ARTICLE
Auteur(s) : Daniela Mölleken1, Hertha
Richter-Appelt2, Stefan Stodieck1, Thomas Bengner3
1Epilepsy Center Hamburg, Protestant Hospital
Alsterdorf, Hamburg
2Institute for Sexual Research and Forensic
Psychiatry, University Clinic Eppendorf, University
of Hamburg
3Charité, Campus Mitte, Department of Psychiatry
and Psychotherapy, Berlin, Germany
Article reçu le 12 Decembre 2009, accepté le 26 Avril 2010
Epilepsy is associated with an increased rate of sexual
dysfunction in women and men (Morrell et al., 1994; Morrell
and Guldner, 1996; Herzog et al., 2005). The aetiology of
sexual dysfunction in epilepsy is probably multifactorial (Morrell,
1991), based on endocrinological, neurological, pharmacological,
psychological, and social factors (Baird et al., 2003;
Devinsky, 2005; De Souza et al., 2000; Morrell et al.,
2005; Harden, 2002; Lambert, 2001). While endocrinological and
pharmaceutical correlates have frequently been studied, studies
focusing on psychological influences are far less reported
(Talbot et al., 2008). The present study investigated the
influence of personality on sexual dysfunction in epilepsy
patients.
The term “sexual dysfunction” may refer to different aspects
such as erectile dysfunction or decrease in libido. In the present
study we documented sexual well-being using a comprehensive
questionnaire covering several sexual functions and aspects in
women and men (Derogatis et al., 1991; Derogatis, 1997). We
have used the term sexual quality of life (SQOL) (Arrington
et al., 2004) which encompasses five to six different domains
which include: (a) interest, desire, and libido, (b) satisfaction
with or quality of sexual experiences such as ejaculation or orgasm
and pain or discomfort with sex, (c) sufficient excitement and
arousal, for example, as shown by sufficient erection
or lubrication for intercourse, (d) the ability to
achieve an orgasm, (e) attitudes or behaviours, for example,
feelings of avoidance or embarrassment and fluctuation in the
frequency of sexual intercourse, and (f) the impact of sexual
functioning on the relationship (Derogatis, 1997; Arrington
et al., 2004).
Personality has an influence on quality of life in healthy
adults (Ramanaiah et al., 1997). An influential model of
personality is the five-factor model (e.g. Costa and McCrae, 1992)
which distinguishes between openness to new experiences,
conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism.
Epilepsy is often related to accentuated personality traits (Rose
et al., 1996), and a substantial number of epilepsy patients
suffer from low quality of life. Thus, personality changes due to
epilepsy may have a negative impact on the patient's quality of
life. For example, increased neuroticism in epilepsy patients
correlates with depression and anxiety and is inversely related to
quality of life (Swinkels et al., 2003). Moreover, low quality
of life and depression (with or without antidepressant medication)
is frequently related to decreased libido (Mathew and Weinman,
1982). Accordingly, epilepsy patients with symptoms of depression
and anxiety frequently also suffer from sexual dysfunction (De
Souza et al., 2000; Morrell et al., 2005; Talbot
et al., 2008). In the present study, we hypothesized that
accentuated personality traits in epilepsy patients may have a
negative influence on their SQOL.
It is known that certain personality traits may have a positive
or negative influence on sexual quality of life. For example, in
patients with sexual problems, elevated neuroticism is correlated
with dysphoric symptoms, negative body image, and lowered sexual
satisfaction. On the other hand, more extraverted patients
with sexual problems report more sexual drive and experience a
more positive body image, and more positive affects in
relation to sexuality than patients with low extraversion (Costa
et al., 1992). Furthermore, openness to new experiences is
positively correlated with the range of sexual experiences, a
liberal attitude towards sex, and sexual drive and fantasy (Costa
et al., 1992). In the present study we hypothesised that while
extraversion and openness could have a positive effect, neuroticism
could have a negative effect on SQOL in epilepsy patients.
SQOL and its determinants may differ between the sexes.
Interestingly, sexual dysfunction is related to psychological and
social problems in women, but to self-reported physical problems in
men (Harris et al., 2008; Dunn et al., 1999). In order to
study SQOL in both women and men with epilepsy, the DISF-SR
(Derogatis et al., 1991; Derogatis, 1997; Derogatis, 1996) was
selected as a questionnaire to determine sexual quality of life.
