ARTICLE
Auteur(s) : L. LAINO1, S. PALA D.
INNOCENZI1, G. ACCAPPATICCIO1, M.A.M. VAN
STEENSEL2
1 Department of Dermatology, University of Rome
“La Sapienza”, Rome, Italy
2 Department of Dermatology, University Hospital
Maastricht, the Netherlands
Article accepted on 19/1/2004
Porokeratosis of Mibelli (PM) is defined as a rare disorder of
epidermal keratinisation characterized by centrifugally spreading
patches surrounded by narrow horny ridges and with central atrophy.
The lesions are craterlike. It has been suggested that the disease
results from the expansion of an abnormal clonal population of
keratinocytes [1-3]. Histological examination shows a highly
characteristic abnormality: columns of parakeratotic cells
extending through the entire thickness of the stratum corneum, or
“cornoid lamella” [4]. The existence of other, clinically distinct,
types of porokeratotis is commonly accepted. For PM, classically
occurring in middle-aged males and on skin that is not exposed to
sunlight, immunosuppression is a well-documented association.
Occurrence in the genital area has been described on a number of
occasions [5-12] and it is rarely observed in Negroid people. It
seems to be more common in Italians [13].
Here we report on a negroid man with proven porokeratosis and
immune abnormalities. The case shows that although porokeratosis is
not per se indicative of immunosuppression, its presence may
serve as a warning sign and should prompt immunological evaluation.
A genital localization of suspect lesions in persons not belonging
to one of the classical at-risk groups should prompt suspicion of
the diagnosis.
Case report
A 36-year-old Negroid man, born in Italy from non-consanguineous
parents, presented to our department with a 3-year-history of
multiple, raised, annular and well defined skin lesions on the
scrotum. These varied from 5 to 15 mm in diameter (Figs. 1a, b) and
showed a raised hyperkeratotic border with a central depressed area
lacking hair follicles. An incisional biopsy from the edge of one
of the lesions showed hyperkeratotic and acanthotic epidermis. A
column of parakeratotic cells surrounded by orthohyperkeratosis
(Fig. 2) was
visible in the centre of the lesion. This finding of a typical
cornoid lamella confirmed the clinical suspicion of porokeratosis.
Routine laboratory investigations showed a decreased number of
T-helper lymphocytes in blood, and a decreased CD4+/CD8+ ratio
(Table I). Further immunological
evaluation failed to show other abnormalities. Screening for HIV-1
and HIV-2 (ELISA) infection was negative. The patient was in good
health; in particular, there were no signs of infections associated
with immunosuppression. There was no history of exposure to
carcinogens in the workplace.
Table I. Lymphocyte subsets in
peripheral blood; highly abnormal values in boldface
| Subset |
Percentage in patient |
Normal values |
| CD3 |
75.7% |
59-76% |
| CD4 |
3.5% |
40-53% |
| CD8 |
43.2% |
22-36% |
| CD56 (NK) |
10.5% |
1-7% |
| CD2 |
76.1% |
60-80% |
| CD19 |
13.1% |
4-12% |
| CD4/CD8 |
0.04% |
1.8% +/– 0. |
There was no family history of similar skin lesions and the
patient did not use any type of systemic or topical medications.
Based on the presence of cornoid lamellae in the biopsy specimen,
immune disturbance and a negative family history, a diagnosis of
genital porokeratosis was made.
Discussion
Porokeratosis is a rare disorder of epidermal keratinisation,
clinically characterized by centrifugally enlarging hyperkeratotic
plaques, associated with the histopathological hallmark of cornoid
lamellae [13]. Several other types of porokeratosis that are
thought to be clinically distinct have been described. Considering
the identical histology of all postulated subtypes, we feel that
the porokeratoses may be a more homogeneous group than is commonly
thought. All types that are currently distinguished on clinical
grounds may share the same molecular background. Xia et al.
have identified two loci so far, one located near the Darier
disease gene SERCA2 on chromosome 12p and one on chromosome
15q25 [14, 15]. The particular event triggering the clinical
appearance of the disorder may be determined by the nature of the
mutation, genetic background, or the presence of mosaicism. The
nature and availability of the triggering event will also differ
between patients. In disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis
(DSAP), for instance, occurring in sun-exposed areas, the trigger
appears to be UV-exposure [16]. UV exposure can cause
p53 mutations by inducing thymidine dimers [17], which may
contribute to the disease phenotype. Incidentally, this may be an
explanation for the observed rarity of porokeratosis in blacks or
in the genital region. In both cases, exposure of keratinocytes to
UV radiation will be relatively low. In so-called porokeratosis
Mibelli, immune suppression or an ethnically determined genetic
background effect may allow the abnormal clone to expand [2].
