ARTICLE
Auteur(s) : Gerald Haidinger,
Thomas Waldhoer, Nikolaus Duschek, Christian Vutuc
Department of Epidemiology, Centre of Public Health,
Medical University of Vienna, Borschkegasse 8a, 1090 Vienna,
Austria
accepté le 22 Juin 2009
The Austrian Cancer Society started the first campaign in 1988,
informing the public about skin cancer, and has repeated it every
year since then [1]. The campaigns entitled “sun without remorse”
(“Sonne ohne Reue”) inform about skin cancer and its primary and
secondary prevention. The target population is encouraged to see a
doctor for a whole body skin examination, to determine the person’s
individual risk and to receive information on primary prevention
and self-screening. Because primary prevention is a major target of
the campaign, younger age groups are especially addressed.
We report for the first time on the prevalence of knowledge
about and of self-reported participation and frequency of screening
for skin cancer in Austrian men and women aged 15-79 years, sampled
in the years 1995 and 2005.
Materials and methods
The data analysed were extracted from two population-based
representative cross-sectional studies “Attitudes Towards Cancer”
conducted in 1995 and repeated in 2005, using the same selection
criteria, sample size, methods, and questionnaire. The aim of both
studies was to survey the knowledge, attitudes and behaviour of the
Austrian population with respect to various aspects of cancer. The
studies covered all parts of Austria and are described in detail
elsewhere [2-8]. In short: both studies (1995 and 2005) were
conducted in cooperation with a public opinion survey institute.
A quota sample of 2400 Austrians aged 15 years or over was
selected for each survey. The samples comprised 0.04% of the
population ≥ 15 years of age and were representative in terms of
age, sex, occupational status, and area of residence (source:
population census 1991 and 2001). The samples of respondents were
weighted (“post-stratified”) to resemble the respective census
population.
This analysis was restricted to men and women aged 15-79 years.
The study groups comprised of 966 men and 1,081 women in 1995 and
of 951 men and 1,021 women in 2005.
In the questionnaire, screening for skin cancer in asymptomatic
persons was explicitly asked for, but not for the diagnostic
examination in patients with symptoms. Men and women were asked if
they had ever heard of early detection of skin cancer and if so,
whether they had ever had a whole body examination during their
lifetime, and if so, the number of screenings. Respondents who had
never heard of early detection of skin cancer (1995: men: n = 392,
40.6%, women: n = 459, 42.5%; 2005 men: n = 438, 46.1%, women: n =
367, 35.9%) were included in our calculations and counted as
never-screened.
The following categories were defined for age: 15-39 years,
40-59 years and 60-79 years and for frequency of screenings: once,
2-3 times, 4+ times, number not specified, and never had.
Subsequently the respondents were asked whether the screening was
performed by a dermatologist or by a general practitioner, by
another specialist or at an out-patient clinic.
Besides the screening-specific information, socio-demographic
variables concerning sex, age, marital status, residence, education
and income were collected. Education was categorized as being
“high” when respondents answered to having completed general
qualification for university entrance or having completed a
university study (which – in Austria – corresponds to 12 years of
school or more). Frequencies and confidence limits were calculated
in SAS [9]. Statistics comprised of chi-square tests of differences
in prevalence between the 1995 and the 2005 survey, and between
educational levels, as well as between areas of residence.
Results
In the 1995 survey 59.4% of men and 57.5% of women knew about early
detection of skin cancer by screening, compared to 53.9% of men and
64.1% of women in 2005. The prevalence of knowledge by age groups
is given in table 1. Knowledge differed
significantly in relation to educational level, better educated
persons more often knew about screening for skin cancer (table 1).
The prevalence of screening for skin cancer increased in men
from 8.1% in 1995 to 13.3% in 2005 (table
2) and in women from 11.2% to 22.4% (table 3). In all age groups, the prevalence
increased in all frequency categories except in men in the age
group 60-79 years where in the category “2-3 screenings” the
prevalence decreased slightly. Regarding education, differences
were found between poorly educated and highly educated persons,
showing that higher education leads to an increase of screening
usage, although statistically non significant. Statistically
significant differences were only found in males in the 1995
survey: 21.1% (95% CI: 20.9-21.3) of the highly educated men made
use of screening, compared to 11.3% (95% CI: 11.2-11.4) of the men
with lower education levels.
