ARTICLE
Cytotoxic T cells (CTL) are known to express the CD8 epitope and to recognize
their targets through the T cell receptor in an MHC class I-restricted
manner. In such a way specific lysis of target cells by CTLs is effected
over secretory and non-secretory pathways [1, 2]. In the non-secretory
cytolytic mechanism the linkage of the CTL over Fas ligands and Fas receptors
to the target cell leads to its programmed death, i.e. apoptosis.
On the other hand, the secretory cytolytic mechanism involves the CTL's
secretion of granzymes and perforin (syn. cytolysin), which both are released
by a Ca+-dependent degranulation process [3]. Human perforin
is a 70 kD protein which polymerizes to a cylindric structure to be introduced
as a pore into the plasma membrane of the target cell [4]. It has been
postulated that the penetration of the target cell by granzymes, water
and salts through polyperforin plasma membrane pores eventually causes
proteolysis and osmotic effects leading to cell death [1, 5-7]. The expression
of perforin is known to be substantially up-regulated in CD8+
CTL upon activation, but to stay at a relatively stable, constitutively
high level in natural killer cells [4].
The perforin expression among CD8+ cells in peripheral blood
of kidney transplant recipients was found to be increased during rejection
crises as compared to patients tolerating the transplant [8]. In dermatology
until now, the aspect of CTL activation has been studied predominantly
in lesional skin tissue, namely in the context of drug reactions [9] as
well as drug- and virus-induced erythema multiforme and Stevens-Johnson
syndrome (SJS) [10-12].
The objective of our present study was to study the perforin+
proportion of peripheral CD8+ lymphocytes as a marker for CTL
activity in patients with generalized inflammatory skin diseases. We now
report upon increased peripheral blood CTL activity in patients with a)
drug-induced macular and papular rashes, b) drug-induced SJS and c) drug-unrelated
exacerbated psoriasis. The augmentation of the perforin+ proportion
of peripheral CD8+ lymphocytes proved to be a phenomenon with
some degree of disease specificity in reflection of the inflammation activity,
because it was missing in drug-independent acute urticaria and abolished
due to successful treatment of SJS. The findings seem to be meaningful
also with regard to the current controversal discussion arguing for a
central role of CD8+ versus CD4+ lymphocytes
in a hypothetical pathogenetic concept explaining psoriasis as a T cell-dependent
autoimmune-like disease [13].
Methods
Patients
Perforin expression in CD8+ cells of the peripheral blood
was studied in a total of n = 50 individuals admitted to our clinic. The
cohort comprised subgroups of n = 14 patients with acute macular-papular
generalized drug eruptions (ages ranging from 19 to 79 years), n = 10
patients with acute generalized urticaria (26 to 79 years, >= 25% body
surface involvement), and n = 11 patients with exacerbated chronic-plaque
or eruptive-exanthematic psoriasis (29 to 73 years, PASI scores between
25 and 35). In the latter two subgroups only such patients were included
for whom a drug-induction of the skin manifestations could be ruled out
by a thorough review of the patient's history. Moreover, those patients
being affected by a physical, cholinergic or contact urticaria as well
as an urticaria vasculitis were excluded. An additional subgroup consisted
of n = 5 patients suffering from drug-induced SJS (27 to 75 years). Controls
were n = 10 individuals not affected by any inflammatory skin or systemic
disease (21 to 79 years).
Separation of mononuclear cells from peripheral
blood
From each patient 20 ml of peripheral venous blood were drawn and simultaneously
treated with 2 ml of heparin (Novo Nordisk Pharma, Mainz, Germany). The
blood samples were diluted 1:1 (v/v) with a 3.5% polypeptide plasma expander
solution (Haemaccel 35, Behring Werke AG, Marburg, Germany) and incubated
for 60 minutes at 37° C. Subsequent separation of peripheral blood
mononuclear cells (PB-MNC) was performed by a buoyant density centrifugation
at 440 xg for 30 minutes on a Ficoll-Paque plus cushion (Ficoll, Uppsala,
Sweden) at 4° C [14, 15]. The band of cells at the interface was
collected and washed twice with Hank's buffered salt solution (HBSS).
Cell fixation and plasma
membrane permeabilization
Preparation of PB-MNC for the subsequent antibody-labeling was performed
by using a commercial kit (ICS permeabilization kit, cat. no. 9319, Hölzel
Diagnostika, Köln, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
In brief, aliquots of 1 x 106 PB-MNC were fixed with 2% buffered
formaldehyde for 10 minutes at room temperature. After two washes with
HBSS the plasma membranes were permeabilized for 10 minutes with a buffer
containing 0.1% saponin.
