ARTICLE
Auteur(s) : SC
Kellett1, DJ Gawkrodger2
1Department of Clinical Psychology, Keresforth
Centre, Barnsley S70 6RS, UK.
2Department of Dermatology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital,
Sheffield, S10 2JF, UK
accepté le 1 Septembre 2005
Isotretinoin (13-cis-retinoic acid) was introduced in 1982 for the
treatment of nodular and cystic acne, and more recently
additionally in the treatment of less severe acne that has been
found to be unresponsive to antibiotics [1]. Acne remains the most
common reason for referral to specialist dermatological services
[2]. Isotretinoin’s mechanism of action is fourfold; the reduction
of sebum excretion [3], reduction of comedone formation [4],
reduction of cutaneous and ductal Propionibactatium acnes [5] and
reduction of general inflammation [6]. Isotretinoin is therefore
active with regards to the four central aetiological factors
involved in acne [7], which accounts for both its high degree of
treatment efficacy [8] and presumably its increased usage in recent
years [9]. Although the dermatological efficacy of isotretinoin is
undoubted, the treatment is not without physical complications;
isotretinoin is teratogenic and therefore contraindicated in
pregnancy and can produce a range of unpleasant side-effects
including commonly dry skin, lethargy, photosensitivity and
abnormal liver and lipid functioning [10]. A less widely researched
and far more controversial issue is the degree to which
isotretinoin can create psychiatric problems in dermatology
patients; including depression, psychotic symptoms, suicidal
ideation and attempted suicide [11]. In terms of a possible mode of
neuropsychological action, animal studies have illustrated that
retinoids can cross into the central nervous system and may alter
dopamine signalling systems important in mood regulation efforts
[12]. Although intuitively appealing, human evidence regarding such
neuropsychological pathways has not yet been forthcoming.The
evidence regarding the association between psychiatric problems and
isotretinoin usage [1] falls into four main themes; (a) case
reports (b) reviews (c) systematic studies and (d) predictive
studies. A number of case studies report patients (with no family
history of depression) developing depression shortly after
beginning isotretinoin [13, 14] or committing suicide on completing
isotretinoin treatment [15, 16]. Obviously, such case reports are
open to methodological criticism and the conclusions drawn
therefore need to be necessarily conservative and reserved. Some
case reports however include withdrawal/recommencement/increase of
isotretinoin, which adds some degree of further methodological
control and complexity. A case was reported of a male patient
developing depression two weeks after starting isotretinoin, which
initially responded to antidepressant medication, only to recur
when the dose of isotretinoin was increased [17]. In a case series
report, 24 patients were reported whose depression resolved once
isotretinoin was withdrawn, only to recur again once the
isotretinoin was recommenced [18].With regards to the reviews
conducted, the methodologies have tended to focus on attempting to
assess the proportion of patients developing depression once
started on isotretinoin and subsequent psychiatric response to
isotretinoin withdrawal. In a series of patients (n = 110) treated
at doses between 1 and 2 mg/kg/day, 5.45% were found to develop
depressive symptoms; with all such patients experiencing a
remission in such symptoms once isotretinoin was stopped [19].
Spontaneous depression was reported to occur in 1% in a mixed
dermatological diagnostic group (n = 700) being treated with
isotretinoin, with depressive symptoms being seen to resolve within
2-7 days of discontinuation of isotretinoin [20]. In the US between
the years 1982 and 2000, 37 patients committed suicide whilst
taking isotretinoin, with a further 110 patients requiring
in-patient psychiatric care. Of the patients committing suicide 22
per cent had a psychiatric history, whilst 44 per cent of the
in-patient admissions had previous psychiatric diagnoses [21].
