ARTICLE
Auteur(s) : Sung-Jan
Lin1,2, Shiou-Hwa Jee2, Chen-Yuan
Dong3
1Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan
University, No. 1, Sec. 1, Jen-Ai Road, Taipei 100, Taiwan
2Department of Dermatology, National Taiwan University
Hospital and National, Taiwan University College of Medicine, No.
7, Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei 100, Taiwan
3Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, No.
1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Road, Taipei 106, Taiwan
accepté le 25 Avril 2007
As the largest organ of the human body, the skin is responsible for
a plethora of important physiological functions. The regulation of
body temperature, prevention of body fluid loss, and protection
against environmental harm are maintained by this vital organ.
Since the skin is located on the exterior of the body, it is most
accessible to imaging techniques for diagnostic purposes.
Naturally, a major goal in dermatological diagnosis is the real
time diagnosis and monitoring of physiological conditions. However,
as in many areas of medicine, the field of dermatology continues to
rely heavily on histological procedures in the diagnosis of
pathological conditions. While such procedures are effective in
diagnosing many pathological conditions, they have major drawbacks
in that they are invasive in nature and that the fixation and
processing procedures render the study of dermatological dynamic
processes impossible. With advances in technical innovations, novel
modalities are now been applied to the field of dermatology [1]. In
particular, non-invasive or minimally invasive imaging techniques
that enable real time observation of skin physiological conditions
are invaluable in overcoming the drawbacks of histological
examinations [2-4].The development of non-invasive imaging
techniques, such as reflected confocal microscopy and optical
coherence tomography (OCT), have helped to improve the clinical
diagnosis of skin conditions [2, 3]. However, in recent years,
multiphoton microscopy has emerged as an alternative imaging
modality that holds great potential for dermatological applications
in the clinics. The precursor of multiphoton imaging is two-photon
fluorescence microscopy (TPFM) invented by Webb’s group in Cornell
in 1990 [5]. In TPFM, a fluorescent molecule excitable by the
single photon absorption of a UV or visible photon is excited by
the simultaneous absorption of two less energetic, near infrared
(IR) photons. A number of significant advantages associated with
two-photon excitation (TPE) render this technique the preferred
choice in many biomedical imaging applications. First, the high
incident photon flux required for efficient TPE limits the
excitation to the focal volume. As a result, the microscopic
imaging achieved by scanning the excitation spot produces images
with excellent axial depth discrimination without the use of
confocal apertures.Furthermore, the near IR photons used for sample
excitation are absorbed and scattered less by tissues, thus
resulting in improved sample imaging depths. Finally, since the
near IR wavelength is spectrally separated from the emission, which
lies mostly in the visible range, effective detection of sample
luminescence can be easily achieved [5, 6]. In addition to TPE, the
non-linear polarization effect of second harmonic generation (SHG)
is also of tremendous value in biomedical imaging. In general,
researchers have demonstrated that SHG microscopy can be used to
image a variety of biological tissues such as collagen, muscle, and
microtubule [7-9]. The more specific applications of SHG microscopy
include the study of the thermal denaturation of corneas and
tendons [10, 11] and the prediction of heat-induced collagen
shrinkage [12].SHG is a polarization effect. In general,
Pi the polarization of a material is related to the
external electric field E by the relation:In materials lacking an
inversion symmetry, the non-vanishing second order susceptibility
χijk can lead to the generation of second harmonic
signals at half the wavelength of the incident excitation
wavelength. Tissues such as collagen and skeletal muscle have been
demonstrated to be effective second harmonic generators. Since
fluorescence emission is typically at longer wavelengths than the
SHG signal, the two signals can be easily separated and be used for
image contrast enhancement [7, 9].Over the past decade, multiphoton
imaging has found a variety of applications in dermatology. In vivo
imaging of human skin was achieved almost ten years ago [13, 14]. A
detailed morphological comparison between multiphoton and
histological images in ex vivo mouse skin shows that a variety of
epithelial and dermal structures can be identified by multiphoton
imaging [15]. More recently, multiphoton imaging of human skin and
mucosa has been achieved [16], and time-resolved techniques have
been applied to mapping the structures of human skin [17]. In
addition, advances in higher harmonic imaging and spectral analysis
have contributed as additional modalities in dermatological imaging
[18-20]. In addition to morphological imaging, multiphoton imaging
has been demonstrated to be effective in addressing specific issues
in dermatology. For example, lifetime imaging has been shown to be
able to characterize pH gradient within the stratum corneum [21].