Mosaicism can also explain why porokeratosis sometimes occurs only
locally and in a linear distribution. If the abnormal clone arises
in the skin during embryogenesis it may spread along the lines of
Blaschko, later in life giving rise to a porokeratotic eccrine
ostial dermal duct nevus (PEODDN) or linear porokeratosis. Linear
forms of the various clinical presentations of porokeratosis should
occur. Indeed, there is a report of a case of linear porokeratosis
Mibelli [18]. In such cases, the distribution of the disorder is
determined by the extent of mosaicism. Mixed types of porokeratosis
should also occur as type 2 segmental manifestations. Indeed,
there are reports of a linear porokeratosis superimposed on DSAP,
interpreted as a type 2 segmental event. In these cases, the
patients were probably heterozygous for mutations in the DSAP gene
[19,20]. Loss of the wild type allele for instance due to somatic
recombination [21] later in life resulted in the development of a
linear porokeratosis superimposed on the generalised disorder.
These cases lend further support to the notion that all types of
porokeratosis share the same molecular background. Hence, the
clinical subtypes are useful as pointers to possible underlying
causes but do not indicate fundamentally different genetic
backgrounds.
Loss of heterozygosity may be a frequent event in porokeratosis as
the presence of microsatellite instability and chromosomal
instability have been demonstrated in porokeratosis [22-25]. This
observation may also explain the cancer-proneness of the lesion.
Interestingly, microsatellite instability affects a number of genes
that contain repeat tracts such as β-catenin and PTEN [26-31]. Both
genes are involved in epithelial tumorigenesis and may contribute
to malignant transformation of porokeratoses. All considered the
use of different terms to denote the clinical appearance of
porokeratosis does in our view not contribute significantly to the
diagnostic process and may lead to confusion and semantic
discussion. We suggest that the disorder henceforth be referred to
as “porokeratosis” only.
In conclusion, we describe a black man suffering from genital
porokeratosis in the context of sub-clinical immunosuppression of
unknown cause. Although the relationship between porokeratosis and
immunosuppression is not absolute, immunological evaluation should
be considered in negroid people presenting with suspicious lesions
because triggering by UV radiation is unlikely. Histological
examination of the lesions should be performed in order to confirm
the diagnosis since porokeratosis predisposes to the development of
squamous cell carcinoma. Careful follow-up or local therapy, for
instance with immunomodulators, seems to be warranted. n
References
1. Scappaticci S, Lambiase S, Orecchia G, Fraccaro
M. Clonal chromosome abnormalities with preferential involvement of
chromosome 3 in patients with porokeratosis of Mibelli.
Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1989; 43: 89-94.
2. Reed RJ, Leone P. Porokeratosis-a mutant clonal
keratosis of the epidermis. I. Histogenesis. Arch Dermatol
1970; 101: 340-7.
3. Chernosky ME, Freeman RG. Disseminated
superficial actinic porokeratosis (DSAP). Arch Dermatol
1967; 96: 611-24.
4. Chernosky ME. Porokeratosis. Arch Dermatol
1986; 122: 869-70.
5. Levell NJ, Bewley AP, Levene GM.
Porokeratosis of Mibelli on the penis, scrotum and natal cleft.
Clin Exp Dermatol 1994; 19: 77-8.
6. Robinson JB, Im DD, Jockle G, Rosenshein NB.
Vulvar porokeratosis: case report and review of the literature.
Int J Gynecol Pathol 1999; 18: 169-73.
7. Watanabe T, Murakami T, Okochi H, Kikuchi K,
Furue M. Ulcerative porokeratosis. Dermatology 1998; 196:
256-9.
8. Ramesh V, Misra RS, Mahaur BS. Pseudoainhum in
porokeratosis of Mibelli. Cutis 1992; 49: 129-30.
9. Porter WM, Du PMH, Philip G, Bunker CB.
Porokeratosis of the penis. Br J Dermatol 2001; 144:
643-4.
10. Neri I, Marzaduri S, Passarini B, Patrizi A.
Genital porokeratosis of Mibelli. Genitourin Med 1995; 71:
410-1.
11. Helfman RJ, Poulos EG. Reticulated
porokeratosis. A unique variant of porokeratosis. Arch
Dermatol 1985; 121: 1542-3.
12. Schramm P, Bork K. [Naeviform
porokeratosis – only a morphologic variant of
porokeratosis of Mibelli (author’s transl)]. Z Hautkr 1982;
57: 963-70.
