ARTICLE
Ossification (secondary osteoma formation) within the skin may occur
in a variety of conditions, including pilomatricomas, basal cell carcinomas,
appendageal and fibrous proliferations, inflammation, trauma and calcification
[1]. Even though melanocytic naevi (MN) represent the most frequent cause
of secondary ossification of the skin [2] (referred to as "osteo-naevi
of Nanta"), the occurrence of ossification within a MN is an unusual event,
occurring in 1.4% of all lesions [2, 3]. Mummification, defined as the
presence of keratinised epithelial cells with a characteristic appearance
(shadow cells) is typical of pilomatricoma, a benign tumour originating
from hair matrix cells that has recently been found to be caused by mutations
in the beta-catenin gene [4]. To the best of our knowledge, mummification
has never been described in association with an MN. We present herein
a benign MN that combined both these unusual histological features, i.e.
ossification and mummification.
Case report
A 31-year old female consulted for a long-standing lesion of the chin,
diagnosed clinically as MN and excised for cosmetic reasons. Histologically,
the lesion was dome-shaped and overlaid by a normal-looking epidermis.
The upper and mid-dermis contained a dense proliferation of benign nevus
cells, some of which were multinucleated; they were arranged in nests
surrounding hair follicles. In the deep dermis, underneath the nevus cell
nests, bony nodules were seen (Fig.
1); some of them were compact while others contained mature fatty
tissue. Close to the bony nodules, a hair follicle was present that showed
eosinophilic keratinization of its matrix, resulting in the formation
of shadow cells (Fig. 2).
In the vicinity of this follicle, round, well-demarcated masses consisting
of shadow cells were seen in the dermis, surrounded by foreign-body type
giant cells (Fig. 3).
Shadow cells strongly expressed high MW keratin polypeptides, recognised
by AE3 monoclonal antibody, but did not react with AE1 antibody, recognizing
low MW keratin polypeptides. The adjacent dermis also contained keratin
masses, surrounded by a foreign-body type reaction (Fig.
3).
Discussion
Mummification corresponds to a peculiar type of keratinisation of epithelial
cells, resulting in the characteristic appearance of "shadow cells". These
are keratinocytes with a dense, homogeneous, eosinophilic cytoplasm and
a central unstained area representing the shadow of the disintegrated
nucleus. Mummification characteristically occurs in pilomatricomas, the
shadow cells being the end-result of keratinisation of the basophilic
hair follicle matrix cells. Rarely, mummification can be observed in other
lesions, including basal cell carcinomas, epidermoid cysts, keratoacanthomas,
chondroid syringomas and inflamed hair follicles [5]; to the best of our
knowledge, shadow cells have never been described in association with
MN. Ossified MN may contain keratin masses within the dermis, but mummification
has never been reported within them [2, 6]. In the present case, the occurrence
of mummification within hair follicles could be secondary to preceding
inflamation (folliculitis), although this was inconspicuous on the sections
examined. Had the lesion not been excised, it can also be speculated that
the changes observed within hair follicles would have resulted in the
development of a true pilomatricoma. This association could be fortuitous,
since we are not aware of any published cases associating these two lesions
(despite the fact that both frequently occur on the face). However, it
is tempting to speculate that mummification could be somehow related to
osteoma formation. Indeed, the origin of ossification within an MN is
not precisely known. It has been claimed that ossification may represent
a disordered embryological process, the osteoma regarded as a hamartoma
as the MN itself [7]; however, the prevailing theory is that osteoma formation
is metaplastic, resulting from inflammatory changes involving the surrounding
hair follicles [2, 6]. Since mummification may result in ossification
(as happens in pilomatricoma), the present case suggests that ossification
in MN may also occur as a consequence of mummification occurring within
surrounding hair follicles.
Article accepted on 27/4/00
REFERENCES
1. Burgdorf W, Naseman T. Cutaneous osteomas: a clinical and histopathologic
review. Arch Dermatol Res 1977; 260: 121-35.
2. Moulin G, Souquet D, Balme B. Naevus pigmentaires et ossifications
cutanées. Ann Dermatol Venereol 1991; 118: 199-204.
3. Salm R, Swinburne L. Bone formation in pigmented nevi. J
Pathol Bact 1963; 85: 297-303.
4. Chan E, Gat U, McNiff J, Fuchs E. A common human skin tumour
is caused by activating mutations in beta-catenin. Nat Genet 1999;
21: 410-3.
5. Kanitakis J, Hermier C, Chouvet B, Thivolet J. Epithélioma
calcifié de Malherbe à type histologique particulier. Dermatologica
1984; 168: 259-62.
6. Knox W, McWilliam L, Benbow E, McMahon R, Wilkinson N, Bonshek
R. Foreign body giant cell reactions and ossification associated with
benign melanocytic naevi. J Clin Pathol 1993; 46: 72-4.
7. Duperrat B. Ostéomes cutanés. Étude basée
sur 24 cas personnels. Ann Derm Syph 1961; 88: 11-31.
|