The injury to skin by toxicological agents and the subsequent
recovery process can also be monitored [22], and understanding
wound healing is another area in which mulitphoton imaging has been
successfully applied [23, 24]. The combination of multiphoton
autofluorescence (AF) and SHG imaging has also been shown to be
effective in the qualitative and quantitative characterization of
basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and photoaging [25, 26]. Additional
applications of multiphoton imaging include the characterization of
skin thermal damage and the UV generation of reactive oxygen
species in ex vivo human skin [27-29]. Understanding the role of
spherical aberration and developing high resolution imaging
apparatus for the mouse animal model are also among the advances
made in multiphoton dermatological microscopy [30, 31].
Multiphoton instrumentation
Most multiphoton microscopes use the point-scanning approach in
image acquisition. In our laboratory, we use a diode-pumped solid
state (DPSS), titanium-sapphire (ti-sa) laser system for excitation
(figure 1). The
broad lasing bandwidth of the ti-sa laser allows the selection of
excitation wavelengths in the 700-1,000 nm range. For imaging
purposes, a modified commercial microscope is used. The excitation
source is guided into the imaging microscope by a pair of
galvanometer-driven mirrors (Model 6220, Cambridge Technology,
Cambridge, MA). The entrance port of the microscope is modified to
accommodate a pair of beam expanding lenses. Proper beam expansion
is necessary to ensure overfilling of the objective’s back
aperture, which results in optimal focusing. The expanded beam is
reflected into the back aperture of the focusing objective by a
primary dichroic and the luminescence generated at the focal volume
is collected in the epi-illuminated geometry. Collected
fluorescence and/or SHG signals pass through the primary dichroic
and are processed by additional filters before being detected by
the detectors of single-photon counting photomultiplier tubes. If
three-dimensional imaging is preferred, a piezoelectric positioning
objective or a sample translation stage can be used for axial
imaging. Since large area images are often needed to appreciate the
global tissue structure, the sample translation stage can also be
used to position the specimen after each optical scan. The large
area multiphoton image can then be assembled from individually
acquired small area images.
To demonstrate the usefulness of multiphoton imaging in
characterizing physiological and pathological conditions, we
present the results of multiphoton images of normal skin and the
multiphoton analysis of BCC and different degrees of skin
photoaging.
Multiphoton imaging of normal skin
In multiphoton imaging, the detailed morphology of epithelial and
dermal structures can be obtained without fixation and staining
procedures (figure
2). The stratum corneum is autofluorescent and the
hexagonal morphology of single corneocytes can be clearly
demonstrated (figure
2A). When the image is taken deeper, the serial transition
from the granular layer (figure 2B), spinous layer
(figure 2C) and
basal layer (figure
2D) cells can be easily identified. Because nuclei are
deficient in AF signals, the nuclei appear as dark regions in the
cytoplasm. At the dermal-epidermal junction (figure 2E), SHG signals
from dermal collagen start to appear. Collagen is an efficient SHG
source, while elastic fibers produce intense AF. Separation of SHG
and AF signals help to distinguish these two important structures
in the dermis. As shown in figure 2F, fine
autofluorescent elastic fibers penetrating in the network of coarse
collagen fibers can be clearly demonstrated without
immunofluorescent processing (figure 2F).
Multiphoton characterization of basal cell carcinoma
BCC is the most prevalent skin cancer in the world [32]. The cancer
is most often seen in the head and neck area where the level of
accumulative sunlight exposure is the highest. It has been shown
that metalloproteinase activity is up-regulated in BCC and may
account for its local invasive and destructive behavior [33].
Surgical removal is recommended in most patients. However, the
margin of cancer can not be securely determined during the
operation and the local recurrence rate is greater than 10% in
cases undergoing simple excision. Further, wide excision can also
be a problem in certain anatomical sites, such as the eyelids and
nose, where preservation of the adjacent uninvolved tissue is of
great functional and cosmetic significance.
For secure removal of the entire cancer tissue, the technique of
Mohs’ micrographic surgery is used [34]. This technique can detect
cancer margins with almost 100% certainty and the recurrence rate
is only 1% [34]. However, Mohs’ micrographic surgery is
time-consuming and requires the simultaneous cooperation of the
specimen-processing technician and the surgeon.
