ARTICLE
Auteur(s) : Henric S.
Adler, Kerstin Steinbrink
Department of Dermatology, University of Mainz, Germany
accepté le 10 Juillet 2007
Introduction: immune defence vs. immune tolerance
The immune system has two basic functions. First, “la raison
d’être”, to protect from harmful pathogens by mounting appropriate,
qualitatively different immune responses to the respective
challenge, and second, to limit excessive, self-destructive immune
responses, to prevent autoimmunity and non-essential reactions to
innocuous agents.
As professional antigen presenting cells, dendritic cells (DCs)
are a central element in fulfilling these tasks. They take up,
process and present antigens in concert with costimulatory
molecules and cytokines to direct an immune response. DCs are
continuously produced from hematopoetic stem cells and are widely
distributed as immature DCs in both lymphoid and non-lymphoid
tissues. DCs reside at body surfaces, especially the skin, the
airways, in the interstitial spaces of many organs, in the blood,
and afferent lymphatics [1]. By expressing molecular components of
intercellular junctions, DCs may insinuate through tight epithelia,
while extending their processes into the environment to capture
proteins without breaking the epithelial barrier [2]. Thus, DCs can
be considered as specialized sentinels to scrutinize for pathogens,
they integrate and propagate information concerning
homeostatic/steady state and inflammatory/infectious situations,
respectively, and control the ensuing responses.
The role of DCs for innate and adaptive immune defence has been
reviewed thoroughly elsewhere [1, 3, 4] and will be considered only
briefly here. The decision to initiate an immune response and its
quality are largely dependent on “danger” signals associated with
the presence of distinct pathogen challenges (figure 1). The expression
of Toll-like receptors (TLR) and molecules such as C-type lectins,
mannose receptors or intracellular
nucleotide-binding-oligomerization domains (NOD) enables DCs to
recognize conserved pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMP)
like yeast or bacterial glycoproteins, dsRNA, and CpG-DNA,
respectively, and to induce a balanced innate and adaptive response
[4-6].
The former concept of “discrimination between self and non-self”
has been expanded by the theory of an immune system which
discrimitates the steady state situation, with absence of
pathogens, from a situation which is identified as a threat,
requiring immune defence mechanisms. This idea has been introduced
as the “danger model” [7]. In steady state conditions, where there
is no threat but a multitude of antigens derived from body tissues
and innocuous agents, the second task of the immune system is
predominant: to prevent self-destructive autoimmunity and
unnecessary immune activation. Two safety concepts have evolved to
ensure this: central and peripheral tolerance.
Central tolerance
To prevent autoimmunity, self-reactive T cells have to be
controlled. The process of central tolerance leads to deletion of
self-reactive T cells by negative selection (deletional tolerance).
This takes place in the thymus and involves promiscuous expression
of tissue-restricted self antigens (TRAs) by medullary thymic
epithelial cells (mTECs) and cross presentation of these antigens
by thymic DCs [8]. Also, peripheral circulating DCs displaying
peripheral antigens contribute to clonal deletion of thymocytes by
homing to the thymus [9].
Peripheral tolerance
Central tolerance is essential, but not sufficient. There are
certain limits to the efficacy of deletional tolerance.
Self-reactive lymphocytes escape negative selection, thus providing
a source for autoimmunity. Many harmless exogenous proteins enter
the body postnatally and lymphocyte receptors for foreign antigens
might cross-react with self. This requires peripheral strategies to
ensure tolerance. The mechanisms involved are (i) immunological
ignorance of a given antigen, (ii) apoptosis (iii) induction of
anergy and (iv) generation of regulatory T cells with suppressor
activity.
- (i) An antigen that does not reach secondary lymphoid
tissues in minimum doses for a suffiently long period of time to be
appropriately presented by APCs is immunologically ignored.
- (ii) Antigen which is constantly present in the lymphoid
tissue or reaches it in excessive amounts and is presented for
extended periods of time, leads to peripheral deletion of T
cells.
- (iii) Presented antigen, which leads to TCR stimulation
without sufficient positive costimulatory signalling by DC, leads
to anergy, characterized by impaired proliferation and effector
functions in response to further stimulation. (iv) Generation of
regulatory T cells (Treg) can either take place in the thymus – as
for naturally occuring
CD4+CD25+FOXP3+Treg [8, 10] – or
in the periphery e.g. by tolerogenic DCs (tDCs) – as for induced
Treg (iTreg) (see below). Induction of anergy (iii) and suppression
(iv) will be discussed in more detail below in the light of the
involvement of tolerogenic DCs (tDC).
Human and murine DC
DCs are bone marrow-derived leucocytes and comprise a variety of
subpopulations with different functions, which are related to
differentiation state, specific location in the body and
differential interactions with antigens and effector cells of the
immune system. Subtypes of human and murine DCs have been reviewed
elsewhere [11-13].
Development of cell culture methods since the 1990s has allowed
for the generation of larger quantities of DCs of murine and human
origins for detailed morphological and functional analysis [14-26].
In vitro, the most accessible human DC types are monocyte-derived
DCs (moDC). These cells can be generated by culture of
CD14+ precursor cells with GM-CSF and IL-4 or IL-13
[26-32]. This results in an immature DC phenotype, which is defined
by strong antigen uptake and low costimulatory capacity. Further
stimulation with inflammatory cytokines (e.g. IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6
and PGE2) [24], by-products of tissue damage or agents
representing PAMPs, which are recognized by Toll like receptors
(TLR), leads to distinct mature phenotypes with certain functional
specializations [33-35]. Alternatively, DCs can be generated in
vitro from CD34+ precursor cells [21, 36-40].
Maturation of DCs is accompanied by (i) increased formation of
stable MHC-peptide complexes [6, 41-43]; (ii) higher expression of
costimulatory molecules (B7- and TNFR-families) [44-48]; (iii) new
synthesis of cytokines that influence T cell proliferation and
polarization [49, 50]; and (iv) altered expression of chemokine
receptors and production of chemokines that allow for the movement
of DCs into lymphatic vessels and lymphoid organs in vivo and
attraction of T cells respectively [51-54] (figure 2). But DC
maturation may also occur in the absence of infection during such
strong T cell immune responses as in conditions of graft versus
host disease [55], contact allergy [56], and autoimmunity [57].
The function of immature DCs in the concept of steady state
peripheral tolerance
Current understanding of steady state conditions teaches that there
is a constant turnover of DCs which take up and present peripheral
self antigens as well as harmless foreign antigens under non
inflammatory conditions. Partial maturation allows for migration to
lymphoid tissue where these immature steady state DCs (stDCs, figure 1) create
tolerance to the respective antigens, thereby circumventing the
threat to react likewise towards self/harmless antigens under
inflammatory conditions [58-61].
The normal processes of cellular turnover provide tissue
resident iDCs with a constant supply of self antigens for
processing and presentation. Experimental evidence in vivo shows
that antigens from a diversity of cell types such as leucocytes,
endocrine and epithelial cells from the intestine and the skin can
be transferred to DCs constitutively. This has been shown by
proving the presence of cell type specific protein markers (e.g.
keratin, melanin) in stDCs [61]. Besides the capture of soluble
proteins via the expression of multilectin receptors like MMR
(macrophage mannose receptor) or DEC-205, one important mechanism
seems to be the efficient uptake of cellular constituents of dying
cells through apoptotic bodies [61-66]. Recognition of apoptotic
cells is mediated by a series of apoptotic cell-associated
molecular patterns (ACAMP) that are recognized by DC [62, 67].
Receptors involved include scavenger receptors like CD36, the
αv-integrin chain, complement receptors for C1q and
iC3b, the integrin associated protein CD47 and others [63, 66, 67].
Several studies have shown that under non-infectious conditions
immature DCs, which have internalized early apoptotic cells, fail
to upregulate MHC and costimulatory molecules. In addition, these
iDCs have a reduced ability to secrete proinflammatory cytokines
and to produce the immunosuppressive cytokines IL-10 or TGF-β [66].
This sustained immature phenotype prevents activation and
polarization of T cells reactive against the antigens of apoptotic
cells presented, and can contribute to peripheral tolerance.
Internalization of apoptotic cell fragments can lead to
migration towards proximal secondary lymphoid tissue in vivo. This
involves a switch in chemokine receptor expression from homing to
inflamed tissue versus a lymph node homing pattern, by down
regulating CCR5 and upregulating CCR7 [68]. This may be mediated,
in part, by opsonizing apoptotic cells with iC3b [69]. Migratory
iDCs isolated ex vivo exhibit a certain level of surface MHC
expression, T cell costimulatory and adhesion molecules, IL-10
production, low levels of proinflammatory cytokines, but the
virtual absence of IL-12p70 synthesis [61, 63, 70].
It is still an open question whether these migratory stDCs,
sometimes also called “semimature DCs” [59], die rapidly in vivo
with the respective antigens then being transferred to lymph node
resident DCs, or if the migratory stDCs are themselves the inducers
of tolerance. By analysis of DC-T cell interaction in vivo using
real-time two-photon-microscopy, one group has shown that the
contacts of CD8+ T cells in tolerogenic situations are
brief and T cells remain motile, establishing serial contacts with
multiple lymph node resident DCs, whereas during induction of
immunity, T cells stop moving after 15-20 h and establish
prolonged interaction with DCs [71]. Similar results were obtained
for CD4+ T cells in another study [72].
Briefly summarized, migratory DC during steady state (figure 1) have distinct
morphological and functional characteristics with reduced
proinflammatory and costimulatory potential and form brief serial
interactions with T cells in vivo. Further experimental evidence
for the function and impact of stDCs for tolerance induction in
vivo has been reviewed in detail by Steinman et al. [61, 73].
Induction of tolerogenic DCs in vitro
Besides the use of immature DCs, diverse strategies have been used
to modify human, murine or rat DCs in vitro such that a tolerogenic
or regulatory phenotype is generated. This included multiple
protocols for the single or combined use of cytokines with known
immunosuppressive functions (IL-10 or TGF-β) (table 1), TNF-α, IFN-γ, β2 microglobulin [74],
neuropeptides [75] or ligation of SIRP-α (signal regulator protein
α) [76]. Other approaches applied immunosuppressive drugs [77]
(dexamethasone, mitomycin C, cyclosporin A, mycophenolic acid and
derivates or acetylsalicyl acid), inhibitors of NF-κB and vitamins
(1,25-dihydroxy-vitamin D3, Vitamin C or E) (table 1). Genetic engineering of DCs was also used
to direct the expression of IL-10 and/or TGF-β [78-80], soluble
TNF-receptor [81], intracellular CTLA-4 [82], murine ICOS-Ig [83]
or to genetically impair activation of the NF-κB pathway [84-86].
A major part of these strategies and the respective experimental
results will be discussed in further detail below.
iDCs as a tool to induce regulatory T cells
Repetitive stimulation of autologous CD4+ T cells with
iDCs (phenotype, table 1) leads to early
upregulation of CTLA-4, and, in contrast to stimulation with mature
DCs, not to enhanced expression of CD154, CD69 and CD70. T cells
lose their ability to produce IL-2, IFN-γ or IL-4 after several
rounds of stimulation with iDCs and differentiate into non
proliferating, IL-10 secreting Tr1-like cells (for detailed review
of Treg subtypes see Jonuleit et al. [87]). They suppress the
antigen-driven proliferation of Th1 cells in a dose-dependent, but
antigen-nonspecific manner [88]. The induction of the Tr1 phenotype
appears to require IL-10 secretion by iDCs [89]. Jonuleit et al.
reported that the suppressor function (suppression of
proliferation) of these induced Tregs is cell contact-dependent,
does not require CTLA-4 and seems to be independent of IL-10 and
TGF-β as shown by experiments with neutralizing antibodies [88].
But this is controversial, as Levings et al. restored IFN-γ
production, but not proliferation, by blocking IL-10R in
co-cultures of conventional T cells and iTregs [90].
In vitro generated immature monocyte-derived DCs have been shown
to induce antigen specific inhibition of effector T cell function
in vivo after injection in healthy human subjects. A single
injection of immature DCs [iDC) pulsed with influenza matrix
protein (MP) and keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) led to the
inhibition of MP-specific CD8+ T cell effector function.
MP-specific CD8+ T cells, as identified by tetramer
staining, were expanded in those individuals but showed reduced
IFN-γ production and lacked killer activity as compared to
pre-immunization. Notably, IL-10 producing MP-specific cells
appeared after immunization with iDC, which might represent Tr1
type regulatory T cells [91] (table
2).
Murine bone marrow-derived iDCs generated CD25+
Tr1-like regulatory T cells, which suppressed enteroantigen-induced
T cell proliferation in vitro in an IL-10-mediated cell
contact-independent manner. Purified preparations of these Tr1-like
cells generated in vitro protected from enteroantigen-reactive
disease in a murine colitis model in vivo, after injection.
CD4+ T cells of protected mice secreted higher levels of
IL-10 and lower levels of IFN-γ after antigen specific stimulation
[92]. Other work has shown that repetitive injection of iDCs
triggered the expansion of an IL-10-producing T cell population,
which did not express FOXP3 [93]. Adoptive transfer of this cell
population protected mice from collagen-induced arthritis. This was
associated with local IL-10 production and an attenuation of T and
B cell responses, as measured by diminished cytokine production ex
vivo and reduction of the disease-associated bCII-specific antibody
in the sera of treated mice (table
2).
