ARTICLE
Auteur(s) : M Parmentier, C Al Sayed Mahmoud, M Linder, J
Fanni
Nancy-Université, INPL-ENSAIA, Laboratoire de Science et Génie
Alimentaires, Vandœuvre-les-Nancy, France
The nutritional interest of the n-3 fatty acids in terms of
prevention of cardiovascular and other ageing diseases has been
extensively studied under numbered animal and clinical human
trials. There is some evidence that the intake of long-chain n-3
polyunsaturated fatty acids (LC-PUFA) may influence the status of
lipids, particularly the fatty acids composition in blood, cell
membranes or different organs and compartments of the human body. A
recent study in rats carried out in relation with ITERG, Pessac,
France, on margarines supplemented by LC-PUFA vs. precursors
(Linoleic and Alpha-Linolenic Acids) clearly demonstrated a strong
relationship between the diet and the PUFA content of blood lipids,
cholesterol esters and membrane phospholipids of the erythrocytes
[1].
Precursors vs. LC-PUFA, available sources
Only few studies are dealing with the molecular form of PUFA
intake, since a majority of natural or supplemented products are
constituted by triacylglycerols in which the PUFA are esterified
under their final chemical form. Another basic question regarding
the PUFA intake is related to the type of PUFA: should we consider
precursors vs. long chain PUFA? Starting from α-Linolenic Acid, the
liver of the mammalians is able to produce ω3-LC-PUFA, mainly EPA
and DHA through the action of a complex enzymatic pool of
desaturases and elongases [2]. However,
- – EPA is both an important terminal molecule and the
substrate for the elongation and desaturation that lead to DHA.
Therefore, the yield is generally weak for this final molecule of
the ω3 series, especially in the human metabolism.
- – The same enzymatic pool is involved in the metabolism
of Linoleic Acid that generates the ω6-LC-PUFA series, one of the
main terminal molecules being Arachidonic Acid (ARA). For instance,
these ω6-PUFA display antagonist properties regarding inflammation.
The competition between the substrates ALA/LA turns in favour of
the ω6 series since the global intake ratio ω6/ω3 is often higher
than the recommended ratio, which would be close to 5 [3].
The conclusion is that the amounts of DHA available for the
global body metabolism remain insufficient for a large part of the
humans and an intake of dietary ω3-LC-PUFA is highly recommended.
Because the only available source of ω3-LCPUFA comes from marine
lipids for the moment, the best recommendation that can be given is
to eat fish. A promising process to produce LC-PUFA using
engineered oleaginous way is under investigation, but only
preliminary results have been recently obtained and efficient
vegetable systems are expected not before 10 years [4].
Molecular form of PUFA intake in Food
There are several molecular ways to carry fatty acids from diet to
metabolism (table 1). The major
molecular form is represented by triacylglycerols (TAG). In fact,
98% of the fatty acids come from TAG (50-100 g per day for an
adult). Phospholipids (PL) are the second dietary source, mainly
represented by lecithins (2-10 g per day). Apart from these two
main sources,
other nutritional minor molecular species are also available,
such as diacylglycerols (DAG) which are present as minor components
in oils and fats (1-5 g per day), as well as cholesterol esters
(CE) (0.15-0.4 g per day) and fat soluble vitamin esters, such as
retinyl palmitate and tocopherol acetate (1mg and 15 mg per day,
respectively).
Ethyl esters (FAEE) and free fatty acids (FFA) are possible
alternative sources of bioavailable fatty acids but they are not
naturally present in edible oils and fats.
Concerning the main sources that are TAG and PL, it is well
known that the bioavailability of a given fatty acid highly depends
on 2 important parameters:
- – Its ability to produce highly dispersed droplets into
the liquid medium of the stomach. This property is required to
obtain the best compatibility between the oily phases and water, to
permit the lipases and other enzymes to be efficient.
- – Its location on the glycerol backbone (figure 1): best
bioavailability is obtained when the fatty acid is at the sn2
position, thus preserving it under 2-monoglyceride or
2-lyso-phospholipid forms during the intestinal assimilation
process.
Table 1 From food intake to metabolism: Fatty acid
vectors (Fave et al., 2004.
|
– Triacylglycerols: TAG: 98% (50-100 g per day)
|
|
– Phospholipids: mainly lecithins (2-10 g per day)
|
|
– other nutritional sources
|
|
- DAG present as minor components in oils and fats (1-5 g per
day)
|
|
- Cholesterol esters (0.15-0.4 g per day)
|
|
- Fat soluble vitamin esters (retinyl 1 mg, tocopherol acetate
15 mg per day)
|
|
– Ethyl esters
|
|
– Free fatty acids
|
Polar lipids vs. Triacylglycerols
Furthermore, polar lipids and especially phospholipids (PL) could
be another interesting way to carry LC-PUFA into the organism. This
is particularly true when a PUFA is esterified at the sn2 position
as observed in marine PL, especially from Salmon [5]. This property
has not been as widely studied as in the triacylglycerol way,
because products containing a large amount of PL with sn2-LC-PUFA
are not commonly available in the market, except some lipidic
fractions from fish or crustaceans extracted with organic solvents.