In both surveys, in men and in women, most of the screenings
were performed by dermatologists, in 2005 more than 70% of the
screenings (table 4). Classification by
area of residence did not produce statistically significant
differences between groups.
Table 1 Prevalence of knowledge about skin cancer
screening in Austria
|
Men, % (95% CI)a
|
Women, % (95% CI)a
|
|
1995 (n = 966)
|
2005 (n = 951)
|
1995 (n = 1081)
|
2005 (n = 1021)
|
|
Age
|
|
|
|
|
|
15-39
|
56.7 (52.1-61.1)
|
53.4 (48.8-58.0)
|
57.7 (53.3-62.1)
|
61.1 (56.6-65.4)
|
|
40-59
|
61.3 (55.7-66.7)
|
59.0 (53.5-64.3)
|
62.3 (56.7-67.6)
|
70.6 (65.4-75.3)
|
|
60-79
|
62.9 (56.0-69.3)
|
46.4 (39.3-53.7)
|
52.2 (46.5-57.9)
|
60.9 (54.4-67.0)
|
|
Education
|
|
|
|
|
|
Low
|
56.8 (56.3-57.4)
|
51.3 (50.8-51.8)
|
54.9 (54.4-55.5)
|
61.5 (60.9-62.2)
|
|
High
|
72.6 (72.0-73.4)b
|
66.7 (66.1-67.4)b
|
74.0 (73.3-74.8)b
|
76.0 (75.3-76.8)b
|
|
Total
|
59.4 (56.3-62.5)
|
53.9 (50.8-57.1)
|
57.5 (54.6-60.5)
|
64.1 (61.1-66.9)
|
Table 2 Men, prevalence of self-reported skin cancer
screening by age group and by number of screenings in 1995 and in
2005
|
Total sample n
|
Never had % (95% CI)a
|
Number of screenings ever had, % (95% CI)a
|
Ever had (%)
|
|
Age
|
|
|
1
|
2-3
|
4+
|
Not specified
|
|
|
1995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15-39
|
464
|
93.3 (90.7-95.3)
|
4.5 (3.0-6.8)
|
0.9 (0.3-2.3)
|
0.4 (0.1-1.7)
|
0.9 (0.3-2.3)
|
6.7 (4.7-9.3)
|
|
40-59
|
300
|
90.7 (86.8-93.5)
|
6.0 (3.8-9.3)
|
1.3 (0.5-3.5)
|
1.0 (0.3-3.1)
|
1.0 (0.3-3.1)
|
9.2 (6.5-13.2)
|
|
60-79
|
202
|
90.6 (85.7-93.9)
|
3.5 (1.7-7.1)
|
3.9 (2.0-7.7)
|
1.5 (0.5-4.5)
|
0.5 (0.1-3.4)
|
9.4 (6.1-14.3)
|
|
All ages
|
966
|
91.1 (90.0-93.5)
|
4.8 (3.6-6.3)
|
1.6 (1.0-2.7)
|
0.8 (0.4-1.6)
|
0.8 (0.4-1.6)
|
8.1 (6.5-10.0)
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15-39
|
451
|
88.7 (85.4-91.3)
|
7.3 (5.2-10.1)
|
2.7 (1.5-4.6)
|
0.9 (0.3-2.3)
|
0.4 (0.1-1.8)
|
11.3 (8.7-14.6)
|
|
40-59
|
317
|
82.9 (78.4-86.7)
|
8.2 (5.6-11.8)
|
3.8 (2.2-6.5)
|
4.7 (2.9-7.7)
|
0.3 (0.0-2.2)
|
17.0 (13.3-21.6)
|
|
60-79
|
183
|
87.9 (82.4-92.0)
|
4.9 (2.6-9.2)
|
2.7 (1.1-6.4)
|
2.7 (1.1-6.4)
|
1.6 (0.5-5.0)
|
12.0 (8.0-17.6)
|
|
All ages
|
951
|
86.6 (84.3-88.7)
|
7.1 (5.7-9.0)
|
3.0 (2.1-4.4)
|
2.5 (1.7-3.7)
|
0.6 (0.3-1.4)
|
13.3 (11.3-15.7)
|
Table 3 Women, prevalence of self-reported skin cancer
screening by age group and by number of screenings in 1995 and in
2005
|
Total sample n
|
Never had % (95% CI)a
|
Number of screenings ever had, % (95% CI)a
|
Ever had (%)