However, in a long-term physical safety study of isotretinoin usage
[22], less than 0.5 of 1 per cent of patients were found to respond
with depression, with the authors stating that such reactive
depression was, on the balance of evidence, unlikely to be related
to isotretinoin usage.In terms of systematic studies, there are a
smaller number of such studies completed, which also unfortunately
tend to be compromised by poor methodological design, with
additional reliability and validity concerns regarding the
psychiatric outcome indicators employed. In a prospective study of
the side-effects associated with isotretinoin usage [10],
depression was self-reported by 4% of 124 patients and tended to
persist throughout treatment, but not with sufficient of intensity
to prompt isotretinoin withdrawal. In a large sample size (n =
7535), retrospective cohort style study isotretinoin usage had no
increase in relative risk estimates for depression, psychotic
symptoms, suicide or attempted suicide [11]. Despite obvious
adequate statistical power, the study suffered due to the inherent
uncertainty regarding the validity of the diagnostic categories
gleaned from computerised databases. A prospective study (n = 215)
compared the mood and quality of life outcomes between isotretinoin
and antibiotic/topical treatment groups [23]. During the course of
isotretinoin treatment, group data indicated that patients with
moderate levels of depression tended to remain stable over time
(i.e. neither detriment nor improvement to reported mood state
during treatment). Five patients were withdrawn from the study, due
to apparent worsening of mood, two of whom agreed to be formally
psychiatrically assessed. Such assessments tended to reveal
sub-clinical depression, due to coexisting psychosocial stressors
and patients were hence recommenced on isotretinoin without
psychiatric incident.As is evident from the previous studies,
attempts to analyse the possible association between that of
isotretinoin and depression, have been hamstrung by poor
methodological design including lack of randomised placebo
controls, qualitative single case reports, small quantitative
sample sizes, validity and reliability issues regarding measurement
and limited data on clinical parameters. The relationship between
acne and depression is further complicated by evidence that
indicates that acne, due to its unsightly nature and subsequent
likelihood to create body shame [24], tends possibly to predispose
patients to developing depression. At present, it is effectively
impossible to accurately forecast patients who may be prone to
developing depression during or following isotretinoin treatment,
with the pathway to a depressive presentation likely to be a
multifactorial [1] and biopsychosocial phenomena.
Materials and methods
Participants
The sample was recruited by a consultant dermatologist (DJG) during
routine clinical practice. All patients had been referred for
specialist assessment and intervention due to non-responsiveness to
standard acne treatment regimes in Primary Care. The study was
approved by the South Sheffield Research Ethics Committee, with all
patients providing written consent regarding their participation in
the study. At assessment, the patients’ demographic details were
collected alongside medical/drug histories and routine
dematological and laboratory examinations were performed. The
sample consisted of 21 males (63.63%) of an average age of 25.00
(sd = 6.67) and 12 females (36.36%) with an average age of 24.75
(sd = 4.71). All patients were assessed as suitable for treatment
with isotretinoin (13-cis-retinoic acid; Roaccutane), which was
subsequently prescribed at a standard dose of 1mg/kg for 16 weeks.
Patients were dermatologically re-assessed after 8 weeks of
treatment and on conclusion of isotretinoin treatment at 16 weeks.
At each assessment point (i.e. initiation of treatment,
mid-treatment at week 8 and termination of treatment at week 16),
patients were requested to complete a range of psychological
measures and dermatological self-ratings. 21 patients completed
measures at week 8 and 22 completed measures at termination of
treatment (week 16).
Psychological measures
At assessment, week 8 and week 16, patients completed both the 21
item Beck Depression Inventory (BDI; Beck, 25) and the 20 item Beck
Hopelessness Scale (BHS; Beck, 26, 27). The BDI has been
extensively examined and illustrated to have good validity and
sound reliability [25]. The BDI is a valid and reliable measure of
the intensity of depressive symptomatology and has been used
extensively in research studies designed to assess the efficacy of
pharmacological interventions and in the detection of depression in
medical patients [28]. The BDI can be treated as a single total
scale score or as two independent scales, which have been indicated
via factor analysis. The first scale is titled
‘cognitive-affective’ and measures the intensity of the
psychological symptoms of depression such sadness, guilt and
worthlessness. The second scale is titled ‘somatic’ and measures
the physical symptoms of depression such as appetite, libido and
sleep difficulties [25]. On the total BDI, scores between 0-13
indicate minimal depression, 14-19 mild, 20-28 moderate and 29-63
severe [25]. The BHS has similarly been extensively studied and
found to have satisfactory psychometric properties [26, 27]. A
cut-off score of 9 or above on the BHS is predictive of suicide
completers [27].
Dermatological ratings; clinician and patient ratings
The severity of acne was graded clinically by a Consultant
Dermatologist (DJG) using a validated acne assessment tool [29].
This system essentially entails using clinical observations to
grade the presenting acne on a 0-8 scale. Patients also completed a
self-assessment of acne severity using a 0-8 visual analogue scale
for their face, chest and back. This rating system has been
previously utilised in isotretinoin evaluation research [30].