Phospholipids commonly occur in vegetable oils and animal fats,
but they are still considered as impurities. Therefore, degumming
is the first step of the refining process of vegetable oils.
Residual amounts of PL in edible oils are less than 5 ppm
(expressed in P content). However, their functional properties are
commonly used in the food industry as edible surfactants
(lecithins).
In this case, their nutritional properties are not exceptional
due to the fact that their FA composition is banal. On the other
hand, PL from eggs and plants are still available as
nutraceuticals.
Nutritional interest of polar lipids
The question is: is there any interest to use PL as vectors for
PUFA rather than TAG? The particular interest of marine PL consists
in a high degree of unsaturation, with ARA, EPA and DHA mainly
esterified at the sn-2 position. Consequently, their intestinal
absorption is high according to Bourre, 2004 [6]. This property has
been confirmed by using a Caco-2 cells assay (figure 2). The
permeability of the PUFA on PL was found 5 times higher and the
final intracellular level 50 times higher than PUFA on TAG.
Wijendran et al. (2002) have shown that the efficacy of PUFA
supplementation was higher by using Phospholipids instead of TAG as
established in a dose-response study [7]. These benefits could be
due to the amphiphilic properties of the phospholipids reflected in
a better water dispersibility and a greater susceptibility to
phospholipases compared to the glycerolysis of TAG.
Several studies have concerned the brain function: a
supplementation of DHA on PL improves behaviour, learning and
visual functions in ω3-deficient mice, as demonstrated by Carrie et
al., 2002 [8]. Moreover, in mice with PUFA deficiency, Bourre et
al., 2002 showed that a PUFA on phospholipids supplementation was
more efficient than a TAG form to recover a normal AG composition
in brain [9]. A particular PL, phosphatidylcholine (PC), has been
proposed to be a specific AG carrier to the brain by Lagarde et
al., 2001 [10].
Other effects related to ageing have been investigated: Rotstein
et al. (1987) have observed that DHA-rich PL decreased in the
retina during ageing [11], as well as the turnover of the PL in the
synaptic membranes decreased [12]. Bourre (1992) established that
the efficacy of some hepatic desaturases decreased during ageing,
this making worse the DHA potential deficiency [13].
Phospholipids and brain
Specific studies have concerned the effect of dietary PL on the
brain functions. Kidd (1999) showed that PC improved memory and
learning performances in ageing human [14]. In the same order,
Bernoud et al. (1999) proposed Lyso-PC as the most efficient
carrier of DHA to specific brain tissues [15]. Brain preferentially
absorbs DHA as sn-2 Lyso-PC compared with unesterified DHA [16]. On
the contrary, PS appeared to be concentrated in the cell membranes
of the brain. A comparison between TAG- and PL-fed groups indicated
that only PL supplementation increased brain DHA, as established by
Werner et al., 2004 [17].
Regarding brain diseases, PL have been found to have a
beneficial effect in dementia, depression, and other diseases.
Moreover, PL have been supposed to improve some brain functions
like memory. However, all these global effects are still
controversial, even though this has been claimed by some
nutraceuticals for years.
Extraction and enrichment processes
Assuming that there is some interest to produce concentrated PL,
especially marine PL that are particularly rich in PUFA, what are
the industrial available processes for extracting these molecules
from natural complex stuffs?
First of all, let’s consider the available PUFA-rich
phospholipids sources for production at industrial level. The term
“marine lecithin” is used to describe a mixture of phospholipids
(PC, PE, PS, PI…) obtained from a marine raw material, i.e. Krill
and other crustaceans, roe and milt of fish such as salmon,
herring, capelin and cod…, also marine by-products from the
filleting industry.
All these products are rich in LC-PUFA phospholipids, depending
on the species.
Pig or other mammalians brain extracts can be considered as good
sources; unfortunately they have been disqualified by the recent
BSE crisis for safety concerns. So, it can be assumed that marine
PL are the only industrial source available in safe conditions.
Several patents are dealing with this challenge, but all the
processes described are based on the extraction of phospholipids
from lipid mixtures using organic solvents (acetone, methanol,
propanol…):
- – Products containing highly unsaturated fatty acids for
use by women and their children during stages of preconception,
pregnancy and lactation/post-partum [18].
- – Method for extraction of a lipid mixture containing
PUFA-rich PL from viscera of fish, method for preserving viscera
prior to extraction, and lipid mixture extracted thereby [19].
