ARTICLE
Auteur(s) : Henrik Dal1, Cecilia
Boldemann1,2, Bernt
Lindelöf3
1Centre for Public Health, Stockholm County Council,
Stockholm, Sweden
2Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska
Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
3Department of Dermatology, Karolinska University
Hospital, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden
accepté le 23 Avril 2007
Intermittent exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation from the sun
and sunbeds is an important factor in the etiology of malignant
melanoma (hereafter melanoma) [1-4] besides the number of nevi per
unit of body surface, freckling tendency and sun sensitivity (skin
type), particularly if such exposure occurs at an early age [5, 6].
There is also epidemiological evidence of a dose-response
relationship between common nevi in children and parents’
intentional tanning [7]. The low incidence of melanoma in Northern
countries half a century ago seems to be the result of behavioral
adjustment to UV intensity, probably also implying fewer nevi in
the population at that time. Not much is known about induction
times between exposure and manifest disease, but it is estimated to
vary between a few years [8] to several decades, which complicates
the track-down of a link to tanning behavior. Previous studies have
observed an increase of melanoma incidence of the trunk and limbs,
and thus indicated a behavioral genesis [9-14]. The increment of UV
exposure by explicit and implicit intentional outdoor tanning (sun
seeking behavior, aquatic and alpine sports, travel to seaside
resorts), and the introduction of cosmetic sunbeds in 1978 (Sweden)
may reflect in the relative body site distribution of melanoma. An
increasing proportion of tumors, particularly with intermittently
exposed body sites taking an increasing proportion, would further
corroborate behavior as a major etiologic factor. The objective of
this study was to establish the trends in relative body site
distribution of malignant melanoma during a half century with
regard to gender and age, in an attempt to discern behavioral and
societal aspects in a descriptive fashion. We surveyed data from
the Swedish Cancer Registry (SCR) of melanomas from 5-year calendar
periods 1960-1964 to 2000-2004 by body site for age and gender
cohorts and by intermittent, continuous and mixed UV exposure type,
in an attempt to discern a reflection of major behavioral and
societal changes in the relative distribution of melanoma by body
site.
Material and methods
Geographical data, study base and study population
Sweden, in Northern Europe, is situated between the 54th
and the 69th parallels, with yearly ambient solar UVR of
270-420 kJ m2 skin surface (horizontal surface)
depending on the latitude [15]. The recorded meteorological spring
period (diurnal mean temperature 0-10o centigrade) is
short, usually lasting from April to May [16], and summer (diurnal
mean temperature >10o) usually lasts from the end of
May until the end of August. Episodes of ozone depletion in Sweden
with marked downward deviations of long-range ozone values have
also been recorded during the 90s, resulting in a higher episodic
influx of UV-radiation during February-May [16].
During the period under study (1960-2004) the population has
increased from 7 to 9 million inhabitants, and the percentage
living in urban areas and south of the 60th parallel has
increased from 60 to 85% [17]. The population is mobile, with
> 7 million registered airline departures to foreign
destinations in 2004, of which 860,000 (12%) were departures to
seaside resorts south of the 40th parallel [18].
The cancer registry
In 1958, reporting to the SCR of cancers upon diagnosis became
compulsory. Malignancies are reported by clinicians, pathologists
and cytologists, with most cancers thus being reported twice [19].
The coverage of the SCR was reported to be 96% in the late 1970s,
and close to 100% in 2000 [20]. The register is based on a 10-digit
national registration number (NRN) unique for every Swedish
resident. The NRN is made up of birth date (year, month, day), plus
two digits indicating birthplace, one indicating gender, and a
control number. The NRN enables linkage of exposure and outcome
data and can be used to test specific etiologic hypotheses relevant
for epidemiological surveillance and public health promotion.
Statistical methods
The melanoma cases, diagnosed from 1960 until 2004, and coded
according to the 7th revision of the International
Classification of Diseases (ICD-7 code 190.0, 190.1-4 head sites,
190.5 trunk, 190.6 upper limbs, 190.7 lower limbs, 190.8-190.9
multiple parts or unspecified parts) were classified according to
gender, age, and calendar period (5-year intervals). In situ
lentigo maligna were excluded from analysis. The sites of the head
and neck region were joined in one category: head-sites (190.1-4),
as were multiple parts and parts unspecified: multiple
parts/unspecified (190.8, 9). The site-specific age standardized
incidences (European standard population) for each of the five
defined anatomical sites were then calculated, including a total of
46,337 melanomas in 44,623 patients. The patients were then divided
into the following age groups according to age at diagnosis: 0-29
years, 30-49 years, 50-69 years, and 70+ years. For clarity,
melanomas of multiple and unspecified parts were excluded in the
presentation of the relative site specific distribution. The
patients were born between 1863 and 2001. Of the melanomas, 80%
were diagnosed in patients born from 1900-1949. The relative
site-specific distribution of diagnosed melanomas over time was
calculated for each gender and age group, and thus trends assessed
by incidence per site, relative site distribution per age group and
calendar period. Further, a categorization was made of body sites
by sun exposure type: head (face normally uncovered, exposure
mostly continuous), trunk (normally covered, exposure mostly
intermittent), and limbs (mixed exposure).
