ARTICLE
Auteur(s) : Georges Naasan1, Mohamad
Yabroudi1, Amal Rahi1, Mohamad A
Mikati1,2
1Department of Pediatrics, American University
of Beirut, Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
2Division of Pediatric Neurology, Children’s Health
Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina,
USA
Article reçu le 26 Juin 2009, accepté le 12 Octobre 2009
Pyridoxine-dependant epilepsy (PDE) was first described by Hunt
et al. in 1954. It is a rare disorder, encountered most
commonly in the first few days of life. Birth prevalence has been
studied previously in the UK and the Netherlands and found to be
roughly 1:783,000 and 1:396,000, respectively (Baxter, 1999;
Been et al., 2005). A study in South India determined
that 7.4% of children with intractable childhood epilepsy were
conclusively diagnosed with PDE, defined as intractable recurrent
seizures that respond to pyridoxine administration; seizures recur
when vitamin supplementation is discontinued and cease when
pyridoxine therapy is reinstituted (RamachandranNair and
Parameswaran, 2005).
Recent studies have demonstrated the efficiency of diagnostic
tests such as measurements of urinary alpha-aminoadipic
semialdehyde (AASA) and pipecolic acid, as well as gene testing for
mutations in the antiquitin gene encoding for the AASA
dehydrogenase enzyme (Bok et al., 2007; Plecko et al.,
2007). Recognition of PDE is crucial for a proper diagnostic
approach and appropriate management. Due to the rarity of the
condition, the electroencephalographic (EEG) patterns of PDE,
whether ictal or interictal, are not fully defined and few
descriptions exist in the literature, of which most are rare case
reports and case series. Thus, additional observations are expected
to increase our knowledge of this disorder and especially our index
of suspicion, for the prompt recognition of the disease. Here, we
report our observations in four previously unreported PDE cases.
The objective of the study was to characterize, in particular, the
EEG manifestations rather than the clinical manifestations or
seizure types of PDE.
Materials and methods
The medical records and EEG recordings of four patients diagnosed
with pyridoxine-dependant epilepsy in our institution, the American
University of Beirut Medical Center in Lebanon, were reviewed. The
patients were diagnosed based on Baxter’s criteria (Baxter, 1999):
- – seizures were resistant to antiepileptic drugs and
ceased after administration of pyridoxine;
- – seizures were completely controlled by monotherapy
with pyridoxine;
- – recurrence of seizures was observed upon cessation of
pyridoxine therapy and controlled again after reinstitution of the
therapy.
For all patients, pyridoxine was withdrawn at follow-up, usually
6-12 months following initiation of therapy depending on the
progress of each case, and seizures usually subsequently recurred
one to four weeks later. Recent urinary AASA and genetic testing
currently preclude the use of pyridoxine withdrawal as a required
diagnostic criteria, however, at the time, such tests were not
available for patients, hence the use of the above diagnostic
criteria. EEG recordings were available for two patients prior to
pyridoxine therapy (however, these were recorded at four and
10 months of age and not in the neonatal period), two patients
immediately after pyridoxine treatment and in all four patients
during long-term follow-up receiving pyridoxine.
Results
Patient characteristics
The characteristics of the patients are summarized in table 1. All the patients were initially consulted
and treated elsewhere, thus the details concerning the type or
evolution of seizures were based only on the history given at the
time and further details were not available to us. None of the
patients gave a history of intrauterine movements, encephalopathy
or abdominal symptoms. Onset of seizures occurred in the first few
days of life (two to five days old). Three patients had generalized
tonic clonic seizures and one had a focal left-sided tonic clonic
seizure. These were the only types of seizures recorded as the
patients were not initially diagnosed or treated at our centre
during their neonatal period. Pyridoxine treatment was initiated
very early for two patients and delayed to four months and
10 months of age in the other two patients, due to a delay in
seeking specialized medical care. Pyridoxine was administered
orally, except for patient 1 who initially received treatment
intravenously and presented a mild immediate reaction consisting of
mild hypotonia. The patient was also monitored for respiratory
distress and apnoea, although none was recorded.
