUFA n-6
|
54.5
|
40.0
|
44.4
|
52.9
|
57.1
|
56.1
|
57.3
|
57.3
|
|
n6/n3 ratio
|
681.0
|
99.9
|
35.2
|
7.5
|
4.8
|
4.6
|
4.9
|
5.3
|
|
trans-FA
|
0.5
|
0.2
|
0.4
|
-
|
0.9
|
0.8
|
1.7
|
-
|
|
Total FA
|
96.9
|
95.9
|
96.8
|
91.8
|
96.8
|
95.5
|
96.0
|
96.4
|
Oils from PUFA group
Grape seed, sunflower, sesame, wheat germ, and walnut oils are rich
in PUFAs with contents ranging from 40 (sesame) to 63 g (grape
seed) PUFA/100 g oil. Grape seed has been classified in an LA
subclass, sunflower, sesame, and wheat germ oils in an LA+MUFA
subclass, and walnut oil in an LA+SFA subclass (table 2) (Dubois et al., 2007).
PUFA/LA subclass
Grape seed oil is the richest in PUFAs, representing 66.5% of total
FAs, and has been classified in an LA subclass Dubois et al.,
2007. Indeed, this oil shows the highest content in linoleic acid
(63.3 g/100 g oil), but due to a poor linolenic acid
content, the PUFA n-6/PUFA n-3 ratio is very high. Our results
regarding FA composition of grape seed oil are quite similar to
those previously reported, with only few differences (Udayasekhara
Rao, 1994; Sovová et al., 2001). Grape seed oil from India
contained 8.1% of myristic acid (14:0) and less palmitic acid
(16:0) (3.5%) than in the present study (7.2%). French grape seed
oil showed slightly higher OA content and slightly lower LA content
than those reported for grape seeds from Macedonia (Sovová
et al., 2001). In addition, Sovová et al., 2001 reported
the presence of 0.4% γ-linolenic acid (GLA, 18:3 n-6). However, in
our study, chromatograms of FAMEs prepared from grape seed oil did
not show any peak in the area of GLA elution, neither GLA nor
trans-ALA (GLA overlapped with some trans-ALA on the BPX-70 60-m
column under analytical conditions used in the present study
(Vingering and LeDoux, 2009)).
PUFA/LA+MUFA subclass
Other PUFA oils like sunflower, sesame, and wheat germ oils also
contain high MUFA amounts (Dubois et al., 2007).
The main fatty acids in “conventional” sunflower oil are
linoleic and oleic acids, along with palmitic acid (Noor Lida
et al., 2002; Guinda et al., 2003; Gupta, 2002; Wang,
2002), but field-grown mutant sunflower seeds can show much higher
contents of oleic or oleic plus palmitic acids (Guinda et al.,
2003). Sunflower oils analysed in the present study show an FA
composition similar to the conventional sunflower oil profile
(Codex Alimentarius).
Like argan oil, sesame oil is balanced in both OA and LA as
major FAs, but contrary to argan, LA content was found to be higher
than OA content. Such results are in accordance with previously
reported data (Kochbar, 2002), even if LA content from the present
study (42% of total FAs) was at the lowest limit of results
from literature (Lee, et al., 1998; Abou-Gharbia et al.,
2000; Alpaslan et al., 2001; Jahaniaval et al., 2000).
Nevertheless, our results are within the range of values
established by the Codex Alimentarius for sesame oil (Codex
Alimentarius). Such low LA contents were also reported from sesame
seeds in Turkey depending on the interaction between row space and
irrigation effects (Alpaslan et al., 2001). Dubois
et al., 2007 classified sesame oil in PUFA group and argan in
MUFA group, but average LA content of sesame oil calculated from
published data was higher than LA content measured in the present
study. This is the reason why both argan and sesame oils, which
have close FA compositions in our study, are presented in different
groups in table 2.
Contrary to most of the oils analysed in the present study, the
tested wheat germ oil is not a mixture, but a unique sample from a
traditional local factory producing a virgin cold-pressed oil.
However, our results are quite similar to the results previously
reported for FA compositions of wheat germ oil extracted either by
solvents at cold or hot temperatures (Dunford and Zhang, 2003), or
supercritical CO2 (Panfili et al., 2003). Only
small differences are observed, for instance OA content is slightly
lower, and both LA and ALA contents are higher in the present study
than in the reported data (Dunford and Zhang, 2003; Panfili
et al., 2003). Moreover, LA and ALA contents of wheat germ
oils extracted by solvents decreased with increasing temperatures
during solvent extraction (Dunford and Zhang, 2003). No trans-PUFA
is detected in the virgin wheat germ oil analysed in the present
study, even as traces.