This inventory includes almost identical versions for women and
men, but at the same time still carefully considers important
differences between the sexes in relation to arousal and
orgasm.
Methods
Patients
This study received prior approval from the hospital's ethics
committee and has been performed in accordance with the ethical
standards laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki of 1975, as
revised in 1983. Each participant gave informed consent to the
study. Forty-nine patients were included in the present study (23
women and 26 men). Fifteen patients had generalised epilepsy
and 34 patients had focal epilepsy. In order to compare the
patients’ results with healthy individuals, we report norm scores
for the different questionnaires in addition to the raw scores. The
patient sample reported in this study is part of an ongoing
research project (see Mölleken et al., 2009). The criteria for
inclusion were age, between 18 and 65 years, and fluency
in German. Exclusion criteria were psychiatric diagnoses other than
depression or anxiety disorder, a verbal intelligence quotient
below 75, and the intake of enzyme-inducing AEDs. Crystallized
verbal intelligence quotient (IQ) was estimated using the German
vocabulary test “Wortschatztest” (Schmidt and Metzler, 1992).
Patients with diseases other than epilepsy (e.g. hypothyroidism,
sleep disorder) or receiving medication other than AEDs (e.g.
antidepressants) were also excluded from this study.
Procedures
All patients admitted to the clinic between February 2006 and March
2007 were asked to participate in the study if they met the
inclusion criteria. Sixty-two of 199 patients (31%) refused to
take part or did not return the questionnaires. Of these patients,
three had generalised epilepsy, 34 had focal epilepsy,
12 patients had a psychiatric diagnosis, nine had diagnoses
other than epilepsy or psychiatric illness, two patients had
epilepsy of unclear aetiology, and in two patients the diagnosis
remained unclear even after intensive video-EEG-monitoring. Thirty
patients were women and 32 were men. The mean age was
37 years (n = 62; SD = 12).
Of the remaining 137 patients, we further excluded
88 patients based on the following (many patients had two or
more reasons leading to their exclusion): 48 patients had a
psychiatric co-morbidity other than self-reported depression or
anxiety disorder (mostly substance abuse or alcohol abuse);
patients with organic amnesic syndrome were also excluded, as we
felt that these patients may not have been able to reflect on their
past experiences well enough to fill out the questionnaires
validly; 23 patients had a neurological co-morbidity other
than epilepsy (e.g. severe head injury, stroke); 14 patients
had internal co-morbidities (e.g. urological diagnoses, thyroid
disease, heart disease); 13 patients received a primary
diagnosis other than epilepsy (e.g. sleep disturbance, syncope due
to non-neurological reasons); 12 epilepsy patients took
enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs known to influence SQOL
(Mölleken et al., 2009). In addition, five patients otherwise
suited to the study did not complete all three questionnaires
relating to SQOL, life satisfaction, and personality (see below),
and were thus also excluded. Patients received the questionnaires
during the first three days of their stay, as the questionnaires
related to the preceding four weeks.
Assessment of SQOL
We employed the German version of the DISF-SR (Derogatis
et al., 1991; Derogatis, 1997; Derogatis, 1996). The inventory
includes versions for women and men, each composed of 25 items
assessing five SQOL domains: cognition and fantasy (abbreviated to
“fantasy”; five items), arousal (five items), behaviour and
experience (“experience”; five items), orgasm (six items), and
drive and relationship (“drive”; four items). The domains
”fantasy”, “experience”, and “drive” use identical items for both
versions. In the domain “arousal” both of the two items differ
between the two versions. In total, of the 25 items, seven are
different between the two versions. Items are answered on either
five- or nine-point scales. The five-point scale ranges from “not
at all” to “very much so” and questions, for example, the quality
of orgasm. One nine-point scale ranges from “not at all” to “four
times a day or more often” and questions, for example, the
frequency of sexual arousal. The other nine-point scale ranges from
“could not be worse” to “could not be better” and questions, for
example, overall sexual drive. The DISF-SR has proven reliability
(internal consistency, test-retest and inter-rater reliability) and
construct validity (Derogatis, 1997). Higher scores represent
better SQOL. In addition to the raw scores, we report T-scores for
women and men for the five subscales and the overall score (mean =
50; SD = 10). The norms are based on community populations (n =
277). In the DISF-SR, women require ten raw score points less than
men in the overall score (73 versus 83) to reach a gender-keyed
T-value of 50 and nine raw score points less in the sub-scale
“fantasy” (16 versus 25). This means the gender-keyed norm scores
adjust for generally less frequent sexual fantasies in women than
in men. The raw score, to reach a T-value of 50, is very similar or
identical between women and men in the sub-scales relating to
arousal (13 versus 13), experiences (14 versus 14), orgasm (16
versus 17), and drive (15 versus 15). It is important to note that
even when all items differ between women and men in the sub-scale
relating to arousal, the relationship of raw and norm scores is
identical in women and men.