Table 1 Features of human monocyte derived mature and
tolerogenic DCs
|
|
|
Mature DCs
|
Tolerogenic DCs
|
|
Molecule on DC [Ligand on T cells]
|
Transmitted Signal in T cells
|
mDC (Mo derived)
|
iDC
|
Treatment: IL-10
|
Treatment:IL-10/ TGF-β
|
Treatment:NFκB Inhibition
|
Treatment:Gluco-corticoid
|
|
|
MHC I [TCR]
|
(+)
|
(+) high
|
(+) low
|
(+) low to intermediate
|
(+) intermediate
|
(+) intermediate
|
|
|
|
MHC II [TCR]
|
(+)
|
(+) high
|
(+) low
|
(+) low to intermediate
|
(+) intermediate
|
(+) intermediate
|
|
|
|
B7 family
|
- B7-1 (CD80) [CD28]
- [CD152/CTLA-4]
|
Dependent on ligand: CD28 (+) CD152 (-)
|
(+) high
|
(-) to low
|
(+) low to intermediate
|
(-) to low
|
(+) low to intermediate
|
(+) low to intermediate
|
|
- B7-2 (CD86) [CD28]
- [CD152/CTLA-4]
|
(+) high
|
(+) low
|
(+) intermediate
|
(+) low
|
(+) intermediate
|
(+) intermediate
|
|
|
B7-H1/PD-L1 [PD-1]
|
(-)
|
(+) high
|
(+)
|
(+) high
|
|
|
(+) high
|
(+)
|
|
B7-DC/PD-L2 [PD-1]
|
(+) high
|
(+)
|
(+) high
|
|
|
|
|
|
B7-H2/ICOSL [ICOS]
|
(+)
|
(+) high
|
(+)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B7-H3 [?]
|
(+) / (-)
|
(+) high
|
(+) high
|
(+) high
|
|
|
|
|
|
(-)
|
|
|
(+) high
|
|
|
|
|
|
TNFR family
|
CD40 [CD154/CD40L]
|
(+)
|
(+) high
|
(+) low
|
(+) low
|
low
|
|
low
|
low
|
|
Inhibitory recetors
|
ILT-1
|
(-)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(+)
|
|
ILT-2
|
(-)
|
(-)
|
(+)
|
(+)
|
|
|
|
(+)
|
|
ILT-3
|
(-)
|
(+)
|
(+)
|
(+)
|
|
|
|
|
|
ILT-4
|
(-)
|
mRNA (+?)
|
|
↑mRNA (+ ?)
|
|
|
↑mRNA (+ ?)
|
(+)
|
|
ILT-5
|
(-)
|
mRNA (+?)
|
|
↑mRNA (+ ?)
|
|
|
|
(+)
|
|
Ig superfamily
|
CD83 [?]
|
(+?)
|
(+)
|
(-)
|
(-) to low
|
low
|
(-) to low
|
|
(-) to low
|
|
Ig superfamily Adhesion molecules
|
CD54/ICAM-1
|
(+)
|
(+) high
|
|
(-) to low
|
|
|
low
|
|
|
CD58/LFA-3
|
(+)
|
(+) high
|
(-)
|
(-) to low
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chemokine receptors
|
CCR-1
|
n.a.
|
(-) to low
|
(+) high
|
(+) Decoy
|
|
|
|
|
|
CCR-2
|
n.a.
|
(-) to low
|
(+) high
|
(+) Decoy
|
|
|
|
|
|
CCR-3
|
n.a.
|
(-) to low
|
(+) high
|
(+) (Decoy?)
|
|
|
|
|
|
CCR-5
|
n.a.
|
(-) to low
|
(+) high
|
(+) Decoy
|
|
|
|
|
|
CCR-7
|
n.a.
|
(+) high
|
(-)
|
(-) to low
|
|
|
|
(-) to low
|
|
CXCR-4
|
n.a.
|
(+) high
|
(-)
|
(+) intermediate
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cytokines
|
Ratio IL-12/IL-10
|
- IL-12: Proliferation, Cytokine production (IFN-γ),Th1
polarization
- IL-10: inhibition of Proliferation Tr1 development
|
high
|
Low production of both cytokines
|
↓
|
↓
|
↓
|
↓
|
↓
|
|
IL-1β
|
cofactor for T cell polarization (Th2 and Th17)
|
(+) high
|
(-)
|
↓
|
|
|
↓
|
|
|
IL-6
|
- Cofactor for T cell polarization (Th17)
- Inhibition of CD4+CD25+ Treg
|
(+) high
|
(-)
|
↓
|
|
|
↓
|
|
|
TNF-α
|
Cofactor for T cell polarization (Th17)
|
(+) high
|
(-)
|
↓
|
|
↓
|
↓
|
|
|
Trans-cription-factors
|
NFκB (RelB)
|
n.a.
|
activated & nuclear translocation
|
|
|
|
inactive cytoplasmic complex
|
|
|
|
Enzymes
|
IDO
|
(-) by Tryptophan deprivation
|
Low
|
High
|
High?
|
|
|
|
|
Table 2 Use of tDCs in experimental models in vivo
|
Species
|
Model
|
tDC type
|
Result
|
Ref.
|
|
Mouse
|
Transplantation (for comprehensive review see Morelli et al.
[188])
|
iBMDC
|
Prolonged allograft survival
|
188
|
|
IL-10/TGF-β-BMDC
|
Protection from XGVHD and GVL
|
123, 124
|
|
Immature DEX-BMDCs
|
No tolerance induction
|
168
|
|
LPS- DEX-BMDCs
|
Induction of antigenspecific T cell anergy and prolonged allograft
survival
|
166
|
|
1,25(OH)2D3 BMDCs
|
Adoptive transfer of in vitro generated 1,25(OH)2D3
treated BMDCs prolonged allograft survival
|
187
|
|
Colitis
|
iBMDC
|
In vitro by iBMDC induced Tr1-like Treg protected from disease
after injection
|
94
|
|
Arthritis
|
iBMDC
|
Repetitive injection of iBMDCs induced Tr1-like Treg cell
population and adoptive transfer of iTreg protected recipients from
disease
|
95
|
|
DTH
|
IL-10BMDC
|
Prophylactic or therapeutic treatment resulted in impaired antigen
specific T cell proliferation and reduced DTH reaction
|
121
|
|
Asthma
|
IL-10BMDC
|
Reduction of T cell proliferation and cytokine production but
no alteration of allergen specific IgE and eosinophilia
|
122
|
|
IL-10 tg mice derived splenic
CD11c+CD45RBhighDC
|
Transfer of ova-pulsed spleenic
CD11c+CD45RBhighDC from IL-10 transgenic mice
resulted in tolerance mediated by IL-10 secreting Tr1-like induced
Treg
|
123
|
|
Experimental endotoxemia
|
IL-10/TGF-β-BMDC
|
Protection against experimentally induced endotoxemia and
peritonitis
|
124
|
|
Human
|
Influenza Mp specific CD8+ effector function
|
iDC
|
- Influenza Mp specific CD8+ effector function was
inhibited
- Occurrence of IL-10 producing T cells (Tr1?)
|
92
|
IL-10 modulated DCs
Immunomodulatory effects of IL-10 on APCs [94], in particular
Langerhans cells [95], were described soon after the discovery of
this cytokine in the late 1980s [96]. Early work had shown that
IL-10 prevented the generation of human DCs from CD14+
precursor cells in vitro, if applied together with GM-CSF and IL-4
[97] or IL-13 from beginning of cell culture. Instead, a phenotype
with macrophage-like morphology, high expression of CD14, CD16 and
CD68 and decreased levels of CD1a and CD1c was induced [97, 98].
Macrophage development appears to be promoted by IL-10-mediated
upregulation of CD115, which is the receptor for macrophage colony
stimulating factor (M-CSF), leading to enhanced sensitivity to
endogenously produced M-CSF [99].
In contrast, if DCs were allowed to differentiate for 5 to 7
days and IL-10 was added at this time point together with a
maturation stimulus, such as a mix of inflammatory cytokines [100]
or LPS [101], the DC phenotype was preserved, yet
maturation-induced upregulation of MHC molecules, costimulatory
molecules, and adhesion molecules was prevented and the LPS-induced
production of cytokines was impaired (table
1). Importantly, in contrast to iDCs, IL-10DCs do not
display functional plasticity and are resistant to further
maturation. IL-10DCs show high expression of some members of the B7
family (table 2), the inhibitory
molecules ILT2 and ILT3, and are low secretors of inflammatory
cytokines [HS Adler, unpublished results, references [101-104] and
table 1]. IL-10 also has a strong impact
on the maturation-induced switch of chemokine receptor expression.
IL-10DCs express low levels of the lymph node targeting CCR7, yet
retain cell surface expression of inflammatory CCR1, CCR2, CCR3,
CCR5 (HS Adler, unpublished results, ref [105] and table 1). CCR1, CCR2 and CCR5 have been shown to be
functional decoys, which may act as molecular sinks and scavengers
for inflammatory chemokines [105].
IL-10DCs have a dramatically reduced capacity to stimulate
primary T cell proliferation, prevent activation of primed or naive
T cells by anti-CD3 and induce antigen-specific anergy in primed
and naive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in a variety
of experimental setups [101, 106-112] Anergized CD4+ and
CD8+ T cells had impaired effector functions, reduced
IFN-γ production, and melanoma tyrosinase-specific CD8+
T cells failed to lyse target cells. Antigen-specific anergy was
broken by the addition of high amounts of exogenous IL-2 [109,
110].
Notably, anergic T cells, generated by culture with IL-10DCs,
display suppressor activity and can thus be considered as a
population of induced regulatory T cells (iTreg). These
CD4+ or CD8+ iTregs suppressed proliferation,
IL-2 and IFN-γ production of syngeneic effector T cells in a cell
contact-dependent manner, independent from soluble factors such as
IL-10 or TGF-β [113]. These iTreg displayed increased intracellular
and extracellular expression of CTLA-4. Blocking of this molecule
partially restored proliferation in suppressor assays, indicating
an important role for CTLA-4 in the suppressor function of
iTregs.
Suppressor function and anergy of iTregs are associated with a
cell cycle arrest in the G1 phase, mediated by high
expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase (cdk) inhibitor
p27kip1. This prevents phosphorylation-induced
degradation of Rb and cell cycle progress. Both IL-2 and
anti-CTLA-4 led to decreased expression of p27kip1 and
loss of suppressor function in co-cultures [114].
Recently, we identified a distinct pattern of MAP kinase
activation in iTreg generated by IL-10DC [115]. As compared to
fully activated effector T cells, iTregs had diminished JNK
activity and showed no induced activation of ERK. In contrast, the
activity of MAP kinase p38 and its downstream effector kinases
MAPKAP-K 2/3 were significantly increased during priming and
restimulation of iTregs. The elevated activation of p38 proved to
be critical for both, the induction and maintenance of anergy,
controlled by the enhanced expression of p27Kip1.
Inhibition of p38 by the specific inhibitor SB203580 either during
priming or restimulation of iTreg, resulted in loss of the anergic
state, downregulation of p27Kip1 expression, cell cycle
progress and restored production of IL-2 and IFN-γ.
Furthermore, the antigen-specific suppressor function of iTreg
was strictly dependent on p38 controlled cell cycle arrest and lost
by treatment with SB203580.
For generation of iTregs by IL10-DCs, some surface molecules
have been reported to be of particular relevance. B7-H1 is highly
expressed on IL-10DCs (table 1) [108].
Blocking of this molecule on IL-10DCs strongly enhanced their
stimulatory capacity on T cells in primary proliferation. If B7-H1
– PD-1 interaction was blocked at restimulation of T cells
precultured with IL-10DCs, anergy was broken and proliferation
restored [108].
These in vitro generated data for human IL-10-modulated DCs have
been supported by experiments performed in the murine system in
vitro and in vivo. In an OVA-specific allergy model, the treatment
with OVA-pulsed IL-10-modulated BMDCs in prophylactic and
therapeutic experiments resulted in strongly reduced OVA-specific T
cell proliferation in vitro and significantly impaired
DTH-reactions in vivo [116]. In a related model of murine
OVA-induced asthma, treatment of mice with OVA-pulsed IL-10BMDCs
prior to and during OVA/alum sensitization resulted in
significantly impaired OVA-specific proliferation and cytokine
production by lymph node cells. However, systemic (OVA-specific
IgE) and local (airway eosinophilia) allergen responses remained
unchanged [117] (table 2). The presence
of a cell type similar to in vitro generated IL-10BMDCs was also
shown in the spleen and lymph nodes of BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice in
vivo and was significantly enriched in the spleen of IL-10
transgenic mice [118] (table 2).
In some experimental settings, human moDCs (phenotype, table 1) or murine BMDCs modulated with IL-10
plus TGF-β have been used. [119-121]. The experimental results
suggest no basic differences in the ability of IL-10DCs and
IL-10/TGF-β-DCs to efficiently generate iTregs (table 2).
Immunosuppressive agents targeting NFκB to generate tDCs
The transcription factor family of NFκB is critically involved in
DC maturation and function in murine and human models by regulating
IL-12 and TNF-α production, expression of MHC II and costimulatory
molecules [122-125]. The presence of RelB in the nucleus can thus
be used as a marker for mature DCs [126-128]. Targeting this
pathway is one possibility to prevent maturation of DCs (table 1).
The immunomodulatory effect of IL-10 on murine bone
marrow-derived iDCs is also mediated in part by suppression of the
PI3K/Akt pathway and IκB kinase activity, both leading to reduced
NFκB activation [129]. Further strategies, such as the use of IκB
kinase- or NFκB inhibitors (see below), steroid hormones (see
below), Vitamin C, Vitamin E [130], Vitamin D3 (see below) or
neuropeptides [131-133] to generate tDCs, target this central
regulatory pathway in DC maturation.
Direct targeting of NFκB to induce tDCs
Direct interference with NFκB activity in murine models has
included the use of decoy oxyribonucleotides with binding sites to
sequester NFκB [134], transgenic overexpression of IκB [86, 135],
use of NEMO-binding domain peptide (NBD) [136], and chemical
inhibitors of NFκB [137, 138]. Treated DCs were resistant to
LPS-mediated maturation, showed reduced expression of MHC II,
costimulatory molecules and proinflamatory cytokines and had
impaired allogenic and antigenspecific stimulatory capacity.
Treatment of DC progenitors with the NFκB inhibiting agent LF
15-0195 resulted in a population of tDCs that improved the clinical
score, inhibited antigen specific T cells and antibody responses in
a murine arthritis model [138]. Modulation of DCs with other
pharmacological NFκB inhibitors (andrographolide, rosiglitazon)
prevented onset of EAE in mice [137].
In human moDCs, inhibition of NFκB by a pharmacological
inhibitor (pyrrolidine dithiocarbamat, PDTC) prevented LPS-induced
maturation, led to reduced expression of HLA-DR, costimulatory
molecules and proinflammatory cytokines (table
1), and induced alloantigen specific anergy in T cells
[139]. Another inhibitor of NFκB (Bay 11-7082), which has been
shown to induce antigen-specific tolerance in vivo in mice by
inducing IL-10 producing Treg [140], did not modify human moDCs in
vitro. Other pharmacological substances that have been described to
induce tDCs, at least in part, by targeting NFκB, include the
tyrosine kinase inhibitor Imatinib (human moDC) [141], the
immunosuppressive drug FK778 (human moDC) [142] and cyclosporin A
(murine BMDC) [143], and dexamethasone (murine DC line) [144]
(murine BMDC) [145].