PUFA/LA+SFA subclass
Dubois et al., 2007 classified walnut oil in a PUFA group/LA
+SFA subclass, but these authors used only Greek data (Tsamouris
et al., 2001). The FA composition of the mixture made from 5
French walnut oils is quite different from the results obtained
with Greek oil [40], but remains in accordance with data from Wolff
(1993) for German and French oils. In the present work, as for
Wolff's results, the walnut oil mixture has lower SFA (10%) and
much higher MUFA (17% of total FAs) contents than the Greek oil
(respectively, SFA 15% and MUFA 1%). Regarding PUFA content, the
French oil is poorer in 18:2 n-6 and richer in 18:3 n-3, with
an LA n-6/ALA n-3 ratio of 4.8 against 7.4 for the Greek oil. The
walnut oil mixture also presents a relatively high TFA content
(0.86 g/100 g oil, representing 0.9% of total FAs).
Deodorisation, the last step of oil refining, is known to be the
main cause of trans-PUFA isomer formation during oil processing
(LeDoux et al., 2007). Wolff (1993) reported TFA contents from
0.84% to 1.83% in refined walnut oils and 0.1% for virgin walnut
oil.
In addition to the planed work, we analysed two walnut oils
individually (walnut I & II, table 1) and an extra walnut oil (organic
walnut III, table 1) labelled as
virgin cold-pressed oil. Overall, the FA compositions of these
three oils conform to our previous findings, including good LA
n-6/ALA n-3 ratios (table 2).
However, both the walnut I & II oils contained TFAs
(respectively, 0.8% and 1.8% of total FAs) and both of these oils
showed trans-18:2 as well as trans-18:3, while the FAME
chromatograms for organic walnut oil did not show any TFA, even as
traces.
Variation factors of oil FA composition
The present study recalls and underlines the specificity of the
analysed vegetable oils in terms of their FA composition, an often
used criterion for the general classification of oils and fats,
recently revisited by Dubois et al., 2007. Overall, our
results are in agreement with the average of the vegetable oil FA
compositions published in literature in the past decade for the
same oils as well as in the FA compositions given by the Codex
Alimentarius standard for named vegetable oils (Codex
Alimentarius). However, differences were observed between our
results and published data for some FA contents of several oils.
These differences could be explained by various reasons.
Significant differences in FA profiles were reported for the
same kind of oil in relation with several parameters. Among
influencing factors, the cultivar and the origin of the oleaginous
plant have been quoted (Lee et al., 1998; Ollivier
et al., 2006; Ollivier et al., 2003; Mannina et al.,
2003; Guinda et al., 2003). In contrast, numerous varieties of
a same oleaginous fruit from different geographical origins have
been reported to have very close FA compositions (Hilali
et al., 2005). Changes in total FA amounts as well as in FA
proportions were also observed during development of oilseeds
(Chung et al., 1995) and, for a same vegetable, pulp and seed
can shows drastic differences in their FA compositions (Ranalli
et al., 2003; Bora et al., 2001).
Overview
Figure
2 shows the SFA, MUFA, and PUFA distributions of the
different analysed oils. Only few variations are observed regarding
SFA contents, from 7 to 19% of total FAs depending on the oil.
In all oils, palmitic acid (16:0) is always the major SFA,
followed by stearic acid (18:0). Other SFAs, such as 14:0, 20:0,
22:0, and 24:0, are minor. On the other hand, both MUFA and
PUFA contents show drastic variations depending on oleaginous
species and vary respectively from 14.4 to 77.5% (MUFA) and from
7.1 to 66.5% (PUFA) of total FAs. Oleic acid (18:1 n-9) is always
the major MUFA and linoleic acid (LA, 18:2 n-6) is the major PUFA.
Only three pure (non-combined) oils show α-linolenic acid (ALA,
18:3 n-3) contents higher than 7 g/100 g oil: wheat germ
(7.1 g/ 100 g), rapeseed (7.8), and walnut (11.9).
The LA n-6/ALA n-3 ratios of these oils are respectively, 7.5
(wheat germ), 2.4 (rapeseed), and 4.8 (walnut). Both rapeseed and
walnut oils, having a high LA content and a low LA/ALA ratio, turn
out to be interesting oils to increase ALA intakes in the French
diet with an adequate balance between LA and ALA contents.
