ARTICLE
Auteur(s) : Jean-Luc Lévêque1,
Emmanuelle Xhauflaire-Uhoda2, Gérald E
Piérard2
1Consultant, Paris, France
2Department of Dermatopathology, University Hospital of
Liège, Liège, Belgium
accepté le 8 Mars 2006
Since the mid eighties, several imaging methods have been developed
for non invasively studying the skin in health and disease. Some of
them (ultrasound imaging, magnetic resonance imaging, confocal
microscopy, optical coherent tomography, two photons imaging) are
dedicated to the structure and/or to the measurement of some of its
properties.Beside those methods which allow the investigation of
internal layers of the skin with resolutions varying from cell
dimension to tissue dimension, some others are only dedicated to
imaging the skin surface. Today, skin colour, temperature and
microrelief can be routinely recorded. Quite recently, a new type
of skin surface imaging was designed under the heading of
Capacitance Imaging (CI). This new method allows us to picture the
skin surface capacitance corresponding to the skin surface
hydration.This paper deals with the presentation of the functioning
principle of skin CI, and with the description of its various
domains of application.
Functioning principle
Skin CI is based on silicon image sensor (SIS) technology developed
by electronic companies in order to record fingerprints for
security reasons [1]. The sensor is composed of 92,160
microcapacitors located on a 1.8 × 1.28 cm plate measuring
skin capacitance every 50 μm. These microcapacitors are
protected by a very thin silicon oxide layer. The dedicated device
for skin recordings is called SkinChip® (L’Oréal, Paris)
[1, 2]. It can be plugged directly to the USB port of any computer.
When the measuring plate is closely applied to the skin surface,
images are produced corresponding to the hydration map of the skin
surface. Such images are coded in 256 gray levels with the darker
pixels representing high capacitance and the clear ones, the lower
capacitance values. Beside the generic software of the sensor
providing images, three other main softwares were developed for
routinely characterizing some specific skin parameters. The Mean
Gray Level (MGL) of the image histograms allows measuring the mean
skin surface hydration. The Corner Density (CD) parameter
corresponds to the number per cm2 of crossings between
the primary lines [4]. The main orientations of the primary lines
can also be detected.
Capacitance imaging of the skin surface
The CI method allows quite easy observation of the skin surface
texture. Indeed, most of the features defining the skin microrelief
(lines, pores, furrows wrinkles etc) appear in white because their
bottoms are not in contact with the measuring plate [1, 3, 5-7].
The gray levels of the skin surface, which is in close contact with
the measuring plate, is interpreted in terms of capacitance or
water content of the stratum corneum (SC).
Some typical aspects of skin CI found in adults are presented in
( figure 1 ).
Pilo-sebaceous openings at the skin surface of the lateral side of
the neck appear as whitish objects ( (figure 1A) ). The skin of
the abdomen is less studded by such pores ( (figure 1B) ). The inner
side of the arm is quite protected from light and the microrelief
appears very dense ( (figure 1C) ). The skin of
the dorsum of the hand of an elderly person shows microrelief lines
mostly oriented along one direction ( (figure 1D) ), and some
whitish zones correspond to pigmented areas. The lower lip exhibits
a distinct CI map ( (figure 1E) ). Fine furrows
are visible. In addition, a whitish zone corresponding to a drier
area is surprisingly located at the most internal part of the lip.
SkinChip® was recently used for classifying lips
according to their surface patterns [6]. Skin CI of forehead skin
can reveal shallow frown lines ( (figure 1F) ).
As shown above the interest of skin CI is not only to routinely
supply images of the skin surface patterns, but also to
characterize them according to important skin surface properties,
namely the hydration and the microrelief patterns.
Skin surface hydration
Quite a close correlation has been established between the MGL of
the skin CI and the capacitance values given by a
Corneometer® (C+K electronic, Cologne) [1, 3]. This is
not surprising because the SkinChip® measuring plate
“sees” exactly what a Corneometer® electrode captures.