The relative distribution by body site was studied, comparing
the youngest and the oldest age-at-diagnosis groups in the first
(1960-1964), and the last (2000-2004) calendar periods, meaning
that the oldest at diagnosis were born predominantly in the 1890s,
and the youngest at diagnosis in the late 1970s and so on.
Results
Between the calendar periods 1960-1964 and 2000-2004, the most
rapid incidence increase occurred for melanomas of the upper limbs
(men 885%, women 1216%), and of the trunk (men 729%, women 759%),
and of the lower limbs (men 418%, women 289%) in both genders. The
standardized incidence increase of the upper limbs rose from 0.3 to
2.9 (men), and from 0.3 to 3.39 (women), of the trunk from 1.1 to
9.2 (men), and 0.6 to 5.2 (women), and of the lower limbs from 0.4
to 1.9 (men), and from 1.6 to 6.3 (women). The most frequent body
sites of melanoma which have evolved during the studied time period
are thus the trunk in both men and women, and lower limbs in women
(figure 1A, B).
The incidence increase of head tumors was slower and took a
decreasing share of all tumors (figure 2A-D). Across the
full life span, melanomas of the trunk and lower limbs dominated
among patients < 70 years, whereas tumors of the head were most
common among patients ≥ 70 years. Melanomas on the intermittently
exposed trunk took an increasing proportion of all melanomas during
the period studied except in 30-49-year-old men, and in women aged
>70 years (figure 2A-D). Comparing
the first calendar period of diagnosis 1960-1964 with the most
recent one of 2000-2004, head tumors dominated in patients who were
aged ≥ 70 years at diagnosis 1960-1964, whereas the trunk and limbs
were the dominating body sites in patients aged < 70 years at
diagnosis and diagnosed 2000-2004 (figure 2A-D, and table 1).
Table 1 Incident cases of melanoma by studied age
group, body part, and most likely type of exposure Sweden
1960-1964, and 2000-2004, unspecified and multiple tumours
excluded
|
Men
|
Women
|
|
Diagnosed
|
Diagnosed
|
|
Age, body part, and most likely type of exposure
|
1960-1964 N (%)
|
2000-2004 N (%)
|
1960-1964 N (%)
|
2000-2004 N (%)
|
|
Head & neck (continuous)
|
|
0-29
|
10 (22)
|
16 (14)
|
11 (18)
|
17 (8)
|
|
30-49
|
22 (12)
|
63 (8)
|
23 (10)
|
67 (6)
|
|
50-69
|
50 (21)
|
212 (11)
|
52 (20)
|
158 (9)
|
|
70+
|
58 (44)
|
371 (22)
|
54 (42)
|
367 (25)
|
|
Trunk (intermittent)
|
|
0-29
|
20 (43)
|
57 (52)
|
10 (16)
|
107 (46)
|
|
30-49
|
113 (62)
|
446 (58)
|
65 (28)
|
411 (38)
|
|
50-69
|
111 (48)
|
1042 (57)
|
52 (20)
|
527 (31)
|
|
70+
|
25 (19)
|
870 (51)
|
18 (14)
|
270 (18)
|
|
Upper and lower limbs (mixed exposure)
|
|
0-29
|
16 (35)
|
37 (34)
|
41 (66)
|
107 (46)
|
|
30-49
|
47 (26)
|
258 (34)
|
142 (62)
|
600 (56)
|
|
50-69
|
71 (31)
|
579 (32)
|
154 (60)
|
1002 (60)
|
|
70+
|
48 (37)
|
467 (27)
|
57 (44)
|
844 (57)
|
Discussion
In terms of relative distribution by body site, the main finding in
this study was the rapid incidence increase of melanomas of the
trunk and limbs, and the decreased share of melanomas of the head
and neck region of all melanomas. A half century ago tumors of the
constantly exposed head and neck region dominated (though the
incidence was low). Among tumors diagnosed in 2000-2004,
intermittent sites dominated both in terms of incidence rise and by
relative comparison with the other body sites.
