Texte intégral de l'article
 
   
  Version PDF

Skin eruptions associated with microscopic polyangiitis


European Journal of Dermatology. Volume 14, Number 4, 255-8, July-August 2004, Clinical report


Summary  

Author(s) : Mariko SEISHIMA, Zuiei OYAMA, Makiko ODA , Department of Dermatology, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Minaminokawa‐cho 4‐86, Ogaki City, 503‐8502, Japan .

Summary : Microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) is a systemic vasculitis histologically characterized by small‐vessel involvement. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (especially anti‐myeloperoxidase antibodies) (MPO‐ANCA) are often positive in serum. Although the skin is affected in 20‐70% of patients, the precise description has been limited. This retrospective study analyzed clinical manifestations in patients of MPA with skin eruptions. Ten patients with skin eruptions diagnosed as MPA according to Chapel Hill consensus criteria consisted of 6 men and 4 women aged from 38 to 80 years (62.1 ± 13.3). Clinical manifestations, laboratory data, and histological findings were examined. Purpura and petechiae in 6 patients, livedo in 2 patients, and erythema in 7 patients, especially erythema on the hands and\\or fingers in 4 patients, were observed. Histological findings from the eruptions in 7 patients showed perivascular lymphocyte infiltration in the upper dermis in 4 patients, and infiltration of lymphocytes and a few neutrophils around small arteries in the middle to deep dermis in 2 patients and diffuse infiltration of histiocytes and lymphocytes in the middle dermis in 1 patient. Cutaneous involvements in MPA showed a wide spectrum of clinical and histological findings.

Keywords : antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies, microscopic polyangiitis, MPO‐ANCA, purpura, skin eruption

Pictures

ARTICLE

Auteur(s) : Mariko SEISHIMA, Zuiei OYAMA, Makiko ODA

Department of Dermatology, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Minaminokawa-cho 4-86, Ogaki City, 503-8502, Japan

Article accepted on 22/03/2004

Microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) that involves small vessels often show a poor prognosis in the case of patients with inappropriate initial treatments [1-3]. Serious clinical complications usually arise from renal diseases, typically focal necrotizing glomerulonephritis with crescents, and from pulmonary haemorrhage. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (especially anti-myeloperoxidase antibodies) (MPO-ANCA) are often positive in serum [4-6]. The skin is affected in 20-70% of patients with MPA [2, 7, 8]. Oral ulcer, splinter haemorrhage, palpable purpura, and facial edema have been described as clinical features [9-12]. However, the description of skin eruptions in MPA patients has been limited. Thus, we report here 10 MPA patients with skin eruptions.

Patients

Ten Japanese patients with MPA consulted the Department of Dermatology in Ogaki Municipal Hospital during the past 5 years. The clinical background and features of 10 patients (6 men and 4 women) with MPA are summarized in Table I. These patients were aged from 38 to 80 years (62.1 ± 13.3). Written informed consent for the study was obtained from all patients.

Table ICharacteristics of patients with microscopic polyangiitis
Patient No. Age/Sex Renal involvement Pulmonary involvement MPO-ANCA Eruptions Biopsy site Others
 1 65/M + PH 36 EU telangiectasia, livedo, erythema (extremities)  
 2 63/M + PH 127 EU purpura, petechiae, pigmentation (extremities)  
 3 61/M + 560 EU erythema, papules, telangiectasia, livedo (trunk), petechiae, purpura (extremities) lower extremity gastric bleeding
 4 44/F + PH 283 EU erythema (hands) dorsum of hand mononeuritis, polyarthralgia audile disturbance
 5 78/F + 67 EU purpura, petechiae, papules, scale (extremities) lower extremity polyarthralgia
 6 80/M + PH 410 EU purpura, petechiae (extremities) lower extremity  
 7 71/M + IP 242 EU erythema (trunk) back gastric bleeding
 8 59/F IP 61 EU erythema, scale (face, hands) purpura, petechiae

(lower extremities)
polyarthralgia
 9 38/F + PH 53 EU erythema (hands, fingers) dorsum of hand polyarthralgia
10 62/M + PH 120 EU erythema (hands), purpura, petechiae (lower extremities) lower extremity ANA:5120
PH: pulmonary haemorrhage, IP: interstitial pneumonia, ANA: antinuclear antibody titer.