|
|
Age
|
|
|
1
|
2-3
|
4+
|
Not specified
|
|
|
1995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15-39
|
485
|
88.9 (85.7-91.4)
|
6.6 (4.7-9.2)
|
2.5 (1.4-4.3)
|
0.8 (0.3-2.2)
|
1.2 (0.6-2.7)
|
11.1 (8.6-14.3)
|
|
40-59
|
305
|
90.8 (87.0-93.6)
|
4.3 (2.5-7.2)
|
2.9 (1.5-5.6)
|
1.0 (0.3-3.0)
|
1.0 (0.3-3.0)
|
9.3 (6.4-13.0)
|
|
60-79
|
291
|
86.6 (82.2-90.1)
|
4.1 (2.4-7.1)
|
6.2 (3.9-9.6)
|
3.1 (1.6-5.8)
|
0 (0-1.2)
|
13.4 (9.9-17.8)
|
|
All ages
|
1081
|
88.8 (96.8-90.6)
|
5.3 (4.1-6.8)
|
3.6 (2.6-4.9)
|
1.5 (0.9-2.4)
|
0.8 (0.4-1.6)
|
11.2 (9.4-13.2)
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15-39
|
468
|
78.4 (74.5-81.9)
|
11.1 (8.6-14.3)
|
5.3 (3.6-7.8)
|
4.5 (2.9-6.8)
|
0.6 (0.2-2.0)
|
21.6 (18.1-25.5)
|
|
40-59
|
323
|
74.0 (68.9-78.5)
|
13.6 (10.3-17.8)
|
4.9 (3.1-7.9)
|
5.6 (3.5-8.7)
|
1.8 (0.8-4.1)
|
26.0 (21.5-31.1)
|
|
60-79
|
230
|
80.9 (75.3-85.4)
|
6.1 (3.6-10.0)
|
6.9 (4.3-11.1)
|
4.8 (2.7-8.4)
|
1.3 (0.4-4.0)
|
19.1 (14.6-24.7)
|
|
All ages
|
1021
|
77.6 (74.9-80.0)
|
10.8 (9.0-12.8)
|
5.6 (4.3-7.2)
|
4.9 (3.7-6.4)
|
1.2 (0.7-2.1)
|
22.4 (20.0-25.1)
|
Table 4 Proportion of skin cancer screening performed
by dermatologist, general practitioner, other specialist, or
outpatient clinic
|
Men, % (95% CI)a
|
Women, % (95% CI)a
|
|
1995 (n = 78)
|
2005 (n = 127)
|
1995 (n = 121)
|
2005b (n = 229)
|
|
Dermatologist
|
62.8
|
73.2
|
53.7
|
78.6
|
|
General practitioner
|
23.0
|
14.2
|
25.6
|
9.2
|
|
Other specialist
|
3.8
|
3.9
|
4.9
|
4.4
|
|
Outpatient clinic
|
10.2
|
8.7
|
15.7
|
7.9
|
|
Total
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
Discussion
In Austria, since 1988 when the program “sun without remorse” was
implemented, skin cancer screening has been available free of
charge. Compared to other free-of-charge (opportunistic) screenings
for cancer, knowledge about this screening (table 1) is low: awareness about colon cancer
screening (2005: men 80%, women 82%), prostate cancer screening
(2005: men 85%), and breast and cervical cancer screening (women
1995 and 2005: > 95%) is much higher [5-8]. From 1995 to 2005
knowledge about early detection of skin cancer by screening even
decreased in men by 5.5% but increased in women by 6.6% (table 1). One of the reasons for a decrease in men
and an increase in women may be that women have a higher awareness
for skin specific irritations which may even be emphasized by the
Austrian Cancer Society’s campaigns about ageing of the skin caused
by sun exposure. Furthermore, women fear cancer more than men [2].