Statistical analysis
The total and sub-scale BDI, BHS and dermatological rating scores
were examined using repeated measure ANOVAs, with post-hoc
comparisons of mean difference performed to examine possible
differentiation between the phases of isotretinoin treatment (i.e.
week 8-16; phase 1, week 9-16; phase 2). For each scale, Mauchly’s
Test of Sphericity was non-significant, indicating that data was
suitable for ANOVA.
Results
Analysis of the differences on the scales between those who
completed the study and those who dropped out of treatment revealed
that those patients who completed treatment had significantly
higher ‘cognitive-affective’ scores on the BDI at assessment (t =
2.05, sig. < 0.05). No other differences were apparent on any of
the other psychological or dermatological scales between completers
and non-completers. No gender differences on any of the
psychological or dermatological scales were evident at any time
during the course of isotretinoin treatment. The mean duration of
the skin disease in the treatment completers was 6.60 (sd 4.08)
years.
Table 1( Table 1 ) summarises the
results from the repeated measures ANOVA on the psychological
measures and the dermatological ratings over the course of the
isotretinoin treatment and compares the BDI data with available
comparable evidence [23]. In terms of the psychological scales, the
ANOVA indicate that there was no difference over the course of
treatment on overall depression scores, overall hopelessness and
the somatic symptoms of depression. However there was a significant
reduction over the course of isotretinoin treatment on the
cognitive-affective scale of the BDI. Post hoc pair-wise
comparisons of the phases of treatment indicate that there was a
significant reduction in cognitive-affective features of depression
between assessment and 8-week review (phase 1, mean difference =
2.76, p = 0.02), but not between week 8 and termination of
treatment (phase 2, mean difference = – 0.47, p = 0.71).
Comparison of the BDI data with that of the available evidence
[23], illustrates higher depression score means at assessment,
mid-term and completion of isotretinoin treatment in the current
sample.
In terms of the dermatological ratings, both dermatologist and
self-rated facial and back acne significantly reduced over the
course of the isotretinoin treatment. The reductions in the
severity of acne on the chest (self-rated), did not however reach
statistical significance. In terms of the dermatologist rated
severity of acne, there were significant improvements both between
assessment and 8-week review (phase 1, mean difference = 2.14, p =
0.01) and week 9 and termination of treatment (phase 2, mean
difference = 1.35, p =0.01). On the self-rated severity of face and
back acne, significant improvements were also recorded in both
phases of isotretinoin treatment. There were no significant
correlations between dermatologist and self-rating of acne severity
at any point during isotretinoin treatment.
Table 2( Table 2 ) contains the
categories of the patients on the BDI as they progress through
isotretinoin treatment. 6.45% (n = 2) were in the severely
depressed category at the start of treatment (and admitting
suicidal ideation), which fell to an n = 1 at week 8 and
termination of treatment (and still admitting suicidal ideation).
Examination of the BHS scores equal to or greater than 9 and
therefore indicating suicide potential revealed that 9.09% (n = 3)
of the patients at assessment were reporting significant feelings
of hopelessness, which fell to a single patient at week 8 and at
termination of treatment.
Table 1 Psychological and dermatological scores during
isotretinoin treatment
|
|
|
|
F-Value
|
|
3.5 (4.00)
|
3.1 (3.7)
|
3.0 (3.9)
|
|
|
BDI
|
13.29 (14.82)
|
10.35 (12.64)
|
10.11 (12.64)
|
1.84
|
|
BDI: Cognitive-Affective scale
|
9.17 (9.93)
|
6.41 (9.59)
|
5.94 (8.98)
|
3.33*
|
|
BDI: Somatic scale
|
3.58 (4.54)
|
3.35 (3.55)
|
3.58 (3.67)
|
0.09
|
|
BHS
|
4.76 (5.61)
|
4.58 (5.05)
|
3.88 (4.58)
|
0.19
|
|
Clinician acne grading score
|
3.92 (2.81)
|
1.78 (1.47)
|
0.42 (0.64)
|
14.14**
|
|
Self-rated; face
|
5.64 (1.90)
|
1.50 (1.01)
|
0.71 (0.91)
|
63.28**
|
|
Self-rated; chest
|
1.28 (1.72)
|
0.50 (0.65)
|
0.35 (1.33)
|
2.81
|
|
Self-rated; back
|
2.85 (2.82)
|
0.64 (0.92)
|
0.28 (0.82)
|
10.64**
|
Table 2 BDI categories during course of isotretinoin
treatment
|
- Minimal depression
- (0-13 BDI score range)
|
- Mild depression
- (14-19 BDI score range)
|
- Moderate depression
- (20-28 BDI score range)
|
- Severe depression
- (29-63 BDI score range)
|
|
Assessment (n = 33)
|
74.19%
|
9.67%
|
9.67%
|
6.45%
|
|
80.95%
|
4.76%
|
9.52%
|
4.76%
|
|
Termination (n = 22)
|
81.81%
|
4.54%
|
9.09%
|
4.54%
|
Discussion
The current study has attempted to address the association between
isotretinoin treatment and depression via a prospective study. An
obvious issue of debate and concern is the degree to which acne
exerts a negative effect on mood, even prior to an attempt to
intervene dermatologically. Patients may well have already ‘failed’
on antibiotic/topical treatment provided via Primary Care, in the
context of experiencing ‘skin failure’ [31] and the acknowledged
stigma of acne [24], thereby creating the necessary conditions for
depression to occur in some psychologically vulnerable patients. In
short, patients with severe and/or recalcitrant acne may well be
hopeless prior to treatment with isotretinoin, especially given
that the average duration of acne in the study was over six years.