Assessment of personality
The NEO-FFI was used to assess neuroticism, extraversion, openness,
agreeableness, and conscientiousness (Costa and McCrae, 1992;
Borkenau and Ostendorf, 1993). It contains 60 items on a
five-point scale, ranging from “strongly agree” to “strongly
disagree”. The NEO-FFI has proven reliability (internal
consistency, test-retest reliability) and construct validity
(Borkenau and Ostendorf, 1993). We report gender-keyed T scores
(mean = 0; SD = 1). The norms are based on a representative sample
of 2,112 adult healthy individuals.
Assessment of general life satisfaction, depression,
and trait anxiety
As a control measure, general life satisfaction was assessed using
the Life Satisfaction Questionnaire (Fahrenberg et al., 2000).
This inventory covers ten areas of life (health, professional life,
financial situation, leisure and hobbies, marriage and partnership,
relationship to own children, self-esteem, sexuality, social life
and living situation). Each domain includes seven items, rated on a
seven-point scale from “very unhappy” to “very content”. An overall
score is calculated from seven domains (excluding professional
life, marriage and partnership, and relationship to own children).
The Life Satisfaction Questionnaire has proven reliability
(internal consistency) and construct validity (Fahrenberg
et al., 2000). We report the overall raw score and the
respective gender-keyed and age-corrected norm-score on a
nine-point standard scale (mean = 5; SD = 2). The norms were based
on a representative sample of 2,780 healthy individuals. As
a further control measure, we quantified depressive symptoms
with the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI; Hautzinger et al.,
1993). Anxiety symptoms were quantified by the “trait” sub-scale of
the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI; Laux et al., 1981).
We report age-corrected, gender-keyed percentile scores for women
and men.
Diagnostic work-up
All patients underwent a diagnostic workup with 24- to 72-hour
video-EEG-monitoring, and structural magnetic resonance imaging
studies. Focal epilepsy diagnosis was based on seizure semiology
and interictal or ictal EEG abnormalities. Auras and seizure
semiology were documented as reported by either the patient,
witnesses, or during video-telemetry or video-EEG monitoring
(Lüders et al., 1998; Manford, 2001; Rosenow et al.,
2001). Idiopathic generalised epilepsy was defined by typical
semiology of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, absence seizures, or
primary generalised tonic-clonic seizures and generalised EEG
patterns during video/EEG monitoring. Patients taking more than one
antiepileptic drug (AED) were classified as receiving
“polytherapy”. Patients receiving phenytoin, carbamazepine, or
primidone were classified as “taking an enzyme-inducing AED”.
Statistical methods
We analyzed the influence of personality on SQOL by stepwise
backward multiple linear regression analysis with an exclusion
criterion of F < 3. We used both raw and norm scores for these
analyses. The DISF-SR overall score was used as the dependent
variable, and the five NEO-FFI personality factor scores were used
as independent variables. Overall life satisfaction and sex were
used as control variables (for further detail see “results” section
below).
