ARTICLE
Auteur(s) : Rolf Hoffmann
Dermaticum, Privatpraxis für Dermatologie, Kaiser-Joseph-Str.
262, 79098 Freiburg, Germany
accepté le 19 Septembre 2007
Unwanted facial hair (UFH) is relatively common and is
characterised by facial hair growth that is coarser, longer, or
more profuse than the woman considers normal for her age. It is
often a symptom of an underlying medical disorder. It has been
shown that the amount of UFH considered unacceptable and
distressing to the sufferer is much less than the criteria
typically used by physicians to make a clinical diagnosis of facial
hirsutism [1]. This is important as studies have shown that the
presence of UFH has a tremendous negative impact on quality of life
leading to low self-esteem and low self-confidence [2, 3].
There are several methods available to address unwanted hair
growth. Commonly these include tweezing, shaving, waxing, and
bleaching, with around 20% of women using one of these temporary
methods at least once a week [4, 5]. More permanent approaches
including electrolysis and laser hair removal are also available.
Laser photo-epilation has become a popular choice for removing UFH,
although its effectiveness can be variable [6], with only 50-90% of
hairs being permanently removed [7-9]. Furthermore, laser hair
removal is less efficacious against hair with thinner shaft
diameters and ineffective on blond, grey and white hair [10]. In
addition, it is a costly procedure and requires multiple
treatments. Consequently, there remains a need for additional
effective methods for managing UFH.
Eflornithine is an irreversible inhibitor of ornithine
decarboxylase [11], a rate-limiting enzyme in the conversion of
ornithine to the polyamine, putrescine [12]. Polyamines, such as
putrescine, play a critical role in cell proliferation and the
differentiation of many cells [13]. Inhibition of ornithine
decarboxylase in the hair follicle slows hair growth [11].
Eflornithine 11.5% cream is indicated in the treatment of facial
hirsutism in women. In randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled
studies, eflornithine cream has been shown to significantly reduce
the growth of UFH in women, and to be well tolerated, both when
used alone and when combined with laser treatment [14-16].
Eflornithine is thought to be suitable for all skin and hair types
and is not anticipated to favour one particular hair shaft size
over another [16].
Methods historically used to assess hair growth have tended to
be time-consuming, costly and difficult to perform [17]. There was
a need for an operator- and patient-friendly, reliable and
sensitive method of monitoring hair growth and treatment response
in the management of UFH. Such a tool must be able to assess hair
growth rate, density and thickness. TrichoScan is a novel,
reliable, well-validated method of quantitatively assessing these
biological parameters of hair growth [17]. This technique combines
epiluminescence microscopy (ELM) with automatic digital image
analysis [17]. A good correlation between TrichoScan and manual
evaluation of hair counts has been demonstrated. TrichoScan is more
reproducible than manual evaluation, the margin of operator error
is small and there is greater consistency in data collection
compared with manual evaluation. TrichoScan has been shown to be a
valuable tool in clinical trials assessing the efficacy of
treatments for a number of conditions, including androgenetic
alopecia, and facial hirsutism [18]. This open-label study was
conducted to evaluate the efficacy of eflornithine 11.5% cream in
the management of UFH in women, using TrichoScan to quantify the
results.
Materials and methods
Subjects
Women aged ≥ 18 years with unwanted hair on the upper lip who
attended the clinic were consecutively included in the study.
Exclusion criteria were as follows: history of skin malignancy;
pregnancy or lactation; known or suspected intolerance or
hypersensitivity to the investigational products or any of its
ingredients. The study was conducted in accordance with the
Declaration of Helsinki, and reviewed and approved by an
Independent Ethics Committee (Landesärztekammer Südbaden, Germany).
Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. The study
was listed under EudraCt Number: 2005-003537-41.
Study design
This was an open-label, single-centre, non-randomised study. The
first subject was enrolled on 25 October 2005 and the last
completed the study on 11 April 2006. The primary objective of the
study was to evaluate the efficacy of twice-daily eflornithine
11.5% cream in women with UFH, using TrichoScan. The primary
efficacy endpoint was mean hair density (hairs/cm2). The
secondary efficacy endpoints were mean and cumulative hair length
(mm), mean hair thickness (μm), and hair growth rate (mm/day).