Glucocorticosteroid modulated tDCs
Dexamethasone treatment of human immature moDCs leads to impaired
phenotypical and functional maturation (table
1) when activated by a variety of stimuli such as LPS,
CD40L, or proinflammatory cytokines in vitro [144-151] and ex vivo
[152] and induction of ILT-4 transcription. Primary activation of T
cells with dexamethasone-treated DCs (DEX-DCs) only induced low
proliferation and IFN-γ low producing T cells [149, 150, 153, 154].
Both naive and memory T cells primed by DEX-DCs were anergic upon
restimulation with mature DCs and showed some limited suppressive
capacity. Induction of anergy was dependent on IL-10 secretion and
B7-H1 expression of DEX-DCs. Upon restimulation, T cell anergy was
prevented during priming, but proliferation was not restored by
high levels of exogenous IL-2 [150].
Hydrocortisone (HC) has less potency than dexamethasone. In one
report, allergen-pulsed human HC-treated moDCs of atopic
individuals (HC-DCs) were compared to IL-10DCs [112]. IL-10DCs
inhibited the production of Th1 and Th2 cytokines in naive, but not
memory T cells, whereas HC-DC-priming inhibited IFN-γ, but not IL-4
or IL-5 production in naive T cells upon restimulation with
allergen-pulsed mature DCs.
The effect of dexamethasone on DC function has also been
addressed in murine DC lines [144, 155-157], murine LCs [158, 159],
murine spleenic DCs [160] and BMCDs [145, 147, 154, 157, 161-164]
(table 2). Dexamethasone treatment of
murine BMDCs prior to LPS stimulation led to maturation resistance
[145, 157, 162, 163]. Multiple rounds of restimulation with
LPS-DEX-BMDCs induced a population of IL-10-producing
IL-4-/IFN-γ- CD4+ T cells [157,
161]. In a murine transplantation model, LPS-DEX-BMDCs induced
antigen specific T cell anergy and prolonged survival of a
completely MHC-mismatched heart allograft more efficiently than
immature BMDCs [162] (table 2).
The generation of functional Treg, induced by
dexamethasone-treated matured DCs, has been shown by use of a newly
established murine immature DC line (SP37A3) [155]. Maturation is
induced by GM-CSF plus the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β and
TNF-α or LPS, respectively. Addition of dexamethasone resulted in
tolerogenic DCs, expressing diminished levels of MHC II and
costimulatory molecules, and reduced levels of mRNA for CD83, OX40L
and the cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-12, whereas mRNA for IL-1RA
was drastically enhanced. Priming of T cells with these DCs induced
a population of Treg, which suppressed antigen-specific T cell
proliferation in vitro [155].
1,25(OH)2 Vitamin D3-modulated tDCs
The secosteroid hormone 1,25(OH)2D3 is the activated
form of vitamin D3 and its biological effects are mediated by the
Vitamin D receptor (VDR). VDR is a member of the superfamily of
nuclear hormone receptors and functions as a ligand-activated
transcription factor that binds specific DNA sequence elements
[165]. Human monocytes express high amounts of VDR which is
subsequently downregulated in the course of moDC differentiation
and maturation [166]. Treatment of human moDCs or murine BMDCs with
1,25(OH)2D3 or analogues has a profound
impact on maturation-induced changes in morphology and function
[167, 168]. LPS-induced maturation of human moDCs in the presence
of 1,25(OH)2D3 generates tDCs (table 1) [166, 169-172]. The production of
proinflammatory IL-12p70 is decreased. The effect on IL-10
production is controversial, though most reports show at least
retained or even increased production of this cytokine [151, 167,
173, 174]. It has been shown that vitamin D3 exerts its modulating
function on human mDCs, moDCs and murine BMDCs via inhibition of
NFκB family transcription factor activation and expression (e.g.
RelB) [173-176].
Stimulation of T cells with tolerogenic
1,25(OH)2D3-treated matured DCs resulted in
reduced primary proliferation and IFN-γ production during primary
activation [166, 170, 171, 173, 177]. When restimulated, T cells
primed with 1,25(OH)2D3-treated moDCs showed
upregulation of CD152 (CTLA-4), impaired proliferation and IFN-γ
production, which could not be rescued by high amounts of exogenous
IL-2. One report states that this T cell anergy is
antigen-unspecific, as restimulation with mature DCs derived from a
second donor, unrelated to the DCs used for priming, also resulted
in T cell hyporesponsiveness [169] – in striking contrast to T cell
anergy induced by IL-10DCs [100, 110, 113]. Anergic T cells,
induced by immature 1,25(OH)2D3 treated
moDCs, express enhanced levels of FOXP3 and display antigen
unspecific suppressor activity. The tolerogenic effects of
1,25(OH)2D3 and its analogues have also been
observed on murine DCs in vitro [145, 178-181] and in vivo [182,
183] (table 2).
Upregulation of IDO expression in tDCs
The enzyme indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) degrades the indole
moiety of tryptophan, serotonin and melatonin. This results in the
production of neuroactive and immunomodulatory metabolites called
kynurenines. IDO expression has been associated with a tolerogenic
DC phenotype [184-186]. And a variety of agents are able to induce
IDO in human or murine DCs: IL-10 [184], PGE2[187],
dexamethasone and reverse signaling via GITRL [188]. The
tolerogenic mechanism of action of IDO is still a matter of
research but possibilities include effects on T cells by local
depletion of the essential amino acid tryptophane by the IDO
expressing tDCs, effects of downstream metabolites of tryptophane
like kynurenines on T cells or DCs and effects of IDO on the DCs
themselves [185, 189, 190] (table 1 and
figure 2).
Tolerogenic DC in vivo and therapeutical impact: friend or
foe?
Tolerogenic DC modulated in different ways have been used (in part
successfully) in a variety of animal models to protect from disease
and have thus generated data to foster the development of the
therapeutic use of tDCs in humans. As discussed before in detail in
the context of the respective type of tDC used and summarized in
table 2, animal and human models
included those for transplantation [191], colitis, DTH/CHS, asthma,
autoimmune disease, and inflammation.
Tumor-derived factors modulate DCs
Induction of tolerance is certainly unwanted and highly
counterproductive in tumor disease. Whereas in a variety of cancer
types, the induction of antigen-specific T cells has been
described, it appears that peripheral mechanisms of dominant
tolerance prevent efficient priming and/or effector phases of
anti-tumor immune responses [192]. This has to be taken in account
in regimens using vaccination strategies to treat neoplastic
disease, and might contibute to the frequent lack of significant
responses in clinical trials [193]. The tumor itself (tumor cells
and stromal cells) provides for an immunosuppressive
microenvironment which favours tolerogenic/regulatory responses via
a number of mechanisms, including the modulation of APCs towards a
tolerogenic phenotype and peripheral induction of regulatory T
cells [192, 194, 195]. In a number of human cancers and animal
tumor models, secretion of immunosuppressive lipid mediators and
cytokines including IL-10 and TGF-β has been observed [192,
196-201]. The efficacy of tumor-derived cytokines/soluble mediators
for induction of tDCs has been shown by use of tumor-derived cell
culture supernatants to modulate the antigen presenting and
stimulatory potential of DCs in vitro [201-206]. Tumor infiltrating
DCs, e.g. in metastatic melanoma in humans, showed impaired
migration and T cell stimulatory potential [207]. The
immunosuppressive effects on DCs in metastatic melanoma and other
forms of cancer were especially visible in proximal tumor-draining
sentinel lymph nodes (SN), which show, in part due to enhanced
apoptosis [208], a reduced frequency and activation state of DCs,
together with increased expression of IL-10 [194, 195]. This was
associated with impaired T cell activation, cytokine generation and
cytotoxicity towards tumor cells [195].
UV radiation impairs DC function
Ultraviolet radiation (UVR) is the primary cause for the initiation
of non-melanoma skin cancer, exerting its effects by at least two
mechanisms: first, UV-induced mutations, and second, modulation of
the immune response [209, 210]. UVB has been shown to affect
migratory behaviour and expression of co-stimulatory molecules by
LCs [211] resulting in reduced allostimulatory potential [212]. UVR
induces the production of immunomodulatory cytokines in
keratinocytes via oxidative pathways, e.g. platelet activating
factor (PAF), which in turn can stimulate the production of
PGE2, IL-4 and IL-10. Additionally, production of IL-10
by mast cells in response to UVR appears to be important [213].
Two different animal models were used to study the effects of
UVR, the “acute low dose model” and the “high dose model”. Low dose
UVB induced inhibition of the local sensitisation phase of CHS
response to a hapten [214]. High dose UVB irradiation induced
inhibition of the systemic sensitization phase of CHS and DTH when
antigen is applied at distant, non-irradiated skin. Low dose UVR
led to the development of tolerance, which correlated with
functionally impaired DCs in non-draining lymph nodes. This
systemic suppression of DC function and induction of hapten
tolerance was dependent on IL-10 production by keratinocytes in the
epidermis [215]. Adoptive transfer of UV-induced suppressor T cells
in a transgenic model revealed that induction of hapten-specific
tolerance was mediated via Fas/Fas-ligand induced cell death of DCs
in the recipients, which could be prevented by IL-12 [216]. The
Treg population acting on DCs was further characterized as
CTLA-4+ secretors of high amounts of IL-10, TGF-β and
IFN-γ, but low levels of IL-2 and no IL-4. CTLA-4 expression proved
to be functionally relevant as blockage of CTLA-4+
prevented induction of tolerance in vivo and prevented IL-10
secretion in vitro [217]. Thus, at least two mechanisms seem to
contribute to UV-induced tolerance: one involving the generation of
Tr1-like regulatory T cells, possibly via IL-10 modulation of DC
function and a second relying on apoptosis of DCs caused by an
induced IL-10 secreting CTLA-4+ Treg population [209,
210, 218].
Modulation of DC function by commensals and pathogens
In contrast to pathogenic bacteria, strong systemic immune
responses against commensal bacteria, e.g. in the gut, are unwanted
and are limited by a number of mechanisms including
compartmentalised antigen-presentation and production of IgA [219,
220]. At least in some cases, a direct modulation of DC function by
commensal bacteria has been shown [221, 222].
A variety of pathogens have developed strategies to weaken host
immune defences, especially by modifying DC function, thus
generating a tolerogenic DC phenotype (figure 2) and impairing
the resulting pathogen-specific immune response.
Herpesviridae like human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) [223, 224],
murine CMV [225] and Herpes simplex virus 1 [226] reportedly
inhibit DC functions. In the case of HCMV, production of the viral
homologue of IL-10 (vIL-10) has a dramatic impact on the activation
of STAT3, expression of costimulatory molecules and proinflammtory
cytokines in human DCs comparable to the effect of human IL-10
[224]. This strategy of vIL-10 production has also been developed
by a member of the Parapoxviridae, Orf virus, which induces
cutaneous lesions in sheep goats and humans [227].
In HIV infection, the number of myeloid DCs and plasmacytoid DCs
is reduced and their capacity to stimulate T cell proliferation is
impaired, in part due to defective expression of costimulatory
molecules [228, 229]. Lymph node DCs of acutely HIV-infected
patients expressed reduced amounts of CD80 and CD86 [230]. The
virus encoded protein Vpr appears to act on the expression of CD80,
CD83, CD86 at the transcriptional level, and leads to an enhanced
IL-10/IL-12 ratio in HIV-infected DCs [231]. Endogenously expressed
HIV-encoded Nef in iDCs uncouples cytokine and chemokine production
from maturation-induced expression of costimulatory molecules and
thus allows the attraction of T cells for virus spread without
subsequent appropriate activation of T cells [232]. Recently, it
has been shown that mDCs generated from HIV-1 viremic individuals
were substantially impaired in their ability to secrete IL-12 and
to prime the proliferation of autologous NK cells, which in turn
failed to produce adequate amounts of IFN-γ [233].
In helminthic infections, chronic immune activation results in
hyporesponsiveness and anergy of T cells and an increase of Treg
[234]. The inhibition of DC maturation and function appears to play
an important role, and IL-10-modulation of DCs has been reported
previously for helminthic infections [235, 236]. Furthermore, an
increase of IL-10 and/or TGF-β production has been observed in vivo
in humans and in baboons infected with helmiths, leaving the
possibility that this might contribute to a tolerizing phenotype of
DCs [237, 238].
What’s up with “mature” DCs inducing tolerance?
Currently, the semantics of the term “tolerogenic DCs” is a matter
of debate [239-244]. The data reviewed herein all refer to DCs
which are morphologically and phenotypically not fully mature (i.e.
not competent to prime effector T cells, but rather to induce
tolerance via induction of T cell apoptosis, anergy or generation
of Treg). With good reason, some reports have questioned whether
mere morphological markers (such as low expression of MHC or
costimulatory molecules) are sufficient to define tDCs and stated
that certain populations of so called “mature” DCs are tolerogenic
[241, 243, 244]. To have a common basis for discussion, the term
“mature” has to be defined. As used herein, the term “mature” is
used synonymously to “functionally mature” and applies to DCs which
have been terminally differentiated using maturation conditions,
leading to high expression of MHC molecules, costimulatory
molecules and cytokines by DCs, which are able to prime and shape
polarized T cell responses. Thus “mature tolerogenic DCs” deserve a
closer look in respect to the above definition.
In detail: murine TNF-α-matured BMDCs induced antigen-specific
protection from experimental autoimmune encephalitis (EAE) in mice
[243]. In view of the 3 categories of signals (TCR-mediated,
costimulatory molecule-mediated, cytokine-mediated) required for
optimal priming and shaping of effector T cell responses, two
signals (high MHC expression and high expression of costimulatory
molecules) are provided by TNF-α-matured DCs, whereas signal 3 –
the production of proinflammatory cytokines is severely impaired.
Though TNF-α is part of well defined maturation protocols for human
DCs [24], its use as a single maturation stimulus in the murine
system is not sufficient to induce a fully mature DC phenotype.
Some authors prefer the term “semi-mature” for this state [59].