Results
The demographic and clinical description of the patient sample is
described in table 1. Mean values
for the DISF-SR scores, the NEO-FFI scores and the further control
scores are given in table 2. In
order to depict a decrease of SQOL in our sample, we report the
mean norm values of the DISF-SR for women and men as provided by
the questionnaire manuals with the mean T-score in the healthy norm
sample. As can be seen in table 2,
lower DISF scores were reported in women than men, visible in all
raw and norm scores. Also, women's DISF overall score was one
standard deviation below the expected mean, while men showed normal
SQOL in comparison with the norm values given in the manual. In
contrast, men showed relatively low life satisfaction. Women and
men did not differ with respect to symptoms of anxiety and
depression as tested by BDI and STAI. Moreover, our sample did not
show elevated symptoms of depression or anxiety (table 1). Both women and men exhibited low
norm scores in extraversion and openness to new experiences, and
high norm scores in neuroticism (table 2). Agreeableness and conscientiousness
did not differ from the mean of the norm population.
To test the hypothesis of the present study, i.e. whether
personality traits influence SQOL in epilepsy patients, we
calculated a regression analysis with the DISF-SR overall score as
the dependent variable, and the five personality factor scores,
sex, and the life satisfaction score as independent variables (n =
49). DISF-SR overall T-score was predicted by sex (t (46) = - 2.7,
beta = - 0.36, p = 0.007) and the T-score for extraversion (t (46)
= 3.1, beta = 0.39, p = 0.003). This model explained 22% of the
variance (corrected R2 = 0.22, F (2,46) = 7.8, p =
0.001). The effect of extraversion on DISF-SR overall T-score is
illustrated in figure 1. When using
raw scores from the questionnaires instead of the norm scores, we
received a very similar result. DISF-SR overall raw score was
predicted by sex (t (46) = - 3.9, beta = - 0.48, p <
0.001) and extraversion (t (46) = 3.0, beta = 0.37, p = 0.004). The
model explained 29% of the variance (corrected R2 =
0.29, F (2,46) = 10.7, p < 0.001).
We subsequently explored the more fine-grained influence of sex,
the five personality factors, and life satisfaction on the
different SQOL sub-scales. We calculated five regression analyses
with the different DISF-SR sub-scores as the dependent variable,
and the five personality factor scores, sex, and the life
satisfaction score as independent variables (n = 49). Employing the
norms scores, we obtained the following results:
1) DISF-SR fantasy was predicted by sex (t (45) = - 3.6,
beta = - 0.44, p < 0.001), extraversion (t (45) = 3.7, beta =
0.46, p < 0.001), and conscientiousness (t (45) = - 2.2, beta =
- 0.28, p = 0.03). The model explained 31% of variance (corrected
R2, F (3,45) = 8.1, p < 0.001);
2) DISF-SR arousal was predicted by sex (t (47) = - 3.0,
beta = - 0.40, p = 0.003). The model explained 15% of variance
(corrected R2, F (1,47) = 9.2, p = 0.004);
3) DISF-SR experience was predicted by extraversion
(t (47) = 2.9, beta = 0.39, p = 0.006). The model explained
13% of variance (corrected R2, F (1,47) = 8.2, p =
0.006);
4) DISF-SR orgasm was predicted by sex (t (45) = - 2.4,
beta = - 0.32, p < 0.02), agreeableness (t (45) = - 2.8, beta =
- 0.41, p = 0.006), and life satisfaction (t (45) = 3.4, beta =
0.49, p = 0.001). The model explained 21% of variance (corrected
R2, F (3,45) = 5.3, p = 0.003);
5) DISF-SR drive was predicted by sex (t (44) = - 3.2,
beta = - 0.43, p = 0.003), agreeableness (t (44) = - 2.6, beta = -
0.36, p = 0.01), conscientiousness (t (44) = - 1.9, beta = - 0.27,
p = 0.06), and life satisfaction (t (44) = 4.0, beta = 0.62, p <
0.001). The model explained 25% of variance (corrected
R2, F (4,44) = 5.0, p = 0.002).
We also re-calculated the five latter analyses with raw scores
instead of norm scores. This lead to very similar results when the
identical variables were included in the respective regression
models, and only minor changes in the beta scores, or the amount of
variance explained by the models. It is important to note that we
did not correct these post-hoc analyses for multiple significance
tests, and the alpha error of the reported significances may thus
be inflated. However, the resulting regression models remain
significant even when the significance level was raised to p <
0.01.