To evaluate the potential of multiphoton imaging in replacing
Mohs’ surgery, we applied multiphoton microscopy in discriminating
BCC from the normal dermis [25]. In the multiphoton images, BCC is
characterized by clumps of autofluorescent cells in the dermis
(figure 3A). The
cancer cells have a relatively large nuclei and a higher nucleus to
cytoplasm ratio (figure
3A, yellow insert). The unique feature of BCC, peripheral
palisading, also can be observed. These features can also be seen
in the histological images (figure 3B). Another
prominent feature revealed by multiphoton imaging is the alteration
of extracellular matrix in the BCC stroma. In uninvolved dermis,
SHG signal by collagen accounts for much of the optical signal
(figure 3A , red
insert). However, in the stroma within and surrounding the cancer
clumps, SHG diminishes while AF signals increase (figure 3A, purple insert).
The decrease of SHG indicates that the collagen molecule packing
has been disrupted and can reflect an up-regulated collagenase
activity in cancer tissue.
Further, we performed quantitative analysis in the nonlinear
optical property of cancer stroma in an attempt to discriminate BCC
from the normal dermal stroma (figure 3C). In our
approach, the multiphoton fluorescence (MF) pixel number (a) and
SHG pixel number (b) within selected regions of interest were
determined and the MF to SHG index (MFSI) is defined to be
(a–b)/(a+b) [25]. According to this definition, MFSI will reach the
maximum value of 1 when only MF signals are present and MFSI will
decrease as collagen content increases. MFSI’s lower limit of -1
occurs when MF is absent and only the SHG signal is present. The
MFSI is highest within the tumor masses (mean MFSI = 0.93)
where the contribution of the fluorescent signal comes from the
cytoplasm (figure
3C). In normal dermal stroma, the MFSI is at its lowest,
reflecting the higher content of intact collagen. In cancer stroma,
the MFSI is significantly higher than that in normal dermal stroma.
The decrease of SHG and increase of MF in cancer stroma accounts
for the higher MFSI.
Alteration of dermal structures associated with photoaging
In addition to BCC, pathological conditions due to skin photoaging
are also among the critical issues in dermatological care. In skin
photoaging, exposure to UV radiation from sunlight plays a major
role in causing the associated pathological conditions [35].
Various surgical procedures and topical treatments are used to
rejuvenate photoaged skin, aimed at reversing the epidermal and
dermal alterations associated with photoaging. Due to the lack of a
reliable and noninvasive methodology, evaluation of the treatment
response usually depends on subjective clinical assessment.
Nonetheless, photoaging can be evaluated by the histological
changes in the extracellular matrix components of the dermis. In
cases of severely photoaged skin, an increase in disorganized
elastic fibers can be found in the superficial dermis (solar
elastosis) [35]. As we demonstrated in BCC imaging, multiphoton
microscopy is effective in monitoring the alteration in the
extracellular matrix at high resolution. When the facial skin
specimens from patients of different ages were investigated by
multiphoton imaging, we found age-dependent changes in the dermal
extracellular matrix [26]. In the case of a 20-year-old individual,
AF and SHG signals are interspersed in the papillary dermis (figure 4A, A3). In
the case of a 40-year-old individual, the AF signals increase and
SHG signals decrease (figure 4A, B3). In the
case of 70-year-old individual, SHG signals can only be detected in
a very thin zone right beneath the basement membrane and large
amounts of fluorescent elastic fibers (solar elastosis) can be
found in the dermis (figure 4A, C3). The trend
of decreasing SHG signals and increasing AF signals is
well-correlated with the histological findings of the decrease of
collagen fibers and an increase of elastic fibers with increasing
age (figure 4A,
panels of H&E and elastic stains). When the non-linear optical
properties of the patients are quantitatively analyzed, we found
that a radiometric approach based on the SHG and AF signals is a
good indicator of the degree of photoaging (figure 4B). Similar to the
MFSI ratio used to characterize the BCC specimens, the SAAID (SHG
to AF aging index of dermis) ratio, defined as (b–a)/(b+a), can be
used for analyzing differently photoaged skin. In severely
photoaged patients, the SAAID ratio is expected to approach –1
while younger patients are expected to have higher SAAID ratios.
Indeed, figure
4B shows this trend and supports the fact that analysis of
AF and SHG signals can be used for the qualitative and quantitative
characterization of differently photoaged skin.
After our proof-of-principle demonstration of this technique ex
vivo, Koehler et al. conducted an in vivo study in 18 individuals
from 21 to 84-years-old for the determination of intrinsic skin
aging. They found a negative correlation between the age of the
individual and the measured SAAID [36]. Hence, this technique is
capable of analyzing the changes of skin extracellular matrix
associated with aging and can be developed into a diagnostic tool
for the minimally invasive evaluation of effects of various
treatments aimed at skin rejuvenation.