Double labeling with anti-perforin and anti-CD8
antibodies
Murine monoclonal antibodies used were directed against human perforin
(clone delta G9, cat. no. 16476, Hölzel Diagnostika; final dilution
1:625) and human CD8 (clone UCHT4, Hölzel Diagnostika; final dilution
1:1,000), labeled with FITC and R-Phycoerythrin (R-PE) [16, 17]. As a
control for unspecific antibody binding we employed a murine monoclonal
IgG2b/FITC derived from the BPC4 plasmocytoma (clone BPC4, Hölzel
Diagnostika, final dilution 1: 1,250). For each individual five parallel
incubations of the PB-MNC aliquots were performed for 20 minutes at 4°
C in the dark, as follows: a) control without antibody, b) single label
anti-perforin/FITC control, c) single label anti-CD8/R-PE control, d)
IgG2b/FITC control for unspecific binding, e) simultaneous double labeling
with anti-perforin/FITC and anti-CD8/R-PE. Subsequently, the cell preparations
were treated with 0.1% saponin followed by a final washing with HBSS.
Flow cytometry analysis and statistics
The expression of perforin and CD8 was analyzed on a FACScanTM
flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany). Among the total
of PB-MNC the lymphocyte subpopulation was identified by its forward/side
scattering characteristics and gated. The relative amounts of lymphocytes
with positive or negative expressions of perforin and CD8 were detected
as explained in Fig. 1.
Data are expressed as means ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis
was performed by the Mann-Whitney U-test with an overall level of significance
set to p ¾ 0.05 [18]. Multiple comparisons required Bonferroni's
adjustment.
Results
The overall data of our study comparing the perforin expression in CD8+
peripheral blood lymphocytes between selected generalized inflammatory
dermatoses are presented in Table
I. Representative examples of the flow cytometry data underlying
these results are given in Figure
2.
The perforin+ proportion in CD8+ lymphocytes was
found to be significantly increased in generalized drug eruptions (68.8
± 24.9%) and exacerbated psoriasis (67.2 ± 17.1%) as compared
to the control group (43.5 ± 11.6%, p ¾ 0.05; Fig.
3). There was no significant difference for patients with urticaria
(58.2 ± 23.1%). Correspondingly, the perforin-negative and CD8+
proportion in total lymphocytes was significantly decreased in drug eruptions
(7.6 ± 7.1%) as well as in psoriasis (8.6 ± 4.5) in comparison
to the control (15.8 ± 5.1), which did not differ from urticaria
(10.2 ± 5.2; Table I).
Additionally, a group of n = 5 patients affected by a drug-induced SJS,
i.e. the major type of erythema exsudativum multiforme including
mucous membrane involvement, was studied. These patients experienced SJS
when the following drugs were administrated: allopurinol, gentamicin,
acetaminophen (syn. paracetamol), certoparin, penicillin (patient no.1);
metamizol (patient no. 2); diclofenac (patient no. 3), acetaminophen,
oily extract from various herbs (patient no. 4); lorazepam, lamotrigin,
acetaminophen (patient 5). The perforin+ proportion in CD8+
lymphocytes was determined on the admission day and 7 days later after
systemic high-dose steroid medication, and found to decline substantially
during this period in each of these patients (Fig.
4). The average of the perforin+ proportion in CD8+
lymphocytes was 81.6% and 33.0% on the day of admission and day 7, respectively.
The relatively wide variation of the parameter, ranging from 66% (patient
no. 5) to 100% (patient no. 3) on the admission day (Fig.
4), may be explained by a) the various severities of the skin
involvement and b) the fact that some of the patients had been pre-treated
with systemic steroids, i.e. for a maximum duration of three days.
Discussion
Activation of CTL is known to occur in viral and bacterial diseases
as well as in neoplasia, autoimmune diseases and in the context of allo-transplant
rejection [1, 4, 19]. These CD8+ effector cells are responsible
for the specific destruction of target cells carrying microbial, tumor-
or auto-antigens. In the present study we have chosen the perforin+
proportion of CD8+ peripheral lymphocytes as an indicator for
overall CTL activity in generalized inflammatory skin diseases. The detection
of the expression of perforin as a cytoplasmic epitope by flow cytometry
was rendered possible by using saponin to permeabilize the plasma membrane
in order to allow the intracellular penetration of the FITC-labeled anti-perforin
antibodies.
In the present study the perforin+ proportion of CD8+
peripheral lymphocytes was found to be significantly increased in patients
with generalized cutaneous macular-papular drug eruptions (average of
69%, n = 14) as compared to controls not affected by any inflammatory
skin disease (44%, n = 10). A maximum average value of the parameter,
i.e. 82%, was determined for a group of patients affected by drug-induced
SJS, i.e. immediately after admission to our clinic. These data
are in good agreement with results from immuno-histological studies which
demonstrated an intense perforin-positive dermal infiltrate in lesional
skin biopsies from drug-induced SJS [11]. The generally pivotal pathogenic
role of drug-reactive, CD8+ lymphocytes in drug-related bullous
skin eruptions had been demonstrated in earlier studies [10]. Similar
results of an increased lesional expression of perforin were reported
for cases of virally induced erythema multiforme [12].