As a side result of the present study, we further tested
correlations between the five personality factors and
life satisfaction in our patient sample (n = 49). Using
raw scores, life satisfaction correlated negatively with
neuroticism (r = - 0.58; p < 0.001), and positively with
extraversion (r = 0.57; p < 0.001), agreeableness (r = 0.44; p =
0.04), and conscientiousness (r = 0.40; p = 0.04).
Table 1 Demographic and clinical description
of the patient sample.
|
Variable
|
n = 49
|
Men
|
Women
|
|
Sex (women/men)
|
23/26
|
|
|
|
Age (years; mean, SD)
|
34 (11)
|
34 (11)
|
34 (11)
|
|
Verbal IQ
|
98 (12)
|
100 (12)
|
98 (12)
|
|
Partnership (marriage or partnership vs. single)
|
34/15
|
16/10
|
18/5
|
|
Duration of partnership (n = 34; median, quartiles)
|
7 (2;15)
|
6 (2;16)
|
8 (2;14)
|
|
Body Mass Index (mean, SD)
|
27 (6)
|
28 (5)
|
27 (7)
|
|
Focal epilepsy/generalised epilepsy
|
34/15
|
18/8
|
16/7
|
|
Duration of epilepsy (years; median; quartiles)
|
11 (3;25)
|
15 (4;23)
|
10 (1;28)
|
|
Seizure frequency (none/rare/often/very often)
|
3/9/18/19
|
2/7/10/7
|
1/2/8/12
|
|
Poly-/Monotherapy/No AEDs
|
15/22/12
|
9/12/5
|
6/10/7
|
|
BDI (sum score; median, quartiles)
|
9 (2;14)
|
8.5 (2;15)
|
10 (2;12)
|
|
STAI (percentiles; mean = 50; SD = 34)
|
|
69.5 (29.7)
|
63.9 (29.0)
|
|
Life satisfaction (raw score)
|
237 (41)
|
230 (45)
|
245 (35)
|
|
Life satisfaction (Stanine; mean = 5; SD = 2)
|
|
3.7 (2.3)
|
4.5 (1.9)
|
Table 2 Mean DISF and NEO FFI scores for women and
men, and for the overall group.
|
Scale
|
|
n = 49
|
|
Men
|
Women
|
|
DISF fantasy, raw score
|
|
21 (11)
|
|
27.0 (7.9)
|
14.2 (9.9)
|
|
T-score (mean = 50, SD =10)
|
|
|
|
53.4 (9.2)
|
45.6 (12.3)
|
|
DISF arousal, raw score
|
|
14 (9)
|
|
17.3 (10.0)
|
9.4 (6.6)
|
|
T-score
|
|
|
|
56 (19.4)
|
40.1 (15.0)
|
|
DISF experience, raw score
|
|
11 (8)
|
|
12.5 (8.3)
|
10.3 (7.5)
|
|
T-score
|
|
|
|
45.9 (15.3)
|
43.4 (14.8)
|
|
DISF orgasm, raw score
|
|
13 (8)
|
|
15.4 (7.6)
|
10.6 (7.9)
|
|
T-score
|
|
|
|
46.3 (16.3)
|
40.7 (13.8)
|
|
DISF drive, raw score
|
|
13 (5)
|
|
14.8 (4.5)
|
11.8 (5.5)
|
|
T-score
|
|
|
|
47.8 (12.0)
|
42.0 (14.0)
|
|
DISF overall score
|
|
71 (34)
|
|
84.9 (28.8)
|
56.3 (32.5)
|
|
T-score
|
|
|
|
50.8 (15.9)
|
40.0 (17.2)
|
|
NEO-FFI Extraversion, raw score
|
|
2.2 (0.5)
|
|
2.1 (0.6)
|
2.2 (0.5)
|
|
T-score (mean = 0; SD =1)
|
|
|
|
-0.5 (1.0)
|
-0.3 (0.9)
|
|
NEO-FFI Neuroticism, raw score
|
|
2.0 (0.6)
|
|
1.9 (0.7)
|
2.0 (0.5)
|
|
T-score
|
|
|
|
0.4 (1.0)
|
0.1 (0.7)
|
|
NEO-FFI Openness, raw score
|
|
2.3 (0.5)
|
|
2.2 (0.5)
|
2.4 (0.4)
|
|
T-score
|
|
|
|
-0.9 (0.9)
|
-0.7 (0.8)
|
|
NEO-FFI Agreeableness, raw score
|
|
2.5 (0.5)
|
|
2.5 (0.4)
|
2.5 (0.5)
|
|
T-score
|
|
|
|
0.2 (0.9)
|
0.0 (1.2)
|
|
NEO-FFI Conscientiousness, raw score
|
|
2.7 (0.5)
|
|
2.8 (0.6)
|
2.5 (0.5)
|
|
T-score
|
|
|
|
0.3 (0.9)
|
0.0 (0.7)
|
Discussion
In the present study, low extraversion and female sex were
associated with decreased SQOL in epilepsy patients. Our results
suggest that, in particular, introverted women with epilepsy may
have an elevated risk of a decreased SQOL. This result is in line
with our initial hypothesis that accentuated personality traits may
negatively influence SQOL in epilepsy patients.
