ARTICLE
Auteur(s) : Mirka Hoesl1, Klaus
Dietz2, Martin Röcken1, Mark
Berneburg1
1Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls
University, Liebermeisterstraße 25, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany
2Department of Medical Biometry, Eberhard Karls
University, Liebermeisterstraße 25, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany
accepté le 19 F�vrier 2010
Xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) [1] is a rare autosomal recessive
disorder with an incidence of 0.9 per 106 live
births in Europe and an estimated prevalence worldwide of
1:106 [2]. Clinically, XP is characterized by xerotic
skin, sun sensitivity, poikiloderma, telangiectasia and an
approximately 2000-fold increased risk of developing skin cancer
[3-6]. Skin tumors include basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell
carcinoma as well as malignant melanoma [7]. This is explained by
the fact that cells from XP patients are defective in the repair
mechanism nucleotide excision repair [8]. Nucleotide excision
repair is a tightly regulated multiprotein process whose main
function is the removal of bulky helix distorting DNA damage
inflicted by ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Genetic studies on
cultured cells have revealed seven complementation groups (A-G)
which are deficient in NER as well as a variant form, where cells
are deficient in translesion synthesis. Due to these defects, cells
of XP patients show a mutator phenotype, leading to mutations in
genes such as p53, ultimately leading to the generation of
UV-induced skin tumors. Therefore, patients with XP are required to
apply stringent photoprotection to reduce the risk of developing
skin cancer. This includes strict avoidance of direct sun-exposure,
UV-protective screens on all windows, long sleeved protective
clothing and application of sun-protection with very high
protection levels in the UVA as well as the UVB range. The skin,
besides other organs, is capable of de novo vitamin D synthesis.
Keratinocytes, macrophages and fibroblasts synthesise active
vitamin D from cholesterol precursors by photochemical activation
(UVB) in the skin [9-12].
Recently vitamin D levels have been implicated in skin
carcinogenesis and it has been postulated that photoprotection may
lead to clinically relevant reduction of vitamin D levels [13-17].
To address this point we investigated in our cohort of patients
suffering from XP whether the stringent photoprotective measures
carried out by these patients are responsible for potentially
reduced serum levels of vitamin D.
Methods
Patients
This retrospective study involved 15 patients with Xeroderma
pigmentosum examined during their regular biannual check-up. All
patients gave their informed consent to participate in the study
and the investigation was approved by the local ethics committee.
The group included 8 male and 7 female patients aged
between 4 and 69 years (table
1). Six patients were younger than 18 years old. Eight
of the 15 recruited patients were of German origin, while
3 originated from the Middle East, 3 from the
mediterranean region and 1 patient from the Netherlands. The
study included the complementation groups XP-A, XP-C, XP-D, XP-F
and XP-V. One patient additionally suffered from
trichothiodystrophy [18]. Measured serum calcium showed normal
values and PTH was not measured. Exclusion criteria included
substitution with Vitamin D or calcium other than normal food
intake as well as renal failure or increased bone fractures.
