ARTICLE
Auteur(s) : Lars Alexander Schneider1,4,
Joachim Dissemond2, Edith Schwamborn4,5,
Meinhard Wlaschek1,4, Peter Brenneisen3,4, Karin
Scharffetter-Kochanek1,4
1Department of Dermatology and Allergology,
University of Ulm, Maienweg 12, D-89081 Ulm, Germany
2Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University
of Essen, Germany
3Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology I,
University of Duesseldorf, Germany
4Department of Dermatology, University of Cologne,
Germany
5Miltenyi Biotech GmbH, Bergisch-Gladbach, Germany
accepté le 1 Mai 2006
Ambient UV radiation, to which our skin is daily exposed, consists
of over 90% UVA. With its penetrating capacity into the dermis, UVA
creates reactive oxygen species (ROS) and photooxidative stress,
defined as an imbalance between generation of ROS and existing
antioxidative protection [1]. One major result of photooxidative
stress in dermal fibroblasts is membrane damage caused by lipid
peroxidation (LPO) [2-4]. In biological membranes with a high
content of polyunsatured fatty acids, LPO results in destruction of
membrane structure and function, disturbed membrane fluidity,
protein modifications, perforation of the cell membrane and finally
even lysis of cells [5, 6]. This is one pathway via which long term
effects of UVA such as photocarcinogenesis, immunosuppression and
photoaging are promoted [7, 8]. We have recently shown that the
lazaroid tirilazad is able to inhibit UVA mediated LPO in human
dermal fibroblasts [9].The effects of tirilazad are permitted by
the intercalation of the lipophilic part into the
phospholipid-bilayer of cellular membranes. Unspecific physical and
chemical attributes are changed and through a loss of fluidity a
stabilisation of the membrane occurs. This very effectively
terminates the LPO chain reaction [10]. Apart from this stabilising
effect tirilazad also acts as an antioxidant by quenching hydroxyl-
and peroxyl radicals and keeps the vitamin E content in the cell
membranes constant [11]. Despite being a 21-amino-steroid-molecule,
tirilazad does not exert the typical genomic effects of mineral- or
corticosteroids, like modulation of cytokine production, protein
synthesis and immunosuppression [11]. Lazaroids are thus
non-hormonal 21-aminosteroids.Since tirilazad diminishes UVA
induced LPO and has a further potential as an antioxidant we aimed
to evaluate its possible effect on the increase of typical markers
for acute photooxidative stress in human dermal fibroblasts. Such a
typical photooxidative stress response is the release of
inflammatory cytokines like interleukin-6 (IL-6). Another typical
effect causing solar scarring and photoaging in the long term is
the release of matrix-degrading enzymes like
matrix-metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1) [12, 13]. Both of these acute
markers of stress are furthermore linked as UVA and UVB induce
MMP-1 production and -enzymatic activity in the skin via autocrine
and paracrine loops involving IL-6 [14-16].It has recently been
shown that the induction of MMP-1 is partly linked with LPO as
well, since LPO induced by UVA radiation leads to activation of the
transcription factor NFκB, which then mediates IL-6 induction [17].
In summary, there is a distinct rationale behind the investigation
of the possible effects tirilazad might have against the acute UVA
stress response, i.e. release of IL-6 respectively MMP-1 into the
extracellular space.
Materials and methods
Chemicals
All chemicals were obtained from Sigma (Deisenhofen, FRG) unless
otherwise stated and were of HPLC grade.
Cell culture
Dermal foreskin fibroblasts were cultured after outgrowth from skin
biopsies of healthy human donors aged 3-6 years. The fibroblasts
were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM)
(GIBCO-BRL, Eggenstein, FRG) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum
(FCS) (Biochrom, Berlin, FRG), glutamine (2 mM), penicillin (400
U/mL), streptomycin (50 μg/mL), and grown on plastic dishes in a
humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% air at
37 °C [18]. Prior to UVA irradiation, confluent fibroblasts
were either pre-incubated 24 h in medium with non-toxic
concentrations of the lazaroid tirilazad mesylate (30 μmol/L)
or mock treated as control fibroblasts.