Even though the occurrence of melanomas has not been observed to
be related to chronically sun-exposed body sites in the same way as
squamous cell cancer, this study may give a clue to an existing
dose-response relationship between exposure site and risk of
melanoma, as well as a relationship between exposed skin surface
and risk of melanoma. Even though dysplastic nevi preferably occur
on the trunk [21], there are no indications of an increased
proportion of the population carrying a genetic disposition for
dysplastic nevi. The rapid relative increase of melanomas of the
trunk therefore makes a behavioral genesis even more likely. This
has also been stated by a number of studies of white populations in
Sweden [9], the United States [10], Canada [11], New Zealand [12],
former East Germany [13], and Finland [14].
Lifestyles related to urbanization quickly became established
during the period of 1960-2000 when the percentage of the Swedish
population living in densely populated areas rose from 60 to 85%
[16]. The shift from rural to urban living may have resulted in a
higher proportion of intermittent exposure, as it involves
lifestyles with an increased risk of such exposure. During the same
period the number of airline departures to seaside resorts south of
the 40th parallel increased by 1,229% from 70,000 in
1962 to 860,000 in 2004 [18]. During the same period (1978)
cosmetic tanning devices (sunbeds) were introduced on the Swedish
market, the use of which became widespread within a short period of
time, particularly in the younger population [22-24]. It is
reasonable to assume that sun seeking behavior patterns and the use
of sunbeds involve intermittent exposures to larger skin surfaces
[25] and also increase intermittent exposure on body sites other
than the head, compared to unintentional continuous exposure
related to occupational exposure such as fishing and farming.
Intentional exposure may be closely related to intermittent
exposure, the more so as indoor work has increased and thereby
continuous, suberythemal UV exposure, possibly protective against
melanoma [26], may have declined. It also must be pointed out that
continuous sun exposure to the head does not protect against MM.
Intentional tanning also involves a considerable increase in
horizontal exposure at a right angle, resulting in a further
increase of UV exposure of the trunk and legs [27, 28]. The
relative increase of melanomas on the arms may also reflect little
outdoor stay other than during the summer and/or on holiday, and
that – when outdoors- the limbs are covered up not because of high
UV-intensity, but because of a cold climate.
The use of sunscreens, which at an early stage were promoted as
imperative means of protection, has been questioned due to scanty
application and the probable intention of the user to prolong sun
exposure [29]. Also, during the first decades of the register
period, sunscreens on the market mostly provided protection against
UVB, and less against UVA. This may have resulted in an increase of
sun exposure on body sites other than the head if sunscreens were
used on the trunk and the limbs.
Cosmetics with or without sun protective agents used on the face
may have yielded protection, mainly for women. On the other hand,
other cosmetics may have photosensitizing properties. Even if the
trend of the use of various cosmetics is largely unknown it is
reasonable to assume that the use of cosmetics both with and
without sunscreens has increased during the studied period.
Divergent etiological pathways for melanoma have been discussed,
including etiological factors not related to UV exposure, such as
melanocytic proliferation [30]. However, melanomas on
intermittently and chronically exposed body sites have been
observed to be correlated to an over-expression of p53 [31, 32]. A
further aspect is the possible increase in aquatic and alpine
sports involving chilled skin in combination with high exposure to
ultraviolet radiation, and the implication this has for DNA-repair,
as there is evidence of poorer DNA-repair in chilled skin (1,000
dimer repairs/sec vs. 10,000 dimer repairs/sec) [33].
Considering ozone depletion, it has been estimated that a 1%
loss of stratospheric ozone would result in a global increase of
skin cancers by 1-2% [34]. Episodes of ozone depletion (deviation
of long range mean total ozone by mean value per month) have been
recorded in Sweden throughout the 90s, with peaks of depletion
occurring in the spring months of 1993, 1996, and 2000 [16]. Even
though it is unlikely that any cases of melanoma in Sweden so far
could be ascribed to ozone depletion, it may in the future have
implications for both unintentional and intermittent sun exposure
to the head and intentional sun exposure all over the body.
Finally, it can be suspected that in a long-term perspective the
increase of melanoma may be diluted due to an upsurge in the use of
sunbeds, and hence intermittent exposure of the total skin surface.
In terms of anthropometric measures, the rising trends and relative
increase of melanoma on the trunk may also be due to the obesity
pandemic as the skin surface may have increased and hence more skin
cells on these body sites are at risk [35]. A hormonal impact,
reflected in increased body height, has also been observed, at
least in men [36].