Additional dermatological applications of mulitphoton
imaging
There have been numerous reports applying multiphoton microscopy
for drug delivery applications [37-44]. Due to the ease in
accessing the fluorescence emission, the penetration pathways of
model drugs in the stratum corneum can be visualized and quantified
[37-41, 44]. Combination with polarization techniques enables
multiphoton imaging to analyze the molecular alignment of
intercellular lipids associated with the treatment of penetration
enhancers [44, 45]. In addition, the dermal penetration of drugs
can be visualized [43]. Finally, multiphoton imaging in vivo also
allows the real time investigation of transcutaneous drug delivery
in humans [42].
Melanin is an effective generator of multiphoton fluorescence
[17]. In addition to the discrimination of basal cell carcinoma
from normal dermis [25], benign pigmented lesions and malignant
melanoma can also be highlighted by their intrinsic AF [17].
Clinical trials are needed to prove whether multiphoton microscopy
can be a useful tool for the detection of early melanomas and
differentiating benign pigmented lesions from malignant
melanomas.
Since multiphoton imaging is able to differentiate extracellular
collagen from elastic fibers, it has great potential for
application in skin diseases featured by changes of dermal collagen
fibers and elastic fibers, including pseudoxanthoma elasticum,
elastolysis, morphea, scleroderma, and GVHD.
In addition to visualizing cells and extracellular matrix,
dermal vessels can also be imaged by multiphoton imaging. By
intravascular injection of fluorescent agents, the morphology of
dermal vessels and even the blood cells can be observed [31]. This
approach can be used to analyze the angiogenesis of skin cancers
and the microvascular hemodynamics associated with various skin
disorders in animal models.
Conclusion
Since its introduction, multiphoton microscopy has contributed to a
number of areas in biology and medicine. The non-invasive nature,
reduced photodamage, and enhanced penetration depths make
multiphoton microscopy the preferred imaging modality in many areas
of biomedical applications. In dermatology, applications such as
the imaging and identification of BCC and skin photoaging may be
extended into clinical practice. For this approach to become widely
applicable in clinical settings, a number of issues remained to be
resolved. First, clinical applications would need the availability
of high speed (real-time) scanning systems in which disturbances
associated with patient movements can be minimized. Furthermore, an
ex vivo, and eventually in vivo image database of the various types
of pathological skin conditions need to be established and analyzed
in order to understand the effectiveness of multiphoton imaging in
discriminating diseased states of the skin from normal ones.
Finally, the potential health hazards associated with the
multiphoton excitation processes need to be well characterized.
With additional development, multiphoton imaging has potential to
become widely applied in the clinical diagnosis of skin
pathological conditions in vivo.
Acknowledgements
The authors want to express their gratitude for the financial
support from National Research Program for Genomic Medicine and
National Science Council, Taiwan (NSC94-3112-B-002-015-Y and
NSC95-3112-B-002-019 for S. J. L. and S. H. J.;
NSC94-3112-B-002-015-Y for C.Y.D.). Conflict of Interest: none.
References
1 Serup J. High Tech dermatology. Eur J Dermatol 2007; 17:
178-80.
2 Rajadhyaksha M, Grossman M, Esterowitz D,
Webb RH. In-Vivo Confocal Scanning Laser Microscopy of Human
Skin - Melanin Provides Strong Contrast. J Invest Dermatol 1995;
104: 946-52.
3 Welzel J, Lankenau E, Birngruber R,
Engelhardt R. Optical coherence tomography of the human skin.
J Am Acad Dermatol 1997; 37: 958-63.
4 Leveque JL, Xhauflaire-Uhoda E, Pierard GE.
Skin capacitance imaging, a new technique for investigating the
skin surface. Eur J Dermatol 2006; 16: 500-6.
5 Denk W, Strickler JH, Webb WW. 2-photon laser
scanning fluorescence microscopy. Science 1990; 248: 73-6.
6 So PTC, Dong CY, Masters BR, Berland KM.
Two-photon excitation fluorescence microscopy. Annu Rev Biomed Eng
2000; 2: 399-429.
7 Zoumi A, Yeh A, Tromberg BJ. Imaging cells and
extracellular matrix in vivo by using second-harmonic generation
and two-photon excited fluorescence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;
99: 11014-9.
8 Campagnola PJ, Loew LM. Second-harmonic imaging
microscopy for visualizing biomolecular arrays in cells, tissues
and organisms. Nat Biotechnol 2003; 21: 1356-60.