All the patients who received pyridoxine from the onset of
treatment to their last medical check-up were clinically
seizure-free (except those whose treatment was tapered). Two
patients with a delay in treatment presented moderate mental
retardation. All other concomitant antiepileptics were tapered off
and then stopped after starting pyridoxine therapy.
Table 1 Patients’ characteristics.
|
Patient no.
|
Age at onset of seizure
|
Seizure classification
|
Status epilepticus
|
Age when pyridoxine treatment was started
|
Pyridoxine dose during maintenance therapy
|
Long-term outcomea
|
|
1
|
5 days
|
Generalized tonic clonic
|
Yes
|
10 months
|
250 mg twice daily
|
At last follow-up (five years old), patient was seizure-free with
moderate mental retardation
|
|
2
|
4 days
|
Generalized tonic clonic
|
Yes
|
4 months
|
50 mg twice daily
|
At last follow-up (13 years old), patient was seizure-free with
moderate mental retardation
|
|
3
|
2 days
|
Generalized tonic clonic
|
No
|
2 days
|
40 mg once daily
|
At last follow-up (17 years old), patient was seizure-free with
normal development
|
|
4
|
5 days
|
Focal left sided tonic clonic
|
No
|
5 days
|
80 mg once dailyb
|
At last follow-up (15 years old), patient was seizure-free with
normal development
|
EEG before pyridoxine administration
The following EEG descriptions refer to the two patients in whom
treatment was delayed to four months and 10 months. EEGs of
the other pre-treated patients were not available and no serial EEG
studies before pyridoxine administration were available. For
patient 2, a pre-pyridoxine interictal EEG at four months of age
showed a burst suppression pattern that was most prominent in the
frontal central regions in some segments and diffuse slowing with
bilateral independent multifocal spikes and sharp waves in other
segments of the EEG. For patient 1, pre-pyridoxine ictal EEG at
10 months of age revealed an intermittent right hemispheric
burst suppression pattern consisting of 3-second periods of low to
moderate voltage theta with 1-second periods of high voltage sharp
theta and delta activity. The left hemisphere showed continuous
semi-rhythmic spike and slow wave activity, as well as (in other
segments of the EEG) generalized semi-rhythmic, usually bilaterally
synchronous, sharp and slow wave activity, maximal in the right
temporal area. Intermittently, the burst suppression pattern on the
right side would show right-sided beta discharges in the periods of
suppression (figure
1). During this recording, patient 1 was unresponsive
with frequent generalized clonic jerks occurring every one to few
seconds. Of note, both patients were receiving other
anticonvulsants (patient 2 received valproate and patient
1 received phenobarbital and phenytoin) before pyridoxine
treatment was started, which were later tapered off.
EEG after pyridoxine administration
For patient 2, the post-pyridoxine EEG showed a decrease in the
number of epileptiform discharges with complete resolution after
one month of receiving pyridoxine.
For patient 1, serial EEG tracings after pyridoxine
administration are summarized in table
2 with illustrations in figure 2. In particular,
patient 1 experienced an intermittent re-emergence of the
generalized burst suppression pattern at two days after initiation
of pyridoxine therapy, which was not persistent, but continued to
recur until day five (figure 2A, B). Moreover,
after the EEG on day five that showed only diffuse slowing with a
very brief period of burst suppression, a transient worsening was
noticed on day 22 of therapy. This manifested as bilateral,
predominantly right-sided, very frequent spikes and spike wave
discharges superimposed on a high voltage slow asymmetric
background in wakefulness and in sleep (figure 2C, D).