- – Extraction of phospholipids from fish roe by SC-CO2,
following by 3 ethanol extraction steps [20] (figure 3).
- – Extraction of phospholipids from Krill by successive
acetone and alcohol treatments [21] (figure 4).
A novel enzymatic extraction process (patented [22])
As said above, all processes involve drastic chemical conditions.
Such conditions are now out of the scope of nutritional and
nutraceutical products constraints. Therefore, looking for
alternative mild processes, carried out at low temperature and
solvent-free conditions was an interesting scientific and
industrial challenge.
Starting from a natural source of LCPUFA esterified on PL, which
is the brain tissue of Salmo salar, (see composition on table 2) we have investigated a mild process [22]
without any use of organic solvent and able to provide an extract
that is rich in PL, itself being particularly rich in DHA (>
30%). This enzymatic process provides at industrial level a product
that have been called Phospho-Lipo-Peptidic Complex (PLPC)
available for a nutraceutical use with the special target to
deliver a high concentration of DHA on PL in the specific metabolic
pathway of these molecules.
As described figure
5, heads of salmon are crushed in an adequate water amount
and the mixture is submitted to the action of proteases. The
enzymatic hydrolysis is monitored to achieve a destructuration of
the animal tissue able to allow subsequent separation by
centrifugation.
The products obtained are a soluble protein hydrolysate, a pure
oily phase (neutral oil), and a mixture that contains
phospholipids, peptides and oil. The FA-compositions of these
different fractions are given (table 3).
It is noticeable that the PLPC lipid phase is highly unsaturated,
containing near to 40% of n-3 PUFA, with a ratio DHA/EPA reaching
2.16. The PL phase of the PLPC contains more than 30% DHA with a
ratio n-3/n-6 equal to 8.6 (figure 6).
The study of the oily phases of the PLPC by TLC-FID, after
development in hexane/diethyl ether/formic acid (80:20:0.2, v/v/v)
shows that this complex contains 45% of TAG and 54% of PL (figure 7A). A second
development using chloroform/methanol/ammonia (130:70:10, v/v/v)
allows the separation between PL molecules (figure 7B). Major PL is
phosphatidylcholine (68.2%), followed by phosphatidylethanolamine
(10.8%), phosphatidylserine (8.9%), sphingomyeline (4.6%) and
phosphatidylinositol (4.8%).
Table 2 Physico-chemical composition of a filleting
by-product of Salmo salar.
|
Composition
|
Head
|
Filet
|
|
Proteins (%)
|
13.1 ± 0.4
|
18.2 ± 0.5
|
|
Lipids (%)
|
23.8 ± 0.5
|
14.5 ± 1.5
|
|
Dry mater (%)
|
67.8 ± 1.3
|
36.8 ± 0.5
|
|
Ash (%)
|
2.6 ± 0.6
|
1.3 ± 0.1
|
Table 3 Fatty acid composition of the raw material and
the fractions extracted from a salmon by-product after enzymatic
hydrolysis (neutral oil, Phospho-lipo-peptidic complex (PLPC) and
phospholipids (PL) of the PLPC.
|
Fatty acids groups
|
Salmon heads (raw material)
|
Neutral oil
|
PLPC
|
PL of the PLPC
|
|
∑ SFA
|
24.65
|
25.23
|
23.64
|
19.29
|
|
∑ MUFA
|
39.92
|
40.78
|
31.34
|
24.00
|
|
∑ PUFA
|
35.42
|
34.02
|
45.13
|
56.71
|
|
∑ PUFA n-6
|
7.73
|
7.78
|
5.59
|
5.86
|
|
∑ PUFA n-3
|
27.69
|
26.24
|
39.04
|
50.44
|
|
EPA
|
8.43 ± 0.18
|
7.74 ± 0.48
|
8.19 ± 0.14
|
10.31 ± 0.10
|
|
DHA
|
12.10 ± 0.64
|
11.90 ± 0.70
|
18.18 ± 0.39
|
33.10 ± 0.40
|
|
DHA/EPA
|
1.44
|
1.54
|
2.16
|
3.44
|
|
n-3/n-6
|
3.58
|
3.17
|
6.98
|
8.60
|
Conclusion
An enzymatic patented process has been validated at industrial
scale to produce a phospho-lipo-peptidic complex extracted from
salmon heads. The oily phase of this PLPC contains 54% of
Phospholipids, which are particularly rich in DHA (more than 30%).
The final objective could be now to characterize how the product
can affect the phospholipid composition of the cell-membrane with
particular effect on the neuronal cell structure.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to “Les Salaisons d’Orly” (SENIA, Rungis,
France) and Laboratoires Le Stum, Lorient, France, for financial
support.