Therefore these DCs meet the definition of tDCs and should not be
called “mature” as defined above. In another model, costimulatory
competent, CD40-deficient DCs are unable to prime CD4+
or CD8+ T cell responses in mice in vivo [240]. In this
setting, the lack of one important member of the TNFR family of
costimulatory molecules led to severely impaired cytokine
production (i.e. IL-12) by DCs, thus, these DCs do not meet the
above criteria for “mature DCs”. Interestingly, CD40/CD40L-mediated
signal transduction seemed to be essential in this model as
compared to IL-12 production itself, since IL-12 p40–/–
mice show normal levels of T cell activation. Murine DCs of
genetically modified mice (TLR4–/– or
MyD88–/–) exposed to endogenous levels of inflammatory
mediators in vivo, were unable to prime T cell responses, although
they showed features of conventional maturation and stimulated T
cell proliferation in a comparable way as wild type DCs matured by
TLR-ligands. Importantly, these indirectly activated DCs also
lacked IL-12 production and primed for neither IL-4, nor IFN-γ
production.
But in one aspect mature DCs are indeed involved in controlling
tolerance, as mature DCs are able to expand functional
CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ Treg [245,
246]. These Treg retain the ability to suppress conventional T cell
functions as determined by proliferation and cytokine production.
But “expansion” is not “generation” and thus mature DCs can not –
referring to currently available data – be considered as
tolerogenic DCs.
The characteristics of tolerogenic DCs: what do they have in
common?
General features of tDCs become apparent considering the diverse
tolerizing conditions and respective DC phenotypes hitherto
described. Efficient DC–T cell interactions for priming of
subsequent effector responses require antigen specific signalling
via MHC-TCR interactions: “signal 1”; signalling via costimulatory
molecules: “signal 2”; and shaping of the ensuing T effector cell
profile via cytokine signalling (DC secreted proinflammatory
cytokines), interaction of TNF/TNFR family or signalling via
molecules like Notch/Notch ligand: “signal 3” [247-251]. The
current model of T cell activation teaches that optimal stimulation
is achieved with strong signals 1 + 2 + 3, having mutual effects on
DC and T cells, thus enhancing the efficiency by mounting the
appropriate effector response. Deviations of this scheme lead to T
cell anergy, apoptosis or development of a regulatory phenotype,
dependent on the specific conditions (figure 2). Costimulatory
signalling seems to be important for the induction of anergy and
Treg populations. Some interactions of B7 family members and the
respective receptors on T cells, leading to inhibitory signals in T
cells, were of special importance (e.g. B7-CTLA-4 and PDL-1L/PD-1)
(table 1 and figure 2). But mere
morphological markers are not predictive for an immunogenic or
tolerogenic phenotype of DCs. tDCs can be largely characterized as
DCs with reduced antigen presenting capacity and thus reduced
potential for MHC-TCR signalling (MHClow) and/or a low
ratio of costimulatory to inhibitory molecules and/or an enhanced
ratio of IL-10 to IL-12 as compared to optimally matured DCs
(summarized in figure
2). Notably, not all 3 criteria have to be met to induce a
tolerogenic phenotype, which can only be defined functionally.
Table 1 summarizes features of diverse
human monocyte derived tDCs generated in vitro. Furthermore,
populations of tDCs have been shown to display impaired activation
of intracellular pathways important for DC maturation, like NF-κB
transcription factors (e.g. RelB), concomitant with high expression
of Bcl-3, thus preventing the transcription of RelB regulated
genes.
Future perspectives
The immunological context (homoestatic condition versus
pathogen/tumor thread) and the respective source of antigen (self,
commensal, allergen or transplant versus pathogen) determine
whether the activity of tDC turns out to be beneficial or harmful -
if tDCs appear as “friend or foe”. A therapeutical use of tDCs for
human patients may be feasible in situations where antigen-specific
immune responses to known antigens need to be suppressed, while
avoiding unwanted side effects. This applies for transplantation,
autoimmune diseases, and allergy. Especially in conditions where
there are currently therapies with severe side effects (e.g.
autoimmune diseases) or no effective therapeutic regimens (e.g.
certain allergic disorders), the therapeutic use of tDCs seems
highly promising. On the other hand there are conditions of
disease, where immune suppression is unwanted and even life
threatening, as with the activity of tDCs in conditions of tumor
diseases (e.g. malignant melanoma) and in certain infectious
diseases (HIV, MV or tuberculosis). In these situations, countering
of tDC activity by direct targeting of DCs (e.g. cytokines in
melanoma) or reconstitution of DC function by conventional
therapies (e.g. HAART in AIDS [252]) is important.
Future research needs to address further refinement and adaption
of current protocols for the respective therapeutical application
and to compare the functional efficacy of the diverse populations
of tDCs (table 1 and figure 2) for special
applications, also including the analyses of the modes of action
(apoptosis, induction of anergy and/or regulatory T cells). This
would allow for the streamlined introduction of safe and more
efficient new immunological therapies by use of tDCs.
Acknowledgements
This work has been supported by the DFG (SFB584/B6) and MAIFOR,
both to K.S. We thank Drs E. von Stebut, Karsten Mahnke and Helmut
Jonuleit for critically reading the manuscript.
References
1 Banchereau J, Steinman RM. Dendritic cells and the
control of immunity. Nature 1998; 392: 245-52.
2 Rescigno M, Urbano M, Valzasina B,
Francolini M, Rotta G, Bonasio R, Granucci F,
Kraehenbuhl JP, Ricciardi-Castagnoli P. Dendritic cells
express tight junction proteins and penetrate gut epithelial
monolayers to sample bacteria. Nat Immunol 2001; 2(4): 361-7.
3 Liu YJ, Kanzler H, Soumelis V, Gilliet M.
Dendritic cell lineage, plasticity and cross-regulation. Nat
Immunol 2001; 2(7): 585-9.
4 Rossi M, Young JW. Human Dendritic Cells: Potent
antigen-presenting cells at the crossroads of innate and adaptive
immunity. J Immunol 2005; 175(3): 1373-81.
5 Pulendran B. Variegation of the immune response with
dendritic cells and pathogen recognition receptors. J Immunol 2005;
174(5): 2457-65.
6 Iwasaki A, Medzhitov R. Toll-like receptor control
of the adaptive immune responses. Nat Immunol 2004; 5(10):
987-95.
7 Matzinger P. The danger model: a renewed sense of self.
Science 2002; 296(5566): 301-5.
8 Kyewski B, Klein L. A central role for central
tolerance. Annu Rev Immunol 2006; 24(1): 571-606.
9 Bonasio R, Scimone ML, Schaerli P,
Grabie N, Lichtman AH, von Andrian UH. Clonal
deletion of thymocytes by circulating dendritic cells homing to the
thymus. Nat Immunol 2006; 7(10): 1092-100.
10 Fontenot JD, Rudensky AY. A well adapted regulatory
contrivance: regulatory T cell development and the forkhead family
transcription factor Foxp3. Nat Immunol 2005; 6(4): 331-7.
11 Ardavin C. Origin, precursors and differentiation of
mouse dendritic cells. Nat Rev Immunol 2003; 3(7): 582-90.
12 Shortman K, Liu YJ. Mouse and human dendritic cell
subtypes. Nat Rev Immunol 2002; 2(3): 151-61.
13 Wilson HL, O’Neill HC. Murine dendritic cell
development: difficulties associated with subset analysis. Immunol
Cell Biol 2003; 81(4): 239-46.
14 Ratzinger G, Baggers J, de Cos MA,
Yuan J, Dao T, Reagan JL, Munz C,
Heller G, Young JW. Mature human Langerhans cells derived
from CD34+ hematopoietic progenitors stimulate greater cytolytic T
lymphocyte activity in the absence of bioactive IL-12p70, by either
single peptide presentation or cross-priming, than do
dermal-interstitial or monocyte-derived dendritic cells. J Immunol
2004; 173(4): 2780-91.
15 Gatti E, Velleca MA, Biedermann BC, Ma W,
Unternaehrer J, Ebersold MW, Medzhitov R,
Pober JS, Mellman I. Large-scale culture and selective
maturation of human Langerhans cells from granulocyte
colony-stimulating factor-mobilized CD34+ progenitors. J Immunol
2000; 164(7): 3600-7.
16 Lutz MB, Kukutsch N, Ogilvie ALJ. ner S, Koch
F, Romani N, Schuler G. An advanced culture method for generating
large quantities of highly pure dendritic cells from mouse bone
marrow. J Immunol Methods 1999; 223(1): 77-92.
17 Thurner B, Roder C, Dieckmann D, Heuer M,
Kruse M, Glaser A, Keikavoussi P, Kampgen E,
Bender A, Schuler G. Generation of large numbers of fully
mature and stable dendritic cells from leukapheresis products for
clinical application. J Immunol Methods 1999; 223(1): 1-15.
18 Strobl H, Riedl E, Scheinecker C,
Bello-Fernandez C, Pickl WF, Rappersberger K,
Majdic O, Knapp W. TGF-beta 1 promotes in vitro
development of dendritic cells from CD34+ hemopoietic progenitors.
J Immunol 1996; 157(4): 1499-507.
19 Young JW, Szabolcs P, Moore MA. Identification
of dendritic cell colony-forming units among normal human CD34+
bone marrow progenitors that are expanded by c-kit-ligand and yield
pure dendritic cell colonies in the presence of
granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor and tumor necrosis
factor alpha. J Exp Med 1995; 182(4): 1111-9.
20 Szabolcs P, Avigan D, Gezelter S,
Ciocon DH, Moore MA, Steinman RM, Young JW.
Dendritic cells and macrophages can mature independently from a
human bone marrow-derived, post-colony-forming unit intermediate.
Blood 1996; 87(11): 4520-30.
21 Szabolcs P, Moore MA, Young JW. Expansion of
immunostimulatory dendritic cells among the myeloid progeny of
human CD34+ bone marrow precursors cultured with c-kit ligand,
granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, and TNF-alpha. J
Immunol 1995; 154(11): 5851-61.
22 Caux C. zutter-Dambuyant C, Schmitt D, Banchereau J.
GM-CSF and TNF-[alpha] cooperate in the generation of dendritic
Langerhans cells. Nature 1992; 360(6401): 258-61.
23 Inaba K, Inaba M, Romani N, Aya H,
Deguchi M, Ikehara S, Muramatsu S, Steinman RM.
Generation of large numbers of dendritic cells from mouse bone
marrow cultures supplemented with granulocyte/macrophage
colony-stimulating factor. J Exp Med 1992; 176(6): 1693-702.
24 Jonuleit H, Kuhn U, Muller G,
Steinbrink K, Paragnik L, Schmitt E, Knop J,
Enk AH. Pro-inflammatory cytokines and prostaglandins induce
maturation of potent immunostimulatory dendritic cells under fetal
calf serum-free conditions. Eur J Immunol 1997; 27(12):
3135-42.
25 Romani N, Reider D, Heuer M, Ebner S,
Eibl B. Generation of mature dendritic cells from human blood:
an improved method with special regard to clinical applicability. J
Immunol Methods 1996; 196: 137-51.
26 Sallusto F, Lanzavecchia A. Efficient presentation
of soluble antigen by cultured human dendritic cells is maintained
by granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus
interleukin 4 and downregulated by tumor necrosis factor. J Exp Med
1994; 179: 1109-18.
27 Ruppert J, Schutt C, Ostermeier D,
Peters JH. Down-regulation and release of CD14 on human
monocytes by IL-4 depends on the presence of serum or GM-CSF. Adv
Exp Med Biol 1993; 329: 281-6.
28 Peters JH, Xu H, Ruppert J, Ostermeier D,
Friedrichs D, Gieseler RK. Signals required for
differentiating dendritic cells from human monocytes in vitro. Adv
Exp Med Biol 1993; 329: 275-80.
29 Ruppert J, Friedrichs D, Xu H, Peters JH.
IL-4 decreases the expression of the monocyte differentiation
marker CD14, paralleled by an increasing accessory potency.
Immunobiology 1991; 182(5): 449-64.
30 Chaperot L, Chokri M, Jacob MC,
Drillat P, Garban F, Egelhofer H, Molens JP,
Sotto JJ, Bensa JC, Plumas J. Differentiation of
antigen-presenting cells (dendritic cells and macrophages) for
therapeutic application in patients with lymphoma. Leukemia 2000;
14(9): 1667-77.
31 Goxe B, Latour N, Chokri M, Abastado JP,
Salcedo M. Simplified method to generate large quantities of
dendritic cells suitable for clinical applications. Immunol Invest
2000; 29(3): 319-36.
32 Cao H, Verge V, Baron C, Martinache C,
Leon A, Scholl S, Gorin NC, Salamero J,
Assari S, Bernard J, Lopez M. In vitro generation of
dendritic cells from human blood monocytes in experimental
conditions compatible for in vivo cell therapy. J Hematother Stem
Cell Res 2000; 9(2): 183-94.
33 de Jong EC, Smits HH, Kapsenberg ML. Dendritic
cell-mediated T cell polarization. Springer Semin Immunopathol
2005; 26(3): 289-307.
34 Liu YJ, Kanzler H, Soumelis V, Gilliet M.
Dendritic cell lineage, plasticity and cross-regulation. Nat
Immunol 2001; 2(7): 585-9.
35 Rossi M, Young JW. Human dendritic cells: potent
antigen-presenting cells at the crossroads of innate and adaptive
immunity. J Immunol 2005; 175(3): 1373-81.
36 Caux C, Vanbervliet B, Massacrier C,
Dubois B. Zutter-Dambuyant C, Schmitt D, Banchereau J.
Characterization of human CD34+ derived dendritic/Langerhans cells
(D-Lc). Adv Exp Med Biol 1995; 378: 1-5.
37 Caux C, Massacrier C. zutter-Dambuyant C,
Vanbervliet B, Jacquet C, Schmitt D, Banchereau J. Human dendritic
Langerhans cells generated in vitro from CD34+ progenitors can
prime naive CD4+ T cells and process soluble antigen. J Immunol
1995; 155(11): 5427-35.
38 Caux C, Vanbervliet B, Massacrier C.
zutter-Dambuyant C, de Saint-Vis B, Jacquet C, Yoneda K, Imamura S,
Schmitt D, Banchereau J. CD34+ hematopoietic progenitors from human
cord blood differentiate along two independent dendritic cell
pathways in response to GM-CSF+TNF alpha. J Exp Med 1996; 184(2):
695-706.