Tolerability was assessed at the end of the study using a patient
questionnaire. Patients were asked to judge tolerability according
to a five-point scale, with ‘excellent tolerability’ being rated as
a 1, ‘very good’ a 2, ‘good’ a 3, ‘satisfactory’ a 4, and ‘not
satisfactory’ a 5.
All subjects were instructed to apply eflornithine 11.5% cream
twice daily, according to the manufacturer’s recommendation, to the
upper lip area for a period of 4 months. During this time no other
potentially permanent epilation was allowed including plucking
(tweezing), electrolysis or laser epilation. Patients were,
however, allowed to bleach or shave the hairs, and to continue to
apply make-up and wash as normal. As this was an open-label study
there was no protocol for randomisation or blinding. Subjects were
instructed to bring their unused investigational product and empty
used tubes to every visit.
Study equipment
For macroscopic imaging of the upper lip a stereotactic device
(figure 1) was
used to ensure that all patients were photographed consistently.
This was accomplished with a chin and forehead holder. All images
were taken with a Canon Powershot A95. This camera was controlled
via a computer and the camera settings (use of flash, pixel number,
compression etc) were predefined for both macroscopic images and
TrichoScan images. After the macroscopic image was taken the camera
was detached from the device and an optic for skin-contact
microscopy was attached (figure 2).
TrichoScan assessments
Individuals were assessed at baseline, 1 month, 2 months and 4
months. Each assessment consisted of two visits. At the first visit
the upper lip was shaved completely and TrichoScan images were
taken for time recording. Subjects were instructed not to undergo
laser epilation or electrolysis, or to shave or pluck their upper
lip and to return to the investigation centre after 7 days for the
second visit. At the second visit of each monthly assessment a
macroscopic image was taken first and then a second TrichoScan
image was taken. As grey or fair hairs have only limited contrast
compared with skin, the area of the lip was dyed using hair dye
(Just for Men, Brush in Colour Gel), which was mixed according to
the manufacturer’s instructions and applied for 5 minutes. It has
been shown that dyed hairs produce the same imaging results as
non-dyed hair [19]. The dye was then removed with an alcoholic
tincture (Kodan Spray), and the area under investigation covered
with one drop of corn oil to avoid air bubbles. TrichoScan images
were then taken of the area between the lateral angle of the mouth
and the tip of the nose (2cm2 area) to obtain images of
the upper lip and for microscopic assessment of the efficacy
parameters. The images were then loaded onto the TrichoScan
software for analysis.
Statistical analysis
The primary and secondary endpoints were assessed using the
Wilcoxon test.
Results
In total, 25 women (aged 25-63 years old, mean 45.3 years) were
enrolled in the study. Due to personal reasons unrelated to study
medication, two patients dropped out of the study after 1 month of
treatment and one after 2 months. TrichoScan images of the upper
lip from one typical patient taken at baseline, Month 1 and Month 2
are shown in figure
3. Changes from baseline in hair density, mean hair length,
cumulative hair length, mean hair thickness and hair growth rate
over the 4-month treatment period are shown in table 1. Treatment with eflornithine 11.5% cream
resulted in a statistically significant decrease in hair density as
measured by TrichoScan from baseline to Month 1 (− 11.4
hairs/cm2; p = 0.014), Month 2 (−16.5
hairs/cm2; p = 0.013) and Month 4 (− 12.05
hairs/cm2; p = 0.05, figure 4). In addition,
mean hair length (figure
5) and cumulative hair length (figure 6) decreased
significantly from baseline to Month 1 (− 0.084 mm; p =
0.005 and − 7.104 mm, respectively; p = 0.001) Month 2
(− 0.132 mm and − 10.054 mm, respectively p <
0.001); and Month 4 (− 0.122 mm and − 8.061 mm,
respectively; p = 0.001). Eflornithine 11.5% cream also resulted in
a significant decrease in hair growth rate from baseline to Month 1
(− 0.015 mm/day, p = 0.004), Month 2
(− 0.021 mm/day, p < 0.001) and Month 4
(− 0.017 mm/day, p < 0.001, figure 7). Mean hair
thickness did not change significantly throughout the study period
(table 1).
No patient withdrew from the study due to side-effects. The mean
score from the tolerability questionnaire was 1.7, between
excellent (1) and very good (2).