Fibroblast gels
Collagen type-I from rat tails (Sigma Aldrich) was solved in 0.1%
acetic acid over night and mixed with 0.1% NaOH, FCS, DMEM and
cultured fibroblasts at a density of 105 cells per dish,
layered out as collagen-fibroblast gel and left to contract for 4
days covered by medium. Prior to UVA irradiation, gels were either
pre-incubated 24 h with 30 μM/L lazaroid tirilazad
mesylate or mock treated as controls. UVA Irradiation was performed
as described below.
Tirilazad
The molecular structure of tirilazad is shown in ( figure 1 ). Tirilazad is a
member of a new class of synthetic non-hormonal (nonglucocorticoid)
21-aminosteroids and was available and distributed under the brand
name Freedox® by Pharmacia, Kalamazoo,USA before this
company was merged with Pfizer. The commercially available
Freedox® solution contained 1.5 mg tirilazad mesylate,
equivalent to 1.3 mg tirilazad free base, per ml of the raw
solution plus citrate buffer, sodium chloride and water for
injection. For our investigations Freedox® solution was
used exclusively. The concentration of 30 μM used in our
experiments was selected on the basis of a toxicity analysis in
which fibroblasts were incubated with a range of different
tirilazad concentrations and exposed to UVA as described below
(data not shown). Afterwards the cell survival rate was tested with
the MTT test described below. Concentrations up to 50 μM still
resulted in a cell survival rate of greater than 80%. However, as
we wanted to stay well above this cut-off margin we chose
30 μM as the working concentration of tirilazad for the
experiments as it resulted in a cell survival rate of > 90%.
UVA irradiation
Confluent fibroblast monolayer cultures or fibroblast gels were
irradiated at a distance of 40 cm using a high-intensity
halogen metalloid UVA-source (UVASUN3000) Mutzhas, Munich, FRG).
Spectral irradiance was measured routinely with an OL-754
UV/visible light spectroradiometer calibrated against the OL-752-10
spectral irradiance standard certified by the National Institute of
Standards and Technology (Optronic Laboratories, Orlando, FL). The
irradiation intensity at the surface of the fibroblasts was 60
mW/second. Irradiation fluence was monitored with a UVA
ultraviolet-dosimeter. During irradiation, cells/gels were
incubated in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and maintained at
37 °C in a thermostatically controlled water bath. Following
irradiation, PBS was replaced by fresh DMEM with supplements.
IL-6 ELISA
Post UVA exposure fibroblasts were kept in FCS free medium. For
extracellular IL-6 measurement cell culture supernatant was
harvested at the desired time point, centrifuged for 5 min at
10,000 rpm and used directly as sample in a commercially available
IL-6 ELISA kit (Pelikine kit by CLB company Amsterdam, NL)
according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For determination of
intracellular IL-6 levels cell lysate samples were generated by
washing the cells with 0.9% saline, adding 0.3% lysis buffer,
scraping the fibroblasts off into 3 mL medium and homogenising by
ultrasound. In all cases total protein content of fibroblasts in
the relevant culture dish was determined by an assay (Bio-Rad,
Munich, FRG) according to Bradford [19]. ELISA results obtained in
ng IL-6 per ml sample fluid were then related to total protein and
expressed as percent of corresponding control values set to 100%.
MMP-1 and Tissue inhibitor of MMP-1 (TIMP-1) ELISA with Cell
Supernatant
Post UVA exposure fibroblasts in cell cultures were kept in
FCS-free medium for 24 h as FCS is known to alter MMP-1
expression. For determination of extracellular MMP-1/TIMP-1 (tissue
inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1) levels, supernatant was then
harvested, centrifuged for 5 min at 10,000 rpm and used as
sample in commercially available ELISA systems. MMP-1 and
TIMP-1“sandwich” ELISA assays were performed according to the
manufacturer’s protocols (Amersham). Again, in all cases total
protein content of fibroblasts in the relevant culture dish was
determined by an assay (Bio-Rad, Munich, FRG) according to Bradford
[19]. ELISA results obtained in ng MMP-1/TIMP-1 protein per mL
sample fluid were then related to total protein and expressed as
percent of corresponding control values set to 100%.The MMP-1 ELISA
system measures total MMP-1 as well as pro MMP-1 and active MMP-1.