Both techniques establish an impaired contact with the skin surface
because of its microrelief. The Corneometer® gives the
average capacitance of the contact area, while the
SkinChip® displays the repartition histogram of the
values, MGL representing their mean value.
Treating dry skin with a high-performance moisturizer modifies
its CI characteristics. Images become darker (more hydrated) with,
in some cases, recovery of a more regular pattern of the primary
lines of the microrelief ( (figure 2) ). The meaning
of such a phenomenon which may appear either after a single or
repeated applications is presently under investigation.
Sweating is also easily observed by skin CI. At its onset, which
remains clinically imperceptible, only black dots appear, marking
the active sweat gland openings. This finding questions the
interpretation to be given to the blind transepidermal water loss
(TEWL) determinations which may indeed be influenced by
imperceptible sweating. Progressively, the CI black dots become
larger and larger till merging to farm in a continuous black area (
(figure 3) ).
Because sweat appears as black dots, it is quite easy to measure
its contribution to the MGL of the skin CI by thresholding the
histogram.
Another great advantage of skin CI is to supply a hydration map
of the skin surface. On photo-aged skin, CI may be heterogeneous.
Some regions look quite dry, some others, just in the vicinity
looking normal (( figure
1D ) and ( figure 4 )). Such a patchy
heterogeneity in hydration of the skin surface in the elderly could
be related to focal variations in the epidermal differentiation of
photoexposed skin.
Skin surface pattern
As shown above, the primary and secondary lines of the microrelief
network can easily be viewed by CI. Of course, only the 2D network
can be characterized through CI. On the forearm, CD varies from
about 250 to 400/cm2 according to age. This finding is
in agreement with previous findings [8-10], showing a decrease in
the microrelief line density with ageing.
Another way to explore skin ageing using CI is to display the
main orientations of the microrelief lines. CI can indeed routinely
show the two main perpendicular orientations of the skin
microrelief and their rotation when the skin is stressed ( (figure 5) ). This is
in line with previous observations made on replicas [8].
Other elements of the skin microrelief (pores, wrinkles) are
also imaged and can be manually quantified [7].
Surfactant-induced skin reaction
The dynamics of stratum corneum reactivity to surfactants is
complex. Surfactants present in hygiene and skin care products are
in part adsorbed at the skin surface [11], and they also permeate
the SC where they interact with proteins and lipids. A number of
physicochemical interactions exist between corneocytes and
surfactants [12]. One of the earliest events following
surfactant-induced protein denaturation is perceived as corneocyte
swelling [13]. This condition leads to a paradoxical and transient
SC hydration following surfactant challenge in vivo [14]. The
structure and physical properties of the SC can be altered
profoundly following prolonged contact with anionic surfactants
[13, 15, 16]. As a consequence, minimal to severe irritation may
develop with variable severity. Full-blown lesions show
inflammatory erythema, increased TEWL, altered cutaneous
microrelief, increased SC roughness and erratic desquamation. Some
of the changes can be assessed using non-invasive instrumental
methods. In particular, the SC water content can be assessed in
vivo using devices measuring changes in electrical properties of
skin at different frequencies and at different depths inside the SC
[17-19].
Skin CI has an added value to the conventional methods of
assessment. Indeed, the sensitivity of skin CI allows the
disclosure of focal and minute changes that are blurred by methods
averaging data on a relatively large area corresponding to the size
of the measuring probe. In addition, the CI method allows us to see
the invisible sweating that interferes with any global
electrometric assessment and supposedly TEWL measurement.
Two experimental studies have been performed to assess the
discrete effects of mild surfactants on human SC [20, 21]. One
study used the short-term patch-testing method [20]. The other one
used an open method close to the in-use conditions [21]. Both
procedures disclosed the early step of corneocyte swelling induced
by surfactants ( (figure
6A) ). Delayed assessments after a couple of hours, as well
as repeated surfactant insults showed a second event characterized
by a skin surface drying effect ( (figure 6B) ). A
correlation was found with data gained by the corneosurfametry
bioassay [21].