Table 1 Mean difference in primary and secondary
outcome measures during the 4-month treatment period
|
Variable
|
Month
|
Difference from baseline
|
p value
|
|
Density (hairs/cm2)
|
1
|
− 11.419
|
0.014
|
|
2
|
− 16.540
|
0.013
|
|
4
|
− 12.045
|
0.058
|
|
Length mean (mm)
|
1
|
− 0.084
|
0.005
|
|
2
|
− 0.132
|
< 0.001
|
|
4
|
− 0.122
|
< 0.001
|
|
Cumulative length (mm)
|
1
|
− 7.104
|
0.001
|
|
2
|
− 10.054
|
< 0.001
|
|
4
|
− 8.061
|
0.001
|
|
Mean thickness (μm)
|
1
|
3.295
|
0.075
|
|
2
|
1.177
|
0.540
|
|
4
|
2.065
|
0.799
|
|
Growth rate (mm/day)
|
1
|
− 0.015
|
0.004
|
|
2
|
− 0.021
|
< 0.001
|
|
4
|
− 0.017
|
< 0.001
|
Discussion
In this study, eflornithine 11.5% cream applied twice daily for 4
months significantly reduced the growth of UFH, as measured by
TrichoScan. The application of eflornithine 11.5% cream resulted in
significant reductions in hair density, hair length and hair growth
rate, with improvements starting to be seen with TrichoScan as
early as 1 month after the start of treatment. It is important to
note that the reductions in hair density as measured in this study
are due to the slowing of hair growth by eflornithine, so that less
hair is detectable at the time of the second TrichoScan visit at 7
days, rather than due to removal of hair. It should also be noted
that, although the reductions in hair density, hair length and hair
growth rate are seen as early as 1 month using TrichoScan imaging,
physicians and patients may not notice visible improvements in UFH
until 8 weeks of treatment. Eflornithine 11.5% cream was generally
well tolerated. No patient withdrew because of lack of
tolerability.
These results support the findings of previous randomised,
double-blind, controlled studies that have demonstrated the
efficacy and safety of eflornithine 11.5% cream as monotherapy [14]
and in combination with laser therapy [15, 16]. In two randomised,
vehicle-controlled trials involving 596 women, 70% of eflornithine
11.5% cream-treated patients, compared with 41% of placebo-treated
patients experienced some improvement in their condition, as
assessed by the Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA). Improvement
was seen from 8 weeks after initiating treatment [14]. The present
study demonstrates that eflornithine immediately starts working on
the hair follicle to slow facial hair growth, providing
encouragement to physicians and patients during the initial 8 weeks
until the benefits of treatment are visibly seen.
Two small, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies
have investigated the efficacy and safety of eflornithine cream
combined with laser treatment versus laser treatment alone. In both
studies, the addition of eflornithine cream to laser hair treatment
resulted in a more rapid reduction of UFH, compared with laser
treatment alone. Eflornithine was also well tolerated in both
studies [15, 16]. Of note, in the current study, mean hair
thickness was not affected by eflornithine cream, providing further
reassurance that its use does not decrease the efficacy of
simultaneous or subsequent laser therapy, which works best on
coarse hair [10].
The effects of treatment in facial hirsutism can be difficult to
measure. In this study, TrichoScan was shown to be a highly useful
tool for evaluating the effectiveness of eflornithine 11.5% cream
in the treatment of women with UFH. This method of evaluating hair
growth has several advantages over standard techniques. Unlike
other methods, TrichoScan has been well-validated and its
reliability is investigator-independent, suggesting that it may be
a more quantifiable method of evaluating hair growth than PGA [17].
Furthermore, TrichoScan is relatively simple and quick to perform,
unlike other techniques that can be tedious and time-consuming
[17]. In addition, the amount of equipment needed is small. Many
dermatologists already have ELM-systems and would only need the
TrichoScan software in order to use this method of evaluating hair
growth in their practice. Of particular interest to the busy
physician, TrichoScan can be performed following only 8-12 minutes
of ‘hands-on’ experience [17].
In conclusion, eflornithine 11.5% cream was shown to be an
effective treatment for the management of UFH in women. Using
TrichoScan, the effect of eflornithine 11.5% cream on facial hair
growth was starting to be seen from 1 month after initiation of
treatment. Eflornithine 11.5% cream provides women with an
effective treatment option for this distressing condition. Further
studies should be initiated with greater numbers of patients to
investigate further the effectiveness of TrichoScan in evaluating
treatment responses in facial hirsutism.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by Shire Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG.