39 Caux C, Massacrier C, Vanbervliet B,
Dubois B, Durand I, Cella M, Lanzavecchia A,
Banchereau J. CD34+ hematopoietic progenitors from human cord
blood differentiate along two independent dendritic cell pathways
in response to granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor
plus tumor necrosis factor alpha: II. Functional analysis. Blood
1997; 90(4): 1458-70.
40 Caux C, Massacrier C, Vanbervliet B,
Dubois B, de Saint-Vis B. zutter-Dambuyant C, Jacquet C,
Schmitt D, Banchereau J. CD34+ hematopoietic progenitors from human
cord blood differentiate along two independent dendritic cell
pathways in response to GM-CSF+TNF alpha. Adv Exp Med Biol 1997;
417: 21-5.
41 Cella M, Scheidegger D, Palmer-Lehmann K,
Lane P, Lanzavecchia A, Alber G. Ligation of CD40 on
dendritic cells triggers production of high levels of
interleukin-12 and enhances T cell stimulatory capacity: T-T help
via APC activation. J Exp Med 1996; 184: 747-52.
42 Inaba K, Turley S, Iyoda T, Yamaide F,
Shimoyama S. The formation of immunogenic MHC class II-
peptide ligands in lysosomal compartments of dendritic cells is
regulated by inflammatory stimuli. J Exp Med 2000; 191: 927-36.
43 Turley SJ, Inaba K, Garrett WS,
Ebersold M, Untermaehrer J. Transport of peptide-MHC
class II complexes in developing dendritic cells. Science 2000;
288: 522.
44 Caux C, Massacrier C, Vanbervliet B,
Dubois B, Van KC. Activation of human dendritic cells
through CD40 cross-linking. J Exp Med 1994; 180: 1263.
45 Inaba K, Witmer-Pack M, Inaba M,
Hathcock KS, Sakuta H. The tissue distribution of the
B7-2 costimulator in mice: abundant expression on dendritic cells
in situ and during maturation in vitro. J Exp Med 1994; 180:
1849.
46 Tseng SY, Otsuji M, Gorski K, Huang X,
Slansky JE, Pai SI, Shalabi A, Shin T,
Pardoll DM, Tsuchiya H. B7-DC, a new dendritic cell
molecule with potent costimulatory properties for T cells. J Exp
Med 2001; 193(7): 839-46.
47 So T, Lee SW, Croft M. Tumor necrosis
factor/tumor necrosis factor receptor family members that
positively regulate immunity. Int J Hematol 2006; 83(1): 1-11.
48 Greenwald RJ, Freeman GJ, Sharpe AH. The B7
family revisited. Annu Rev Immunol 2005; 23: 515-48.
49 Ebner S, Ratzinger G, Krosbacher B,
Schmuth M, Weiss A, Reider D, Kroczek RA,
Herold M, Heufler C, Fritsch P, Romani N.
Production of IL-12 by human monocyte-derived dendritic cells is
optimal when the stimulus is given at the onset of maturation, and
is further enhanced by IL-4. J Immunol 2001; 166(1): 633-41.
50 Langenkamp A, Messi M, Lanzavecchia A,
Sallusto F. Kinetics of dendritic cell activation: impact on
priming of Th1, Th2 and nonpolarized T cells. Nat Immunol 2000; 1:
311.
51 Sozzani S, Allavena P, Vecchi A,
Mantovani A. The role of chemokines in the regulation of
dendritic cell trafficking. J Leukoc Biol 1999; 66(1): 1-9.
52 Dieu MC, Vanbervliet B, Vicari A,
Bridon JM, Oldham E. it-Yahia S, Briere F, Zlotnik A,
Lebecque S, Caux C. Selective recruitment of immature and mature
dendritic cells by distinct chemokines expressed in different
anatomic sites. J Exp Med 1998; 188(2): 373-86.
53 Yanagihara S, Komura E, Nagafune J,
Watarai H, Yamaguchi Y. EBI1/CCR7 is a new member of
dendritic cell chemokine receptor that is up-regulated upon
maturation. J Immunol 1998; 161(6): 3096-102.
54 Sallusto F, Palermo B, Lenig D,
Miettinen M, Matikainen S. Distinct patterns and kinetics
of chemokine production regulate dendritic cell function. Eur J
Immunol 1999; 29: 1617.
55 Larsen CP, Steinman RM, Witmer-Pack M,
Hankins DF, Morris PJ, Austyn JM. Migration and
maturation of Langerhans cells in skin transplants and explants. J
Exp Med 1990; 172(5): 1483-93.
56 Enk AH, Katz SI. Early molecular events in the
induction phase of contact sensitivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
1992; 89(4): 1398-402.
57 Abrams JR, Kelley SL, Hayes E, Kikuchi T,
Brown MJ, Kang S, Lebwohl MG, Guzzo CA,
Jegasothy BV, Linsley PS, Krueger JG. Blockade of T
lymphocyte costimulation with cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated
antigen 4-immunoglobulin (CTLA4Ig) reverses the cellular pathology
of psoriatic plaques, including the activation of keratinocytes,
dendritic cells, and endothelial cells. J Exp Med 2000; 192(5):
681-94.
58 Jonuleit H, Schmitt E, Steinbrink K,
Enk AH. Dendritic cells as a tool to induce anergic and
regulatory T cells. Trends Immunol 2001; 22(7): 394-400.
59 Lutz MB, Schuler G. Immature, semi-mature and fully
mature dendritic cells: which signals induce tolerance or immunity?
Trends Immunol 2002; 23(9): 445-9.
60 Mahnke K, Schmitt E, Bonifaz L, Enk AH,
Jonuleit H. Immature, but not inactive: the tolerogenic
function of immature dendritic cells. Immunol Cell Biol 2002;
80(5): 477-83.
61 Steinman RM, Hawiger D, Nussenzweig MC.
Tolerogenic dendritic cells. Annu Rev Immunol 2003; 21(1):
685-711.
62 Savill J, Dransfield I, Gregory C,
Haslett C. A blast from the past: clearance of apoptotic cells
regulates immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol 2002; 2(12):
965-75.
63 Liu G, Wu C, Wu Y, Zhao Y. Phagocytosis
of apoptotic cells and immune regulation. Scand J Immunol 2006;
64(1): 1-9.
64 Wang Z, Larregina AT, Shufesky WJ,
Perone MJ, Montecalvo A, Zahorchak AF,
Thomson AW, Morelli AE. Use of the inhibitory effect of
apoptotic cells on dendritic cells for graft survival via T-cell
deletion and regulatory T cells. Am J Transplant 2006; 6(6):
1297-311.
65 Xu W, Roos A, Daha MR, Van KC. Dendritic
cell and macrophage subsets in the handling of dying cells.
Immunobiology 2006; 211(6-8): 567-75.
66 Morelli AE. The immune regulatory effect of apoptotic
cells and exosomes on dendritic cells: its impact on
transplantation. Am J Transplant 2006; 6(2): 254-61.
67 Krispin A, Bledi Y, Atallah M,
Trahtemberg U, Verbovetski I, Nahari E,
Zelig O, Linial M, Mevorach D. Apoptotic cell
thrombospondin-1 and heparin-binding domain lead to dendritic-cell
phagocytic and tolerizing states. Blood 2006; 108(10): 3580-9.
68 Ip WK, Lau YL. Distinct maturation of, but not
migration between, human monocyte-derived dendritic cells upon
ingestion of apoptotic cells of early or late phases. J Immunol
2004; 173(1): 189-96.
69 Verbovetski I, Bychkov H, Trahtemberg U,
Shapira I, Hareuveni M, Ben-Tal O, Kutikov I,
Gill O, Mevorach D. Opsonization of apoptotic cells by
autologous iC3b facilitates clearance by immature dendritic cells,
down-regulates DR and CD86, and up-regulates CC chemokine receptor
7. J Exp Med 2002; 196(12): 1553-61.
70 Coates PT, Duncan FJ, Colvin BL, Wang Z,
Zahorchak AF, Shufesky WJ, Morelli AE,
Thomson AW. In vivo-mobilized kidney dendritic cells are
functionally immature, subvert alloreactive T-cell responses, and
prolong organ allograft survival. Transplantation 2004; 77(7):
1080-9.
71 Hugues S, Fetler L, Bonifaz L, Helft J,
Amblard F, Amigorena S. Distinct T cell dynamics in lymph
nodes during the induction of tolerance and immunity. Nat Immunol
2004; 5(12): 1235-42.
72 Zinselmeyer BH, Dempster J, Gurney AM,
Wokosin D, Miller M, Ho H, Millington OR,
Smith KM, Rush CM, Parker I, Cahalan M,
Brewer JM, Garside P. In situ characterization of CD4+ T
cell behavior in mucosal and systemic lymphoid tissues during the
induction of oral priming and tolerance. J Exp Med 2005; 201(11):
1815-23.
73 Steinman RM, Hawiger D, Liu K, Bonifaz L,
Bonnyay D, Mahnke K, Iyoda T, Ravetch J,
Dhodapkar M, Inaba K, Nussenzweig M. Dendritic cell
function in vivo during the steady state: a role in peripheral
tolerance. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2003; 987: 15-25.
74 Xie J, Wang Y, Freeman III ME,
Barlogie B, Yi Q. Beta 2-microglobulin as a negative
regulator of the immune system: high concentrations of the protein
inhibit in vitro generation of functional dendritic cells. Blood
2003; 101(10): 4005-12.
75 Gonzalez-Rey E, Chorny A, Delgado M.
Regulation of immune tolerance by anti-inflammatory neuropeptides.
Nat Rev Immunol 2007; 7(1): 52-63.
76 Latour S, Tanaka H, Demeure C, Mateo V,
Rubio M, Brown EJ, Maliszewski C, Lindberg FP,
Oldenborg A, Ullrich A, Delespesse G,
Sarfati M. Bidirectional negative regulation of human T and
dendritic cells by CD47 and its cognate receptor signal-regulator
protein-alpha: down-regulation of IL-12 responsiveness and
inhibition of dendritic cell activation. J Immunol 2001; 167(5):
2547-54.
77 Hackstein H, Thomson AW. Dendritic cells: emerging
pharmacological targets of immunosuppressive drugs. Nat Rev Immunol
2004; 4(1): 24-34.
78 Gorczynski RM, Bransom J, Cattral M,
Huang X, Lei J, Xiaorong L, Min WP, Wan Y,
Gauldie J. Synergy in induction of increased renal allograft
survival after portal vein infusion of dendritic cells transduced
to express TGFbeta and IL-10, along with administration of CHO
cells expressing the regulatory molecule OX-2. Clin Immunol 2000;
95(3): 182-9.
79 Moore F, Buonocore S, Paulart F,
Thielemans K, Goldman M, Flamand V. Unexpected
effects of viral interleukin-10-secreting dendritic cells in vivo:
preferential inhibition of TH2 responses. Transplant Proc 2004;
36(10): 3260-6.
80 Takayama T, Tahara H, Thomson AW. Transduction
of dendritic cell progenitors with a retroviral vector encoding
viral interleukin-10 and enhanced green fluorescent protein allows
purification of potentially tolerogenic antigen-presenting cells.
Transplantation 1999; 68(12): 1903-9.
81 Wang Q, Liu Y, Wang J, Ding G,
Zhang W, Chen G, Zhang M, Zheng S, Cao X.
Induction of allospecific tolerance by immature dendritic cells
genetically modified to express soluble TNF receptor. J Immunol
2006; 177(4): 2175-85.
82 Tan PH, Yates JB, Xue SA, Chan C,
Jordan WJ, Harper JE, Watson MP, Dong R,
Ritter MA, Lechler RI, Lombardi G, George AJ.
Creation of tolerogenic human dendritic cells via intracellular
CTLA4: a novel strategy with potential in clinical
immunosuppression. Blood 2005; 106(9): 2936-43.
83 Wang G, Zhu L, Hu P, Zhu H, Lei P,
Liao W, Yu B, Gong F, Shen G. The inhibitory
effects of mouse ICOS-Ig gene-modified mouse dendritic cells on T
cells. Cell Mol Immunol 2004; 1(2): 153-7.
84 Andreakos E, Smith C, Monaco C,
Brennan FM, Foxwell BM, Feldmann M. Ikappa B kinase
2 but not NF-kappa B-inducing kinase is essential for effective DC
antigen presentation in the allogeneic mixed lymphocyte reaction.
Blood 2003; 101(3): 983-91.
85 Tomasoni S, Aiello S, Cassis L, Noris M,
Longaretti L, Cavinato RA, Azzollini N,
Pezzotta A, Remuzzi G, Benigni A. Dendritic cells
genetically engineered with adenoviral vector encoding dnIKK2
induce the formation of potent CD4+ T-regulatory cells.
Transplantation 2005; 79(9): 1056-61.
86 Calder VL, Bondeson J, Brennan FM,
Foxwell BM, Feldmann M. Antigen-specific T-cell
downregulation by human dendritic cells following blockade of
NF-kappaB. Scand J Immunol 2003; 57(3): 261-70.
87 Jonuleit H, Schmitt E. The regulatory T cell
family: distinct subsets and their interrelations. J Immunol 2003;
171(12): 6323-7.
88 Jonuleit H, Schmitt E, Schuler G, Knop J,
Enk AH. Induction of interleukin 10-producing,
nonproliferating CD4+ T cells with regulatory properties by
repetitive stimulation with allogeneic immature human dendritic
cells. J Exp Med 2000; 192: 1213-22.
89 Levings MK, Gregori S, Tresoldi E,
Cazzaniga S, Bonini C, Roncarolo MG. Differentiation
of Tr1 cells by immature dendritic cells requires IL-10 but not
CD25+CD4+ Tr cells. Blood 2005; 105(3): 1162-9.
90 Levings MK, Gregori S, Tresoldi E,
Cazzaniga S, Bonini C, Roncarolo MG. Differentiation
of Tr1 cells by immature dendritic cells requires IL-10 but not
CD25+CD4+ Tr cells. Blood 2005; 105(3): 1162-9.
91 Dhodapkar MV, Steinman RM. Antigen-bearing,
immature dendritic cells induce peptide-specific, CD8+ regulatory T
cells in vivo in humans. Blood 2002; 100: 174-7.