Skin adnexal disorders
Skin pore is a dermocosmetic term which does not encompass one
single feature. In the dermatological language, it is replaced to
the best advantage by acroinfundibulum and acrosyringium to
distinguish the openings of the folliculo-sebaceous ducts and the
sweat gland apparatus, respectively. Skin CI is a rapid and
sensitive method revealing the acrosyringia of discretely active
glands. The same approach can reveal the open and the
keratin-filled funnel-like acroinfundibular structures [7, 22].
These structures are revealed as whitish low capacitance spots due
to the absence of contact between the probe and the epithelial
lining of each empty infundibulum, or to the dry nature of a
microcomedo.
Acne is a typical skin condition where skin capacitance imaging
can highlight the heterogeneous patchwork of the electrical
properties of the skin. Among the typical pin-point pattern of
normal-looking pores, microcomedones and open comedones appear as
larger low-capacitance objects. When inflammation is present, the
papules appear as targetoid structures ( (figure 7) ) centered by a
whitish comedo surrounded by a darker rim revealing a weakened skin
barrier function and the presence of a discrete serosity exsudate
[23].
Hyperkeratotic non-tumoral dermatoses
Epidermal hyperkeratosis is a typical feature of pityriasis
versicolor. The condition is easily highlighted by skin CI because
the skin surface is dryer than the surrounding skin ( (figure 8) ). Interestingly
enough, the lesional skin appears anhidrotic, perhaps due to the
occlusion of the acrosyringia [24]. The method allows the detection
of small lesions of pityriasis versicolor almost invisible to the
naked eye.
Psoriasis is the paradigm of the inflammatory hyperkeratotic
dermatoses. Skin CI reveals a map of heterogeneous electrical
properties on lesional skin [25]. Whitish low capacitance is
characteristic for stable hyperkeratotic plaques. More inflammatory
and evolving plaques show darker high capacitance spots (( figure 9 )). This
aspect is most likely related to sites exhibiting increased TEWL
[26]. Skin CI can thus provide clues of disease activity in the
plaque stage of psoriasis.
Benign keratotic or pigmented tumours
Viral warts are typically hyperkeratotic. They are easily
identified using skin CI ( (figure 10) ) exhibiting
the dry aspect of the SC [24]. No difference in capacitance
reduction was found between different types of warts.
Melanocytic naevi and pigmented seborrhoeic keratoses are
sometimes difficult to distinguish on clinical grounds. Skin CI
shows variable aspects irrespective of the nature of these lesions
(( figures 11A and
B )). Low capacitance is commonly yielded, but increased
capacitance is also possible, particularly on minimally inflammed
lesions [27].
Conclusion
Skin CI is a novel procedure allowing both visualization and
quantification of the skin microrelief, SC hydration and
imperceptible sweating. The method brings sound information in
dermocosmetology. It also brings insights into physiopathological
disorders revealing some unexpected features.
References
1 Lévêque JL, Querleux B. SkinChip®, a new tool for
investigating the skin surface in vivo. Skin Res Technol 2003; 9:
343-7.
2 Piérard GE, Lévêque JL. What is SkinChip®? From
silicon image sensor technology to SkinChip®. Dermatology 2004;
208: 291-2.
3 Batisse D, Giron F, Lévêque JL. Capacitance imaging of the
skin surface. Skin Res Technol (in press).
4 Berardesca E, Primavera G, Zahouani H,
Lévêque JL. Capacitance imaging: new parameters for
characterizing the skin surface texture, effect of hydration. Skin
Res Technol 2005; 11: 293.
5 Piérard GE, Uhoda I, Piérard-Franchimont C.
From skin microrelief to wrinkles: an area ripe for investigations.
J Cosmet Dermatol 2003; 2: 21-8.
6 Lévêque JL, Goubanova E. Influence of age on lips
and the perioral skin. Dermatology 2004; 208: 307-13.