MMP-1 ELISA with lysed fibroblasts from collagen gels
In case of the collagen gels cell lysate was used as sample for the
MMP-1 ELISA. This lysate was generated by taking off the
supernatant, washing once in cold PBS and sonicating the gel with
200 μL PBS on ice. After centrifugation the clear lysate
supernatant was then used as samples. The ELISA procedure was the
same as described above. ELISA results were here also related to
the total protein content of fibroblasts in the gel dish.
IL-6 mRNA Northern blot analysis
At two different time points after UVA exposure total RNA was
isolated from cultured fibroblasts using the Trizol method. Then
equal amounts of RNA were fractionated by size on an agarose gel.
After diffusion transfer to nitrocellulose filters and vacuum
baking (Schleicher & Schuell, Dassel, Germany), hybridizations
were performed and studied by Northern blot analysis using a cDNA
probe for IL-6 and 18S ribosomal RNA (as a control). Specific bands
were normalised against the 18S ribosomal bands and subsequent
densitometry, i.e. grey value measurement with Adobe Photoshop 5.5
Software was performed.
Cell Viability assay (MTT-test)
The viability of the fibroblasts was monitored 24h after tirilazad
supplementation, ± exposure to UVA. This was done by means of the
MTT test as described by Moosmann [20]. We used non-cytotoxic
concentrations and set the cut off for tirilazad pre-incubation
plus UVA exposure to a minimum of 90% cell survival.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed on an exploratory basis only
using GraphPad Prism version 3.0a (GraphPad Software, San Diego
California, USA). Values of p < 0.05 were considered to be
significant. Each of the different subgroups was described by mean
and standard deviation. Multi group comparisons of unpaired
observations were subjected to an ANOVA analysis.
Results
Tirilazad reduces extracellular IL-6 concentration post UVA
exposure
In order to evaluate the effect of tirilazad against UVA induced
release of IL-6 human dermal fibroblasts were incubated for
24 h with 30 μmol/L tirilazad and exposed to a single
dose of 200 kJ/m2 UVA. The non-toxicity of this
experimental setting was controlled by the MTT test as described in
materials and methods. The cell culture supernatant was harvested
at time points 2-24 h post-irradiation and the IL-6
concentration in it was determined and related to the total protein
content of the culture dish. ( Figure 2 ) shows the
results from n = 3 independent experiments. For each time point the
IL-6 concentration in the supernatant is expressed in % of the
value for the corresponding mock-irradiated (± tirilazad
pre-incubated) control fibroblasts of the same time-point.
Fibroblasts without tirilazad pre-incubation produced markedly
increased extracellular IL-6 levels with a peak at 12 h
post-irradiation reaching then a level of 700% compared to mock
treated control fibroblasts. In contrast tirilazad pre-incubated
fibroblasts showed a clearly diminished increase of IL-6 that also
peaked at 12 h post-irradiation but reached only values of
280% of mock treated control fibroblasts. This difference between
the tirilazad treated and untreated fibroblasts was significant in
an exploratory ANOVA analysis at time points from 3, 6 and
12 h post-irradiation.
Tirilazad does not reduce IL-6 mRNA post UVA irradiation
In order to investigate whether the decreased IL-6 level in the
extracellular space of tirilazad pre-incubated fibroblasts would
result from an inhibition of IL-6 production by tirilazad on the
transcriptional level, we next looked at IL-6 mRNA production
post-irradiation with and without tirilazad pre-incubation. For
this approach RNA was isolated from fibroblasts irradiated with
200 kJ/m2 UVA with and without tirilazad
pre-incubation at the two time points 3 h and 6 h
post-irradiation, i.e. in the time frame of a
steep-but-not-yet-peaking IL-6 increase in the supernatant.