Table 1 Age, gender, means of vitamin D levels and
sun-protection (i) overall and (ii) with drometriazole trisiloxane
of investigated XP-patients
|
Patient ID
|
Age
|
Vit 1.25-OH
|
Vit D 25-OH
|
Years of overall sunprotection
|
Years of sunprotection with drometriazole trisiloxane
|
|
1
|
7
|
154
|
8
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
23
|
89
|
32
|
23
|
6
|
|
4
|
11
|
86
|
19
|
9
|
9
|
|
5
|
4
|
89
|
42
|
3
|
4.5
|
|
7
|
38
|
81
|
66
|
8
|
0
|
|
9
|
62
|
26
|
15
|
61
|
0
|
|
10
|
35
|
25
|
18
|
32
|
2
|
|
11
|
26
|
25
|
11
|
23
|
12
|
|
12
|
11
|
99
|
24
|
10
|
12
|
|
13
|
16
|
187
|
54
|
12
|
|
|
14
|
24
|
92
|
7
|
20
|
0
|
|
15
|
21
|
56
|
24
|
18
|
6
|
|
16
|
11
|
87
|
23
|
3
|
5
|
|
17
|
23
|
54
|
10
|
10
|
|
|
18
|
69
|
160
|
50
|
35
|
4
|
Vitamin D assessment
Vitamin D levels 1,25-(OH)2D and 25-OHD were measured from
patients’ serum samples with the range of normal values for 25-OHD
set between 25-170 nmol/L. For 1,25-(OH)2D the range of normal
values varies for infants, children and adults. For infants the
range is 70-360 pmol/L, for children 70-220 pmol/L and
for adults it is set between 45-135 pmol/L [19]. We did not
differentiate between blood samples taken during summer or winter
months. Laboratory and clinical evaluations were performed at the
Department of Dermatology, Tübingen and at four other Dermatology
clinics within Germany.
Sun-protection questionnaire
In addition to blood samples taken, patients received a
questionnaire including 14 questions about their
sun-protection-behaviour. The term “duration of sun protection” was
defined as the time from when the patient remembered carrying out
any measure aimed at avoiding deleterious ultraviolet radiation
until the last time the patient carried out any form of this
UV-avoidance. This sun protection could comprise any combination of
protection by clothing, simply avoiding sunlight as well as using
sun protection ointments containing (i) drometrizole trisiloxane or
(ii) other commercially available sunscreens. Answers were either
chosen from four given options (50%) or chosen from a scale ranging
from 1-10.
Statistical analysis
All data were documented with Microsoft Excel and stored
anonymously. Only patients who filled in the questionnaire and from
whom data regarding vitamin D was available were included (table 1). Statistical analysis was performed
using the statistical software JMP. The association between the
duration of light protection and reduced vitamin D levels was
assessed by logistic regression.
Results
Vitamin D values
Serum vitamin D levels of all investigated patients are given in
table 1. Levels of 25-OHD were normal
for 33% (5 of 15) of patients, increased for 0% and decreased
for 67% (10 of 15) of investigated XP patients. Levels for
active 1,25-(OH)2D are given in figure 1. They were normal
for 73% (11 of 15), increased for 7% (1 of 15) and
decreased for 20% (3 of 15) of patients, respectively.
Sun-protection
Duration of sun-protection was documented in all patients.
Protective measures according to questionnaires included avoidance
of ambient or artificial UV-radiation, textile UV-protection and
application of sunscreen. Duration of sun-protection applied ranged
from 3 to 61 years (table 1).
Association of decreased vitamin D values
and duration of sun-protection
There was no statistically significant association (likelihood
ratio test p = 0.8564) between 25-OHD serum levels and duration of
sun-protection (figure
1, dashed line). Results for 1,25-(OH)2D levels in
correlation with duration of sun-protection are given in figure 1 (solid line).
Probabilities followed a sigmoidal shape of three phases.
Approximately, within the first 20 years of sun-protection the
probability of decreased 1,25-(OH)2D levels was not above 0.25.
Within 20-40 years the probability ranged between
0.25 and 0.75. Above 40 years of sun-protection the
probability of decreased 1,25-(OH)2D levels was above 0.75. Thus,
for 30 years of sun-protection the probability of decreased
vitamin D levels was under 50% (likelihood ratio test p = 0.0058).
Twelve of 15 patients used sunscreen with drometrizole
trisiloxane (table 1). When looking at
this particular subset of patients there was no statistically
significant association between duration of sun-protection with
drometrizole trisiloxane and probability of reduced serum levels of
25-OHD and 1,25-(OH)2D (p = 0.3852, p = 0.8540, respectively). All
other parameters, like sunprotection by strict avoidance of any
type of UV-exposure, clothing, UV-protective windowscreens, showed
no statistically significant effect on the vitamin D values of our
patients.