The provision of an antibiotic control group in future studies of
isotretinoin would appear a useful methodological addition. The
current study has used a validated measure of hopelessness, a
measure that has not been employed previously in
psychodermatological research. The BHS data indicated that 9.09% of
the sample had sufficient levels of hopelessness prior to
treatment, to warrant concern as to possible risk of suicide
completion. The figure of approximately nine per cent is broadly
similar to previous research investigating prevalence of suicidal
ideation in dermatology patients [32]. Such previous research is
open to criticism however due to employing single item assessments,
which are notoriously, both clinically and psychometrically,
unreliable. The single patient who remained hopeless at the
mid-point and termination of isotretinoin treatment in the current
study, experienced dermatological improvements in their acne
indicating that the depression was probably unrelated to the skin
disease. No patients were removed from the study due to concerns
regarding their mental health.
The design of the current study facilitated the comparison of
the phases of isotretinoin treatment in terms of dermatological and
psychological functioning, an analysis that has not been previously
attempted. Use of the ‘somatic’ and ‘cognitive-affective’
sub-scales of the BDI revealed results that were masked in the
overall BDI score and may have been masked in previous research
using the BDI as an outcome indicator [23]. The current data
suggest that the significant improvements in the
cognitive-affective features of depression recorded during
treatment, took place specifically in the first eight weeks of
treatment, but were not subsequently statistically maintained
during the second phase of treatment. It is interesting to note
that the group of patients that completed treatment scored
significantly higher on the ‘cognitive-affective’ sub-scale at
assessment, in comparison to people who chose to eventually
terminate treatment. This may suggest that patients who are
experiencing negative moods prior to treatment are more likely to
remain in treatment and endure the likely side-effects of
isotretinoin [10], in comparison to patients with higher moods at
assessment. The methodology did not include investigation of the
reasons for withdrawal from isotretinoin treatment and the study.
No tandem changes in somatic features of depression were recorded
in either of the phases of isotretinoin treatment. The lack of
reduction in somatic features of depression over the course of
treatment, may be due to BDI scale items such as the ‘loss of
energy’ (BDI item 15) and ‘fatigue’ (BDI item 20) measuring aspects
of lethargy, which are an acknowledged and common side-effect of
isotretinoin treatment [10]. More specific research regarding the
relationship and interplay between mood and the physical
side-effects of isotretinoin treatment is urgently required. No
gender differences were apparent across the treatment duration,
which is unusual in psychodermatological research [24]. However,
previous research has not tended to employ measures such as the BDI
and BHS. Gender differences may well occur in aspects of social
presentation [24], due to females tending to be more embarrassed by
their skin diseases than males, yet the presence of such gender
differences in dermatologically-related depression is under
researched. The fact that the current study employed the BDI and
the BHS has proved useful, as these well-validated measures have
been previously under utilised in investigations of isotretinoin
and psychodermatological issues in general. The means prior to,
during and on completion of isotretinoin, on the BDI in the current
study was elevated in comparison to previous research [23].
Patients in the comparison data were also treated with isotretinoin
for 8 weeks longer, on average, than the current sample. It is
difficult to interpret such results without additional sources of
evidence on the BDI from dermatological populations.