Mock-irradiated fibroblasts were used as controls. ( Figure 3A ) shows one
representative northern blot and ( figure 3B ) the results of
the densitometric analysis of n = 3 blots. As a reference control
18S RNA was used in the blots. The 18S RNA bands of all probes gave
similar grey values in the densitometric analysis indicating a
comparable loading of the samples (data not shown). As to the IL-6
mRNA levels, a stronger signal was observed at 3 h in all
irradiated and at 6 h only in the irradiated and tirilazad
pre-incubated fibroblasts compared to the mock-irradiated control
fibroblasts. Furthermore it is evident that at both time points the
pre-incubated tirilazad revealed increased IL-6 mRNA levels
compared to the fibroblasts that were simply irradiated. Finally
tirilazad pre-incubation without UVA exposure did not increase the
IL-6 RNA level compared to mock irradiation. Densitometry analysis
revealed then that the actual increase in specific IL-6 mRNA signal
at 3 h reached 130% of the mock treated control fibroblasts
(= 100%) for fibroblasts without and 151% for fibroblasts with
tirilazad pre-incubation. The 6h value for tirilazad pre-incubated
fibroblasts was 130% of control fibroblasts whilst irradiated
fibroblasts without tirilazad had a signal back in the range of
mock irradiated controls (= 100%). Statistically the
difference in signal strength for IL-6 mRNA between tirilazad
pre-incubation and wihtout tirilazad exposure was not significant.
However, the IL-6 production on mRNA level is visibly enhanced by
tirilazad pre-incubation, which indicates that the decrease in
extracellular IL-6 concentration, which we observed with tirilazad,
can only result from an effect on a different step in IL-6
regulation than mRNA levels.
Tirilazad leads to IL-6 accumulation in the cell preventing
leakage
As the decreased IL-6 concentration in the fibroblast supernatant
that tirilazad achieves, did not result from an inhibition of IL-6
genome transcription it could be due to a “tyre-fitting”-effect of
tirilazad in the cell membrane keeping the newly produced IL-6 from
leaking out. This hypothesis was investigated further. For that
purpose we irradiated fibroblasts with 200 kJ/m2
again with and without pre-incubation with 30 μmol/L tirilazad
and analysed this time the amount of IL-6 in the fibroblasts
3 h and 24 h post-irradiation. The results were
calculated in relation to the total protein content of the
fibroblasts. ( Figure
4 ) summarises the results of n = 3 independent
experiments. We found, 3 h post-irradiation, in tirilazad
pre-incubated and irradiated fibroblasts, an excessively high level
of IL-6 of 2700% the value of mock-treated control fibroblasts,
whilst lysate from UVA exposed fibroblasts without tirilazad showed
IL-6 levels of “only” 745% of control fibroblasts. The huge
difference in IL-6 levels found between these two groups of
fibroblasts reached statistical significance in an exploratory
multiple group comparison analysis with ANOVA.
Comparing these excessive levels with the values present in the
fibroblasts 24 h post-irradiation it becomes evident that in
both tirilazad pre-incubated and control fibroblasts, the IL-6
content in the cells had gone down significantly to 200% in
tirilazad pre-incubated fibroblasts and 150% in just irradiated
fibroblasts, again in relation to mock treated controls. This
decline in intracellular IL-6 levels from 3 to 24 h
post-irradiation going along with the observed increase of IL-6 in
the supernatant over the same period, suggests that the accumulated
IL-6 has been leaking out between the two time points examined.
Tirilazad inhibits the UVA induced extracellular MMP-1 increase
in fibroblasts post UVA exposure resulting in a lower MMP-1/TIMP-1
ratio
Having demonstrated a significant effect of tirilazad on IL-6
secretion, we next addressed the question whether this substance
might also be able to decrease the extracellular MMP-1
concentration following UVA irradiation of fibroblasts. Fibroblasts
were therefore pre-incubated again with 30 μmol/L tirilazad
for 24 h and exposed to 200 kJ/m2UVA.
Mock-irradiated and pre-incubated fibroblasts served as controls.