Discussion
Serum levels of 25-OHD were reduced in 67% of the investigated
patients when a laboratory specific cut-off for normal values of
25-70 nmol/L was applied. Other authors even suggest a higher
cut-off for normal 25-OHD values [20]. When applying this limit,
12 of 15 (80%) patients would be considered to have
reduced vitamin D serum levels. In any case, these results indicate
that levels of the important storage form [21] of vitamin D are
decreased in patients suffering from xeroderma pigmentosum. Since
de-novo synthesis of vitamin D requires ultraviolet radiation it
has been hypothesised that this may be due to excessive
photoprotection carried out by these patients in order to avoid
carcinogenic UV-exposure [16, 22]. Interestingly, reduction of
25-OHD was not associated with any type or duration of
sun-protection applied by these patients, thus indicating that,
while 25-OHD may be reduced in XP patients, the underlying cause
may not simply be due to lack of sun exposure or due to excessive
sun-protection. It has been reported by others that XP-patients are
at risk of having reduced vitamin D levels [22]. However, this
study only investigated three patients, thus not allowing
statistical analysis. Solitto et al. also investigated vitamin
D levels in XP-patients for six years [21]. During this observation
period XP-patients even showed normal serum levels for both
metabolites 25-OHD and 1,25-(OH)2D. In addition to this finding,
Solitto et al. could also not find a seasonal influence in
these patients on vitamin D levels. The authors concluded that sun
protection applied by XP patients does not vary during the year in
order to achieve complete UV-avoidance.
In addition to XP, studies in patients suffering from lupus
erythematosus, another skin disease requiring stringent
sun-protection, revealed that patients also showed reduced vitamin
D levels but in this study the authors found this to be more likely
due to inflammation or therapeutic application of systemic
glucocorticoids rather than sun-protection [23], thus supporting
our finding that the application of stringent sun protection is not
causally involved in reduced vitamin D serum levels.
De novo synthesis by UVB is known to be the most important
source of vitamin D, but physiological serum levels can also be
reached by oral uptake [14, 24]. It was not in the scope of this
study to investigate the relationship between oral vitamin D
substitution and subsequent serum levels. Furthermore, in our study
we did not find reduced levels for serum calcium, osteoporosis or
increased incidence of bone fractures.
Nevertheless, as a result of our study, we do recommend oral
vitamin D substitution for XP-patients as well as other individuals
who have to avoid any type of exposure to ultraviolet
radiation.
As with 25-OHD, serum levels of 1,25-(OH)2D, also showed no
association with type of sun protection but there was a positive
association with the duration of all types of sun-protection taken
together. However, this occurred only after decades of sun
protection. Therefore, it appears prudent to say that with regards
to this type of vitamin D, there may also be a potential risk of
reduced levels of vitamin D serum levels but in order to observe
this, the most rigid regimen to avoid any form of UV-exposure has
to be applied for 30 years or longer.
Acknowledgements
Financial support: this study was in part supported by La Roche
Posay. Conflict of interest: M.B. has received lecture honoraria
from La Roche Posay.
References
1 Cleaver JE. Defective repair replication of DNA in xeroderma
pigmentosum. Nature 1968; 218: 652-6.
2 Kleijer WJ, Laugel V, Berneburg M, et al.
Incidence of DNA repair deficiency disorders in western Europe:
Xeroderma pigmentosum, Cockayne syndrome and trichothiodystrophy.
DNA Repair (Amst) 2008; 7: 744-50.
3 Berneburg M, Lehmann AR. Xeroderma pigmentosum and
related disorders: defects in DNA repair and transcription. Adv
Genet 2001; 43: 71-102.
4 Bootsma D, Kraemer KH, Cleaver JE,
Hoeijmakers JHJ. Nucleotide excision repair syndromes:
Xeroderma pigmentosum, Cockayne syndrome, and trichothyodystrophy.