92 Gad M, Kristensen NN, Kury E,
Claesson MH. Characterization of T-regulatory cells, induced
by immature dendritic cells, which inhibit enteroantigen-reactive
colitis-inducing T-cell responses in vitro and in vivo. Immunology
2004; 113(4): 499-508.
93 Charbonnier LM, van Duivenvoorde LM,
Apparailly F, Cantos C, Han WG, Noel D,
Duperray C, Huizinga TW, Toes RE, Jorgensen C,
Louis-Plence P. Immature dendritic cells suppress
collagen-induced arthritis by in vivo expansion of CD49b+
regulatory T cells. J Immunol 2006; 177(6): 3806-13.
94 Fiorentino DF, Zlotnik A, Vieira P,
Mosmann TR, Howard M, Moore KW, O’Garra A.
IL-10 acts on the antigen-presenting cell to inhibit cytokine
production by Th1 cells. J Immunol 1991; 146(10): 3444-51.
95 Enk AH, Angeloni VL, Udey MC, Katz SI.
Inhibition of Langerhans cell antigen-presenting function by IL-10.
A role for IL-10 in induction of tolerance. J Immunol 1993; 151(5):
2390-8.
96 Fiorentino DF, Bond MW, Mosmann TR. Two types
of mouse T helper cell. IV. Th2 clones secrete a factor that
inhibits cytokine production by Th1 clones. J Exp Med 1989; 170(6):
2081-95.
97 Buelens C, Verhasselt V, De GD,
Thielemans K, Goldman M, Willems F. Interleukin-10
prevents the generation of dendritic cells from peripheral blood
mononuclear cells cultured with interleukin-4 and
granulocyte/macrophage-colony-stimulating factor. Eur J Immunol
1997; 27: 756-62.
98 Allavena P, Piemonti L, Longoni D,
Bernasconi S, Stoppacciaro A, Ruco L,
Mantovani A. IL-10 prevents the differentiation of monocytes
to dendritic cells but promotes their maturation to macrophages.
Eur J Immunol 1998; 28(1): 359-69.
99 Rieser C, Ramoner R, Bock G, Deo YM,
Holtl L, Bartsch G, Thurnher M. Human
monocyte-derived dendritic cells produce macrophage
colony-stimulating factor: enhancement of c-fms expression by
interleukin-10. Eur J Immunol 1998; 28(8): 2283-8.
100 Steinbrink K, Wolfl M, Jonuleit H,
Knop J, Enk AH. Induction of tolerance by IL-10-treated
dendritic cells. J Immunol 1997; 159(10): 4772-80.
101 McBride JM, Jung T, de Vries JE,
Aversa G. IL-10 alters DC function via modulation of cell
surface molecules resulting in impaired T-cell responses. Cell
Immunol 2002; 215(2): 162-72.
102 Kryczek I, Wei S, Zou L, Zhu G,
Mottram P, Xu H, Chen L, Zou W. Cutting edge:
induction of B7-H4 on APCs through IL-10: novel suppressive mode
for regulatory T cells. J Immunol 2006; 177(1): 40-4.
103 Buelens C, Verhasselt V, De GD,
Thielemans K, Goldman M, Willems F. Human dendritic
cell responses to lipopolysaccharide and CD40 ligation are
differentially regulated by interleukin-10. Eur J Immunol 1997;
27(8): 1848-52.
104 Velten FW, Duperrier K, Bohlender J,
Metharom P, Goerdt S. A gene signature of inhibitory MHC
receptors identifies a BDCA3(+) subset of IL-10-induced dendritic
cells with reduced allostimulatory capacity in vitro. Eur J Immunol
2004; 34(10): 2800-11.
105 D’Amico G, Frascaroli G, Bianchi G,
Transidico P, Doni A, Vecchi A, Sozzani S,
Allavena P, Mantovani A. Uncoupling of inflammatory
chemokine receptors by IL-10: generation of functional decoys. Nat
Immunol 2000; 1(5): 387-91.
106 Beinhauer BG, McBride JM, Graf P,
Pursch E, Bongers M, Rogy M, Korthauer U, de
Vries JE, Aversa G, Jung T. Interleukin 10 regulates
cell surface and soluble LIR-2 (CD85d) expression on dendritic
cells resulting in T cell hyporesponsiveness in vitro. Eur J
Immunol 2004; 34(1): 74-80.
107 Sato K, Yamashita N, Matsuyama T. Human
peripheral blood monocyte-derived interleukin-10-induced
semi-mature dendritic cells induce anergic CD4(+) and CD8(+) T
cells via presentation of the internalized soluble antigen and
cross-presentation of the phagocytosed necrotic cellular fragments.
Cell Immunol 2002; 215(2): 186-94.
108 Selenko-Gebauer N, Majdic O, Szekeres A,
Hofler G, Guthann E, Korthauer U, Zlabinger G,
Steinberger P, Pickl WF, Stockinger H, Knapp W,
Stockl J. B7-H1 (programmed death-1 ligand) on dendritic cells
is involved in the induction and maintenance of T cell anergy. J
Immunol 2003; 170(7): 3637-44.
109 Steinbrink K, Wolfl M, Jonuleit H,
Knop J, Enk AH. Induction of tolerance by IL-10-treated
dendritic cells. J Immunol 1997; 159(10): 4772-80.
110 Steinbrink K, Jonuleit H, Muller G,
Schuler G, Knop J, Enk AH. Interleukin-10-treated
human dendritic cells induce a melanoma-antigen-specific anergy in
CD8(+) T cells resulting in a failure to lyse tumor cells. Blood
1999; 93(5): 1634-42.
111 Fujii S, Nishimura MI, Lotze MT. Regulatory
balance between the immune response of tumor antigen-specific
T-cell receptor gene-transduced CD8 T cells and the suppressive
effects of tolerogenic dendritic cells. Cancer Sci 2005; 96(12):
897-902.
112 Bellinghausen I, Brand U, Steinbrink K,
Enk AH, Knop J, Saloga J. Inhibition of human
allergic T-cell responses by IL-10-treated dendritic cells:
differences from hydrocortisone-treated dendritic cells. J Allergy
Clin Immunol 2001; 108(2): 242-9.
113 Steinbrink K, Graulich E, Kubsch S,
Knop J, Enk AH. CD4(+) and CD8(+) anergic T cells induced
by interleukin-10-treated human dendritic cells display
antigen-specific suppressor activity. Blood 2002; 99(7):
2468-76.
114 Kubsch S, Graulich E, Knop J,
Steinbrink K. Suppressor activity of anergic T cells induced
by IL-10-treated human dendritic cells: association with IL-2- and
CTLA-4-dependent G1 arrest of the cell cycle regulated by p27Kip1.
Eur J Immunol 2003; 33(7): 1988-97.
115 Adler HS, Kubsch S, Graulich E,
Ludwig S, Knop J, Steinbrink K. Activation of MAP
kinase p38 is critical for the cell cycle controlled suppressor
function of regulatory T cells. Blood 2007; 109(10): 351-9.
116 Muller G, Muller A, Tuting T,
Steinbrink K, Saloga J, Szalma C, Knop J,
Enk AH. Interleukin-10-treated dendritic cells modulate immune
responses of naive and sensitized T cells in vivo. J Invest
Dermatol 2002; 119(4): 836-41.
117 Bellinghausen I, Sudowe S, Konig B,
Reske-Kunz AB, Knop J, Saloga J.
Interleukin-10-treated dendritic cells do not inhibit Th2 immune
responses in ovalbumin/alum-sensitized mice. Int Arch Allergy
Immunol 2006; 141(1): 61-9.
118 Wakkach A, Fournier N, Brun V,
Breittmayer JP, Cottrez F, Groux H. Characterization
of dendritic cells that induce tolerance and T regulatory 1 cell
differentiation in vivo. Immunity 2003; 18(5): 605-17.
119 Sato K, Yamashita N, Baba M,
Matsuyama T. Modified myeloid dendritic cells act as
regulatory dendritic cells to induce anergic and regulatory T
cells. Blood 2003; 101(9): 3581-9.
120 Fujita S, Seino K, Sato K, Sato Y,
Eizumi K, Yamashita N, Taniguchi M, Sato K.
Regulatory dendritic cells act as regulators of acute lethal
systemic inflammatory response. Blood 2006; 107(9): 3656-64.
121 Sato K, Yamashita N, Yamashita N,
Baba M, Matsuyama T. Regulatory dendritic cells protect
mice from murine acute graft-versus-host disease and leukemia
relapse. Immunity 2003; 18(3): 367-79.
122 Ardeshna KM, Pizzey AR, Devereux S,
Khwaja A. The PI3 kinase, p38 SAP kinase, and NF-kappaB signal
transduction pathways are involved in the survival and maturation
of lipopolysaccharide-stimulated human monocyte-derived dendritic
cells. Blood 2000; 96(3): 1039-46.
123 Ouaaz F, Arron J, Zheng Y, Choi Y,
Beg AA. Dendritic cell development and survival require
distinct NF-kappaB subunits. Immunity 2002; 16(2): 257-70.
124 Yoshimura S, Bondeson J, Foxwell BM,
Brennan FM, Feldmann M. Effective antigen presentation by
dendritic cells is NF-kappaB dependent: coordinate regulation of
MHC, co-stimulatory molecules and cytokines. Int Immunol 2001;
13(5): 675-83.
125 Yoshimura S, Bondeson J, Brennan FM,
Foxwell BM, Feldmann M. Antigen presentation by murine
dendritic cells is nuclear factor-kappa B dependent both in vitro
and in vivo. Scand J Immunol 2003; 58(2): 165-72.
126 Pettit AR, Quinn C, MacDonald KP,
Cavanagh LL, Thomas G, Townsend W, Handel M,
Thomas R. Nuclear localization of RelB is associated with
effective antigen-presenting cell function. J Immunol 1997; 159(8):
3681-91.
127 O’Sullivan BJ, MacDonald KP, Pettit AR,
Thomas R. RelB nuclear translocation regulates B cell MHC
molecule, CD40 expression, and antigen-presenting cell function.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97(21): 11421-6.
128 Pettit AR, MacDonald KP, O’Sullivan B,
Thomas R. Differentiated dendritic cells expressing nuclear
RelB are predominantly located in rheumatoid synovial tissue
perivascular mononuclear cell aggregates. Arthritis Rheum 2000;
43(4): 791-800.
129 Bhattacharyya S, Sen P, Wallet M,
Long B, Baldwin Jr. AS, Tisch R.
Immunoregulation of dendritic cells by IL-10 is mediated through
suppression of the PI3K/Akt pathway and of IkappaB kinase activity.
Blood 2004; 104(4): 1100-9.
130 Tan PH, Sagoo P, Chan C, Yates JB,
Campbell J, Beutelspacher SC, Foxwell BM,
Lombardi G, George AJ. Inhibition of NF-kappa B and
oxidative pathways in human dendritic cells by antioxidative
vitamins generates regulatory T cells. J Immunol 2005; 174(12):
7633-44.
131 Gonzalez-Rey E, Chorny A, Fernandez-Martin A,
Ganea D, Delgado M. Vasoactive intestinal peptide
generates human tolerogenic dendritic cells that induce CD4 and CD8
regulatory T cells. Blood 2006; 107(9): 3632-8.
132 Gonzalez-Rey E, Chorny A, Delgado M.
Regulation of immune tolerance by anti-inflammatory neuropeptides.
Nat Rev Immunol 2007; 7(1): 52-63.
133 Delgado M, Gonzalez-Rey E, Ganea D. The
neuropeptide vasoactive intestinal peptide generates tolerogenic
dendritic cells. J Immunol 2005; 175(11): 7311-24.
134 Giannoukakis N, Bonham CA, Qian S,
Chen Z, Peng L, Harnaha J, Li W,
Thomson AW, Fung JJ, Robbins PD, Lu L.
Prolongation of cardiac allograft survival using dendritic cells
treated with NF-kB decoy oligodeoxyribonucleotides. Mol Ther 2000;
1(5 Pt 1): 430-7.
135 Yoshimura S, Bondeson J, Brennan FM,
Foxwell BM, Feldmann M. Role of NFkappaB in antigen
presentation and development of regulatory T cells elucidated by
treatment of dendritic cells with the proteasome inhibitor PSI. Eur
J Immunol 2001; 31(6): 1883-93.
136 Tas SW, de Jong EC, Hajji N, May MJ,
Ghosh S, Vervoordeldonk MJ, Tak PP. Selective
inhibition of NF-kappaB in dendritic cells by the NEMO-binding
domain peptide blocks maturation and prevents T cell proliferation
and polarization. Eur J Immunol 2005; 35(4): 1164-74.
137 Iruretagoyena MI, Sepulveda SE, Lezana JP,
Hermoso M, Bronfman M, Gutierrez MA,
Jacobelli SH, Kalergis AM. Inhibition of nuclear
factor-kappa B enhances the capacity of immature dendritic cells to
induce antigen-specific tolerance in experimental autoimmune
encephalomyelitis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2006; 318(1): 59-67.
138 Popov I, Li M, Zheng X, San H,
Zhang X, Ichim TE, Suzuki M, Feng B,
Vladau C, Zhong R, Garcia B, Strejan G,
Inman RD, Min WP. Preventing autoimmune arthritis using
antigen-specific immature dendritic cells: a novel tolerogenic
vaccine. Arthritis Res Ther 2006; 8(5): R141.
139 Saemann MD, Kelemen P, Bohmig GA,
Horl WH, Zlabinger GJ. Hyporesponsiveness in alloreactive
T-cells by NF-kappaB inhibitor-treated dendritic cells: resistance
to calcineurin inhibition. Am J Transplant 2004; 4(9): 1448-58.
140 Martin E, O’Sullivan B, Low P, Thomas R.
Antigen-specific suppression of a primed immune response by
dendritic cells mediated by regulatory T cells secreting
interleukin-10. Immunity 2003; 18(1): 155-67.
141 Appel S, Rupf A, Weck MM, Schoor O,
Brummendorf TH, Weinschenk T, Grunebach F,
Brossart P. Effects of imatinib on monocyte-derived dendritic
cells are mediated by inhibition of nuclear factor-kappaB and Akt
signaling pathways. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11(5): 1928-40.
142 Zeyda M, Kirsch BM, Geyeregger R,
Stuhlmeier KM, Zlabinger GJ, Horl WH,
Saemann MD, Stulnig TM. Inhibition of human dendritic
cell maturation and function by the novel immunosuppressant FK778.