The concentrations of MMP-1 and its tissue inhibitor TIMP-1 in the
supernatant were determined 24 h post-irradiation. This time
point is known to represent the maximum increase of MMP-1 activity
and protein in vivo post irradiation [13]. Figure 5 shows the
results of n = 3 independent experiments. The basic level of
MMP-1/TIMP-1 in mock treated control fibroblasts was again set to
100%. After UVA exposure untreated and irradiated fibroblasts
revealed an increase to 580% of MMP-1 in the supernatant, whilst
TIMP-1 levels were left unchanged. The tirilazad pre-incubated
fibroblasts revealed a reduced 200% MMP-1 induction in relation to
controls with a TIMP-1 level decreasing to 70% of controls. The
basic 1:1 ratio of MMP-1/TIMP-1 in mock treated controls was
calculated to increase to 4.61:1 after UVA exposure without
tirilazad pre-incubation and 2.87:1 in the presence of tirilazad.
The difference in the increase of MMP-1 between simply irradiated
and tirilazad pre-incubated and irradiated fibroblasts reaches
statistical significance in an exploratory multiple group
comparison analysis (ANOVA).
Tirilazad does not diminish the intracellular MMP-1 protein
concentration after UVA irradiation
Since the decreased MMP-1 levels in the extracellular space that
tirilazad achieved could again, as with IL-6, be due to a membrane
sealing effect or due to a reduced intracellular production of
IL-6, we next addressed this final question. For this purpose we
opted for a model of fibroblasts seeded in collagen gels, i.e.
closer to an in vivo setting. Fibroblasts seeded in collagen gels
were pre-incubated with 30 μmol/L tirilazad for 24 h and
then exposed to 200 kJ/m2UVA. Mock-irradiated
fibroblast-gels with and without tirilazad pre-incubation served as
controls. The concentration of MMP-1 protein was then determined in
the lysed fibroblasts from the gels 24 h post-irradiation,
i.e. at the same time point as when we found a decreased
extracellular level under the influence of tirilazad before. The
results from n = 4 independent experiments are shown in ( figure 6 ). As is
evident, intracellular MMP-1 levels increase in irradiated
fibroblast-gels with and without pre-incubation of tirilazad. The
mean values found were 127% of mock irradiated controls without and
147% with tirilazad pre-incubation. Tirilazad thus clearly achieves
no diminished MMP-1 protein production within the cell but rather
again, similarly as for IL-6, leads to intracellular accumulation
of MMP-1.
Discussion
Tirilazad represents a new synthetic group of 21-aminosteroids
called lazaroids, derived from the molecular structure of
glucocorticosteroids. Lazaroids have been subject to both in-vivo
and in-vitro studies in the context of LPO [21]. To our knowledge
tirilazad has not been evaluated as to its potential in the field
of photodermatology. In a first study we demonstrated the
protective effects of tirilazad against UVA induced LPO in human
dermal fibroblasts in-vitro [9]. The mechanism behind this effect
is so far believed to be a combination of radical scavenging
activity and an alteration of membrane fluidity [10, 22]. Lazaroids
intercalate with their lipophilic areas into the phospholipid
bilayer [23]. This intercalation results in an unspecific change of
physico-chemical properties of membranes, as observed by a lower
fluidity and static stabilisation. As lazaroids are not able to
inhibit LPO in organisms without intact cell-membranes, their
intercalation into the membrane seems to be one central mode of
action and means of protecting membrane function [21]. As tirilazad
is in addition a quencher of hydroxyl-, phenoxyl- and lipid peroxyl
radicals and furthermore helps to keep the vitamin E content in the
cell membrane constant it also functions as an antioxidant [10,
11]. Therefore we set out to explore its possible protective
capacity against acute cellular responses to photo-oxidative
stress. Our study focussed on 2 exemplary markers IL-6 and MMP-1.
We chose an in-vitro system with cultured human fibroblasts in cell
culture dishes and for the last experimental series, in collagen
gels. Great care was taken to eliminate influential factors
affecting the cellular reaction to UVA in addition to the substance
tirilazad which we investigated as supplement as much as possible.
Therefore the fibroblasts were rinsed before and kept in PBS during
irradiation. It is important to be aware of this fact as for
example antibiotics used in the culture medium can influence LPO
during UV exposure [24].