As a particular attention is now being paid to trans-fatty acids
(Mozaffarian et al., 2006; Baylin et al., 2003), we
examined the TFA contents of the oils. Olive and argan oil
mixtures, as well as organic wheat germ and walnut oils did not
present any trans fatty acids even as traces. All other oil
mixtures and avocado oil showed low trans-18:2 and trans-18:3
isomer contents (from 0.1 to 0.9 g total TFA/100 g oil)
representing about 0.1 to 0.9% of total FAs. Both the individually
analysed walnut oils showed TFA contents, with walnut II sample as
high as 1.7 g total TFA/ 100 g oil. These
trans-PUFA are mainly produced during the deodorisation step of oil
refining process (Wolff, 1993a, 1993b). Avocado oil was the only
oil to contain trans-18:1 isomers as low as 0.1% of total FAs.
Crude vegetable oils with such low TFA contents are not considered
to be significant contributors to TFA intakes (Laloux et al.,
2007).
Conclusion
The French experts in the lipid nutrition field have recommended
through the French Food Safety Agency (Afssa) that lipids should
represent from 35% to 40% of the total energy intake (AFSSA, 2010).
In western diets, these recommendations are not met since lipids
represent more than 40% of the total energy intake. In parallel to
this “quantity of fat” aspect, a “quality of fat” consideration is
emerging since the recommendations also require less than 33% of
lipid intake to be SFA, and an LA/ALA ratio of about 4 (AFSSA,
2010) as well as the reduction of TFA (AFSSA, 2005), even if TFA
intake by French population remains lower than in some other
industrial countries (Laloux et al., 2007). Consequently,
French Food composition databank (Afssa-Ciqual) has undertaken a
new set of nutrient analyses of some of the key foods cited in the
latest French food consumption survey. The present paper reports
the FA composition of several vegetable oils. The results
underline that, when considering the nutritional needs
of consumer, oils should be chosen according to their
different FA profiles.
References
[Dubois et al., 2007] Dubois V, Breton S,
Linder M, Fanni J, Parmentier M. Fatty acid profiles
of 80 vegetable oils with regard to their nutritional potential.
Eur J Lipid Sci Technol 2007; 109: 710-32.
[Dubois et al., 2008] Dubois V, Breton S,
Linder M, Fanni J, Parmentier M. Proposition de
classement des sources végétales d'acides gras en fonction de leur
profil nutritionnel. OCL 2008; 15: 56-75.
[AFSSA, 2005] AFSSA. Acides gras trans. Risques et bénéfices
pour la santé. Maisons Alfort, France: Recommandations. AFSSA,
2005.
[Legrand et al., 2001] Legrand P, Bourre JM,
Descomps B, Durand G, Renaud S. Lipides. In:
Martin A, ed. Apports nutritionnels conseillés pour la
population française. Paris: Lavoisier Tec & Doc, 2001:
63-82.
[Afssa-Ciqual] Afssa-Ciqual, Food table composition,
http://www.afssa.fr/TableCIQUAL.
[Vingering and LeDoux, 2009] Vingering N, LeDoux M.
Use of a BPX-70 60m column for screening the fatty acid composition
of industrial cookies. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol 2009; 111:
669-77.
[ISO15885/IDF184, Milk fat, 2002] ISO15885/IDF184, Milk fat -
Determination of the fatty acid composition by gas-liquid
chromatography., in ISO Geneva (CH)/IDF Brussels (BE), 2002:
1-8.
[Ortiz Moreno et al., 2003] Ortiz Moreno A,
Dorantes L, Galindez J, Guzmán RI. Effect of
different extraction methods on fatty acids, volatile compounds,
and physical and chemical properties of Avocado (Persea americana
Mill.) oil. J Agric Food Sci 2003; 51: 2216-21.
[Noor Lida et al., 2002] Noor Lida HMD,
Sundram K, Aminah A, Mamot S. TAG composition and
solid fat content of palm oil, sunflower oil, and palm kernel olein
blends before and after chemical interesterification. J Am Oil Chem
Soc 2002; 79: 1137-44.
[Christopoulou et al., 2004] Christopoulou E,
Lazaraki M, Komaitis M, Kaselimis K. Effectiveness
of determination of fatty acids and triglycerides for the detection
of adulteration of olive oils with vegetable oils. Food Chemistry
2004; 84: 463-74.