To our knowledge, the negative influence of low extraversion on
SQOL has not previously been reported in epilepsy patients. In our
study, extraversion was related to the frequency of sexual
fantasies and sexual experiences, and to overall SQOL. In an
earlier study in patients with sexual problems but without
epilepsy, higher extraversion was related to increased drive, more
sexual experience, a positive body image, and more positive affects
in relation to sexuality (Costa et al., 1992). The effect of
extraversion on the frequency of sexual experiences found in this
earlier study has therefore been replicated in our study. In
addition, we observed that extraversion was only moderately
decreased in men and women with epilepsy when compared with the
norm value, as provided by the NEO-FFI manual. Future studies
should analyse causes of lower extraversion in epilepsy. We also
found low openness to new experiences and high neuroticism in
epilepsy patients. However, in contrast to an earlier study, we
found no correlation with overall SQOL (Costa et al.,
1992).
In the present study, women with epilepsy had less frequent
sexual fantasies and sexual arousal, lower orgasm quality, and
lower sexual drive than men with epilepsy. The effect of sex on
SQOL in epilepsy in the present paper became evident based on both
raw scores and gender-keyed norm scores. Moreover, lower DISF-SR
scores were reported for women than men with epilepsy, again
visible in all raw and norm scores. Also, the DISF-SR overall score
of women was one standard deviation below the expected mean as
provided by the test manual, while men showed normal SQOL. Thus,
although the DISF-SR versions for men and women may differ in some
respects, the lower SQOL we report for women cannot be attributed
to the differences in the inventories for women and men in some of
the sub-scales (see “methods” section). Also, the lower DISF-SR
overall score in women is not explained by more severe
depression or lower life satisfaction in women than in men with
epilepsy. We conclude that women with epilepsy have a decreased
SQOL compared to the expected SQOL in healthy women (table 2) and in comparison to men with
epilepsy. To our knowledge, this is the first study to directly
compare SQOL in women and men. However, future studies comparing
SQOL in women and men with epilepsy should include healthy
participants in their analysis, to further validate this
interpretation.
In contrast to earlier studies (e.g. Herzog et al., 2005),
we observed that men with epilepsy had normal SQOL. In a recent
related paper, we reported that enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs
negatively influence SQOL in men, but not in women (Mölleken
et al., 2009). In the present study, we excluded twelve
patients taking enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs and this may
explain why we could not observe a decrease of SQOL in men, and may
account for differences of SQOL in epilepsy reported elsewhere.
Based on the present study, we cannot determine whether the
correlation between extraversion and SQOL is causal, or merely an
association. For example, epilepsy and psychosocial responses to
the disease may lead to reduced quality of life that in turn might
result in a change of personality. However, former longitudinal
studies on the influence of personality on quality of life in
epilepsy patients were able to show a causal influence of
pre-operative personality on post-operative psychosocial adjustment
and health-related quality of life (Rose et al., 1996). Also,
extraversion has been shown to be very stable throughout life
(Srivastava et al., 2003). In contrast, sexual quality of life
can be sensitive to changes in relation to life circumstances
(Arrington et al., 2004). It is plausible therefore
that this asymmetry of extraversion and SQOL reflects a causal
influence of extraversion on SQOL in this study, and not vice
versa.