Results

Systemic Symptoms and Laboratory Data

Systemic symptoms were fever in all 10 patients, general fatigue in 9 patients (except patient 8 in Table I), haemoptysis in 6 patients (patients 1, 2, 4, 6, 9 and 10), polyarthralgia in 4 patients (patients 4, 5, 8 and 9). Renal dysfunction with haematuria was observed in 9 patients, pulmonary haemorrhage in 6 patients, interstitial pneumonia in 2 patients (patients 7 and 8), and gastric bleeding in 2 patients (patients 3 and 7). Patient 4 had both mononeuritis and auditory disturbance. Serum MPO-ANCA was positive in all 10 patients and antibody titers determined by ELISA were 36-560 EU (196.9 ± 176.2 EU, n = 10), but serum proteinase 3-ANCA was negative in all 10 patients. Antinuclear antibody was positive in one patient (patient 10) and the titer was 1: 5120 (speckled type). Rheumatoid factor, cryoglobulin, hepatitis B and C were all negative. Complement, CPK, aldolase, myoglobin levels were within the normal range. Segmental pauci-immune necrotizing glomerulonephritis was histologically observed in 4 patients (patients 3, 4, 5 and 7) by renal biopsy.
Six patients (patients 1, 2, 4, 6, 9 and 10) showed both rapidly progressive necrotizing glomerulonephritis (RPGN) and pulmonary haemorrhage. Patient 7 had RPGN and interstitial pneumonia. Patient 3 had RPGN, gastric bleeding and purpura. Patient 5 showed RPGN and purpura. Patient 8 showed interstitial pneumonia and purpura. Polyarteritis nodosa, Wegener’s granulomatosis, Churg-Strauss syndrome and Goodpasture’s syndrome were not clinically detected. The diagnosis of MPA was made based on the Chapel Hill consensus criteria [1, 2].

Skin Eruptions

Purpura and petechiae were observed on the extremities in 6 patients (Fig. 1), livedo on the lower extremities in 2 patients. Erythema was seen on the hands in 4 patients (Fig. 2), on the face in 1 patient, on the trunk in 2 patients, and on the extremities in 1 patient (Table I). None of the patients complained of itch. Skin eruptions preceded the systemic symptoms in 2 patients (patients 4 and 8). Patient 10 showed the skin eruption and systemic symptoms simultaneously. In the other 7 patients, systemic symptoms were followed by skin eruptions.

Histological Findings

We performed a skin biopsy from the affected areas in 7 MPA patients except for patients 1, 2 and 8 (Table I). Although 4 patients (patients 5, 7, 9 and 10) showed perivascular lymphocyte infiltration in the upper dermis, 2 patients (patients 3 and 6) showed infiltration with lymphocytes and neutrophils around small arteries in the middle to deep dermis (Fig. 3- 4), and patient 4 showed diffuse infiltration of histiocytes and lymphocytes in the middle dermis (Fig. 5). Direct immunofluorescence study performed in 3 patients (patients 3, 9 10) was negative in all three patients.

Clinical Course and Treatment

All 10 patients were treated with systemic steroid therapy including steroid pulse therapy. Prednisolone was given at 60 mg/day from the beginning or after steroid pulse therapy and the dose was gradually reduced. Nine patients were given prednisolone at a dose of 2.5-12.5 mg/day and 2 patients (patients 1 and 2) were treated with haemodialysis. Skin eruptions disappeared after 2-5 months and MPO-ANCA became negative 3 to 16 months after the beginning of steroid therapy. Regression of skin eruptions preceded negative conversion of MPA-ANCA in 9 patients, except patient 8. There has not been any relapse of either skin eruptions or systemic symptoms in any patient during 2-5 year-follow-up.

Discussion

MPA is a systemic vasculitis that is histologically characterized by small-vessel involvement [13, 14]. The Chapel Hill consensus criteria for MPA include the following signs and symptoms in variable combinations: 1) presence of RPGN and/or alveolar haemorrhage, which could be associated with other systemic manifestations of vasculitis; 2) histological demonstration of small vessel vasculitis or segmental pauci-immune necrotizing glomerulonephritis; or 3) symptoms suggesting small-vessel involvement, e.g., purpura without glomerulonephritis and/or alveolar haemorrhage [1, 2]. In this study, MPA was diagnosed according to this criteria, but cutaneous leukocytoclastic vasculitis restricted to vasculitis in the skin without involvement of vessels in any other organ was excluded. Positive MPO-ANCA are diagnostic for MPA. However, they are not specific for MPA because they are positive in only 50-80% of active MPA patients and are also positive in 10-25% in Wegener’s granulomatosis, 25-30% in Churg-Strauss syndrome [4, 6].
Most patients with MPA show clinically systemic symptoms such as fever, weight loss, myalgias, and polyarthralgia for several months or years [12]. RPGN occurs in 79-90% of MPA patients, and the lung is involved in 25% to 50% of MPA [12]. In this study, RPGN occurred in 90% and lung involvement in 80% including 60% of pulmonary haemorrhage and 20% of interstitial pneumonia. Skin involvement has been reported in 20-70% of MPA [2, 7, 8]. Purpuric skin lesions are the most common cutaneous feature [8,15], and are present in 15-50% [2, 7, 8, 13]. Livedo, nodules and urticaria were observed in 13%, 13%, and 3.5%, respectively [2]. In other reports, bullae, erythema elevatum diutinum [8], and ulcer on the toes [11] were described in MPA patients. In addition, an MPA patient with a wide spectrum of cutaneous lesions such as palpable purpura, vesicles, splinter haemorrhages, subcutaneous palmar nodules and facial edema was also reported [10]. In the present study, purpura and petechiae were observed in 60% of patients, livedo in 20% of patients. Erythema was seen in 70% of patients, especially on the hands in 40%. These findings show that we should consider the possibility of MPA in patients with purpura, petechiae or livedo on the extremities. Mandl et al. showed that cutaneous vasculitis with systemic features, such as myalgias, arthralgias or arthritis, is one of the clinical indications for ANCA testing [5].
Cutaneous involvements in MPA showed a wide spectrum of clinical and histological findings. Histologically, lymphocyte infiltration around capillaries in the upper dermis in 4 patients, infiltration with lymphocytes and neutrophil infiltration around small arteries in the middle to deep dermis in 2 patients and diffuse infiltration of histiocytes and lymphocytes in the middle dermis in 1 patient. From these histological findings, not all skin eruptions in these 10 patients might be specific for MPA. Five patients (patients 1, 3, 6, 9 and 10) received antibiotics or anti-inflammatory agents before consulting our department. It is not clear whether these eruptions appeared as one of the skin manifestations of MPA or some other factors such as drugs or collagen diseases were involved in the eruptions. Drug patch tests and drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation tests were performed in patient 9 using the antibiotics and anti-inflammatory agents that were orally administered before consultation, but test results were negative. Although antinuclear antibody titer was high in patient 10, the symptoms and laboratory data did not fulfill the criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus [16]. In addition, erythema on the palms and fingers in patients 4, 8, 9 and 10 is often observed in collagen diseases such as dermatomyositis and Sjögren’s syndrome but the criteria for these diseases were not fulfilled. Therefore, further studies are necessary to determine whether these eruptions are specific for MPA. n