The design of the current study ensures that the results need to
be interpreted with a degree of caution, due to the acknowledged
absence of a randomised control group. Open study designs such as
the one employed are obviously prone to bias in sampling that may,
as a result, prejudice ratings on outcome measures such as the BHS
and BDI. The employment of a placebo control group in future
research regarding isotretinion and depression is scientifically
indicated, although ethically complex and troubling. The moral
dilemma involved in withholding a dermatologically efficacious
treatment in a group of patients with recalcitrant/severe acne,
that may well respond with improvements in psychological
functioning [30, 33, 34], are yet to be debated and decided. The
study was also compromised by the small sample size. Due to the
likelihood emerging from the available evidence-base that
depression is a possible, but not probable, consequence of
isotretinoin treatment in a proportion of patients, samples in
future prospective studies need to be sizeable, in an attempt to
capture the apparent low base-rate of depressive response to
isotretinoin. The design of such studies would also need ideally to
include some form of ‘no treatment, community control group’, in
order to provide comparisons with the rates of depression
associated with acne in the community. Additionally, in future
research designs, once patients have been identified who have
apparently reacted negatively to isotretinoin, then full
psychological and psychiatric assessments should be completed for
such patients. Such investigations would increase the understanding
of the poorly researched issues of the role (or not) of prior
psychiatric and psychological morbidity issues in sensitivity to
isotretinoin therapy.
The design of future alternative methodologies would also
benefit from far more regular sampling of mood and other
psychological features than conducted in the present and previous
investigations regarding isotretinoin. Such intensive sampling
techniques may well produce more fine-grained analysis of the
timing, frequency and duration of mood change during isotretinoin
treatment and response to drug withdrawal/reintroduction. Such time
sampling issues also need to take into consideration the period of
time following isotretinoin treatment completion. The current study
would have benefited from following patients up after treatment
termination. The long-term consequences of isotretinoin treatment
upon rates of subsequent possible mood disorders are under
researched, as are questions regarding the maintenance of
demonstrated positive psychological effects [30, 33, 34]. Although
the current study has highlighted the previously unrecognised
psychological importance of the first eight weeks of isotretinoin
treatment, the data do not support the presence of a direct and
causal relationship regarding isotretinoin and depression in the
patients studied. Isotretinoin still remains somewhat of a
psychiatric enigma, and will continue to remain so, until
adequately sized and adequately controlled research designs become
available.
Acknowledgements
The authors identify no conflicts of interest and have received no
financial support for this study from any external agency.
References
1 Hong C, Schweitzer I. The association between
depression and isotretinoin usage in acne. Austr New Zeal J Psych
2003; 37: 78-84.
2 Pawin H, Beylot C, Chivot M, Fuare M,
Poli F, Reuuz J, et al. Physiopathology of acne
vulgaris: recent data, new understanding of treatments. Eur J
Dermatol 2004; 14: 4-12.
3 King K, Jones DH, Daltrey DC, et al. A
double-blind study of the effect of 13-cis-retinoic acid on acne,
sebum excretion rate and microbial population. Br J Dermatol 1982;
107: 583-90.
4 Daiziel K, Barton S, Marks R. The effects of
isotretinoin on fbilicular and sebaceous gland differentiation. Br
J Dermatol 1987; 117: 317-23.
5 Leyden JJ, McGinfey KJ. Effect of 13-cis-retinoic
acid on sebum production and propionibacterium acnes in severe
nodulocystic acne. Arch Dermatol Res 1982; 272: 331-7.
6 Falton RH, Lee WL, Shalita AR, et al. In
vivo effect of isotretinoin on monocyte chemotaxis. J Invest
Dermatol 1986; 86: 550-2.
7 Cunliffe WJ, Baxter K. The place of oral
isotretinoin in the treatment of acne: Benefits and side effects.
CME Bulletin Dermatol 2000; 2: 56-62.
8 Farrell LN, Strauss JS, Stranieri AM. The
treatment of severe cystic acne with 13-cis-retinoic acid:
Evaluation of sebum production and the clinical response in a
multiple – dose trial. J Am Acad Dermatol 1980; 3: 602-11.
9 Dreno B, Daniel F, Allaert FA, Aube I.
Acne; evolution of the clinical practice and therapeutic management
of acne between 1996 and 2000. Eur J Dermatol 2003; 13: 166-70.