As mentioned in the introduction, certain personality traits in
epilepsy patients are associated with depression and anxiety
(Swinkels et al., 2003). On the other hand, depression and
anxiety are frequently associated with reduced sexual quality of
life (De Souza et al., 2000; Morrell et al., 2005; Talbot
et al., 2008). This raises the question as to whether
personality is directly associated with SQOL or whether the
reported association between extraversion and SQOL is mediated by
depression and anxiety. The lack of significant depression and
anxiety in our sample suggests that mediation is not the
answer.
One theoretical implication of the present research is the need
for future studies on SQOL in epilepsy to recognise the influence
of extraversion and sex on SQOL. As a clinical implication,
personality traits and especially extraversion should be
investigated using appropriate questionnaires, together with
inventories of sexual quality of life, especially for women with
epilepsy. Furthermore, our results raise the possibility that
decreased SQOL in epilepsy patients due to introversion may be
overcome by strengthening self-confidence by means of social skills
training in adolescents (e.g. Cheng and Furnham, 2002). Our
research underlines the view that the decrease in SQOL in epilepsy
is multifactorial and calls for a multidisciplinary approach to
ensure appropriate treatment (Morrell, 1991; Harden, 2002; Talbot
et al., 2008).
Disclosure
None of the authors has any conflict of interest to disclose.
References
[Arrington et al., 2004] Arrington R, Cofrancesco J,
Wu AW. Questionnaires to measure sexual quality of life. Qual
Life Res 2004; 13: 1643-58.
[Baird et al., 2003] Baird AD, Wilson SJ,
Bladin PF, Saling MM, Reutens DC. Sexual outcome
after epilepsy surgery. Epilepsy Behav 2003; 4: 268-78.
[Borkenau and Ostendorf, 1993] Borkenau P,
Ostendorf F. NEO-Fünf-Faktoren Inventar (NEO-FFI). Göttingen:
Hogrefe, 1993.
[Cheng and Furnham, 2002] Cheng H, Furnham A.
Personality, peer relations, and self-confidence as predictors of
happiness and loneliness. J Adolesc 2002; 25: 327-39.
[Costa and McCrae, 1992] Costa PT, McCrae RR. Revised
NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and the Five Factor Inventory
(NEO-FFI): professional manual. Odessa, Florida: Psychological
Assessment Resources Inc, 1992.
[Costa et al., 1992] Costa PT, Fagan PJ,
Piedmont RL, Ponticas Y, Wise TN. The five-factor
model of personality and sexual functioning in outpatient men and
women. Psychiatr Med 1992; 10: 199-215.
[Derogatis, 1996] Derogatis LR. Derogatis Interview For
Sexual Functioning (DISF/DISF-SR). Baltimore, MD: Preliminary
Scoring, Procedures & Administration Manual. Clinical
Psychometric Research, 1996.
[Derogatis, 1997] Derogatis LR. The Derogatis Interview for
Sexual Functioning (DISF/DISF-SR): an introductory report. J Sex
Marital Ther 1997; 23: 291-304.
[Derogatis et al., 1991] Derogatis L, Meyer J,
King KM. Psychopathology in individuals with sexual
dysfunction. Am J Psychiatry 1991; 138: 757-62.
[De Souza et al., 2000] De Souza EAP,
Keiralla DMB, Silveira DC, Guerriero CAM. Sexual
dysfunction in epilepsy. Identifying the psychological variables.
Arquivos Neuro-Psiquiatria 2000; 58: 214-20.
[Devinsky, 2005] Devinsky O. Neurologist-induced sexual
dysfunction. Enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs. Neurology 2005;
65: 980-1.
[Dunn et al., 1999] Dunn KM, Croft PR,
Hackett GI. Association of sexual problems with social,
psychological, and physical problems in men and women: a cross
sectional population survey. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999; 53:
144-8.
[Fahrenberg et al., 2000] Fahrenberg J, Myrtek M,
Schumacher J, Brähler E. Fragebogen zur
Lebenszufriedenheit. Göttingen: Hogrefe Verlag für Psychologie,
2000.