13. Schamroth JM, Zlotogorski A, Gilead L.
Porokeratosis of Mibelli. Overview and review of the literature.
Acta Derm Venereol 1997; 77: 207-13.
14. Xia K, Deng H, Xia JH, et al. A novel
locus (DSAP2) for disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis
maps to chromosome 15q25.1-26.1. Br J Dermatol 2002; 147:
650-4.
15. Xia JH, Yang YF, Deng H, Tang BS, Tang DS, He
YG, Xia K, Chen SX, Li YX, Pan Q, Long ZG, Dai HP, Liao XD, Xiao
JF, Liu ZR, Lu CY, Yu KP, Deng HX. Identification of a locus for
disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis at chromosome
12q23.2-24.1. J Invest Dermatol 2000; 114: 1071-4.
16. Neumann RA, Knobler RM, Jurecka W, Gebhart W.
Disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis: experimental
induction and exacerbation of skin lesions. J Am Acad
Dermatol 1989; 21: 1182-8.
17. de Gruijl FR, van Kranen HJ, Mullenders LH.
UV-induced DNA damage, repair, mutations and oncogenic pathways in
skin cancer. J Photochem Photobiol B 2001; 63: 19-27.
18. Eyre WG, Carson WE. Linear porokeratosis of
Mibelli. Arch Dermatol 1972; 105: 426-9.
19. Murata Y, Kumano K, Takai T. Type
2 segmental manifestation of disseminated superficial
porokeratosis showing a systematized pattern of involvement and
pronounced cancer proneness. Eur J Dermatol 2001; 11:
191-4.
20. Freyschmidt-Paul P, Hoffmann R, Konig A, Happle
R. Linear porokeratosis superimposed on disseminated superficial
actinic porokeratosis: report of two cases exemplifying the concept
of type 2 segmental manifestation of autosomal dominant skin
disorders. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999; 41: 644-7.
21. Happle R. Somatic recombination may explain
linear porokeratosis associated with disseminated superficial
actinic porokeratosis. Am J Med Genet 1991; 39: 237.
22. Taylor AM, Harnden DG, Fairburn EA. Chromosomal
instability and malignant disease in patients with Porokeratosis of
Mibelli. Br J Cancer 1973; 28: 88.
23. Taylor AM, Harnden DG, Fairburn EA. Chromosomal
instability associated with susceptibility to malignant disease in
patients with porokeratosis of Mibelli. J Natl Cancer Inst
1973; 51: 371-8.
24. Takata M, Shirasaki F, Nakatani T, Takehara K.
Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer associated with
disseminated superficial porokeratosis. Microsatellite instability
in skin tumours. Br J Dermatol 2000; 143: 851-5.
25. Hussein MR, Wood GS. Microsatellite instability
and its relevance to cutaneous tumorigenesis. J Cutan Pathol
2002; 29: 257-67.
26. Minobe K, Bando K, Fukino K, Soma S, Kasumi F,
Sakamoto G, Furukawa K, Higuchi K, Onda M, Nakamura Y, Emi M.
Somatic mutation of the PTEN/MMAC1 gene in breast cancers with
microsatellite instability. Cancer Lett 1999; 144: 9-16.
27. Hirai Y, Tanaka N, Furuta R, Kawaguchi T,
Sakamoto M, Shirahama S, Noda T. Somatic mutations of the
PTEN/NMAC1 gene associated with frequent chromosomal loss detected
using comparative genomic hybridization in endometrial cancer.
Gynecol Oncol 2001; 83: 81-8.
28. Shin KH, Park YJ, Park JG. PTEN gene mutations
in colorectal cancers displaying microsatellite instability.
Cancer Lett 2001; 174: 189-94.
29. Bussaglia E, del Rio E, Matias-Guiu X, Prat J.
PTEN mutations in endometrial carcinomas: a molecular and
clinicopathologic analysis of 38 cases. Hum Pathol
2000; 31: 312-7.
30. Shin KH, Kim JM, Rho KS, Park KH, Oh JE, Min BM.
Inactivation of the PTEN gene by mutation, exonic deletion, and
loss of transcript in human oral squamous cell carcinomas. Int J
Oncol 2002; 21: 997-1001.
31. Kanamori M, Kon H, Nobukuni T, Nomura S, Sugano
K, Mashiyama S, Kumabe T, Yoshimoto T, Meuth M, Sekiya T, Murakami
Y. Microsatellite instability and the PTEN1 gene mutation in a
subset of early onset gliomas carrying germline mutation or
promoter methylation of the hMLH1 gene. Oncogene 2000; 19:
15.
|