ARTICLE
Acrodermatitis continua of Hallopeau (ACH) is a rare, chronic, recurrent
pustular acral eruption, particularly of the distal phalanges of the hands
and feet [1]. Its etiology remains elusive. More women than men are affected
by ACH. Atrophic skin changes and onychomadesis are frequently present.
The disease resembles in many aspects palmoplantar psoriasis. However,
it may be individualized by its chronic course and resistance to the usual
anti-psoriasic drugs [2]. Outbreaks of generalized pustular eruptions
may occur.
Dapsone (4-4' diaminodiphenyl sulfone, DDS) is an ancillary drug exhibiting
a potent inhibition of neutrophil functions. It is frequently used with
success in neutrophilic-dependent dermatoses [3]. Its use in ACH has only
been sporadically mentioned in dermatology textbooks [4, 5], and rarely
documented in the literature [6, 7]. We present a patient suffering from
severe ACH refractory to numerous treatment options. The acropustulosis
responded well to DDS therapy without drug-related side-effects.
Case report
A 74-year-old man suffered for four years from severe ACH that was sometimes
accompanied by generalized pustular eruptions. All his finger tips showed
onychomadesis and sclero-atrophic changes (Fig.
1). No systemic complaints were experienced, except during generalized
episodes. Medical history was not contributory except for hypertension.
Drug intakes were limited to fluoxetin, nifedipine and lormetazepam. A
search for any underlying condition and infection remained negative. Histology
was indistinguisable from pustular psoriasis with intraepidermal neutrophilic
pustules and parakeratosis. Radiographic examination of the hands revealed
diffuse osteoporosis and small areas of bone resorbtion without any joint
involvement. Repeated biological evaluations showed increased leukocyte
counts ranging from 10,000 to 19,000/mm3 (N: 4,300-10,600/mm3)
with a neutrophilic fraction ranging between 76 and 87.5% (N: 42-75%).
Increased SER and CRP values were also repeatedly recorded. Liver and
renal functions were normal.
Initial treatments with topical corticosteroids
(clobetasol propionate 0.05%, betamethasone dipropionate 0.05%, clobetasone
butyrate 0.05%) were interrupted due to the lack of efficacy. Local and
total body PUVA-therapy also failed to improve ACH. No clinical response
was noted with oral methylprednisolone, neither of the general symptoms
nor of the acropustulosis. After three administrations systemic methotrexate
(25 mg/wk) was followed by severe toxic pneumopathy, slowly reversible
after treatment was interrupted. Low dose methotrexate (initially 5 mg/wk,
subsequently increased to 20 mg/wk) yielded only a partial response of
the acrodermatitis. The lesions flaredup within 2 days after each methotrexate
intake, particularly when the doses exceeded 15 mg/wk. Etretinate at a
dose of 75 mg daily initially improved ACH. Thereafter, the disease became
progressively refractory to etretinate. Cyclosporin A therapy, at the
dose of 3 mg/kg was rapidly hampered by the development of uncontrolled
and drug-resistant hypertension, that forced us to withhold this treatment.
A treatment combining methotrexate (15 mg/day) and etretinate (50 mg)
initially brought good clinical results but the disease subsequently became
resistant to such combined treatment. Acitretin treatment at a dose of
40 mg/day was abandoned after 5 weeks due to prominent cutaneous side-effets
and to the lack of efficacy on ACH. Minocycline, at 100 mg daily, was
also abandoned in absence of clinical efficacy after a 6-week trial. A
severe episode of generalized eruption invoked the necessity for hospitalization
and topical tar therapy cleared the generalized pustular eruption, without
any effect on the ACH. Subsequently, a 200 mg/day DDS treatment was initiated.
Blood controls indicated the absence of methemoglobulinemia and G6PD deficiency.
During DDS therapy, methemoglobulinemia remained in an acceptable range
(4-10%) without any clinical manifestation (Fig.
2). Hemolysis remained stable at 12.7 g/dL (N: 13-18 g/dL), associated
with compensatory reticulocytosis at 15.3% (N: 0.2-2%). The previous hyperleukocytosis
returned to normal. Every attempt to reduce the DDS dose below 150 mg/day
or to interrupt the drug intake was rapidly followed by recurrences. The
appropriate maintenance DDS dose for optimal clinical efficacy was 150
mg daily. Local corticosteroids were interrupted and replaced by emollients.
The patient remains symptom free after a 3-month follow up.
Discussion
The treatment of ACH remains difficult and often disappointing. Many
therapies have been attempted with only partial remissions and rapid recurrences
upon treatment interruption or dose reduction. No clear-cut therapeutic
management guideline exists for ACH. Etretinate
(50-75 mg/day) [8], methotrexate (10-25 mg/wk) [9], acitretin (0.5 mg/kg
daily) [10], corticosteroids (triamcinolone 40-60 mg/day with subsequent
tapering) [11], colchicine (1-2 mg/day), cyclosporin A (3-5 mg/kg/day)
[12], minocycline (100-200 mg/day), PUVA and rePUVA therapy have been
advocated as systemic treatments. Topical treatments, including corticosteroids,
tar, anthralin, mechlorethamine [13], fluorouracil [14], and intralesional
injections of triamcinolone, do not provide satisfying results. Topical
calcipotriol has been documented to significantly improve ACH [15, 16].