This may also explain the higher self-reported prevalence of having
ever had a skin cancer screen and the higher frequency of
screenings in women compared to men in both surveys (tables 2, 3). Based on our findings, future
campaigns could be more targeted towards males and towards less
educated persons.
The proportion of screenings by dermatologists increased in men
as well as in women from 1995 to 2005. This trend towards seeing a
specialist is desirable although in rural areas the general
practitioner remains the primary care provider.
In the literature we found only very view studies on this topic:
in the 1998 National Health Interview Survey in the age group 18-65
+ years, 20% of male and 21.9% of female respondents reported
having ever had a skin examination; in the year 2000 survey this
prevalence decreased to 14.2% in men and 15.0% in women [10]. The
numbers found in our 2005 survey are lower in men but higher in
women, although with an increase in both sexes since 1995.
Our prevalence rates are based on self-reports. Nevertheless
these data may reflect under-reporting because respondents may be
unaware of having received a skin cancer screening along the way
during any consultation of a doctor. However, a validation study in
Australia reported a sensitivity of 90.5% [11]. This may not easily
be comparable to Austria because of the high incidence of melanoma
in Australia and thus a much higher awareness in that population.
A high awareness is desirable from the view point of public
health and can be expected for Austria, too, because of trends in
incidence (figure
1).
Meanwhile, effectiveness of screening seems to be proven by a
reduction of tumour thickness [12] and by the trends in mortality
where a levelling-off in males and even a slight reduction in
females can be observed (figure 1).
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Austrians who participated in
this survey for providing the data and the Austrian Cancer Society
(Prof. Paul Sevelda, President, Prof. Michael Micksche, Past
Vice-President) for financial support in funding the
population-based cross-sectional studies on Attitudes Towards
Cancer in 1995 and 2005. Conflict of interest: none.
References
1 Austrian Cancer Society:
http://www.krebshilfe.net/information/sonne/sonne.shtm (accessed 15
April 2009)
2 Haidinger G, Waldhoer T, Janda M,
Poetter M, Vutuc C. Die Selbsteinschätzung der
Bedrohtheit durch Krankheiten. Gesundh Wes 1998; 60: 127-31.
3 Vutuc C, Haidinger G, Waldhoer T. Prevalence of
self-reported screening mammography and impact on breast cancer
mortality in Austria. Wien Klin Wochenschr 1998; 110: 485-90.
4 Vutuc C, Haidinger G, Waldhoer T, Ahmad F,
Breitenecker G. Prevalence of self-reported cervical cancer
screening and impact on cervical cancer mortality in Austria. Wien
Klin Wochenschr 1999; 111: 354-9.
5 Vutuc C, Waldhoer T, Sevelda P,
Micksche M, Haidinger G. Self-reported prostate cancer
screening in Austria. J Med Screening 2006; 13: 148-51.
6 Vutuc C, Waldhoer T, Sevelda P,
Micksche M, Haidinger G. Self-reported opportunistic
screening mammography in Austria. Breast Care 2007; 2: 313-6.
7 Haidinger G, Waldhoer T, Vutuc C. Self-reported
colonoscopy screening in Austria. Eur J Cancer Prev 2008; 17:
354-7.
8 Haidinger G, Waldhoer T, Vutuc C. Self-reported
Pap smear screening in Austria. Wien Med Wochenschr 2008; 158:
222-6.
9 SAS. SAS/STAT User’s Guide,Version 8. Cary, NC: SAS Institute
Inc., 1999.
10 Saraiya M, Hall I, Thompson T, et al.
Skin cancer screening among U.S. adults from 1992, 1998, and 2000
National Health Interview Surveys. Prev Med 2004; 39: 308-14.
11 Aitken JF, Youl PH, Janda M, et al.
Validity of self-reported skin screening histories. Am J Epidemiol
2004; 159: 1098-105.
12 Pehamberger H, Binder M, Knollmayer S,
Wolff K. Immediate effects of a public education campaign on
prognostic features of melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 1993; 29:
106-8.
|