Table 2 Serial EEG findings of patient 1 (patient 1 was
an inpatient for the first week before becoming an outpatient).
|
Time after pyridoxine administration
|
EEG observations
|
|
10 minutes
|
Right-sided high voltage sharp theta activity with intervening
periods of lower amplitude activity; left-sided semi-rhythmic delta
activity that, after a few minutes, became polymorphic. Occasional
spikes (less than before pyridoxine treatment) seen on the
left.
|
|
20 minutes
|
Generalized burst suppression pattern with 1 to 2-sec burst periods
followed by 5-30 sec of complete voltage suppression.
|
|
2 days
|
Generalized rhythmic delta activity with intermixed sharp wave
activity of higher amplitude on the left side. Intermittently, for
a few minutes every 5-10 minutes, the generalized burst suppression
patterna re-emerged (figure 2A).
|
|
5 days
|
Diffuse slowing of the background with occasional multifocal spikes
seen bilaterally, most commonly over the left parietal area but
also over the left frontal, right parietal, right temporal and
right frontal regions. Burst suppressiona recurred once
on the right for one minute during the 30-minute recording (figure 2B, C).
|
|
22 days
|
High voltage slow asymmetric background with more slowing and
higher amplitudes over the right side in wakefulness and in sleep
with very frequent superimposed spikes and spike wave
dischargesb which were predominantly right sided (figure 2D).
|
|
8 months
|
Excess beta activity (probably related to concurrent phenobarbital
therapyc) and excess slowing in sleep, slightly more on
the left, with intermittent 3-4 Hz, at times sharply contoured
slow waves, also slightly more on the left.
|
|
20 months
|
Excess, almost continuous, 11 to 13-Hz frontally predominant
spindle-like rhythms in sleep with a mild excess in posterior delta
activity in sleep. Asymmetry in the background with more delta
activity on the left and lower amplitude on the right upon
arousal.
|
|
31 months
|
Excess beta activity with apparent lack of a well organized
background in wakefulness and in sleep.
|
|
43 months
|
Normal EEG.
|
EEG at long-term follow-up
The EEG of patient 1 was normal 43 months after
initiation of pyridoxine therapy. At the age of 12 years, the
EEG of patient 2 showed left temporal and fronto-temporal
slowing in wakefulness and in sleep with left temporal and
fronto-temporal focal sharp activity. At that time, patient
2 was receiving pyridoxine, 50 mg once daily. These
manifestations became normalized seven months later, after
increasing the dose of pyridoxine to 50 mg twice daily. The
EEG of patient 3, at the age of 12, demonstrated very frequent
right posterior temporal, focal, sharply contoured waves,
generalized bursts of single sharp waves and rare generalized
1-second bursts of sharp and slow wave activity. Nine months later,
and after increasing the dose of pyridoxine from 40 mg every
other day to 40 mg once daily, the EEG was mildly abnormal
with rare scattered sharp waves in the parietal and temporal
regions seen in wakefulness and sleep. As for patient 4, an EEG
recorded at 11 years of age showed 1 to 3-second episodes
of shifting, at times focal with sharply contoured bilateral
temporo-parietal focal waves, with bursts of generalized sharp
activity in drowsiness. All patients were compliant with their
treatment.
Discussion
Most of the available information of EEGs from patients with PDE in
the literature is based on a few case series and case reports.
Below is a discussion of the above findings in the context of a
review of the literature. Of note, although the patients we studied
fulfilled Baxter’s criteria for PDE, they presented some atypical
features, notably, no documented abnormal intra-uterine movements
or breakthrough seizures with intercurrent illnesses and normal to
moderate impairment of school progress. Neonatal EEG in the
pre-pyridoxine treatment phase was not available that would
otherwise have been informative. Although the effect of concomitant
antiepileptics was not specifically studied, our prior experience
suggests that antiepileptic drugs can control the seizures
transiently but may not necessarily correct the EEG (Mikati
et al., 1991). The dose and route of administration of
pyridoxine was different for each patient and a dose-dependent
effect could have influenced the EEG patterns discussed below.
Although we did not specifically set out to study the difference
between pyridoxine administered orally and intravenously, our prior
experience shows that EEG changes may occur earlier after
intravenous administration, but may still persist for hours or days
(Mikati et al., 1991).
Ictal EEG before pyridoxine administration
Ictal EEG patterns observed in PDE patients are consistent with
previous reports:
- – generalized bilaterally synchronous 1-4 Hz spike
and slow wave complexes (Coursin, 1954);
- – runs of unilateral/bilateral intermixed spikes, sharp
waves and slow waves (Mikati et al., 1991);
- – focal rhythmic sharp theta waves (Mikati et al.,
1991).