New York: McGraw Hill, 1998.
5 Kraemer KH, Lee MM, Scotto J. Xeroderma
pigmentosum. Cutaneous, ocular, and neurologic abnormalities in 830
published cases. Arch Dermatol 1987; 123: 241-50.
6 Lehmann AR. DNA repair-deficient diseases, xeroderma
pigmentosum, Cockayne syndrome and trichothiodystrophy. Biochimie
2003; 85: 1101-11.
7 Kraemer KH, Lee MM, Scotto J. DNA repair
protects against cutaneous and internal neoplasia: evidence from
xeroderma pigmentosum. Carcinogenesis 1984; 5: 511-4.
8 Friedberg EC, Walker G. C., and Siede, W. DNA Repair
and Mutagenesis. Washington DC: ASM press, 1995.
9 Pillai S, Bikle DD, Elias PM.
1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D production and receptor binding in human
keratinocytes varies with differentiation. J Biol Chem 1988; 263:
5390-5.
10 Lehmann B, Sauter W, Knuschke P, et al.
Demonstration of UVB-induced synthesis of 1
alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (calcitriol) in human skin by
microdialysis. Arch Dermatol Res 2003; 295: 24-8.
11 Lu J, Goldstein KM, Chen P, et al.
Transcriptional profiling of keratinocytes reveals a vitamin
D-regulated epidermal differentiation network. J Invest Dermatol
2005; 124: 778-85.
12 Hosl M, Berneburg M. Vitamin D and the skin.
Hautarzt 2008; 59: 737-42.
13 Lehmann B, Meurer M. Extrarenal sites of calcitriol
synthesis: the particular role of the skin. Recent Results Cancer
Res 2003; 164: 135-45.
14 Holick MF. Evolution and function of vitamin D. Recent
Results Cancer Res 2003; 164: 3-28.
15 Lehmann B, Genehr T, Knuschke P, et al.
UVB-induced conversion of 7-dehydrocholesterol to
1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in an in vitro human skin equivalent
model. J Invest Dermatol 2001; 117: 1179-85.
16 Querings K, Reichrath J. A plea for the analysis of
Vitamin-D levels in patients under photoprotection, including
patients with xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) and basal cell nevus
syndrome (BCNS). Cancer Causes Control 2004; 15: 219.
17 Lautenschlager S, Wulf HC, Pittelkow MR. Photoprotection.
Lancet 2007; 370: 528-37.
18 Broughton BC, Berneburg M, Fawcett H,
et al. Two individuals with features of both xeroderma
pigmentosum and trichothiodystrophy highlight the complexity of the
clinical outcomes of mutations in the XPD gene. Hum Mol Genet 2001;
10: 2539-47.
19 Kruse K. Vitamin D and Parathyroid. Basel: Karger,
2003.
20 Holick MF. Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med 2007; 357:
266-81.
21 Sollitto RB, Kraemer KH, DiGiovanna JJ. Normal
vitamin D levels can be maintained despite rigorous
photoprotection: six years' experience with xeroderma pigmentosum.
J Am Acad Dermatol 1997; 37: 942-7.
22 Reichrath J. Sunlight, skin cancer and vitamin D: What
are the conclusions of recent findings that protection against
solar ultraviolet (UV) radiation causes 25-hydroxyvitamin D
deficiency in solid organ-transplant recipients, xeroderma
pigmentosum, and other risk groups? J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol
2007; 103: 664-7.
23 Renne J, Werfel T, Wittmann M. High frequency
of vitamin D deficiency among patients with cutaneous lupus
erythematosus. Br J Dermatol 2008; 159: 485-6; [corrected].
24 Mocanu V, Stitt PA, Costan AR, et al.
Long-term effects of giving nursing home residents bread fortified
with 125 microg (5000 IU) vitamin D(3) per daily serving. Am J Clin
Nutr 2009; 89: 1132-7.
|