10 Hull PR, Demkiw-Bartel C. Isotretinoin use in acne:
Prospective evaluation of adverse effects. J Cuta Med Surg 2000; 4:
66-70.
11 Jick SS, Kremers HM, Vasilakis-Scaramozza C.
Isotretinoin use and risk of depression, psychotic symptoms suicide
and attempted suicide. Arch Dermatol 2000; 136: 1231-6.
12 Krezel W, Ghyselinck N, Samad TA, et al.
Impaired locomotion and dopamine signalling in retinoid receptor
mutant mice. Science 1998; 279: 863-7.
13 Byne A, Hnatko G. Depression associated with
isotretinoin therapy. Canadian J Psych 1995; 40: 567.
14 Duke E, Guenther L. Psychiatric reactions to the
retinoids. Can J Dermatol 1993; 5: 467.
15 Bravard P, Krug M, Rzeznick JC. Isotretinoin
et depression, soyons vigilantes. Nouv Dermatol 1993; 12: 15.
16 Gatti S, Serri F. Acute depression from
isotretinoin. J Am Acad Dermatol 1991; 25: 132.
17 Ng CH, Tam MM, Hook SJ. Acne, isotretinoin
treatment and acute depression. W J Biol Psych 2001; 2: 159-61.
18 Ault A. Isotretinoin use may be linked with depression.
Lancet 1998; 351: 730.
19 Hazen PG, Carney JF, Walker AE,
Stewart JJ. Depression – a side effect of 13-cis-retinoic
acid. J Am Acad Dermatol 1983; 9: 278-9.
20 Scheinman PL, Peck GL, Rubinow DR,
DiGiovanna JJ, Abangan DL, Ravin PD. Acute
depression and isotretinoin. J Am Acad Dermatol 1990; 22:
1112-4.
21 Wysowski DK, Pitts M, Beitz J. Depression and
suicide in patients treated with isotretinoin. N Engl J Med 2001;
344: 460.
22 Goulden V, Layton AM, Cunliffe WJ. Long-term
safety of isotretinoin in the treatment of acne vulgaris. Br J
Dermatol 1994; 131: 360-3.
23 Ng CH, Tam MM, Celi E, Tate B,
Schweitzer I. A prospective study of depressive symptoms and
quality of life in acne vulgaris patients treated with isotretinoin
compared to antibiotic and topical therapy. Aust J Dermatol 2002;
43: 262-8.
24 Kellett SC. Shame-fused acne: A biopsychosocial
conceptualisation and treatment rationale. In: Gilbert P,
Miles J, eds. Body Shame: Conceptualisation, Research and
Treatment. Hove: Brunner-Routledge, 2002.
25 Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. BDI-II manual.
The Psychological Corporation. San Antonio: Harcourt Brace &
Company, 2000.
26 Beck AT, Kovacs M, Weissman A. Hopelessness
and suicidal behaviour: An overview. JAMA 1975; 234: 1146-9.
27 Beck AT, Brown G, Berchick RJ,
Stewart BL, Steer RA. Relationship between hopelessness
and ultimate suicide: A replication with psychiatric out-patients.
Am J Psych 1990; 147: 190-5.
28 Zich JM, Attkisson CC, Greenfield TK.
Screening for depression in Primary Care: The CES-D and the BDI.
Intern J Psych Med 1990; 20: 259-77.
29 Allen BS, Smith JG. Various parameters for grading
acne vulgaris. Arch Dermatol 1982; 118: 23-7.
30 Kellett SC, Gawrodger DJ. The psychological and
emotional impact of acne and the effect of treatment with
isotretinoin. Br J Dermatol 1999; 140: 273-82.
31 Cotterill JA, Cunliffe WJ. Suicide in dermatology
patients. Br J Dermatol 1988; 137: 246-50.
32 Gupta MA, Gupta AK. Depression and suicidal
ideation in dermatology patients with acne, alopecia areata, atopic
dermatitis and psoriasis. Br J Dermatol 1998; 139: 846-50.
33 Rubinow DR, Peck GL, Squillance KM,
Gantt GG. Reduced anxiety and depression in cystic acne
patients after successful treatment with isotretinoin. J Am Acad
Dermatol 1987; 17: 25-32.
34 MacDonald Hull S, Cunliffe WJ, Hughes BR.
Treatment of the depressed and dysmorphic acne patient. Clin Exp
Dermatol 1991; 16: 210-1.
|