9 Zipfel WR, Williams RM, Christie R,
Nikitin AY, Hyman BT, Webb WW. Live tissue intrinsic
emission microscopy using multiphoton-excited native fluorescence
and second harmonic generation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100:
7075-80.
10 Tan HY, Teng SW, Lo W, Lin WC,
Lin SJ, Jee SH, Dong CY. Characterizing the
thermally induced structural changes to intact porcine eye, part 1:
second harmonic generation imaging of cornea stroma. J Biomed Opt
2005; 10; (054019).
11 Lin SJ, Hsiao CY, Sun Y, Lo W,
Lin WC, Jan GJ, Jee SH, Dong CY. Monitoring the
thermally induced structural transitions of collagen by use of
second harmonic generation microscopy. Opt Lett 2005; 30:
622-4.
12 Lin SJ, Lo W, Tan HY, Chan JY,
Chen WL, Wang SH, Sun Y, Lin WC, Chen JS,
Hsu CJ, Yu HS, Jee SH, Dong CY. Prediction of
heat-induced collagen shrinkage by use of second harmonic
generation microscopy. J Biomed Opt 2006; 11; (034020).
13 Masters BR, So PTC, Gratton E. Multiphoton
excitation fluorescence microscopy and spectroscopy of in vivo
human skin. Biophys J 1997; 72: 2405-12.
14 Masters BR, So PTC, Gratton E. Optical biopsy
of in vivo human skin: Multi-photon excitation microscopy. Lasers
Med Sci 1998; 13: 196-203.
15 So PTC, Kim H, Kochevar IE. Two-photon deep
tissue ex vivo imaging of mouse dermal and subcutaneous structures.
Opt Express 1998; 3: 339-50.
16 Malone JC, Hood AF, Conley T,
Nurnberger J, Baldridge LA, Clendenon JL,
et al. Three-dimensional imaging of human skin and mucosa by
two-photon laser scanning microscopy. J Cutan Pathol 2002; 29:
453-8.
17 König K, Riemann I. High-resolution multiphoton
tomography of human skin with subcellular spatial resolution and
picosecond time resolution. J Biomed Opt 2003; 8: 432-9.
18 Sun CK, Chen CC, Chu SW, Tsai TH,
Chen YC, Lin BL. Multiharmonic-generation biopsy of skin.
Opt Lett 2003; 28: 2488-90.
19 Palero JA, de Bruijn HS, van der Ploeg-van den
Heuvel A, Sterenborg HJCM, Gerritsen HC. In vivo
nonlinear spectral imaging in mouse skin. Opt Express 2006; 14:
4395-402.
20 Pena AM, Strupler M, Boulesteix T,
Schanne-Klein MC. Spectroscopic analysis of keratin endogenous
signal for skin multiphoton microscopy. Opt Express 2005; 13:
6268-74.
21 Hanson KM, Behne MJ, Barry NP, Mauro TM,
Gratton E, Clegg RM. Two-photon fluorescence lifetime
imaging of the skin stratum corneum pH gradient. Biophys J 2002;
83: 1682-90.
22 Werrlein RJ, Madren-Whalley JS. Multiphoton
microscopy: an optical approach to understanding and resolving
sulfur mustard lesions. J Biomed Opt 2003; 8: 396-409.
23 Navarro FA, So PTC, Nirmalan R, Kropf N,
Sakaguchi F, Park CS, et al. Two-photon confocal
microscopy: A nondestructive method for studying wound healing.
Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114: 121-8.
24 Yeh AT, Kao BS, Jung WG, Chen ZP,
Nelson JS, Tromberg BJ. Imaging wound healing using
optical coherence tomography and multiphoton microscopy in an in
vitro skin-equivalent tissue model. J Biomed Opt 2004; 9:
248-53.
25 Lin SJ, Jee SH, Kuo CJ, Wu RJ,
Lin WC, Chen JS, Liao YH, Hsu CJ, Tsai TF,
Chen YF, Dong CY. Discrimination of basal cell carcinoma
from normal dermal stroma by quantitative multiphoton imaging. Opt
Lett 2006; 31: 2756-8.
26 Lin SJ, Wu RJ, Tan HY, Lo W, Lin WC,
Young TH, et al. Evaluating cutaneous photoaging by use
of multiphoton fluorescence and second-harmonic generation
microscopy. Opt Lett 2005; 30: 2275-7.