The IL-6 release after UVA exposure of fibroblasts is an
interesting parameter because it is linked with LPO mediated
NFκB-activation and thus a direct connection to the membrane
protective potential of tirilazad might be seen [17]. Furthermore
IL-6 is known to be a key cytokine involved in autocrine loops
activating MMP-1 [14] and thus also linked with collagen matrix
degradation, a hallmark of photoaged skin [12, 25].
Our experiments from ( figure 2 ) show that
tirilazad leads to significantly diminished IL-6 levels in the
surrounding extracellular fluid after a single non-toxic dose of
UVA in human dermal fibroblasts. The time pattern of increase is
not altered though. Similarly the extracellular release of MMP-1 is
diminished by tirilazad pre-incubation as well, as we can show in (
figure 5 ). The
underlying mechanism for the reduction of UVA mediated IL-6 and the
increase of MMP-1 in the extracellular space that tirilazad
achieves remain to be discussed. The ability to quench ROS and to
maintain levels of vitamin E in the cell membrane that tirilazad
ensures, might be an explanation [11]. However, assuming this is
the protective mechanism one would consequently expect an
inhibition of IL-6 and MMP-1 production in the fibroblasts
themselves after UVA irradiation. This was investigated in detail
for IL-6. Looking at the levels of IL-6 mRNA 3 and 6h after
irradiation, i.e. at time points when the extracellular increase of
IL-6 was already notable but had not yet reached its peak and could
thus still be potentiated by a sustained intracellular IL-6
synthesis, we found no beneficial influence of tirilazad as shown
in ( figure 3A )
and 3B. In fact what these experiments further reveal is that the
specific level mRNA levels for IL-6 increased in the first
3-5 h post-UVA exposure, as specific IL-6 mRNA levels found in
our fibroblasts 6h after irradiation had again reached normal
control levels of mock-irradiated fibroblasts. In the next step
shown in ( figure
4 ), we then compared the intracellular IL-6 protein levels
of irradiated fibroblasts with and without tirilazad
pre-incubation. This comparison revealed three important further
facts: 1st: Tirilazad pre-incubated fibroblasts
accumulate very high levels of intracellular IL-6 already in the
first 3 h. 2nd: These levels are much higher than
the ones found in fibroblasts without pre-incubation of tirilazad.
3rd: at 24 h after irradiation the intracellular
levels of fibroblasts with and without tirilazad pre-incubation
have greatly decreased and do not differ significantly any more.
These data thus confirmed that tirilazad has neither an inhibitory
effect on IL-6 mRNA transcription nor does it inhibit the later
steps of IL-6 protein assembly as otherwise the extensively high
intracellular IL-6 peak found in tirilazad pre-incubated
fibroblasts would be unexplainable. In summary our data instead
strongly suggest that the stress response following UVA irradiation
and the NFκB-dependent pathway triggered by it, via which IL-6 and
other cytokines like IL-1 are induced, is not inhibited by
tirilazad [26-28]. However, we can here only show this definitely
for IL-6.
With these findings the only other likely possibility for the
observed significantly ameliorated IL-6 release after UVA
irradiation lies in the known membrane stabilising effect of
tirilazad, which could account for a delay in release of IL-6
despite high intracellular levels. In fact the data from ( figure 2 ) and ( figure 4 ) taken
together strongly support this mechanism of action for tirilazad:
The cell membrane is sealed off by the physico-chemical properties
of tirilazad described [11] and this results in the IL-6 content in
the extracellular space increasing more slowly and reaching a
reduced peak in tirilazad pre-incubated fibroblasts compared to
unexposed fibroblasts. The IL-6 which cannot get out immediately,
accumulates in the meantime and results in the observed excessively
high intracellular concentration 3h after UVA exposure. In the
following hours IL-6 then leaks out of the cells in the presence of
tirilazad more slowly than in its absence, and 24 h later the
intracellular levels are still slightly higher in tirilazad
pre-incubated fibroblasts than in fibroblasts without contact with
this substance.
Such an ameliorating effect on extracellular IL-6 as observed in
our experiments with tirilazad could in theory result in a
decreased stimulation of MMP-1 production and subsequent release of
the cell via the known MMP-1 inducing autocrine loops [14].