In the patients with drug-induced SJS syndrome we monitored the perforin+
proportion of CD8+ peripheral lymphocytes in the course of
the disease. For all five patients the values of the parameter substantially
decreased after seven days of systemic steroid administration, i.e.
the average dropped from 82 to 33%. Given these data, the perforin+
proportion of CD8+ peripheral lymphocytes seems to reflect
directly disease activity in SJS.
An abundance of lesional perforin+ lymphocytes in skin biopsies
has also been described for the transfusion-associated graft-versus-host-disease
(GVHD) and some cases of acute GVHD after bone marrow transplantation
[20, 21]. Under such conditions of acute GVHD the occurrence of perforin+
and CD8+ lymphocytes was observed especially as an epidermotropic
invasion phenomenon [22, 23]. In a patient afflicted with a Shulman syndrome-like
scleroderma due to chronic GVHD following allogeneic hematopoietic stem
cell transplantation because of acute myeloic leukemia, we observed an
extremely high perforin+ proportion of peripheral CD8+
lymphocytes, i.e.~ 100% [C. Behrendt, H. Gollnick, B. Bonnekoh:
unpublished data].
Noteworthy, the establishing of CD8+ T cell lines from skin
lesions of Behcet's disease expressing perforin mRNA has been described
[24]. Tumor cells of three patients with angiocentric lymphoma and granulomatous
panniculitis were shown to express perforin as well [25].
That an increased perforin+ proportion of CD8+
peripheral lymphocytes is however not a general feature of generalized
inflammatory skin diseases, is pointed out by our observation in patients
with drug-unrelated acute urticaria. When studying the parameters in these
patients we could not detect any significant difference as compared to
the controls. Obviously, activation of perforin expression does not represent
a decisive step in the pathomechanism of this type of acute urticaria.
However, in patients with drug-unrelated exacerbation of psoriasis we
found a significantly increased perforin+ proportion of CD8+
peripheral lymphocytes (average of 67%) as compared to the controls (44%).
At the present time the pathogenetic meaning of this finding is not really
clear, and it provides a point of discussion, to what extent possibly
autoantigen-directed actions of cytotoxic CD8+ lymphocytes
might be involved in psoriasis. Currently, it is a major undecided debate,
if the CD4+ or the CD8+ lymphocyte may represent
the pivotal cell type in the pathogenetic cascade of immunological events
in psoriasis. Our data are in line with recent findings demonstrating
intraepidermal lymphocytes in psoriatic lesions to be CD8+
and to express GMP-17 (syn. TIA-1), known as a cytotoxic granule protein
found in activated CTL [26].
Thus, we want to propose the perforin+ proportion of CD8+
lymphocytes as a useful, although not highly disease-specific routine
parameter, to be conveniently measured by flow cytometry in peripheral
blood preparations, for the evaluation of the CTL activity in drug-induced
non-urticarial skin reactions, especially with regard to the monitoring
under therapeutic interventions. Moreover, our data point to a possible
involvement of activated peripheral CD8+ lymphocytes in the
pathogenesis of the drug-unrelated exacerbation process of psoriasis.
The pathogenetic meaning of an increased perforin expression is obvious
in SJS by its probable contribution to the well known epidermal necrolysis
phenomena, but will have to be elucidated in the future for macular-papular
drug rashes and psoriasis where skin cell necroses are only rare events.
Article accepted on 26/4/00
CONCLUSION
Acknowledgements
The study was supported in part by a grant FKZ 2587A/0027H from the
Kultusministerium des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt awarded to Prof. Dr. B. Bonnekoh.
REFERENCES
1. Berke G. The CTL's kiss of death. Cell 1995; 81: 9-12.
2. Liu CC, Persechini PM, Young JD. Perforin and lymphocyte-mediated
cytolysis. Immunol Rev 1995; 146: 145-75.
3. Kraut RP, Bose D, Cragoe EJ, Greenberg AH. The influence of
calcium, sodium, and the Na+/Ca2+ antiport on susceptibility
to cytolysin/perforin-mediated cytolysis. J Immunol 1990; 144:
3498-503.
4. Liu CC, Walsh CM, Young JDE. Perforin: structure and function.
Immunol Today 1995; 16: 194-201.
5. Krahenbuhl O, Tschopp J. Involvement of granule proteins in
T-cell-mediated cytolysis. Nat Immun Cell Growth Regul 1990; 9:
274-82.