Professor Hoffmann is the inventor of TrichoScan.
References
1 Wolf JE, Shander D, Huber F, et al.
Randomized, double-blind clinical evaluation of the efficacy and
safety of topical eflornithine HCl 13.9% cream in the treatment of
women with facial hair. Int J Dermatol 2007; 46(1): 94-8.
2 Barth JH, Catalan J, Cherry CA, Day A.
Psychological morbidity in women referred for treatment of
hirsutism. J Psychosom Res 1993; 37(6): 615-9.
3 Sonino N, Fava GA, Mani E, Belluardo P,
Boscaro M. Quality of life of hirsute women. Postgrad Med J
1993; 69(809): 186-9.
4 Olsen EA. Methods of hair removal. J Am Acad Dermatol
1999; 40(2 Pt 1): 143-55.
5 Richards RN, McKenzie MA, Meharg GE.
Electroepilation (electrolysis) in hirsutism. 35,000 hours’
experience on the face and neck. J Am Acad Dermatol 1986; 15(4 Pt
1): 693-7.
6 Tanzi EL, Lupton JR, Alster TS. Lasers in
dermatology: four decades of progress. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003;
49(1): 1-31.
7 Goldberg DJ, Cross FW. Laser hair removal. J Cosmet
Dermatol 2002; 1(1): 53-4.
8 Lou WW, Quintana AT, Geronemus RG,
Grossman MC. Prospective study of hair reduction by diode
laser (800 nm) with long-term follow-up. Dermatol Surg 2000; 26(5):
428-32.
9 Alster TS, Bryan H, Williams CM. Long-pulsed
Nd: YAG laser-assisted hair removal in pigmented skin: a clinical
and histological evaluation. Arch Dermatol 2001; 137(7): 885-9.
10 Drosner M, Adatto M. Photo-epilation: guidelines
for care from the European Society for Laser Dermatology (ESLD). J
Cosmet Laser Ther 2005; 7(1): 33-8.
11 Malhotra B, Noveck R, Behr D,
Palmisano M. Percutaneous absorption and pharmacokinetics of
eflornithine HCl 13.9% cream in women with unwanted facial hair. J
Clin Pharmacol 2001; 41(9): 972-8.
12 Metcalf BW, Bey P, Danzin C, Jung MJ.
Catalytic irreversible inhibition of mammalian ornithine
decarboxylase (E.C. 4.1.1.17) by substrate and product analogues. J
Am Chem Soc 1978; 40: 143-55.
13 Oredsson S, Anehus S, Heby O. Inhibition of
cell proliferation by DL-alpha-difluoromethylornithine, a catalytic
irreversible inhibitor of ornithine decarboxylase. Acta Chem Scand
B 1980; 34(6): 457-8.
14 Schrode K, Huber F, Staszak J, et al. Randomized,
double-blind, vehicle-controlled safety and efficacy evaluation of
eflornithine 15% cream in the treatment of women with excessive
facial hair. Poster presented at the 58th Annual Meeting of the
American Academy of Dermatology, 10-15 March 2000.
15 Hamzavi I, Tan E, Shapiro J, Lui H. A
randomized bilateral vehicle-controlled study of eflornithine cream
combined with laser treatment versus laser treatment alone for
facial hirsutism in women. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007; 57(1):
54-9.
16 Smith SR, Piacquadio DJ, Beger B,
Littler C. Eflornithine cream combined with laser therapy in
the management of unwanted facial hair growth in women: a
randomized trial. Dermatol Surg 2006; 32(10): 1237-43.
17 Hoffmann R. TrichoScan: combining epiluminescence
microscopy with digital image analysis for the measurement of hair
growth in vivo. Eur J Dermatol 2001; 11(4): 362-8.
18 Hoffmann R. TrichoScan: a novel tool for the analysis of
hair growth in vivo. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc 2003; 8(1):
109-15.
19 Pecoraro V, Astore I, Barman JM. Growth rate
and hair density of the human axilla. A. Comparative study of
normal males and females and pregnant and post-partum females. J
Invest Dermatol 1971; 56(5): 362-5.
|