[Harris et al., 2008] Harris JM, Cherkas LF,
Kato BS, Spector TD, Heiman JR. Normal variations in
personality are associated with coital orgasmic infrequency in
heterosexual women: A population-based study. J Sex Med 2008;
5: 1177-83.
[Harden, 2002] Harden CL. Treatment of sexual disorders in
people with epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 2002; 3: 38-41.
[Hautzinger et al., 1993] Hautzinger M, Bailer M,
Worall H, Keller F. Beck-Depressions-Inventar, Manual.
Bern: Huber Verlag, 1993.
[Herzog et al., 2005] Herzog AG, Drislane FW,
Schomer DL, et al. Differential effects of antiepileptic
drugs on sexual function and hormones in men with epilepsy.
Neurology 2005; 65: 1016-20.
[Lambert, 2001] Lambert MV. Seizures, hormones and
sexuality. Seizure 2001; 10: 319-40.
[Laux et al., 1981] Laux L, Glanzmann P,
Schaffner P, Spielberger CD. STAI-deutsche Fassung.
Göttingen: Manual. Beltz Test GmbH, 1981.
[Lüders et al., 1998] Lüders H, Acharya J,
Baumgartner C, et al. Semiological seizure
classification. Epilepsia 1998; 39: 1006-13.
[Manford, 2001] Manford M. Assessment and investigation of
possible epileptic seizures. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001; 70
(Suppl. II): ii3-ii8.
[Mathew and Weinman, 1982] Mathew RJ, Weinman ML.
Sexual dysfunction in depression. Arch Sex Behav 1982; 11:
323-8.
[Mölleken et al., 2009] Mölleken D,
Richter-Appelt H, Stodieck S, Bengner T. Sexual
quality of life in epilepsy: correlations with sex hormone blood
levels. Epilepsy Behav 2009; 14: 226-31.
[Morrell, 1991] Morrell MJ. Sexual dysfunction in epilepsy.
Epilepsia 1991; 32: 38-45.
[Morrell et al., 1994] Morrell MJ, Sperling MR,
Stecker M, Dichter MA. Sexual dysfunction in partial
epilepsy: a deficit in physiologic sexual arousal. Neurology 1994;
44: 243-7.
[Morrell and Guldner, 1996] Morrell MJ, Guldner GT.
Self-reported sexual function and sexual arousability in women with
epilepsy. Epilepsia 1996; 37: 1204-10.
[Morrell et al., 2005] Morrell MJ, Flynn KL,
Done S, Flaster E, Kalayjian L, Pack AM. Sexual
dysfunction, sex steroid abnormalities, and depression in women
with epilepsy treated with antiepileptic drugs. Epilepsy Behav
2005; 6: 360-5.
[Ramanaiah et al., 1997] Ramanaiah NV,
Detwiler FR, Byravan A. Life satisfaction and the
five-factor model of personality. Psychol Rep 1997; 80:
1208-10.
[Rose et al., 1996] Rose KJ, Derry PA,
McLachlan RS. Neuroticism in temporal lobe epilepsy:
assessment and implications for pre- and postoperative psychosocial
adjustment and health-related quality of life. Epilepsia 1996; 37:
484-91.
[Rosenow et al., 2001] Rosenow F, Hamer HM,
Knake S, et al. Lateralizing and localizing signs and
symptoms of epileptic seizures: Significance and application in
clinical practice. Nervenarzt 2001; 72: 743-9.
[Schmidt and Metzler, 1992] Schmidt KH, Metzler P.
Wortschatztest, Manual. Weinheim: Beltz, 1992.
[Srivastava et al., 2003] Srivastava S, John OP,
Gosling SD, Potter J. Development of personality in early
and middle adulthood: set like plaster or persistent change? J Pers
Soc Psychol 2003; 84: 1041-53.
[Swinkels et al., 2003] Swinkels WAM,
Duijsens IJ, Spinhoven PH. Personality disorder traits in
patients with epilepsy. Seizure 2003; 12: 587-94.
[Talbot et al., 2008] Talbot JA, Sheldrick R,
Caswell H, Duncan S. Sexual function in men with
epilepsy: how important is testosterone? Neurology 2008; 70:
1346-52.
|