Therefore we also investigated finally, whether tirilazad
per-incubation is of any benefit for intracellular MMP-1 levels
post UVA irradiation. Our final experiments from ( figure 6 ), taking an
in-vitro model of human dermis, show that no beneficial influence
of tirilazad on the intracellular MMP-1 protein level 24 h
post-irradiation can be detected, which fits with the previous data
and again supports the view that this 21-aminosteroid is in fact
mainly active via its physico-chemical membrane stabilisation
rather than its antioxidant function. The antioxidant function
which we previously found with respect to decrease of lipid
peroxidation does therefore not play a major role in terms of a
mode of protective action against acute photooxidative stress
responses.
As to the possible potential of tirilazad as a substance for
systemic or topical photoprotection it is, important to point out
that in-vivo even the time-delay of an otherwise immediate IL-6 or
MMP-1 increase after UVA exposure will enhance the situation for
the stressed tissue, as it gives more time for dilution of
mediators in the constant tissue perfusion stream. In-vitro
experiments, such as we have used in this study, eliminate this
important factor of tissue perfusion. Tirilazad thus might well be
worth exploring further as a photoprotective substance.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful for the support by the Köln Fortune Program/Faculty
of Medicine, University of Cologne, by the German Research
Foundation DFG SCHA 411/10-1, 10-2 and by the European Union
through the MAUVE project (QLK4-1999-01084).
References
1 Sies H. Biochemsitry of oxidative stress. Angew Chem 1986;
25: 1058-71.
2 Morliere P, Moysan A, Tirache I. Action
spectrum for UV-induced lipid peroxidation in cultured human skin
fibroblasts. Free Radic Biol Med 1995; 19: 365-71.
3 Podda M, Traber MG, Weber C, Yan LJ,
Packer L. UV-irradiation depletes antioxidants and causes
oxidative damage in a model of human skin. Free Radic Biol Med
1998; 24: 55-65.
4 Packer L. Ultraviolet radiation (UVA, UVB) and skin
antioxidants. In: Rice-Evans C, Burdon R, eds. Free
radical damage and its control. ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1994.
5 Girotti AW. Photosensitized oxidation of membrane lipids:
reaction pathways, cytotoxic effects, and cytoprotective
mechanisms. J Photochem Photobiol B 2001; 63: 103-13.
6 Halliwell B, Gutteridge JM. Role of free radicals
and catalytic metal ions in human disease: an overview. Methods
Enzymol 1990; 186: 1-85.
7 Dissemond J, Schneider LA, Brenneisen P,
Briviba K, Wenk J, Wlaschek M, et al.
Protective and determining factors for the overall lipid
peroxidation in ultraviolet A1-irradiated fibroblasts: in vitro and
in vivo investigations. Br J Dermatol 2003; 149: 341-9.
8 Woods GM, Malley RC, Muller HK. The skin immune
system and the challenge of tumour immunosurveillance. Eur J
Dermatol 2005; 15: 63-9.
9 Dissemond J, Schneider LA, Wlaschek M,
Brauns TC, Goos M, Scharffetter-Kochanek K. The
lazaroid tirilazad is a new inhibitor of direct and indirect
UVA-induced lipid peroxidation in human dermal fibroblasts. Arch
Dermatol Res 2003; 295: 287-92.
10 Braughler JM, Pregenzer JF. The 21-aminosteroid
inhibitors of lipid peroxidation: reactions with lipid peroxyl and
phenoxy radicals. Free Radic Biol Med 1989; 7: 125-30.
11 Buttgereit F, Hiepe F, Burmester GR. The
therapeutic potential of lazaroids (21-aminosteroids). A recent
survey. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1997; 122: 1363-7.
12 Brennan M, Bhatti H, Nerusu KC,
Bhagavathula N, Kang S, Fisher GJ, et al.
Matrix metalloproteinase-1 is the major collagenolytic enzyme
responsible for collagen damage in UV-irradiated human skin.
Photochem Photobiol 2003; 78: 43-8.