[Juanéda et al., 2007] Juanéda P, LeDoux M,
Sébédio JL. Analytical methods for determination of trans
fatty acid content in food. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol 2007; 109:
901-17.
[Lee et al., 1998] Lee DS, Noh BS, Bae SY,
Kim K. Characterization of fatty acids composition in
vegetable oils by gas chromatography and chemometrics. Analytica
Chimica Acta 1998; 358: 163-75.
[Przybylski and Mag, 2002] Przybylski R, Mag TK.
Canola/rapeseed oil. In: Gunstone FD, ed. Vegetable oils in
food technology, composition, properties, and uses. Oxford (UK):
Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 2002: 99-127.
[Ollivier et al., 2006] Ollivier D, Artaud J,
Pinatel C, Durbec JP, Guérère M. Differentiation of
French virgin olive oil RDOs by sensory characteristics, fatty
acids and triacylglycerol compositions and chemometrics. Food
Chemistry 2006; 97: 382-93.
[Ollivier et al., 2003] Ollivier D, Artaud J,
Pinatel C, Durbec JP, Guérère M. Triacylglycerol and
fatty acid compositions of Fench virgin olive oils.
Characterization by chemometrics. J Agric Food Chem 2003; 51:
5723-31.
[Boskou, 2002] Boskou D. Olive oil. In: Gunstone FD,
ed. Vegetable oils in food technology, composition, properties, and
uses. Oxford (UK): Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 2002: 244-77.
[Mannina et al., 2003] Mannina L, Dugo G,
Salvo F, et al. Study of the cultivar-composition
relationship in Sicilian olive oils by GC, NMR, and statistical
methods. J Agric Food Sci 2003; 51: 120-7.
[Ranalli et al., 2003] Ranalli A, Pollastri L,
Contento S, et al. Acylglycerol and fatty acid components
of pulp, seed, and whole olive fruit oils. Their use to
characterize fruit variety by chemometrics. J Agric Food Sci 2003;
50: 3775-9.
[International Olive Oil Council] International Olive Oil
Council, Trade standard applying to olive oils and olive-pomace
oils, www.internationaloliveoil.org.
[Alasalvar et al., 2003] Alasalvar C, Shahidi F,
Oshima T, et al. Turkish tombul hazelnut (Corylus
avellana L.). 2. Lipid characteristics and oxidative stability. J
Agric Food Sci 2003; 51: 3797-805.
[Bora et al., 2001] Bora PS, Narain N,
Rocha RVM, Queiroz Paulo M. Characterization of the oils
from the pulp and seeds of avocado (cultivar: Fuerte) fruits.
Grasas y Aceites 2001; 52: 171-4.
[Brühl, 1995] Brühl L. Determination of trans fatty acids
in cold pressed oils. Eur J Med Res 1995; 1: 89-93.
[Sanders, 2002] Sanders TH. Groundut (peanut). In:
Gunstone FD, ed. Vegetable oils in food technology,
composition, properties, and uses. Oxford (UK): Blackwell
Publishing Ltd., 2002: 231-43.
[Dorschel, 2002] Dorschel CA. Characterization of the TAG
of peanut oil by electrospray LC-MS-MS. J Am Oil Chem Soc 2002; 79:
749-53.
[Charrouf and Guillaume, 2008] Charrouf Z,
Guillaume D. Argan oil: Occurrence, composition and impact on
human health. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol 2008; 110: 632-6.
[Rezanka and Rezankovà, 1999] Rezanka T, Rezankovà H.
Characterization of fatty acids and triacylglycerols in vegetable
oils by gas chromatography and statistical analysis. Analytica
Chimica Acta 1999; 398: 253-61.
[Hilali et al., 2005] Hilali M, Charrouf Z,
Soulhi AEA, Hachimi L, Guillaume D. Influence of
origin and extraction method on argan oil physico-chemical
characteristics and composition. J Agric Food Sci 2005; 53:
2081-7.
[Udayasekhara Rao, 1994] Udayasekhara Rao P. Nutrient
composition of some less-familiar oil seeds. Food Chemistry 1994;
50: 379-82.
[Sovová et al., 2001] Sovová H, Zarevúcka M,
Vack M, Stránsky K. Solubility if two vegetable oils in
supercritical CO2. J Supercrit Fluids 2001; 20:
15-28.