For patient 1, our findings confirm both the ictal spike and
slow wave complexes and the increase in theta activity.
Interictal EEG before pyridoxine administration
Interictal EEG patterns observed in PDE patients are consistent
with previous reports:
- – bursts and runs of high voltage bilaterally
synchronous 1-4 Hz sharp and slow wave and spike and slow wave
activity (Mikati et al., 1991);
- – focal sharp waves, multifocal spikes, single sharp
waves and bursts of focal 3-Hz sharp and slow wave complexes
(Mikati et al., 1991; Coker, 1992). Although some of these
findings have been reported, they refer to late onset PDE which
differs from neonatal PDE (Nabbout et al., 1999);
- – bursts of generalized rhythmic delta of shifting
voltage predominance (Mikati et al., 1991);
- – fronto-central bilaterally synchronous single
polyspikes during sleep (Mikati et al., 1991);
- – continuous diffuse high voltage rhythmic delta slow
waves and slow low voltage (Mikati et al., 1991);
- – suppression of burst-like patterns with suppression
periods lasting up to 14 seconds (Nabbout et al., 1999);
- – poorly organized monotonous background with paroxysmal
features (Lott et al., 1978);
- – hypsarrhythmia (Lott et al., 1978).
Our observations confirm the burst suppression pattern
previously observed. However, a normal pre-pyridoxine interictal
EEG has also been observed in one patient with PDE (Coker,
1992).
Interictal EEG directly after pyridoxine administration
Following pyridoxine administration, EEG patterns observed in PDE
patients are consistent with previous reports:
- – slow background and slow rhythm, occasional sharp
waves in the posterior quadrant (Mikati et al., 1991);
- – very poorly developed slow and low voltage background,
often, but not always resulting in normality (Mikati et al.,
1991).
In addition to previous observations, our study has identified
the presence of a burst suppression pattern that occurs for up to
five days following pyridoxine treatment and fluctuations with
transient worsening of electrographic discharge (including an
increased frequency of spike wave discharges) observed at day
22 of pyridoxine treatment. The persistence of the burst
suppression pattern was previously observed as an incidental
finding and not highlighted as a new observation (Nunes
et al., 2002). Similar to our studies, the burst suppression
pattern was reported to disappear after six days of pyridoxine
administration in a one-day-old female neonate (Nunes et al.,
2002). Interestingly, the occasional multifocal spikes, seen most
commonly over the left parietal area at five days post- pyridoxine
treatment in patient 1, were demonstrated previously by Yoshii
et al. (2005) in a seven-month-old female infant with a
delayed diagnosis of PDE, before seven months of age. Hence, based
on our above observations, transient worsening of the EEG during
the first month and persistence of burst suppression for several
days should not rule out a diagnosis of PDE.
Possible reasons for the delay in complete improvement of the
EEG include:
- – a lag in formation of the active form (pyridoxal
phosphate) of pyridoxine;
- – a lag in crossing the blood brain barrier;
- – a lag due to clearing of excess glutamate or secondary
long-term potentiation;
- – a lag due to structural changes (secondary to the
recurrent seizures), the effects of which cannot be overcome until
levels of GABA increase and glutamate decrease with time.
Determining the exact mechanism awaits future studies.
Interictal EEG at long-term follow-up
The EEG at long-term follow-up has been previously described to
normalize with therapy over a period of up to two years after
initiation of pyridoxine therapy (Mikati et al., 1991). For
patient 1, our observations point to an even longer time to
complete normalization (43 months), not previously reported.
In one patient of 12 years of age, we observed right posterior
temporal, focal, sharply contoured waves and slow waves. The same
finding has previously been reported by Ohtsuka et al. (1999)
following a long-term 12-year follow-up of a girl with PDE. However
in this case report, the EEG was recorded the day following a
prolonged generalized seizure, preceded by a visual aura.