27 Masters BR, So PTC, Buehler C, Barry N,
Sutin JD, Mantulin WW, et al. Mitigating thermal
mechanical damage potential during two-photon dermal imaging. J
Biomed Opt 2004; 9: 1265-70.
28 Lin MG, Yang TL, Chiang CT, Kao HC,
Lee JN, Lo W, Jee SH, Chen YF, Dong CY,
Lin SJ. Evaluation of dermal thermal damage by multiphoton
autofluroescence and second harmonic generation (SHG) microscopy. J
Biomed Opt 2006; 11; (064006).
29 Hanson KM, Clegg RM. Observation and quantification
of ultraviolet-induced reactive oxygen species in ex vivo human
skin. Photochem Photobiol 2002; 76: 57-63.
30 Lo W, Sun Y, Lin SJ, Jee SH,
Dong CY. Spherical aberration correction in multiphoton
fluorescence imaging using objective correction collar. J Biomed
Opt 2005; 10; (034006).
31 Li FC, Wang CC, Lin SJ, Jee SH,
Lo W, Dong CY. Dorsal skin fold chamber for high
resolution multiphoton imaging. Opt Quantum Electron 2005; 37:
1439-45.
32 Rubin AI, Chen EH, Ratner D. Basal-cell
carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2005; 24(353): 2262-9.
33 Yucel T, Mutnal A, Fay K, Fligiel SE,
Wang T, Johnson T, Baker SR, Varani J. Matrix
metalloproteinase expression in basal cell carcinoma: relationship
between enzyme profile and collagen fragmentation pattern. Exp Mol
Pathol 2005; 79: 151-60.
34 Rowe DE, Carroll RJ, Day Jr. CL.
Long-term recurrence rates in previously untreated (primary) basal
cell carcinoma: implications for patient follow-up. J Dermatol Surg
Oncol 1989; 15: 315-28.
35 Yarr M, Gilchrest B. In: Freedberg IM,
Eiser AZ, Wolff K, Austen KF, Goldsmith LA,
Katz SI, eds. Fitzpatrick’s Dermatology in General Medicine,
6th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2003: 1386-98.
36 Koehler MJ, Konig K, Elsner P, Buckle R,
Kaatz M. In vivo assessment of human skin aging by multiphoton
laser scanning tomography. Opt Lett 2006; 31: 2879-81.
37 Grewal BS, Naik A, Irwin WJ, Gooris G, de
Grauw GJ, Gerritsen HG, et al. Transdermal
macromolecular delivery: Real-time visualization of iontophoretic
and chemically enhanced transport using two-photon excitation
microscopy. Pharm Res 2000; 17: 788-95.
38 Yu B, Dong CY, So PTC, Blankschtein D,
Langer R. In vitro visualization and quantification of oleic
acid induced changes in transdermal transport using two-photon
fluorescence microscopy. J Invest Dermatol 2001; 117: 16-25.
39 Yu B, Kim KH, So PTC, Blankschtein D,
Langer R. Topographic heterogeneity in transdermal transport
revealed by high-speed two-photon microscopy: Determination of
representative skin sample sizes. J Invest Dermatol 2002; 118:
1085-8.
40 Yu B, Kim KH, So PTC, Blankschtein D,
Langer R. Visualization of oleic acid-induced transdermal
diffusion pathways using two-photon fluorescence microscopy. J
Invest Dermatol 2003; 120: 448-55.
41 Yu B, Kim KH, So PTC, Blankschtein D,
Langer R. Evaluation of fluorescent probe surface intensities
as an indicator of transdermal permeant distributions using
wide-area two-photon fluorescence microscopy. J Pharm Sci 2003; 92:
2354-65.
42 König K, Ehlers A, Stracke F, Riemann I.
In vivo drug screening in human skin using femtosecond laser
multiphoton tomography. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2006; 19: 78-88.
43 Stracke F, Weiss B, Lehr CM, Koenig K,
Schaefer UF, Schneider M. Multiphoton microscopy for the
investigation of dermal penetration of nanoparticle-borne drugs. J
Invest Dermatol 2006; 126: 2224-33.
44 Sun Y, Lo W, Lin SJ, Jee SH,
Dong CY. Multiphoton polarization and generalized polarization
(GP) microscopy reveals oleic-acid-induced structural changes in
intercellular lipid layers of the skin. Opt Lett 2004; 29:
2013-5.
45 Sun Y, Su JW, Lo W, Lin SJ, Jee SH,
Dong CY. Multiphoton polarization imaging of the stratum
corneum and the dermis in ex-vivo human skin. Opt Express 2003; 11:
3377-84.
|