13 Fisher GJ, Wang ZQ, Datta SC, Varani J,
Kang S, Voorhees JJ. Pathophysiology of premature skin
aging induced by ultraviolet light. N Engl J Med 1997; 337:
1419-28.
14 Wlaschek M, Heinen G, Poswig A,
Schwarz A, Krieg T, Scharffetter-Kochanek K.
UVA-induced autocrine stimulation of fibroblast-derived
collagenase/MMP- 1 by interrelated loops of interleukin-1 and
interleukin-6. Photochem Photobiol 1994; 59: 550-6.
15 Fagot D, Asselineau D, Bernerd F. Direct role
of human dermal fibroblasts and indirect participation of epidermal
keratinocytes in MMP-1 production after UV-B irradiation. Arch
Dermatol Res 2002; 293: 576-83.
16 Brenneisen P, Wlaschek M, Wenk J,
Blaudschun R, Hinrichs R, Dissemond J, et al.
Ultraviolet-B induction of interstitial collagenase and
stromelyin-1 occurs in human dermal fibroblasts via an autocrine
interleukin-6-dependent loop. FEBS Lett 1999; 449: 36-40.
17 Wenk J, Schuller J, Hinrichs C,
Syrovets T, Azoitei N, Podda M, et al.
Overexpression of phospholipid hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase
in human dermal fibroblasts abrogates UVA-induced expression of
interstitial collagenase/matrix-metalloproteinase-1 by suppression
of phosphatidylcholine hydroperoxide-mediated NFkappa B activation
and Interleukin-6 release. J Biol Chem 2004.
18 Bayreuther K, Rodemann HP, Hommel R,
Dittmann K, Albiez M, Francz PI. Human skin
fibroblasts in vitro differentiate along a terminal cell lineage.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988; 85: 5112-6.
19 Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the
quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the
principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 1976; 72:
248-54.
20 Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth
and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays.
J Immunol Methods 1983; 65: 55-63.
21 Braughler JM, Pregenzer JF, Chase RL,
Duncan LA, Jacobsen EJ, McCall JM. Novel 21-amino
steroids as potent inhibitors of iron-dependent lipid peroxidation.
J Biol Chem 1987; 262: 10438-40.
22 Wang S, Lantz RC, Rider ED, Chen GJ,
Breceda V, Hays AM, et al. A free radical scavenger
(Lazaroid U75412E) attenuates tumor necrosis factor-alpha
generation in a rabbit model of smoke-induced lung injury.
Respiration (Herrlisheim) 1997; 64: 358-63.
23 Schmid D, Burmester GR, Tripmacher R,
Fici G, von Voigtlander P, Buttgereit F. Short-term
effects of the 21-aminosteroid lazaroid tirilazad mesylate
(PNU-74006F) and the pyrrolopyrimidine lazaroid PNU-101033E on
energy metabolism of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells.
Biosci Rep 2001; 21: 101-10.
24 Le Gall R, Marchand C, Rees JF. Impacts of
antibiotics on in vitro UVA-susceptibility of human skin
fibroblasts. Eur J Dermatol 2005; 15: 146-51.
25 Scharffetter-Kochanek K, Brenneisen P, Wenk J,
Herrmann G, Ma W, Kuhr L, et al. Photoaging of
the skin from phenotype to mechanisms. Exp Gerontol 2000; 35:
307-16.
26 Simon MM, Aragane Y, Schwarz A, Luger TA,
Schwarz T. UVB light induces nuclear factor kappa B (NF kappa
B) activity independently from chromosomal DNA damage in cell-free
cytosolic extracts. J Invest Dermatol 1994; 102: 422-7.
27 Petit-Frere C, Clingen PH, Grewe M,
Krutmann J, Roza L, Arlett CF, et al. Induction
of interleukin-6 production by ultraviolet radiation in normal
human epidermal keratinocytes and in a human keratinocyte cell line
is mediated by DNA damage. J Invest Dermatol 1998; 111: 354-9.
28 Abeyama K, Eng W, Jester JV, Vink AA,
Edelbaum D, Cockerell CJ, et al. A role for
NF-kappaB-dependent gene transactivation in sunburn. J Clin Invest
2000; 105: 1751-9.
|