Conclusion
Based on new EEG findings of patients with PDE, the study of this
case series aims to consolidate our knowledge of EEG patterns
associated with PDE. These findings include: the presence of burst
suppression patterns for up to five days following pyridoxine
treatment, fluctuations with transient worsening of electrographic
discharges following pyridoxine treatment at day 22 and a long
period (43 months) between initiation of pyridoxine treatment
and normalization of the EEG. Observation of one or more of the
above phenomena should not lead to a diagnosis of PDE being ruled
out. We also demonstrate that abnormal EEGs observed during
long-term pyridoxine therapy can often be normalized by increasing
the dose of pyridoxine. These findings should complement the
currently available use of biochemical and genetic tests available
to diagnose and manage these patients.
Disclosure
None of the authors has any conflict of interest to disclose.
References
[Baxter, 1999] Baxter P. Epidemiology of pyridoxine dependent
and pyridoxine responsive seizures in the UK. Arch Dis Child 1999;
81: 431-3.
[Been et al., 2005] Been JV, Bok LA,
Andriessen P, Renier WO. Epidemiology of pyridoxine
dependant seizures in the Netherlands. Arch Dis Child 2005; 90:
1293-6.
[Bok et al., 2007] Bok LA, Struys E,
Willemsen MA, Been JV, Jakobs C.
Pyridoxine-dependent seizures in Dutch patients: diagnosis by
elevated urinary alpha-aminoadipic semialdehyde levels. Arch Dis
Child 2007; 92: 687-9.
[Coker, 1992] Coker SB. Postneonatal vitamin B6-dependent
epilepsy. Pediatrics 1992; 90: 221-3.
[Coursin, 1954] Coursin DB. Convulsive seizures in infants
with pyridoxine-deficient diet. J Am Med Assoc 1954; 154:
406-8.
[Hunt et al., 1954] Hunt Jr AD,
Stokes Jr J, McCrory WW, Stroud HH. Pyridoxine
dependancy: report of a case of intractable convulsions in an
infant controlled with pyridoxine. Pediatrics 1954; 13: 140-5.
[Lott et al., 1978] Lott IT, Coulombe T, Di
Paolo RV, Richardson Jr EP, Levy HL. Vitamin
B6-dependant seizures: pathology and chemical findings in brain.
Neurology 1978; 28: 47-54.
[Mikati et al., 1991] Mikati MA, Trevathan E,
Krishnamoorthy KS, Lombroso CT. Pyridoxine-dependent
epilepsy: EEG investigations and long-term follow-up.
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1991; 78: 215-21.
[Nabbout et al., 1999] Nabbout R, Soufflet C,
Plouin P, Dulac O. Pyridoxine dependent epilepsy : a
suggestive electroclinical pattern. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal
Ed 1999; 81: F125-F129.
[Nunes et al., 2002] Nunes ML, Mugnol F,
Bica I, Fiori RM. Pyridoxine-dependent seizure associated
with hypophosphatasia in a newborn. J Child Neurol 2002; 17:
222-4.
[Ohtsuka et al., 1999] Ohtsuka Y, Hattori J,
Ishida T, Ogino T, Oka E. Long-term follow-up of an
individual with vitamin B6-dependent seizures. Dev Med Child Neurol
1999; 41: 203-6.
[Plecko et al., 2007] Plecko B, Paul K,
Paschke E, et al. Biochemical and molecular
characterization of 18 patients with pyridoxine-dependent epilepsy
and mutations of the antiquitin (ALDH7A1) gene. Hum Mutat 2007; 28:
19-26.
[RamachandranNair and Parameswaran, 2005]
RamachandranNair R, Parameswaran M. Prevalence of
pyridoxine dependent seizures in south Indian children with early
onset intractable epilepsy: A hospital based prospective
study. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2005; 9: 409-13.
[Yoshii et al., 2005] Yoshii A, Takeoka M,
Kelly PJ, Krishnamoorthy KS. Focal status epilepticus as
atypical presentation of pyridoxine-dependant epilepsy. J Child
Neurol 2005; 20: 696-8.
|