References
1 Dubois V, Breton S, Combe N, Fanni J,
Parmentier M. FA composition of blood lipids, cholesterol
esters and membrane phospholipids following a supplementation in
marine LC-PUFA in rats, non published industrial results. Nice:
Congrès francophone de nutrition, 2007.
2 Simopoulos A. Omega-3 fatty acids in health and disease
and in growth and development. Am J Clin Nutr 1991; 54: 438-63.
3 Legrand P. Comment augmenter l’apport nutritionnel en
acides gras n-3. OCL 2004; 1(11): 50-4.
4 Napier J. LC-PUFA from plants, ELSA lecture, 4th EuroFedLipid
congress, Madrid. 2006.
5 Peng J, Larondelle Y, Pham D, Ackman RG,
Rollin X. Polyunsaturated fatty acid profiles of whole body
phospholipids and triacylglycerols in anadromous and landlocked
Atlantic salmon. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B
2003; 134: 335-48.
6 Bourre JM. Roles of unsaturated fatty acids (especially
omega-3 fatty acids) in the brain at various ages and during
ageing. J Nutr Health Aging 2004; 8(3): 163-74.
7 Wijendran V, Huang MC, Diau GY, Boehm G,
Nathanielsz PW, Brenna JT. Efficacy of dietary
arachidonic acid provided as triglyceride or phospholipids as
substrates for brain arachidonic acid accretion in baboon neonates.
Pediatr Res 2002; 51: 265-72.
8 Carrie I, Clément M, de Javel D,
Frances H, Bourre JM. Specific phospholipid fatty acid
composition of brain regions in mice. Effects on n-3
polyunsaturated fatty acid deficiency and phospholipid
supplementation. J Lipid Res 2000; 41: 465-72.
9 Bourre JM, Dumont O. The administration of pig brain
phospholipids versus soybean phospholipids in the diet during the
period of brain development in the rat results in greater
increments of brain docosahexaenoic acid. Neurosci Lett 2002; 355:
129-33.
10 Lagarde M, Bernoud N, Brossard N.
Lysophosphatidylcholine as a preferred carrier form of
docosahexaenoic acid to the brain. J Mol Neurosci 2001; 16:
201-4.
11 Rotstein NP, Ilincheta de Boschero M, Giusto M, Aveldano M.
Effects of aging on the composition and metabolism of
docosahexaenoate-containing lipids of retina. Lipids 22:253–60.
12 Ando S, Tanaka Y, Toyoda Nee OY, Kon K,
Kawashima S. Turnover of synaptic membranes: age-related
changes and modulation by dietary restriction. J Neurosci Res 2002;
70: 290-7.
13 Bourre JM, Piciotti M. Delta-6 desaturation of
alpha-linolenic acid in brain and liver during development and
aging in the mouse. Neurosci Lett 1992; 141: 65-8.
14 Kidd PM. A review of nutrients and botanicals in the
integrative management of cognitive dysfunction. Altern Med Rev
1999; 4: 144-61.
15 Bernoud N, Fenart L, Moliere P, et al.
Preferential transfer of
2-docosahexaenoyl-1-lysophosphatidylcholine through an in vitro
blood–brain barrier over unesterified docosahexaenoic acid. J
Neurochem 1999; 72: 338-45.
16 Thies F, Pillon C, Moliere P, Lagarde M,
Lecerf J. Preferential incorporation of sn-2 lysoPC DHA over
unesterified DHA in the young rat brain. Am J Physiol Regul Integr
Comp Physiol 1994; 267: R1273-R1279.
17 Werner A, Havinga R, Kuipers F,
Verkade HJ. Treatment of EFA deficiency with dietary
triglycerides or phospholipids in a murine model of extrahepatic
cholestasis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2004; 286:
G822-G832.
18 Van Elswyk M. Products containing highly unsaturated fatty
acids for use by women and their children during stages of
preconception, pregnancy and lactation/post-partum. US Patent WO
03/017945 A2. 2003.
19 Hiratsuka S, Toshihiro S, Masayuka H, et al. Method for
extracting lipid mixture containing phospholipids comprising
polyunsaturated fatty acids from viscera of fish, method for
preserving viscera prior to extraction, and lipid mixture extracted
thereby. US Patent 2003/0190392.
20 Leigh S, Kung E, Van Hoogevest P, Tiemessen H. Marine lipid
compositions, US Patent, WO 2004/047554 A1.
21 Sampalis F. Natural Marine source Phospholipids comprising
Flavonoids, polyunsaturated fatty acids and their applications.
WO/2003/011873.
22 Linder M, Fanni J, Parmentier M, Regnault P. Procédé
d’extraction d’huile par voie enzymatique et obtention
d’hydrolysats protéiques à fonctionnalités dirigées. French Patent,
2.835.703. 2002.
|