[Guinda et al., 2003] Guinda A, Dobarganes MC,
Ruiz-Mendez MV, Mancha M. Chemical and physical
properties of a sunflower oil with high levels of oleic and
palmitic acids. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol 2003; 105: 130-7.
[Gupta, 2002] Gupta MK. Sunflower oil. In:
Gunstone FD, ed. Vegetable oils in food technology,
composition, properties, and uses. Oxford (UK): Blackwell
Publishing Ltd., 2002: 128-56.
[Wang, 2002] Wang T. Soybean oil. In: Gunstone FD, ed.
Vegetable oils in food technology, composition, properties, and
uses. Oxford (UK): Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 2002: 18-58.
[Codex Alimentarius] Codex Alimentarius, Codex standard for
named vegetable oils. Codex Stan 210,
www.codexalimentarius.net.
[Kochbar, 2002] Kochbar SP. Sesame, rice-bran, and flaxseed
oils. In: Gunstone FD, ed. Vegetable oils in food technology,
composition, properties, and uses. Oxford (UK): Blackwell
Publishing Ltd., 2002: 297-326.
[Abou-Gharbia et al., 2000] Abou-Gharbia HA,
Shehata AAY, Shahadi F. Effect of processing on oxidative
stability and lipid classes of sesame oil. Food Research
International 2000; 33: 331-40.
[Alpaslan et al., 2001] Alpaslan M, Boydak E,
Hayla M, Gerçek S, Simsek M. Effect of row space and
irrigation on seed composition of Turkish sesame (Sesamum indicum
L.). J Am Oil Chem Soc 2001; 78: 933-5.
[Jahaniaval et al., 2000] Jahaniaval F, Kakuda Y,
Marcone MF. Fatty acid and triacylglycerol compositions of
seed oils of five Amaranthus accessions and their comparison to
other oils. J Am Oil Chem Soc 2000; 77: 847-52.
[Dunford and Zhang, 2003] Dunford NT, Zhang M.
Pressurized solvent extraction of wheat germ oil. Food Research
International 2003; 36: 905-9.
[Panfili et al., 2003] Panfili G, Cinquanta L,
Fratianni A, Cubadda R. Extraction of wheat germ oil by
supercritical CO2: oil and defatted cake
characterization. J Am Oil Chem Soc 2003; 80: 157-61.
[Tsamouris et al., 2001] Tsamouris G,
Hatziantoniou S, Demetzos C. Lipid analysis of Greek
walnut oil (Juglans regia L.). Z Naturforsch 2001; 57c: 51-6.
[Wolff, 1993] Wolff RL. Occurrence of artificial
trans-polyunsaturated fatty acids in refined (deodorized) walnut
oils. Sci Alim 1993; 13: 155-63.
[LeDoux et al., 2007] LeDoux M, Juanéda P,
Sébédio JL. Trans fatty acids: Definition and occurrence in
foods. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol 2007; 109: 891-900.
[Chung et al., 1995] Chung CH, Lee YJ,
Kim DH, Kim HK, Chung DS. Changes of lipid, protein,
RNA and fatty acid composition in developing sesame (Sesamum
indicum L.) seeds. Plant Sci 1995; 109: 237-43.
[Mozaffarian et al., 2006] Mozaffarian D,
Katan MB, Ascherio A, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC.
Trans fatty acids and cardiovascular disease. New Engl J Med 2006;
354: 1601-13.
[Baylin et al., 2003] Baylin A, Kabagambe EK,
Ascherio A, Spiegelman D, Campos H. High 18:2
trans-fatty acids in adipose tissue are associated with increased
risk of nonfatal acute myocardial infarction in costa rican adults.
J Nutr 2003; 133: 1186-91.
[Wolff, 1993a] Wolff RL. Further studies on artificial
geometrical isomers of alpha-linolenic acid in edible linolenic
acid-containing oils. J Am Oil Chem Soc 1993a; 70: 219-24.
[Wolff, 1993b] Wolff RL. Heat-induced geometrical
isomerization of linoleic acid : effect of temperature and heating
time on the appearance of individual isomers. J Am Oil Chem Soc
1993b; 70: 425-30.
[Laloux et al., 2007] Laloux L, du Chaffaut L,
Razanamahefa L, Lafay L. Trans fatty acid content of
foods and intake levels in France. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol 2007;
109: 918-29.
[AFSSA, 2010] AFSSA, Avis relatif à l'actualisation des apports
nutritionels conseillés pour les acides gras (Saisine
n°2006-SA-0359). 2010.
|