References

1. Jennette JC, Falk RJ, Andrassy K, et al. Nomenclature of systemic vasculides: proposal of an international consensus conference. Arthritis Rheum 1994; 37: 187-92.

2. Guillevin L, Durand-Gasselin B, Cevallos R, et al. Microscopic polyangiitis. Clinical and laboratory findings in eighty-five patients. Arthritis Rheum 1999; 42: 421-30.

3. Jennette JC, Thomas DB, Falk RJ. Microscopic polyangiitis (microscopic polyarteritis). Semin Diagn Pathol 2001; 18: 3-13.

4. Savige J, Gillis D, Benson E, et al. International consensus statement on testing and reporting of antineutrophilic cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA). Am J Clin Pathol 1999; 111: 507-13.

5. Mandl LA, Solomon DH, Smith EL, Lew RA, Katz JN, Shmerling RH. Using antineutrophilic cytoplasmic antibody testing to diagnose vasculitis. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162: 1509-14.

6. Wiik AS. Clinical use of serological tests for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies. Reum Dis Clin North Am 2001; 27: 799-813.

7. Guillevin L, Lhote F, Amouroux J, Gherardi R, Callard P, Casassus P. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies, abnormal angiograms and pathological findings in polyarteritis nodosa and Churg-Strauss syndrome: indications for the classification of vasculitides of the polyarteritis nodosa group. Br J Rheumatol 1996; 35: 958-64.

8. Lauque D, Cadranel J, Lazor R, Pourrat J, Ronco P, Guillevin L, Cordier J-F. The Groupe d’Etudes et de Recherche sur les Maladies “Orphelines” Pulmonaires (GERM“O”P). Microscopic polyangiitis with alveolar haemorrhage. Medicine 2000; 79: 222-33.

9. Savige J, Davies D, Falk RJ, Jennette JC, Wiik A. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies and associated diseases: a review of the clinical and laboratory features. Kidney Int 2000; 57: 846-62.

10. Penas PF, Porras JI, Fraga J, Bernis C, Sarriá C, Daudén E. Microscopic polyangiitis. A systemic vasculitis with a positive P-ANCA. Br J Dermatol 1996; 134: 542-7.

11. Homas PB, David-Bajar KM, Fitzpatrick JE, West SG, Tribelhorn DR. Microscopic polyarteritis. Report of a case with cutaneous involvement and antimyeloperoxidase antibodies. Arch Dermatol 1992; 128: 1223-8.

12. Fiorentino DF. Cutaneous vasculitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 48: 311-40.

13. Jennette CJ, Milling DM, Falk RJ. Vasculitis affecting the skin. Arch Dermatol 1994; 130: 899-906.

14. Burrows NP, Lockwood CM. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies and their relevance to the dermatologist. Br J Dermatol 1995; 132: 173-81.

15. Hughes LB, Bridges SL. Polyarteritis nodosa and microscopic polyangiitis: etiologic and diagnostic considerations. Curr Rheumatol Reports 2002; 4: 74-82.

16. Tan EM, Cohen AS, Fries JF, et al. The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1982; 25: 1271-7.


Copyright © 2007 John Libbey Eurotext - Tous droits réservés