It is important not to lose sight of discomfort and serious complications
linked to many of these therapies. The present case report illustrates
some limitations in obtaining a remission in ACH using these therapeutic
modalities.
Beside its antibacterial properties, DDS has
remarkable anti-inflammatory capacities, in particular targeting neutrophils
[3]. It has been demonstrated that DDS inhibits the adherence of neutrophils
to basement membrane zone antibody in a dose-dependent manner [17]. The
inhibition by DDS of neutrophilic infiltration in neutrophilic dermatoses
may be mediated by a suppression of leukocyte integrin function [18].
The use of DDS in ACH has seldom been documented [4, 5]. However, considering
the prominent neutrophilic involvement in ACH, DDS constitutes a reasonable
therapeutic option. The present case highlights the remarkable clinical
response of ACH to DDS in a patient. Chance seems to be an unlikely explanation
of the results. Hence, we underline the usefulness of DDS in drug-resistant
ACH. Another clear lesson from the clinical observation is that there
exists strong evidence that ACH and its associated generalized pustular
eruption may respond distinctively to various treatments. There needs
to be further debate about the pathogenic unicity of neutrophilic dermatoses
and whether any therapeutic effect is specifically limited to certain
subgroups. It has certainly been, and will continue to be, necessary in
many of these dermatoses to accept less than the ideal therapeutic outcomes.
REFERENCES
1. Hallopeau MH. Sur une asphyxie locale des extrémités
avec polydactilite suppurative chronique et poussées éphémères
de dermatite pustuleuse disséminée et symétrique.
Bull Soc Fr Derm Syph 1890; 1: 39-45.
2. White MI, Main RA. The treatment of Hallopeau's acrodermatitis. Arch
Dermatol 1979; 115: 235-6.
3. Coleman MD. Dapsone: modes of action, toxicity and possible strategies
for increasing patient tolerance. Br J Dermatol 1993; 129: 507-13.
4. Braun-Falco O, Plewig G, Wolff HH, Winkelmann RK. Dermatology. Pustular
diseases (Chapter 16). Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1991: 502-10.
5. Combemale P, Prost C. Disulone. In: Thérapeutique dermatologique.
Dubertret L, ed. Paris: Flammarion Médecine-Sciences, 1991: 756-67.
6. Piraccini BM, Fanti PA, Morrelli R, Tosti A. Hallopeau's acrodermatitis
continua of the nail apparatus: a clinical and pathological study of 20
patients. Acta Dermatol Venereol 1994; 74: 65-7.
7. Wilkinson DS. Pustular dermatoses. Br J Dermatol 1969; 81:
38-45.
8. Pearson LH, Allen BS, Smith JG. Acrodermatitis continua of Hallopeau:
treatment with etretinate and review of relapsing pustular eruptions of
the hands and feet. J Am Acad Dermatol 1984; 11: 755-62.
9. Konrad K. Acrodermatitis continua suppurativa Hallopeau. Behandlung
mit Methotrexate. Hautarzt 1970; 21: 119-23.
10. Van Dooren-Greebe RJ, van de Kerkhof PCM, Chang A, Happle R. Acitretin
monotherapy in acrodermatitis continua Hallopeau. Acta Derm Venereol
1989; 69: 344-6.
11. Arnold HL. Treatment of Hallopeau's acrodermatitis with triamcinolone
acetonide. Arch Dermatol 1978; 114: 963.
12. Zachariae H, Thestrup-Pedersen K. Cyclosporin A in acrodermatitis
continua. Dermatologica 1987; 175: 29-32.
13. Notowicz A, Stolz E, Heuvel NVD. Treatment of Hallopeau's acrodermatitis
with topical mechlorethamine. Arch Dermatol 1978; 114: 123.
14. Tsuji T, Nishimura M. Topically administered fluorouracil in acrodermatitis
continua of Hallopeau. Arch Dermatol 1991; 127: 27-8.
15. Emtestam L, Wedén U. Successful treatment for acrodermatitis
continua of Hallopeau using topical calcipotriol. Br J Dermatol
1996; 135: 644-66.
16. Mozzanica N, Cattaneo A. The clinical effect of topical calcipotriol
in acrodermatitis continua of Hallopeau. Br J Dermatol 1998; 138:
556.
17. Nguyen VT, Kadunce DP, Hendrix JD, Gammon WR, Zone JJ. Inhibition
of neutrophil adherence to antibody by dapsone: a possible therapeutic
mechanism of dapsone in the treatment of IgA dermatoses. J Invest Dermatol
1993; 100: 349-55.
18. Booth SA, Moody CE, Dahl MV, Herron MJ, Nelson RD. Dapsone suppresses
integrin-mediated neutrophil adherence function. J Invest Dermatol
1992; 98: 135-40.
|