Transplantation 2005; 80(8): 1105-11.
143 Lee JI, Ganster RW, Geller DA,
Burckart GJ, Thomson AW, Lu L. Cyclosporine A
inhibits the expression of costimulatory molecules on in
vitro-generated dendritic cells: association with reduced nuclear
translocation of nuclear factor kappa B. Transplantation 1999;
68(9): 1255-63.
144 Vital AL, Goncalo M, Cruz MT,
Figueiredo A, Duarte CB, Lopes MC. Dexamethasone
prevents granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor-induced
nuclear factor-kappaB activation, inducible nitric oxide synthase
expression and nitric oxide production in a skin dendritic cell
line. Mediators Inflamm 2003; 12(2): 71-8.
145 Xing N. ML LM, Bachman LA, McKean DJ, Kumar R, Griffin
MD. Distinctive dendritic cell modulation by vitamin D(3) and
glucocorticoid pathways. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2002; 297(3):
645-52.
146 Piemonti L, Monti P, Allavena P,
Sironi M, Soldini L, Leone BE, Socci C,
Di C. V. Glucocorticoids affect human dendritic cell
differentiation and maturation. J Immunol 1999; 162(11):
6473-81.
147 Moser M, De ST, Sornasse T, Tielemans F,
Chentoufi AA, Muraille E, Van MM, Urbain J,
Leo O. Glucocorticoids down-regulate dendritic cell function
in vitro and in vivo. Eur J Immunol 1995; 25(10): 2818-24.
148 Matasic R, Dietz AB, Vuk-Pavlovic S.
Dexamethasone inhibits dendritic cell maturation by redirecting
differentiation of a subset of cells. J Leukoc Biol 1999; 66(6):
909-14.
149 Woltman AM, de Fijter JW, Kamerling SW,
Paul LC, Daha MR, Van KC. The effect of calcineurin
inhibitors and corticosteroids on the differentiation of human
dendritic cells. Eur J Immunol 2000; 30(7): 1807-12.
150 Woltman AM, van der Kooij SW, de Fijter JW,
Van KC. Maturation-resistant dendritic cells induce
hyporesponsiveness in alloreactive CD45RA+ and CD45RO+ T-cell
populations. Am J Transplant 2006; 6(11): 2580-91.
151 Pedersen AE, Gad M, Walter MR,
Claesson MH. Induction of regulatory dendritic cells by
dexamethasone and 1alpha,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D(3). Immunol Lett
2004; 91(1): 63-9.
152 Verhoeven GT, Van Haarst JM, De Wit HJ,
Simons PJ, Hoogsteden HC, Drexhage HA.
Glucocorticoids hamper the ex vivo maturation of lung dendritic
cells from their low autofluorescent precursors in the human
bronchoalveolar lavage: decreases in allostimulatory capacity and
expression of CD80 and CD86. Clin Exp Immunol 2000; 122(2):
232-40.
153 Rea D, Van KC, van Meijgaarden KE,
Ottenhoff TH, Melief CJ, Offringa R. Glucocorticoids
transform CD40-triggering of dendritic cells into an alternative
activation pathway resulting in antigen-presenting cells that
secrete IL-10. Blood 2000; 95(10): 3162-7.
154 Pan J, Ju D, Wang Q, Zhang M,
Xia D, Zhang L, Yu H, Cao X. Dexamethasone
inhibits the antigen presentation of dendritic cells in MHC class
II pathway. Immunol Lett 2001; 76(3): 153-61.
155 Bros M, Jahrling F, Renzing A,
Wiechmann N, Dang NA, Sutter A, Ross R,
Knop J, Sudowe S, Reske-Kunz AB. A newly established
murine immature dendritic cell line can be differentiated into a
mature state, but exerts tolerogenic function upon maturation in
the presence of glucocorticoid. Blood 2007; 109(9): 3820-9.
156 Kitajima T, Ariizumi K, Bergstresser PR,
Takashima A. A novel mechanism of glucocorticoid-induced
immune suppression: the inhibiton of T cell-mediated terminal
maturation of a murine dendritic cell line. J Clin Invest 1996;
98(1): 142-7.
157 Matyszak MK, Citterio S, Rescigno M,
Ricciardi-Castagnoli P. Differential effects of
corticosteroids during different stages of dendritic cell
maturation. Eur J Immunol 2000; 30(4): 1233-42.
158 Salgado CG, Nakamura K, Sugaya M,
Tada Y, Asahina A, Fukuda S, Koyama Y,
Irie S, Tamaki K. Differential effects of cytokines and
immunosuppressive drugs on CD40, B7-1, and B7-2 expression on
purified epidermal Langerhans cells1. J Invest Dermatol 1999;
113(6): 1021-7.
159 Furue M, Katz SI. Direct effects of
glucocorticosteroids on epidermal Langerhans cells. J Invest
Dermatol 1989; 92(3): 342-7.
160 Vizzardelli C, Pavelka N, Luchini A,
Zanoni I, Bendickson L, Pelizzola M, Beretta O,
Foti M, Granucci F, Nilsen-Hamilton M,
Ricciardi-Castagnoli P. Effects of dexamethazone on
LPS-induced activationand migration of mouse dendritic cells
revealed by a genome-wide transcriptional analysis. Eur J Immunol
2006; 36(6): 1504-15.
161 Dong X, Bachman LA, Kumar R, Griffin MD.
Generation of antigen-specific, interleukin-10-producing T-cells
using dendritic cell stimulation and steroid hormone conditioning.
Transpl Immunol 2003; 11(3-4): 323-33.
162 Emmer PM. van d, V, Adema GJ, Hilbrands LB. Dendritic
cells activated by lipopolysaccharide after dexamethasone treatment
induce donor-specific allograft hyporesponsiveness. Transplantation
2006; 81(10): 1451-9.
163 Matsue H, Yang C, Matsue K, Edelbaum D,
Mummert M, Takashima A. Contrasting impacts of
immunosuppressive agents (rapamycin, FK506, cyclosporin A, and
dexamethasone) on bidirectional dendritic cell-T cell interaction
during antigen presentation. J Immunol 2002; 169(7): 3555-64.
164 Vanclee A, Schouten HC, Bos GM. Murine
dendritic cells that are resistant to maturation are unable to
induce tolerance to allogeneic stem cells. Transpl Immunol 2006;
16(1): 8-13.
165 Carlberg C, Polly P. Gene regulation by vitamin
D3. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr 1998; 8(1): 19-42.
166 Hewison M, Freeman L, Hughes SV,
Evans KN, Bland R, Eliopoulos AG, Kilby MD,
Moss PA, Chakraverty R. Differential regulation of
vitamin D receptor and its ligand in human monocyte-derived
dendritic cells. J Immunol 2003; 170(11): 5382-90.
167 Adorini L, Penna G, Giarratana N,
Roncari A, Amuchastegui S, Daniel KC,
Uskokovic M. Dendritic cells as key targets for
immunomodulation by Vitamin D receptor ligands. J Steroid Biochem
Mol Biol 2004; 89-90(1-5): 437-41.
168 van EE. Mathieu C. Immunoregulation by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin
D3: basic concepts. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2005; 97(1-2):
93-101.
169 Piemonti L, Monti P, Sironi M,
Fraticelli P, Leone BE, Dal CE, Allavena P,
Di C. V. Vitamin D3 affects differentiation, maturation, and
function of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells. J Immunol 2000;
164(9): 4443-51.
170 Penna G, Adorini L. 1 Alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3
inhibits differentiation, maturation, activation, and survival of
dendritic cells leading to impaired alloreactive T cell activation.
J Immunol 2000; 164(5): 2405-11.
171 Berer A, Stockl J, Majdic O, Wagner T,
Kollars M, Lechner K, Geissler K, Oehler L.
1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D(3) inhibits dendritic cell differentiation
and maturation in vitro. Exp Hematol 2000; 28(5): 575-83.
172 Penna G, Roncari A, Amuchastegui S,
Daniel KC, Berti E, Colonna M, Adorini L.
Expression of the inhibitory receptor ILT3 on dendritic cells is
dispensable for induction of CD4+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells by
1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Blood 2005; 106(10): 3490-7.
173 Lyakh LA, Sanford M, Chekol S, Young HA,
Roberts AB. TGF-beta and vitamin D3 utilize distinct pathways
to suppress IL-12 production and modulate rapid differentiation of
human monocytes into CD83+ dendritic cells. J Immunol 2005; 174(4):
2061-70.
174 Penna G, Amuchastegui S, Giarratana N,
Daniel KC, Vulcano M, Sozzani S, Adorini L.
1,25-dihydroxyvitamin d3 selectively modulates tolerogenic
properties in myeloid but not plasmacytoid dendritic cells. J
Immunol 2007; 178(1): 145-53.
175 Dong X, Craig T, Xing N, Bachman LA,
Paya CV, Weih F, McKean DJ, Kumar R,
Griffin MD. Direct transcriptional regulation of RelB by
1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and its analogs: physiologic and
therapeutic implications for dendritic cell function. J Biol Chem
2003; 278(49): 49378-85.
176 Dong X, Lutz W, Schroeder TM,
Bachman LA, Westendorf JJ, Kumar R, Griffin MD.
Regulation of relB in dendritic cells by means of modulated
association of vitamin D receptor and histone deacetylase 3 with
the promoter. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102(44): 16007-12.
177 Fritsche J, Mondal K, Ehrnsperger A,
Andreesen R, Kreutz M. Regulation of 25-hydroxyvitamin
D3-1 alpha-hydroxylase and production of 1
alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 by human dendritic cells. Blood 2003;
102(9): 3314-6.
178 Griffin MD, Lutz WH, Phan VA,
Bachman LA, McKean DJ, Kumar R. Potent inhibition of
dendritic cell differentiation and maturation by vitamin D analogs.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2000; 270(3): 701-8.
179 Griffin MD, Xing N, Kumar R. Gene expression
profiles in dendritic cells conditioned by
1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 analog. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol
2004; 89-90(1-5): 443-8.
180 Van EE, Decallonne B, Bouillon R,
Mathieu C. NOD bone marrow-derived dendritic cells are
modulated by analogs of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. J Steroid Biochem
Mol Biol 2004; 89-90(1-5): 457-9.
181 van EE, Dardenne O, Gysemans C,
Overbergh L, Mathieu C. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 alters
the profile of bone marrow-derived dendritic cells of NOD mice. Ann
N Y Acad Sci 2004; 1037: 186-92.
182 Gregori S, Casorati M, Amuchastegui S,
Smiroldo S, Davalli AM, Adorini L. Regulatory T
cells induced by 1 alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and mycophenolate
mofetil treatment mediate transplantation tolerance. J Immunol
2001; 167(4): 1945-53.
183 Griffin MD, Lutz W, Phan VA, Bachman LA,
McKean DJ, Kumar R. Dendritic cell modulation by
1alpha,25 dihydroxyvitamin D3 and its analogs: a vitamin D
receptor-dependent pathway that promotes a persistent state of
immaturity in vitro and in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;
98(12): 6800-5.
184 Munn DH, Sharma MD, Lee JR, Jhaver KG,
Johnson TS. Potential regulatory function of human dendritic
cells expressing indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase. Science 2002; 297:
1867-70.
185 Terness P, Bauer TM, Rose L, Dufter C,
Watzlik A. Inhibition of allogeneic T cell proliferation by
indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-expressing dendritc cells: mediation of
suppression by tryptophan metabolites. J Exp Med 2002; 196:
447-57.
186 Orabona C, Puccetti P, Vacca C,
Bicciato S, Luchini A, Fallarino F, Bianchi R,
Velardi E, Perruccio K, Velardi A, Bronte V,
Fioretti MC, Grohmann U. Toward the identification of a
tolerogenic signature in IDO-competent dendritic cells. Blood 2006;
107(7): 2846-54.
187 von Bergwelt-Baildon MS, Popov A, Saric T,
Chemnitz J, Classen S, Stoffel MS, Fiore F,
Roth U, Beyer M, Debey S, Wickenhauser C,
Hanisch FG, Schultze JL. CD25 and indoleamine
2,3-dioxygenase are up-regulated by prostaglandin E2 and expressed
by tumor-associated dendritic cells in vivo: additional mechanisms
of T-cell inhibition. Blood 2006; 108(1): 228-37.
188 Grohmann U, Volpi C, Fallarino F,
Bozza S, Bianchi R, Vacca C, Orabona C,
Belladonna ML, Ayroldi E, Nocentini G, Boon L,
Bistoni F, Fioretti MC, Romani L, Riccardi C,
Puccetti P. Reverse signaling through GITR ligand enables
dexamethasone to activate IDO in allergy. Nat Med 2007; 13(5):
579-86.
189 Mellor AL, Munn DH. IDO expression by dendritic
cells: tolerance and tryptophan catabolism. Nat Rev Immunol 2004;
4(10): 762-74.
190 Grohmann U, Fallarino F, Puccetti P.
Tolerance, DCs and tryptophan: much ado about IDO. Trends Immunol
2003; 24(5): 242-8.
191 Morelli AE, Thomson AW. Dendritic cells:
regulators of alloimmunity and opportunities for tolerance
induction. Immunol Rev 2003; 196: 125-46.
192 Gajewski TF, Meng Y, Blank C, Brown I,
Kacha A, Kline J, Harlin H. Immune resistance
orchestrated by the tumor microenvironment. Immunol Rev 2006; 213:
131-45.
193 Antonia S, Mule JJ, Weber JS. Current
developments of immunotherapy in the clinic. Curr Opin Immunol
2004; 16(2): 130-6.
194 Shu S, Cochran AJ, Huang RR, Morton DL,
Maecker HT. Immune responses in the draining lymph nodes
against cancer: implications for immunotherapy. Cancer Metastasis
Rev 2006; 25(2): 233-42.
195 Essner R. Experimental frontiers for clinical
applications: novel approaches to understanding mechanisms of lymph
node metastases in melanoma. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2006; 25(2):
257-67.
196 Hersey P, Jamal O. Expression of the gangliosides
GD3 and GD2 on lymphocytes in tissue sections of melanoma.
Pathology 1989; 21(1): 51-8.
197 McKallip R, Li R, Ladisch S. Tumor
gangliosides inhibit the tumor-specific immune response. J Immunol
1999; 163(7): 3718-26.