6. Berke G. Killing mechanisms of cytotoxic lymphocytes. Curr
Opin Hematol 1997; 4: 32-40.
7. Shi L, Mai S, Israels S. Granzyme B autonomously crosses the
cell membrane and perforin initiates apoptosis and Gra B nuclear localization.
J Exp Med 1997; 185: 855-66.
8. Rukavina D, Balen-Marunic S, Rubesa G. Perforin expression
in peripheral blood lymphocytes in rejecting and tolerant kidney transplant
recipients. Transplantation 1996; 61: 285-91.
9. Hertl M, Jugert F, Merk HF. CD8+ dermal T cells
from a sulphamethoxazole-induced bullous exanthema proliferate in response
to drug-modified liver microsomes. Br J Dermatol 1995; 132: 215-20.
10. Hertl M, Bohlen H, Jugert F, Boecker C, Knaup R, Merk HF.
Predominance of epidermal CD8+ T-lymphocytes in bullous cutaneous
reactions caused by beta-lactam antibiotics. J Invest Dermatol
1993; 101: 794-9.
11. Inachi S, Hitoshi M, Masayuki S. Epidermal apoptotic cell
death in erythema multiforme and Stevens-Johnson Syndrome. Arch Dermtol
1997; 133: 845-8.
12. Sayanna K, Watanabe M, Miki Y. Localization of perforin in
viral vesicles and erythema multiforme. Dermatology 1994; 188:
305-9.
13. Griffiths CEM. Immunological pathways in psoriasis. In: Roenigk
HHJr, Maibach HI (eds): Psoriasis, 3rd ed, Dekker, New York, 1998: 341-8.
14. Boyum A. Separation of white blood cells. Nature 1964;
204: 793-4.
15. Boyum A. Isolation of mononuclear cells and granulocytes
from human blood. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1968; 97: 77-89.
16. Hameed A, Olsen KJ, Cheng L, Fox WM, Hruban RH, Podack R.
Immunohistochemical identification of cytotoxic lymphocytes using human
perforin monoclonal antibody. Am J Pathol 1992; 140: 1025-30.
17. Kataoka K, Naomoto Y, Kojima K, Horiki S, Hizuta A, Tanaka
N, Yahagi N, Miyaazaki Y, Okumura K, Orita K. Flow cytometric analysis
on perforin induction in peripheral blood mononuclear cells with interleukin-2
or OK-432. J Immunother 1992; 11: 249-56.
18. Mann HB, Whitney DR. On a test of whether one of two random
variables is stochastically larger than the other. Ann Math Stat
1947; 18: 50-60.
19. Smyth MJ, Ortaldo JR, Shinkai YI, Yagita H, Nakata M, Okumura
K, Young HA. Interleukin 2 induction of pore-forming protein gene expression
in human peripheral blood CD8+ T cells. J Exp Med 1990;
171: 1269-281.
20. Clement MV, Soulie A, Legros-Maida S, Guillet J, Gluckmann
E, Sigaux N, Sasportes M. Perforin and granzyme B: predictive markers
for acute GvHD or cardiac rejection after bone marrow or heart transplantation.
Nouv Rev Fr Hematol 1991; 33: 465-70.
21. Takata M. Immunhistochemical identification of perforin-positive
cytotoxic lymphocytes in graft-versus-host disease. Am J Clin
Pathol 1995; 104: 705-6.
22. Sale GE, Anderson P, Browne M, Myerson D. Evidence of cytotoxic
T-cell destruction of epidermal cells in human graft-vs-host disease.
Immunhistology with monoclonal antibody TIA-1. Arch Pathol Lab Med
1992; 116: 622-5.
23. Baker MB, Altman NH, Podack ER, Levy RB. The role of cell-mediated
cytotoxicity in acute GVHD after MHC-matched allogeneic bone marrow transplantation
in mice. J Exp Med 1996; 183: 2645-56.
24. Mochizuki M. Characteristics of T cell lines established
from skin lesions of Behcet's disease. J Dermatol Sci 1997; 15:
9-13.
25. Takeshita M, Kimura N, Suzumiya J, Ohshima K, Kikuchi M,
Watanabe R, Okamura T, Goto H. Angiocentric lymphoma with granulomatous
panniculitis in the skin expressing natural killer cell and large granular
T-cell phenotypes. Vir Arch 1994; 425: 499-504.
26. Austin LM, Coven TR, Bhardwaj N, Steinman R, Krueger JG.
Intraepidermal lymphocytes in psoriatic lesions are activated GMP-17(TIA-1)
+CD8+CD3+ CTLs as determined by phenotypic analysis. J Cutan Pathol
1998; 25: 79-88.
|