The information available from the SCR includes site,
histological type of tumor, hospital and pathology department,
specimen number and the year when the specimen was taken. Thus,
subtypes of melanoma are not registered with specific codes. The
classification of MMs into different subgroups would require an
analysis of all the original histopathological reports from all
reporting laboratories which is beyond the scope of this study.
Furthermore, the site distribution of the decades before 1960 is
unknown.
The highest relative melanoma increase in non-head sites was
observed in the oldest age-group 70+ years (figure 2A-D) whereas in
the younger age groups the proportion of melanomas on non-head
sites was already high. If this shift in site-distribution is
caused by behavioral changes due to indoor occupations, more
leisure time with outdoor activities, intentional tanning,
including sunbed use, it would be plausible to assume that these
changes – at least in part – were already taking place among
younger age groups prior to 1960. Behavioral and societal changes
as listed above would be expected to affect the younger population
first, so what we observe in the oldest age group is partly the end
of “old times” and partly a cohort-effect, as young people keep
their habits when growing older. Thus, it could be that major site
changes in melanoma affected the younger population in Sweden
during a time of increasing employment in industry, and the
introduction of vacation regulated by law (two weeks, 1938), and
when holidays abroad were rare.
The conclusion is that the shift in relative body-site
distribution observed during the past four decades, of the relative
increase of melanomas, is congruent with societal changes regarding
UV exposure, with migration from rural to urban areas, the
introduction of sunbeds, and the upsurge in leisure time involving
aquatic sports, and airline travel to seaside resorts. But finding
certain evidence of a particular behavior as a cause of MM requires
more specific studies of behavior over time.
Acknowledgements
Financial support: none. Conflict of interest: none.
References
1 Veierod MB, Weiderpass E, Thörn M, et al. A
prospective study of pigmentation, sun exposure, and risk of
cutaneous malignant melanoma in women. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;
95(20): 1530-8.
2 Walter S, King WD, Marrett LD. Association of
cutaneous malignant melanoma with intermittent exposure to
ultraviolet radiation: results of a case-control study in Ontario,
Canada. Int J Epidemiol 1999; 28(3): 418-27.
3 Westerdahl J, Ingvar C, Masback A,
Jonsson N, Olsson H. Risk of cutaneous malignant melanoma
in relation to use of sunbeds: further evidence for UV-A
carcinogenicity. Br J Cancer 2000; 82(9): 1593-9.
4 Walter S, Marrett L, From L, Hertzmann C,
Shannon H, Roy P. The association of cutaneous malignant
melanoma with the use of sunbeds and sunlamps. Am J Epidemiol 1990;
131(2): 232-43.
5 Gandini S, Sera F, Cattaruzza MS, et al.
Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: II. Sun
exposure. Eur J Cancer 2005; 41(1): 45-60.
6 MacKie RM, Freudenberger T, Aitchison TC.
Personal risk-factor chart for cutaneous melanoma. Lancet 1989; 26;
2(8661): 487-90.
7 Rodvall Y, Wahlgren CF, Ullen H,
Wiklund K. Common melanocytic nevi in 7-year-old
schoolchildren residing at different latitudes in Sweden. Cancer
Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007; 16(1): 122-7.
8 MacKie RM, Aitchison T. Severe sunburn and
subsequent risk of primary cutaneous malignant melanoma in
Scotland. Br J Cancer 1982; 46(6): 955-60.
9 Thörn M, Bergström R, Adami HO,
Ringborg U. Trends in the incidence of malignant melanoma in
Sweden, by anatomic site, 1960-1984. Am J Epidemiol 1990; 132(6):
1066-77.
10 Chen YT, Zheng T, Holford TR, Berwick M,
Dubrow R. Malignant melanoma incidence in Connecticut (United
States): time trends and age-period-cohort modeling by anatomic
site. Cancer Causes Control 1994; 5(4): 341-50.
11 Elwood JM, Gallagher RP. Body site distribution of
cutaneous malignant melanoma in relationship to patterns of sun
exposure. Int J Cancer 1998; 78(3): 276-80.
12 Bulliard JL, Cox B. Cutaneous malignant melanoma in
New Zealand: trends by anatomical site, 1969-1993. Int J Epidemiol
2000; 29(3): 416-23.
13 Stang A, Stabenow R, Eisinger B,
Jöckel KH. Site- and gender-specific time trend analyses of
the incidence of skin melanomas in the former German Democratic
Republic (GDR) including 19351 cases. Eur J Cancer 2003; 39(11):
1610-8.
14 Stang A, Pukkala E, Sankila R,
Söderman B, Hakulinen T. Time trend analysis of the skin
melanoma incidence of Finland from 1953 through 2003 including
16,414 cases. Int J Cancer 2006; 119(2): 380-4.