198 Shurin GV, Shurin MR, Bykovskaia S,
Shogan J, Lotze MT, Barksdale Jr. EM.
Neuroblastoma-derived gangliosides inhibit dendritic cell
generation and function. Cancer Res 2001; 61(1): 363-9.
199 Peguet-Navarro J, Sportouch M, Popa I,
Berthier O, Schmitt D, Portoukalian J. Gangliosides
from human melanoma tumors impair dendritic cell differentiation
from monocytes and induce their apoptosis. J Immunol 2003; 170(7):
3488-94.
200 Caldwell S, Heitger A, Shen W, Liu Y,
Taylor B, Ladisch S. Mechanisms of ganglioside inhibition
of APC function. J Immunol 2003; 171(4): 1676-83.
201 Bennaceur K, Popa I, Portoukalian J,
Berthier-Vergnes O, Peguet-Navarro J. Melanoma-derived
gangliosides impair migratory and antigen-presenting function of
human epidermal Langerhans cells and induce their apoptosis. Int
Immunol 2006; 18(6): 879-86.
202 Kiertscher SM, Luo J, Dubinett SM,
Roth MD. Tumors promote altered maturation and early apoptosis
of monocyte-derived dendritic cells. J Immunol 2000; 164(3):
1269-76.
203 Bellone G, Carbone A, Smirne C,
Scirelli T, Buffolino A, Novarino A,
Stacchini A, Bertetto O, Palestro G, Sorio C,
Scarpa A, Emanuelli G, Rodeck U. Cooperative
induction of a tolerogenic dendritic cell phenotype by cytokines
secreted by pancreatic carcinoma cells. J Immunol 2006; 177(5):
3448-60.
204 Monti P, Leone BE, Zerbi A, Balzano G,
Cainarca S, Sordi V, Pontillo M, Mercalli A,
Di C. V, Allavena P, Piemonti L. Tumor-derived MUC1 mucins
interact with differentiating monocytes and induce
IL-10highIL-12low regulatory dendritic cell. J Immunol 2004;
172(12): 7341-9.
205 Shurin MR, Yurkovetsky ZR, Tourkova IL,
Balkir L, Shurin GV. Inhibition of CD40 expression and
CD40-mediated dendritic cell function by tumor-derived IL-10. Int J
Cancer 2002; 101(1): 61-8.
206 Valenti R, Huber V, Filipazzi P,
Pilla L, Sovena G, Villa A, Corbelli A,
Fais S, Parmiani G, Rivoltini L. Human
tumor-released microvesicles promote the differentiation of myeloid
cells with transforming growth factor-beta-mediated suppressive
activity on T lymphocytes. Cancer Res 2006; 66(18): 9290-8.
207 Enk AH, Jonuleit H, Saloga J, Knop J.
Dendritic cells as mediators of tumor-induced tolerance in
metastatic melanoma. Int J Cancer 1997; 73(3): 309-16.
208 Ito M, Minamiya Y, Kawai H, Saito S,
Saito H, Nakagawa T, Imai K, Hirokawa M,
Ogawa J. Tumor-derived TGFbeta-1 induces dendritic cell
apoptosis in the sentinel lymph node. J Immunol 2006; 176(9):
5637-43.
209 Aubin F. Mechanisms involved in ultraviolet
light-induced immunosuppression. Eur J Dermatol 2003; 13(6):
515-23.
210 Norval M. The mechanisms and consequences of
ultraviolet-induced immunosuppression. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2006;
92(1): 108-18.
211 Weiss JM, Renkl AC, Denfeld RW. de RR,
Spitzlei M, Schopf E, Simon JC. Low-dose UVB radiation perturbs the
functional expression of B7.1 and B7.2 co-stimulatory molecules on
human Langerhans cells. Eur J Immunol 1995; 25(10): 2858-62.
212 Dittmar HC, Weiss JM, Termeer CC,
Denfeld RW, Wanner MB, Skov L, Barker JN,
Schopf E, Baadsgaard O, Simon JC. In vivo UVA-1 and
UVB irradiation differentially perturbs the antigen-presenting
function of human epidermal Langerhans cells. J Invest Dermatol
1999; 112(3): 322-5.
213 Alard P, Kurimoto I, Niizeki H,
Doherty JM, Streilein JW. Hapten-specific tolerance
induced by acute, low-dose ultraviolet B radiation of skin requires
mast cell degranulation. Eur J Immunol 2001; 31(6): 1736-46.
214 Toews GB, Bergstresser PR, Streilein JW.
Epidermal Langerhans cell density determines whether contact
hypersensitivity or unresponsiveness follows skin painting with
DNFB. J Immunol 1980; 124(1): 445-53.
215 Kurimoto I, Kitazawa T, Streilein JW. Studies
of delayed systemic effects of ultraviolet B radiation (UVR) on the
induction of contact hypersensitivity, 2. Evidence that
interleukin-10 from UVR-treated epidermis is the critical mediator.
Immunology 2000; 99(1): 134-40.
216 Schwarz T. Mechanisms of UV-induced immunosuppression.
Link between UV-induced tolerance and apoptosis. Eur J Dermatol
1998; 8(3): 196-7.
217 Schwarz A, Beissert S, Grosse-Heitmeyer K,
Gunzer M, Bluestone JA, Grabbe S, Schwarz T.
Evidence for functional relevance of CTLA-4 in
ultraviolet-radiation-induced tolerance. J Immunol 2000; 165(4):
1824-31.
218 Schwarz T. Regulatory T cells induced by ultraviolet
radiation. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2005; 137(3): 187-93.
219 Smith DW, Nagler-Anderson C. Preventing
intolerance: the induction of nonresponsiveness to dietary and
microbial antigens in the intestinal mucosa. J Immunol 2005;
174(7): 3851-7.
220 Macpherson AJ, Geuking MB, McCoy KD. Immune
responses that adapt the intestinal mucosa to commensal intestinal
bacteria. Immunology 2005; 115(2): 153-62.
221 Smits HH, Engering A, Van der KD, De
Jong EC, Schipper K, Van Capel TM, Zaat BA,
Yazdanbakhsh M, Wierenga EA, van KY,
Kapsenberg ML. Selective probiotic bacteria induce
IL-10-producing regulatory T cells in vitro by modulating dendritic
cell function through dendritic cell-specific intercellular
adhesion molecule 3-grabbing nonintegrin. J Allergy Clin Immunol
2005; 115(6): 1260-7.
222 Frick JS, Zahir N, Muller M, Kahl F,
Bechtold O, Lutz MB, Kirschning CJ, Reimann J,
Jilge B, Bohn E, Autenrieth IB. Colitogenic and
non-colitogenic commensal bacteria differentially trigger DC
maturation and Th cell polarization: an important role for IL-6.
Eur J Immunol 2006; 36(6): 1537-47.
223 Beck K, Meyer-Konig U, Weidmann M,
Nern C, Hufert FT. Human cytomegalovirus impairs
dendritic cell function: a novel mechanism of human cytomegalovirus
immune escape. Eur J Immunol 2003; 33(6): 1528-38.
224 Raftery MJ, Wieland D, Gronewald S,
Kraus AA, Giese T, Schonrich G. Shaping phenotype,
function, and survival of dendritic cells by
cytomegalovirus-encoded IL-10. J Immunol 2004; 173(5): 3383-91.
225 Andrews DM, Andoniou CE, Granucci F,
Ricciardi-Castagnoli P. gli-Esposti MA. Infection of dendritic
cells by murine cytomegalovirus induces functional paralysis. Nat
Immunol 2001; 2(11): 1077-84.
226 Salio M, Cella M, Suter M,
Lanzavecchia A. Inhibition of dendritic cell maturation by
herpes simplex virus. Eur J Immunol 1999; 29(10): 3245-53.
227 Lateef Z, Fleming S, Halliday G,
Faulkner L, Mercer A, Baird M. Orf virus-encoded
interleukin-10 inhibits maturation, antigen presentation and
migration of murine dendritic cells. J Gen Virol 2003; 84(Pt 5):
1101-9.
228 Donaghy H, Stebbing J, Patterson S. Antigen
presentation and the role of dendritic cells in HIV. Curr Opin
Infect Dis 2004; 17(1): 1-6.
229 Donaghy H, Gazzard B, Gotch F,
Patterson S. Dysfunction and infection of freshly isolated
blood myeloid and plasmacytoid dendritic cells in patients infected
with HIV-1. Blood 2003; 101(11): 4505-11.
230 Lore K, Sonnerborg A, Brostrom C,
Goh LE, Perrin L, McDade H, Stellbrink HJ,
Gazzard B, Weber R, Napolitano LA. van KY, Andersson
J. Accumulation of DC-SIGN+CD40+ dendritic cells with reduced CD80
and CD86 expression in lymphoid tissue during acute HIV-1
infection. AIDS 2002; 16(5): 683-92.
231 Majumder B, Janket ML, Schafer EA,
Schaubert K, Huang XL, Kan-Mitchell J,
Rinaldo CRJr., Ayyavoo V. Human immunodeficiency virus
type 1 Vpr impairs dendritic cell maturation and T-cell activation:
implications for viral immune escape. J Virol 2005; 79(13):
7990-8003.
232 Messmer D, Jacque JM, Santisteban C,
Bristow C, Han SY, Villamide-Herrera L,
Mehlhop E, Marx PA, Steinman RM, Gettie A,
Pope M. Endogenously expressed nef uncouples cytokine and
chemokine production from membrane phenotypic maturation in
dendritic cells. J Immunol 2002; 169(8): 4172-82.
233 Mavilio D, Lombardo G, Kinter A,
Fogli M. la SA, Ortolano S, Farschi A, Follmann D, Gregg R,
Kovacs C, Marcenaro E, Pende D, Moretta A, Fauci AS.
Characterization of the defective interaction between a subset of
natural killer cells and dendritic cells in HIV-1 infection. J Exp
Med 2006; 203(10): 2339-50.
234 Borkow G, Bentwich Z. Chronic immune activation
associated with chronic helminthic and human immunodeficiency virus
infections: role of hyporesponsiveness and anergy. Clin Microbiol
Rev 2004; 17(4): 1012-30.
235 Silva SR, Jacysyn JF, Macedo MS,
Faquim-Mauro EL. Immunosuppressive components of Ascaris suum
down-regulate expression of costimulatory molecules and function of
antigen-presenting cells via an IL-10-mediated mechanism. Eur J
Immunol 2006; 36(12): 3227-37.
236 Chen CC, Louie S, McCormick BA,
Walker WA, Shi HN. Helminth-primed dendritic cells alter
the host response to enteric bacterial infection. J Immunol 2006;
176(1): 472-83.
237 Farah IO, Mola PW, Kariuki TM, Nyindo M,
Blanton RE, King CL. Repeated exposure induces periportal
fibrosis in Schistosoma mansoni-infected baboons: role of TGF-beta
and IL-4. J Immunol 2000; 164(10): 5337-43.
238 Doetze A, Satoguina J, Burchard G,
Rau T, Loliger C, Fleischer B, Hoerauf A.
Antigen-specific cellular hyporesponsiveness in a chronic human
helminth infection is mediated by T(h)3/T(r)1-type cytokines IL-10
and transforming growth factor-beta but not by a T(h)1 to T(h)2
shift. Int Immunol 2000; 12(5): 623-30.
239 Sporri R. Reis e Sousa. Inflammatory mediators are
insufficient for full dendritic cell activation and promote
expansion of CD4+ T cell populations lacking helper function. Nat
Immunol 2005; 6(2): 163-70.
240 Fujii S, Liu K, Smith C, Bonito AJ,
Steinman RM. The linkage of innate to adaptive immunity via
maturing dendritic cells in vivo requires CD40 ligation in addition
to antigen presentation and CD80/86 costimulation. J Exp Med 2004;
199(12): 1607-18.
241 Quaratino S, Duddy LP, Londei M. Fully
competent dendritic cells as inducers of T cell anergy in
autoimmunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97(20): 10911-6.
242 Sousa RE. Dendritic cells in a mature age. Nat Rev
Immunol 2006; 6(6): 476-83.
243 Menges M, Rossner S, Voigtlander C,
Schindler H, Kukutsch NA, Bogdan C, Erb K,
Schuler G, Lutz MB. Repetitive injections of dendritic
cells matured with tumor necrosis factor alpha induce
antigen-specific protection of mice from autoimmunity. J Exp Med
2002; 195(1): 15-21.
244 Albert ML, Jegathesan M, Darnell RB.
Dendritic cell maturation is required for the cross-tolerization of
CD8+ T cells. Nat Immunol 2001; 2(11): 1010-7.
245 Yamazaki S, Iyoda T, Tarbell K, Olson K,
Velinzon K, Inaba K, Steinman RM. Direct expansion
of functional CD25+ CD4+ regulatory T cells by antigen-processing
dendritic cells. J Exp Med 2003; 198(2): 235-47.
246 Banerjee DK, Dhodapkar MV, Matayeva E,
Steinman RM, Dhodapkar KM. Expansion of FOXP3high
regulatory T cells by human dendritic cells (DCs) in vitro and
after injection of cytokine-matured DCs in myeloma patients. Blood
2006; 108(8): 2655-61.
247 de Jong EC, Smits HH, Kapsenberg ML.
Dendritic cell-mediated T cell polarization. Springer Semin
Immunopathol 2005; 26(3): 289-307.
248 Amsen D, Blander JM, Lee GR, Tanigaki K,
Honjo T, Flavell RA. Instruction of distinct CD4 T helper
cell fates by different notch ligands on antigen-presenting cells.
Cell 2004; 117(4): 515-26.
249 Quezada SA, Jarvinen LZ, Lind EF,
Noelle RJ. CD40/CD154 interactions at the interface of
tolerance and immunity. Annu Rev Immunol 2004; 22: 307-28.
250 Watts TH. TNF/TNFR family members in costimulation of T
cell responses. Annu Rev Immunol 2005; 23: 23-68.
251 Greenwald RJ, Freeman GJ, Sharpe AH. The B7
family revisited. Annu Rev Immunol 2005; 23: 515-48.
252 Krathwohl MD, Schacker TW, Anderson JL.
Abnormal presence of semimature dendritic cells that induce
regulatory T cells in HIV-infected subjects. J Infect Dis 2006;
193(4): 494-504.
|