7 Uhoda E, Piérard-Franchimont C, Petit L,
Piérard GE. The conundrum of skin pores in dermocosmetology.
Dermatology 2005; 210: 3-7.
8 Corcuff P, de Rigal J, Makki S,
Lévêque JL, Agache P. Skin relief and ageing. J Soc
Cosmet Chem 1983; 34: 177-90.
9 Piérard-Franchimont C, Piérard GE. Skin surface
strippings in diagnosing and monitoring inflammatory, xerotic and
neoplastic diseases. Ped Dermatol 1985; 2: 180-4.
10 Piérard-Franchimont C, Piérard GE. Assessment of
aging and actinic damages by cyanoacrylate skin surface strippings.
Am J Dermatopathol 1987; 9: 500-9.
11 Imokawa G, Mishima Y. Adsorption of surfactants
onto human keratin layer in vivo. Contact Dermatitis 1979; 5:
357-66.
12 Zhai H, Fautz R, Fuchs A, Branco N,
Maibach HI. Assessment of the subclinical irritation of
surfactants: a screening open assay model. Exog Dermatol 2002; 1:
238-41.
13 Rhein ID, Robbins CR, Ferne K, Cantore R.
Surfactant structure effects on swelling of isolated human stratum
corneum. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1986; 37: 125-39.
14 Willhelm KP, Cua AB, Wolff HH,
Maibach HI. Surfactant-induced stratum corneum hydration in
vivo: prediction of the irritation potential of anionic
surfactants. J Invest Dermatol 1993; 101: 310-5.
15 Goffin V, Paye M, Piérard GE. Comparison of in
vitro predictive tests for irritation induced by anionic
surfactants. Contact Dermatitis 1995; 3: 38-41.
16 Uhoda E, Paye M, Piérard GE. Comparative
clinical electrometric assessments of the impact of surfactants on
forearm skin. Exog Dermatol 2003; 2: 64-9.
17 Berardesca E. EEMCO guidance for the assessment of
stratum corneum hydration: electrical methods. Skin Res Technol
1997; 3: 126-32.
18 Fluhr JW, Gloor V. Comparative study of five
instruments measuring stratum corneum hydration. Skin Res Technol
1999; 5: 171-8.
19 Goffin V, Piérard-Franchimont C, Piérard GE.
Passive sustainable hydration of the stratum corneum following
surfactant challenge. Clin Exp Dermatol 1999; 24: 308-11.
20 Uhoda E, Lévêque JL, Piérard GE. Silicon image
sensor technology for in vivo detection of surfactant-induced
corneocytes swelling and drying. Dermatology 2005; 210: 184-8.
21 Xhauflaire-Uhoda E, Loussouarn G, Haubrechts C, Saint-Léger
D, Piérard GE. Skin capacitance imaging and corneosurfametry. A
comparative assessment of the impact of surfactants on stratum
corneum. Contact Dermatitis (in press).
22 Xhauflaire-Uhoda E, Hermanns JF,
Piérard-Franchimont C, Piérard GE. Highlighting the rim
of perifollicular epidermal unit. Eur J Dermatol 2006; 16(3):
225-9.
23 Xhauflaire-Uhoda E, Piérard GE. Skin capacitance imaging of
acne lesions. Skin Res Technol (in press).
24 Uhoda E, Piérard-Franchimont C, Piérard GE.
Pityriasis versicolor anhidrotique. Dermatol Actual 2005; 89:
16-7.
25 Xhauflaire-Uhoda E, Piérard-Franchimont C, Piérard GE. Skin
capacitance mapping of psoriasis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol (in
press).
26 Goon ATJ, Yosipovitch G, Chan YH, Goh CL.
Barrier repair in chronic plaque-type psoriasis. Skin Res Technol
2004; 10: 10-3.
27 Xhauflaire-Uhoda E, Piérard GE. Contrasted skin capacitance
imaging of seborrheic keratoses and melanocytic naevi. Dermatology
(in press).
|