15 www.smhi.se (continuous update).
16 Josefsson W. Five years of solar UV-radiation monitoring
in Sweden. Norrköping. Sweden: SMHI; RMK-report No 71, 1996.
17 Ylander H. Urbanization and densification in Sweden
(Urbanisering och tätortsutveckling, in Swedish). Atlas of Sweden’s
classification of counties, municipalities, parishes and built-up
areas. Sweden: Statistics, 1992.
18 Luftfartsverket (Swedish Civil Aviation Administration).
Non-scheduled passenger statistics, 1962-2000. Norrköping, 2006
(www.lfv.se) 24 May 2006.
19 Mattsson B, Wallgren A. Completeness of the Swedish
Cancer Register. Non-notified cancer cases recorded on death
certificates in 1978. Acta Radiol Oncol 1984; 23: 305-13.
20 National Board of Health and Welfare. The Cancer Registry:
Cancer Incidence in Sweden. Stockholm: Centre for Epidemiology,
2004.
21 Stierner U, Augustsson A, Rosdahl I,
Suurkula M. Regional distribution of common and dysplastic
naevi in relation to melanoma site and sun exposure. A case-control
study. Melanoma Res 1992; 1(5-6): 367-75.
22 Boldeman C, Jansson B, Nilsson B,
Ullén H. Sunbed use in Swedish urban adolescents related to
behavioural characteristics. Prev Med 1997; 26: 114-9.
23 Brandberg Y, Ullen H, Sjöverg L, Holm LE.
Sunbathing and sunbed use related to self-image in a randomized
sample of Swedish adolescents. Eur J Cancer Prev 1998; 7(4):
321-9.
24 Boldeman C, Bränström R, Dal H, et al.
Tanning habits and sunburn in a Swedish population age 13-50 years.
Eur J Cancer 2001; 37(18): 2441-8.
25 Wester U, Boldemann C, Jansson B,
Ullén H. Population UV-dose and skin area – do sunbeds rival
the sun? Health Phys 1999; 77(4): 436-40.
26 White E, Kirkpatrick CS, Lee JA. Case-control
study of malignant melanoma in Washington State. I. Constitutional
factors and sun exposure. Am J Epidemiol 1994; 139(9): 857-68.
27 Diffey BL, Kerwin M, Davis A. The anatomical
distribution of sunlight. Br J Dermatol 1977; 97(4): 407-10.
28 Parisi AV, Kimlin MG, Lester R,
Turnbull D. Lower body anatomical distribution of solar
ultraviolet radiation in the human form in standing and sitting
postures. J Photochem Photobiol 2003; 69: 1-6.
29 Autier P, Dore JF, Négrier S, et al.
Sunscreen use and duration of sun exposure: a double-blind,
randomized trial. J Natl Cancer I 1999; 91(15): 1304-9; [see
comments].
30 Whiteman DC, Watt P, Purdie DM,
Hughes MC, Hayward NK, Green AC. Melanocytic nevi,
solar keratoses, and divergent pathways to cutaneous melanoma. J
Natl Cancer Inst 2003; 95(11): 806-12.
31 Cho E, Rosner BA, Colditz GA. Risk factors for
melanoma by body site. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005;
14(5): 1241-4.
32 Kim YC, Lee MG, Cho SH, Lee JH,
Lee DH, Ahn BK. The relation between p53 expression and
physical site of melanoma: an immunohistochemical study. Br J
Dermatol 2003; 149(6): 1299-300.
33 Hjertvik M, Erixon K, Ahnström G. Repair of
DNA damage in mammalian cells after treatment with UV and dimethyl
sulphate: discrimination between nucleotide and base excision
repair by their temperature dependence. Mutat Res 1998; 407(2):
87-96.
34 de Gruijl FR, Van der Leun JC. Estimate of the
wavelength dependency of ultraviolet carcinogenesis in humans and
its relevance to the risk assessment of a stratospheric ozone
depletion. Health Phys 1994; 67(3): 1-7.
35 Gallus S, Naldi L, Martin L,
Martinelli M, La Vecchia C, Oncology Study Group of the
Italian Group for Epidemiologic Research in Dermatology (GISED).
Anthropometric measures and risk of cutaneous malignant melanoma: a
case-control study from Italy. Melanoma Res 2006; 16(1): 83-7.
36 Shors AR, Solomon C, McTiernan A,
White E. Melanoma risk in relation to height, weight, and
exercise. Cancer Causes Control 2001(7): 599-606; (United
States).
|